Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:37:19.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Organization and structure of the philosophical schools

from PART I - INTRODUCTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Keimpe Algra
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jonathan Barnes
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Jaap Mansfeld
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Malcolm Schofield
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Before tackling in detail the issue of the organization and structure of the philosophical schools, both in the Hellenistic period and more generally, one must try to find an answer to the question of what a philosophical school was. This is a difficult question, which has not yet found an answer that copes satisfactorily with all the problems it poses.

Until recently the theory of Wilamowitz prevailed, according to which the philosophers' schools were religious societies (thiasoi), dedicated to the worship of the gods, or the Muses in this particular case. Wilamowitz started from the presumption that all such ancient societies had cult characteristics and that, for this reason, they were recognized by Athenian law, giving them the status of legal bodies. From an outsider's viewpoint the philosophical schools would therefore have appeared to be religious societies devoted to the worship of the Muses, while internally they would have developed functions like those of modern universities. In the Academy and Peripatos, above all, there would have been activity in scientific research and teaching based on a division of duties between teachers old and young, and carried out in a series of public lectures and private seminars.

Wilamowitz's theory has attracted criticism and objections. In particular, it has been discovered that certain elements which for Wilamowitz were typical of a thiasos (statues of the Muses and their worship) were shared by other institutions like the gymnasia and children's schools, and were therefore not by themselves enough to support the identification of philosophical schools as religious societies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angeli, A. (1981) ‘I frammenti di Idomeneo di Lampsaco’, CErc II.Google Scholar
Angeli, A. (1988b) ‘La scuola epicurea di Lampsaco nel PHerc. 176 (Fr. 5 Coll. I, IV, VIII–XXIII)’, CErc 18.Google Scholar
Angeli, A. (1993) ‘Frammenti di lettere di Epicuro nei papiri d'Ercolano’, CErc 23.Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (1980) ‘Note laerziane’, Elenchos 1.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1983b) ‘Individual and community in the first generation of the Epicurean school’, in AA. VV. (1983).Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1986) ‘The cults of Epicurus’, CErc 16.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1983; 1990) ‘What happened to Plato's Garden?’, Hermathena 133 ; repr. in Dillon (1990) study 1.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1991a) ‘Figure femminili della filosofia antica’, in De Martino, F., ed., Rose della Pieria (Bari).Google Scholar
Dorandi, T., ed. (1991b) Filodemo: Storia dei Filosofi [.]: Platone e l'Academia (PHerc. 1021 e 164), La Scuola di Epicuro 12 (Naples).Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1994b) ‘Bryson d'Achaïe’, in Goulet, (1989–94) II.
Ferrary, J. L. (1988) Philhellénisme et Impérialisme, Aspects idéologiques de la conquête romaine du monde hellénistique, de la seconde guerre de Macédoine à la guerre contre Mithridate (Rome).Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1983a) Ricerche filodemee, 2nd edn (Naples).Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1978) Antiochus and the Late Academy, Hypomnemata 56 (Göttingen).Google Scholar
Gomperz, T. (1899) ‘Platonische Aufsätze, II’, SAWW, Philos.-hist. Kl.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1972) ‘Notes on the wills of the peripatetic scholarchs’, Hermes 100.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1974b) ‘Carattere e struttura dell'Accademia antica’, in Zeller, E. & Mondolfo, R.La filosofia dei Greci nel suo sviluppo storico, a cura di M. Isnardi Parente (Florence) vol. 111.2.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1986) ‘L'Accademia antica: interpretazioni recenti e problemi di metodo’, RFIC 114.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. (1920) ‘Aristotle's lecture-room and lectures’, JPh 35.Google Scholar
Longo Auricchio, F. & Tepedino Guerra, A. (1981) ‘Aspetti e problemi della dissidenza epicurea’, CErc 11.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. P. (1972) Aristotle’s School. A History of a Greek Educational Institution (Berkeley).Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1994b) Prolegomena: Questions to be Settled Before the Study of an Author, or a Text, PhA 61 (Leiden).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, L. (1976) ‘Epigrafica. 16. Un successore di Posidonio d' Apamea’, RFIC 104.Google Scholar
Natali, C. (1991) Bios theoretikos. La vita di Aristotele e l'organizzazione della sua scuola (Bologna).Google Scholar
Puglia, E., ed. (1988) Demetrio Lacone: Aporie testuali e esegetiche in Epicuro (PHerc. 1012), La Scuola di Epicuro 8 (Naples).Google Scholar
Romeo, C., ed. (1988) Demetrio Lacone: La poesia (PHerc. 188 e 1014), La scuola di Epicuro 9 (Naples).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1989a) ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman World’, in Griffin, & Barnes, (1989).Google Scholar
Sollenberger, M. G. (1992) ‘The lives of the Peripatetics: an analysis of the contents and structure of Diogenes Laertius' “Vitae philosophorum” book 5’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.6 (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1976) Le pain et le cirque: sociologie historique d'un pluralisme politique (Paris).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehrli, F. (1976) (rev. Lynch 1972) Gnomon 48.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-MoellendorffU., von U., von (1881) Antigonos von Karystos (Berlin; repr. 1965).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×