Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Print publication year: 2005
  • Online publication date: June 2012

32 - Teacher Learning Research and the Learning Sciences

Summary

Teacher learning is an active area for research in education, and although the learning sciences have not been primarily focused on teacher learning, teacher education, or professional development, we argue that the perspectives our field brings to the study of teachers' learning offer great promise. Learning sciences researchers – guided by the cognitive, sociocognitive, sociocultural, and systems-oriented perspectives that are prevalent in our field – have made contributions to and extended research on teacher learning in new and significant directions.

Fostering change in classroom learning and teaching is a central concern of the learning sciences, and teachers are a cornerstone of nearly all formal instructional systems. Teachers are the ultimate interpreters of any classroom-based intervention, and are responsible for a large amount of variance in the effects of instructional interventions – this is known as the “teacher effect” (Nye, Konstantopoulos, & Hedges, 2004). If learning sciences researchers are interested in translating research into practice to effect change at the classroom level – and we believe that they are – it is imperative that the field pay careful attention to how teachers learn their craft and learn to effectively enact the innovations (technologies, curricula, etc.) that emerge from learning sciences research (Fishman et al., 2004).

References
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is – or might be – the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8.
Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J., Moore, J. A., Cunningham, D. J., & The ILF Design Team. (2001). Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the Inquiry Learning Forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 71–96.
Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J., & Scheckler, R. (2004). Designing system dualities: Characterizing an online professional development community. In Barab, S. A., Kling,, R. & Gray, J. H. (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 53–90). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In Nix, D. & Spiro, R. (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Chaney-Cullen, T., & Duffy, T. M. (1998). Strategic teaching frameworks: Multimedia to support teacher change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 1–40.
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H., C. (1998). State policy and classroom performance: Mathematics reform in California (CPRE Policy Brief No. RB-23). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34, 3–14.
Davis, E. A., Smithey, J., & Petish, D. (2004). Designing an online learning environment for new elementary science teachers: Supports for learning to teach. In Kafai, Y. B., Sandoval, W. A., Enyedy, N., Nixon,, A. S. & Herrera, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 594). San Diego: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Derry, S. J., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2002). Addressing teacher education as a complex science: Theory-based studies within the STEP project. In Bell, P., Stevens,, R. & Satwicz, T. (Eds.), International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (pp. 611–615). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Derry, S. J., Seymour, J., Steinkuehler, C., Lee, J., & Siegel, M. A. (2004). From ambitious vision to partially satisfying reality: An evolving socio-technical design supporting community and collaborative learning in teacher education. In Barab, S. A., Kling,, R. & Gray, J. H. (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 256–295). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
Fishman, B. (2003). Linking on-line video and curriculum to leverage community knowledge. In Brophy, J. (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10, pp. 201–234). New York: Elsevier.
Fishman, B., & Duffy, T. M. (1992). Classroom restructuring: What do teachers really need? Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 95–111.
Fishman, B., Marx, R., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–658.
Fishman, B., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43–76.
Frederiksen, J. R., Sipusic, M., Sherin, M., & Wolfe, E. (1998). Video portfolio assessment: Creating a framework for viewing the functions of teaching. Educational Assessment, 5(4), 225–297.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
Geier, B., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., & Soloway, E. (2004). Standardized test outcomes of urban students participating in standards and project-based science curricula. In Kafai, Y. B., Sandoval, W. A., Enyedy, N., Nixon,, A. S. & Francisco, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 206–213). Santa Monica, CA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In Berliner, D. & Calfee, R. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: Macmillan.
Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942–1012.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.
Honey, M., Bennett, D., Hupert, N., Kanze, B., Meade, T., Panush, E. M.. (1994). The mathematics learning forums online: Using telecommunications as a tool for reflective practice. Machine-Mediated Learning, 4(2–3), 163–176.
Kennedy, M. (1999). Form and substance in mathematics and science professional development (NISE Brief No. 3(2)). Madison, WI: National Center for Improving Science Education. Retrieved, from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/nise/Publications/Briefs/Vol_3_No_2/Vol.3,No.2.pdf, Accessed November 23, 2005.
Koschmann, T., Kelson, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1996). Computer-supported problem-based learning: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. In Koschmann, T. (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 83–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Krajcik, J. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2003, April). Design principles for developing inquiry materials with embedded technologies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Krajcik, J. S., Soloway, E., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R. W., Ladewski, B., Bos, N.. (1996). The Casebook of Project Practices: An example of an interactive multimedia system for professional development. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 15, 119–135.
Kubitskey, B., Fishman, B., & Marx, R. (2004, April). Teacher learning from reform-based professional development and its impact on student learning: A case study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research on Science Teaching, Vancouver, Canada.
Lambdin, D., Duffy, T. M., & Moore, J. A. (1997). Using an interactive information system to expand preservice teachers' visions of effective mathematics teaching. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 5, 171–202.
Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Linn, M. C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87(4), 517–538.
Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Internet environments for science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Eylon, B.-S. (2004). The scaffolded knowledge integration framework for instruction. In Linn, M. C., Davis,, E. A. & Bell, P. (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 47–72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258–271.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, B.. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1063–1080.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1998). New technologies for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 33–52.
McMahon, T. A. (1996). From isolation to interaction? Computer-mediated communications and teacher professional development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257.
Palincsar, A. S., Spiro, R. J., & Magnusson, S. J. (2004). Investigating the feasibility of scaling up effective reading comprehension instruction using innovative case-based hypermedia (IERI Proposal No. REC-0343578). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved October 20, 2004, from http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=0343578.
Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In Salomon, G. (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Petish, D. (2004). Using educative curriculum materials to support new elementary science teachers' learning and practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
Reiser, B. J., Spillane, J. P., Steinmuller, F., Sorsa, D., Carney, K., & Kyza, E. (2000). Investigating the mutual adaptation process in teachers' design of technology-infused curricula. In Fishman, B. & O'Connor-Divelbiss, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 342–349). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Renninger, K. A., & Shumar, W. (2004). The centrality of culture and community to participant learning at and with The Math Forum. In Barab, S. A., Kling,, R. & Gray, J. H. (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 181–209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In Sikula, J., Buttery,, T. & Guyton, E. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Richardson, V., & Anders, P. L. (1994). The study of teacher change. In Richardson, V. (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction (pp. 159–180). New York: Teachers College Press.
Riel, M., & Levin, J. A. (1990). Building electronic communities: Success and failure in computer networking. Instructional Science, 19, 145–169.
Riel, M., & Polin, L. (2004). Online learning communities: Common ground and critical differences in designing technical environments. In Barab, S. A., Kling,, R. & Gray, J. H. (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 16–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rockman et al. (1996). Evaluation of PBS Mathline middle school mathematics project 1995–1996: The Second Year. San Francisco, CA: Rockman et al. Retrieved October 15, 2004, from http://rockman.com/projects/pbs/Mathline.pdf.
Ruopp, R. R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister, M. (1993). LabNet: Toward a community of practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
Schank, P., Fenton, J., Schlager, M. S., & Fusco, J. (1999). From MOO to MEOW: Domesticating technology for online communities. In Hoadley, C. M. & Roschelle, J. M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 518–526). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
Schaverien, L. (2000). Towards research-based designing for understanding functional concepts: The case of the web-delivered Generative Virtual Classroom for teacher education. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 1–12.
Schaverien, L. (2003). Teacher education in the Generative Virtual Classroom: Developing learning theories through a web-delivered, technology-and-science education context. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1451–1469.
Schaverien, L., & Cosgrove, M. (1997). Learning to teach generatively: Mentor-supported professional development and research in technology-and-science. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 317–346.
Schlager, M. S., & Fusco, J. (2004). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? In Barab, S. A., Kling,, R. & Gray, J. H. (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 120–153). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schlager, M. S., Fusco, J., Koch, M., Crawford, B., & Phillips, M. (2003, July). Designing equity and diversity into online strategies to support new teachers. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, Seattle, WA.
Schlager, M. S., Fusco, J., & Schank, P. (2002). Evolution of an online education community of practice. In Renninger, K. A. & Shumar, W. (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 129–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221–245.
Sherin, M. G. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163–183.
Shrader, G., & Gomez, L. (1999). Design research for the Living Curriculum. In Hoadley, C. M. & Roschelle, J. M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 527–537). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shumar, W., & Renninger, K. A. (2002). On conceptualizing community. In Renninger, K. A. & Shumar, W. (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 1–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Singer, J., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165–178.
Slotta, J. D. (2004). The Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE): Scaffolding knowledge integration in the science classroom. In Linn, M. C., Davis,, E. A. & Bell, P. (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 203–231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Smithey, J., & Davis, E. A. (2004). Preservice elementary teachers' identity development: Identifying with particular images of inquiry. In Kafai, Y. B., Sandoval, W. A., Enyedy, N., Nixon, A. S., & Herrera, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 635). San Diego: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Songer, N. B. (1996). Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated network-enhanced classrooms: A case of kids as global scientists. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(4), 297–327.
Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
Thomas, G., Wineburg, S., Grossman, P., Myhre, O., & Woolworth, S. (1998). In the company of colleagues: An interim report on the development of a community of teacher learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 21–32.
Vrasidas, C., & Glass, G. V. (2004). Teacher professional development: Issues and trends. In Vrasidas, C. & Glass, G. V. (Eds.), Online professional development for teachers (pp. 1–11). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wise, A., Chang, J.-Y., Duffy, T. M., & Valle, R. (2004). The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 247–271.
Wiske, M. S., & Perkins, D. N. (2005). Dewey goes digital: Scaling up constructivist pedagogies and the promise of new technologies. In Dede, C., Honan,, J. & Peters, L. (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 27–47). New York: Jossey-Bass.