Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T22:35:12.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

29 - Studying strategy as practice through historical methods

from Part IV - Methodological Resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

By
Mona Ericson ,
Leif Melin  and
Andrew Popp
Edited by
Damon Golsorkhi ,
Linda Rouleau ,
David Seidl  and
Eero Vaara
Mona Ericson
Affiliation:
Jönköping International Business School
Leif Melin
Affiliation:
Jönköping International Business School
Andrew Popp
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool Management School
Damon Golsorkhi
Affiliation:
Grenoble School of Management
Linda Rouleau
Affiliation:
HEC Montréal
David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Eero Vaara
Affiliation:
Svenska Handelshögskolan, Helsinki
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter is about why and how historical methods are suitable for studies of strategy as practice with its focus on activities that characterize strategy and strategizing, for which the umbrella term ‘strategy-making’ is often used (Vaara and Whittington 2012). The ambition is to bring clarity to how we can approach strategy-as-practice research from a historical perspective. By introducing and elaborating different categories of historical methods, the chapter offers specific insights into how to use such methods.

Strategy-as-practice research contributes by providing important insights into practice, praxis, and the role and identity of practitioners, using a variety of methods (Jarzabkowski and Spee 2009: Vaara and Whittington 2012). Although some studies do incorporate the notion of history, the interest in historical method is limited. Kaplan and Orlikowski's (2013) study of a dynamic set of strategy-making practices reveals, through the development of chronologies, that managers negotiate and resolve differences in interpretations of the past, present and future. The influence of history on present strategic activity is also apparent in studies of sociocultural codes (Rouleau 2005), the sedimentation of social praxis into practices of replicating routines (Campbell-Hunt 2007) and with regard to an organization's predisposition to act path-dependently (Jarzabkowski 2004). Drawing on Bourdieu (1990), scholars direct attention to practice in relation to habitus – that is, the agent's predisposition to act in a certain way in a field, which denotes a social world, such as an industry or a market. History is mentioned in connection with habitus and field. The construction of habitus and field implies long-lasting processes, conditioned by environment, experience and history (Gomez 2010; Gomez and Bouty 2011). Without explicitly referring to history or a historical method, Whittington, Cailluet and Yakis-Douglas (2011) provide a long view of strategy professionals, in-house strategic planners and external strategy consultants. The long view is based on an analysis of advertisements for these professionals in The New York Times between 1960 and 2000. It should also be acknowledged that studies implicitly account for history through a focus on the emergent character of strategy practice (for example, Balogun and Johnson 2004; Dougherty 2004; Giraudeau 2008; Hendry, Kiel and Nicholson 2010; Jørgensen and Messner 2010; Stensaker and Falkenberg 2007). With a concern for language and discourse, SAP scholars further indicate that history does play a role (Clarke, Kwon and Wodak 2012). Through a narrative act, the researcher captures a sociohistorical dimension (Rouleau 2010).

