Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2020
  • Online publication date: July 2020

1 - International and Intersectional Perspectives on the Psychology of Women

from Section 1 - The Underpinnings of Sex and Gender and How to Study Them

Summary

Most books on the psychology of women are based on a Western perspective. International students and scholars question the validity and relevance of the theories and practices that focus on a restricted population of women and ignore the diverse experience among women within and across countries based on the intersection of sex, gender, sexuality, and social locations. How can we have a universal psychology of women that routinely ignores most of the women in the world? To answer this question, we assembled teams of writers from different regions of the world or familiar with different cultures. We realized that some regions of the world may not have enough quality psychological research to be represented, but we strived to get as broad a coverage as possible. The result is a coherent picture of women’s lives in places that have been underrepresented in the mainstream literature. Gender disparity and inequity prevail in all cultures with common mechanisms. A gender-sensitive and culturally relevant psychology can identify strategies and programs to accelerate global progress toward the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal #5 on gender equality. Where relevant research is available, culture-specific aspects of the topic are featured to highlight the gender issues of concern to particular regions or cultural groups. We believe that the diversity in the range of perspectives included in the chapters through the lenses of authors originating from different cultures will enrich the learning experience of readers.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
American Psychological Association. (2002). Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. Washington, DC: Author. www.apa.org/about/policy/multicultural-guidelines-archived.pdf
Azar, B. (2010). Are your findings WEIRD? Monitor on Psychology, 41, 11. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Brady, L. M., Fryberg, S. A., & Shoda, Y. (2018). Expanding the interpretive power of psychological science by attending to culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 11,40611,413. doi:10.1073/pnas.1803526115
Cheung, F. M. (1994). Promoting women’s development in Hong Kong. In Committee on Women’s Studies in Asia (Eds.), Women’s studies, women’s lives: Theories and practice in South and Southeast Asia (pp. 5973). New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Cheung, F. M. (2012). Mainstreaming culture in psychology. American Psychologist, 67, 721730. doi:10.1037/a0029876
Cheung, F. M., & Holroyd, E. (Eds.). (2009). Mainstreaming gender in Hong Kong society. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Chrisler, J. C., & McHugh, M. C. (2018). Feminist critiques of psychology. In Travis, C. B. & White, J. W. (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women, Vol. 1: History, theory and battlegrounds (pp. 7189). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
CNN (2018). Landmark day for Saudi women as kingdom’s controversial driving ban ends. edition.cnn.com/2018/06/23/middleeast/saudi-women-driving-ban-lifts-intl/index.html
European Institute for Gender Equality. (2017). Gender Equality Index 2017. http://eige.europa.eu/gender-statistics/gender-equality-index/about
Green, J. (2016). Transsexual surgery may be covered by Medicare. LGBT Health, 1, 256258. doi:ccl.idm.oclc.org/10.1089/lgbt.2014.0076
Halpern, D. F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
Halpern, D. F., Aronson, J., Reimer, N., Simpkins, S., Star, J. R., & Wentzel, K. (2007a). Encouraging girls in math and science. Institute for Educational Sciences. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C., Geary, D., Gur, D., Hyde, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007b). The science of sex-differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 152. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x
Halpern, D. F., & Cheung, F. M. (2008). Women at the top: Powerful leaders tell us how to combine work and family. Malden, MA: Wiley.
Halpern, D. F., Eliot, L., Bigler, R. S., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., Hyde, J. S., … Martin, C. L. (2011). The pseudoscience of single-sex schooling. Science, 333, 17061707. doi:10.1126/science.1205031
Halpern, D. F., Straight, C., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Beliefs about cognitive gender differences: Accurate for direction, underestimated for size. Sex Roles, 64, 336347. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9891-2
Heinrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 1-75. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
Jones, D. (2010). A WEIRD view of human nature skews psychologists’ studies. Science, 328, 1627. doi:10.1126/science.328.5986.1627
Marsella, A. J. (2000). Internationalizing the psychology curriculum: Toward new competencies and directions. International Psychology Reporter, 4(3), the APA Division 52 (International Psychology) Newsletter. Reprinted in South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 12, 7072.
Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 141152. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.012
Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2014). The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 3745. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.011
Psychology Day at the United Nations. (2019). The 12th Annual Psychology Day at the United Nations, 25 April 2019: “The Time Is Now: Psychological Contributions to Global Gender Equality.” www.unpsychologyday.com/
Rad, M. S., Martingano, A. J., & Ginges, J. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. PNAS 115 (45), 11,40111,405; published ahead of print November 6, 2018. doi:10.1073/pnas.1721165115
Time (2019). A “620km human chain” – Indian women rally for equality. http://time.com/5491454/620km-human-chain-indian-women-equality/
Turkheimer, E., & Halpern, D. F. (2009). Sex differences in variability for cognitive measures: Do the ends justify the genes? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 612614.
United Nations. (2015). Sustainable development goals. www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
United Nations Development Program. (2018). Human development indices and indicators, 2018 statistical updates. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2018_human_development_statistical_update.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2018). The global gender gap report. www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2018.pdf
World Health Organization. (2017). Safely managed drinking water – Thematic report on drinking water 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/safely-managed-drinking-water-JMP-2017-1.pdf