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 506 - 519
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorisio, A. L. M., and Mutch, A. (2013), ‘In search of historical methods’, Management and Organizational History, 8/2: 105–10.Google Scholar
Balogun, J., and Johnson, G. (2004), ‘Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking’, Academy of Management Journal, 47/4: 523–49.Google Scholar
Barry, D., and Elmes, M. (1997), ‘Strategy retold: toward a narrative view of strategic discourse’, Academy of Management Review, 22/2: 429–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E., and Taylor, S. (2013), ‘Writing history into management research’, Management and Organizational History, 8/2: 127–36.Google Scholar
Boje, D. M. (1991), ‘The storytelling organization: a study of story performance’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36/1: 106–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Boyce, G. (2010), ‘Language and culture in a Liverpool merchant family firm, 1870–1950’, Business History Review, 84/1: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Hunt, C. (2007), ‘Complexity in practice’, Human Relations, 60/5: 793–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chia, R. (2004), ‘Strategy-as-practice: reflections on the research agenda’, European Management Review, 1/1: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R., and Holt, R. (2006), ‘Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R., and Rasche, A. (2010), ‘Epistemological alternatives for researching strategy as practice: building and dwelling worldviews’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 34–46. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, I., Kwon, W., and Wodak, R. (2012), ‘A context-sensitive approach to analysing talk in strategy meetings’, British Journal of Management, 23/4: 455–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colli, A., Iversen, M. J., and de Jong, A. (2011), ‘Mapping strategy, structure, ownership and performance in European corporations: introduction’, Business History, 53/1: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, S. (2013), ‘The silence of the archives: business history, post-colonialism and archival ethnography’, Management and Organizational History, 8/2: 155–73.Google Scholar
Demers, C., Giroux, N., and Chreim, S. (2003),’Merger and acquisition announcements as corporate wedding narratives’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16/2: 223–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilthey, W. (1985), Poetry and Experience. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dougherty, D. (2004), ‘Organizing practices in services: capturing practice-based knowledge for innovation’, Strategic Organization, 2/1: 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericson, M. (2007), Business Growth: Activities, Themes and Voices. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ericson, M. (2014), ‘On the dynamics of fluidity and open-endedness of strategy process: toward a strategy-as-practicing conceptualization’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30/1: 1–15.Google Scholar
Ericson, M., and Melin, L. (2010), ‘Strategizing and history’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 326–43. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fellman, S., and Popp, A. (2013), ‘Lost in the archive: the business historian in distress’, in Czarniawska, B., and Löfgren, O. (eds.), Coping with Excess: How Organizations, Communities and Individuals Manage Overflows: 216–43. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
French, M., and Popp, A. (2010), ‘“Practically the uniform of the tribe”: dress codes among commercial travellers’, Enterprise and Society, 11/3: 436–67.Google Scholar
Fulbrook, M., and Rublack, U. (2010), ‘In relation: the “social self” and ego-documents’, German History, 28/3: 263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1989), Truth and Method. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Giraudeau, M. (2008), ‘The drafts of strategy: opening up plans and their uses’, Long Range Planning, 41/3: 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, M.-L. (2010), ‘A Bourdieusian perspective on strategizing’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 141–54. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gomez, M.-L., and Bouty, I. (2011), ‘The emergence of an influential practice: food for thought’, Organization Studies, 32/7: 921–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, P. (2012), ‘Business history: a cultural and narrative approach’, Business History Review, 86/4: 693–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, K. P., Kiel, G. C., and Nicholson, G. (2010), ‘How boards strategise: a strategy as practice view’, Long Range Planning, 43/1: 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, R., and Popp, A. (2013), ‘Emotion, succession, and the family firm: Josiah Wedgwood & Sons’, Business History, 55/6: 892–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2004), ‘Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use’, Organization Studies, 25/4: 529–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., and Spee, P. (2009), ‘Strategy-as-practice: a review and future directions for the field’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11/1: 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L., and Whittington, R. (2007), Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. R. H. (2002), ‘Routines, capabilities and the growth of the firm: Messrs Ross & Glendining, Dunedin, 1862–1900’, Australian Economic History Review, 42/1: 34–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, B., and Messner, M. (2010), ‘Accounting and strategizing: a case study from new product development’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35/2: 184–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S., and Orlikowski, W. J. (2013), ‘Temporal work in strategy making’, Organization Science, 24/4: 965–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipping, M., and Cailluet, L. (2010), ‘Mintzberg's emergent and deliberate strategies: tracking Alcan's activities in Europe, 1928–2007’, Business History Review, 84/1: 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobrak, C., and Schneider, A. (2011), ‘Varieties of business history: subject and methods for the twenty-first century’, Business History, 53/3: 401–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipartito, K. J. (1995), ‘Culture and the practice of business history’, Business and Economic History, 24/2: 1–42.Google Scholar
Lipartito, K. J. (2008), ‘The future of Alfred Chandler’, Enterprise and Society, 9/3: 430–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipartito, K. J. (2013), ‘Connecting the cultural and the material in business history’, Enterprise and Society, 14/4: 686–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGovern, T., and McLean, T. (2013), ‘The growth and development of Clarke Chapman from 1864 to 1914’, Business History, 55/3: 448–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, C. (2006), ‘Writing the ghost writer back in: Alfred Sloan, Alfred Chandler, John McDonald and the intellectual origins of corporate strategy’, Management and Organizational History, ½: 107–26.Google Scholar
McKenna, C. (2009), ‘Mementos: looking backwards at the Honda motorcycle case, 2003–1973’, in Clarke, S., Lamoreaux, N. R., and Usselman, S. (eds.), The Challenge of Remaining Innovative: Lessons from Twentieth-Century American Business: 219–42. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McKinlay, A. (2013), ‘Following Foucault into the archives: clerks, careers and cartoons’, Management and Organizational History, 8/2: 137–54.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1989), Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange World of Organizations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Peltonen, M. (2001), ‘Clues, margins, and monads: the micro–macro link in historical research’, History and Theory, 40/3: 347–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, A. (2001), ‘Specialty production, personal capitalism and auditors’ reports: Mintons Ltd, c. 1870–1900’, Accounting, Business and Financial History, 10/3: 347–69.Google Scholar
Popp, A. (2012), Entrepreneurial Families: Business, Marriage and Life in the Early Nineteenth Century. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
Popp, A. (forthcoming), ‘The broken cotton speculator’, History Workshop Journal.
Popp, A., and Holt, R. (2012), ‘Entrepreneurship and being: the case of the Shaws’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25/1–2: 52–68.Google Scholar
Popp, A., and Holt, R. (2013), ‘The presence of entrepreneurial opportunity’, Business History, 55/1: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raff, D. (2013), ‘How to do things with time’, Enterprise and Society, 14/3: 435–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. (2010), ‘Studying strategizing through narratives of practice’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 258–70. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rumelt, R. P. (1974), Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sandberg, J., and Dall'Alba, G. (2009), ‘Returning to practice anew: a life-world perspective’, Organization Studies, 30/12: 1349–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzkopf, S. (2012), ‘What is an archive – and where is it? Why business historians need a constructive theory of the archive’, Business Archives, 105/11: 1–9.Google Scholar
Scranton, P. (2008), ‘Beyond Chandler?’, Enterprise and Society, 9/3: 426–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seebohm, T. M. (2004), Hermeneutics: Method and Methodology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Stensaker, L., and Falkenberg, J. (2007), ‘Making sense of different responses to corporate change’, Human Relations, 60/1: 137–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosh, J. (2010), The Pursuit of History. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. (2010), ‘Practice, strategy making and intentionality: a Heideggerian onto-epistmelogy for strategy as practice’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 47–62. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaara, E., and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Manen, M. (1990), Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., and Mayer, M. (2000), The European Corporation: Strategy, Structure, and Social Science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., and Yakis-Douglas, B. (2011), ‘Opening strategy: evolution of a precarious profession’, British Journal of Management, 22/3: 531–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×