Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:18:11.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - Meetings and workshops as strategy practices

from Part V - Substantive Topic Areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

David Seidl
Affiliation:
University of Zurich
Stéphane Guérard
Affiliation:
University of Zurich
Damon Golsorkhi
Affiliation:
Grenoble School of Management
Linda Rouleau
Affiliation:
HEC Montréal
David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Eero Vaara
Affiliation:
Svenska Handelshögskolan, Helsinki
Get access

Summary

Introduction

From the strategy-as-practice perspective, strategy is what people do in organizations (Jarzabkowski, Balogun and Seidl 2007; Johnson et al. 2007; Johnson, Melin and Whittington 2003; Vaara and Whittington 2012; Whittington 2006), and one thing people tend to do often in organizations when they strategize is to take part in meetings. This is hardly surprising, considering that meetings represent one of the most pervasive practices in organizations (Schwartzman 1989). Some early studies on meetings found that they occupy between 59 per cent and 69 per cent of managers’ time (Dahl and Lewis 1975; Mintzberg 1973). Moreover, many studies stress that meetings undeniably offer space in which different strategic views can be shared and disputed (Gailbraith 1973; Guetzkow and Kriesberg 1950; Kwon, Clarke and Wodak 2014; Mintzberg 1973).

Surprisingly, it was only relatively recently that researchers began to take an interest in how meetings and workshops affect strategizing practices (Hodgkinson et al. 2006; Jarzabkowski and Seidl 2008). In fact, meetings were traditionally seen as useless and irrelevant or as nothing more than a ‘neutral’ frame for decision-making processes (see Schwartzman 1989 for more details). Now, however, it is widely recognized that meetings shape the activities that take place within their span. Recent studies have examined from various angles how meetings influence strategy. The most often researched topics include: how meetings and the discursive practices associated with them affect the development of shared views on strategic issues (Clarke, Kwon and Wodak 2012; Kwon, Clarke and Wodak 2014; Wodak, Kwon and Clarke 2011), how meetings enable ‘strategy talk’ and the production of ‘strategy text’ (Spee and Jarzabkowski 2011), how the display of emotions in meetings influences the way in which strategic issues are discussed and evaluated (Liu and Maitlis 2014), how strategic meetings bring middle and senior managers together to negotiate over and agree on consistent collective action (Hoon 2007), how board meetings influence strategy-making (McNulty and Pettigrew 1999), how ‘rituals’ in workshops affect strategic outcomes (Johnson et al. 2010) and how strategy is changed and stabilized through series of meetings (Jarzabkowski and Seidl 2008). All these studies indicate that meetings and workshops have become an established and important research area within the field of strategy as practice.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abzug, R., and Mezias, S. J. (1993), ‘The fragmented state and due-process protections in organizations: the case of comparable worth’, Organization Science, 4/3: 433–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackermann, F., and Eden, C. (2011), ‘Negotiation in strategy making teams: group support systems and the process of cognitive change’, Group Decision and Negotiation, 20/3: 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, B. (2004), ‘Public meetings and the democratic process’, Public Administration Review, 64/1: 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angouri, J., and Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2011), ‘“So what problems bother you and you are not speeding up your work?” Problem solving talk at work’, Discourse and Communication, 5/3: 209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angouri, J., and Marra, M. (2010), ‘Corporate meetings as genre: a study of the role of the chair in corporate meeting talk’, Text and Talk, 30/6: 615–36.Google Scholar
Asmuß, B., and Oshima, S. (2012), ‘Negotiation of entitlement in proposal sequences’, Discourse Studies, 14/1: 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmuß, B., and Svennevig, J. (2009), ‘Meeting talk: an introduction’, Journal of Business Communication, 46/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, F. G. (1965), ‘Decisions by consensus in councils and committees: with special reference to village and local government in India’, in Banton, M. (ed.), Political Systems and the Distribution of Power: 1–20. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Balogun, J., Huff, A. S., and Johnson, P. (2003), ‘Three responses to the methodological challenges for studying strategizing’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 198–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R. (2007), ‘Formulations and the facilitation of common agreement in meetings talk’, Text and Talk, 27/3: 273–96.Google Scholar
Bilbow, G. T. (1997), ‘Cross-cultural impression management in the multicultural workplace: the special case of Hong Kong’, Journal of Pragmatics, 28/4: 461–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilbow, G. T. (1998), ‘Look who's talking: an analysis of “chair-talk” in business meetings’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 12/2: 157–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boden, D. (1994), The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Boden, D. (1995), ‘Agendas and arrangements: everyday negotiations in meetings’, in Firth, A. (ed.), The Discourse of Negotiation: Studies of Language in the Workplace: 83–100. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bothin, A., and Clough, P. (2012), ‘Participants’ personal note-taking in meetings and its value for automatic meeting summarisation’, Information Technology and Management, 13/1: 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourque, N., and Johnson, G. (2008), ‘Strategy workshops and “away days” as ritual’, in W., Starbuck, W., and Hodgkinson, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making: 552–64. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brinkerhoff, M. B. (1972), ‘Hierarchical status, contingencies, and the administrative staff conference’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17/3: 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. L., and Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997), ‘The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time spaced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42/1: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürgi, P. T., Jacobs, C. D., and Roos, J. (2005), ‘From metaphor to practice in the crafting of strategy’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 14/1: 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, J. K., and Varnes, C. J. (2007), ‘Making decisions on innovation: meetings or networks?’, Creativity and Innovation Management, 16/3: 282–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, I., Kwon, W., and Wodak, R. (2012), ‘A context-sensitive approach to analysing talk in strategy meetings’, British Journal of Management, 23/4: 455–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, J. (2009), ‘Beyond taxonomies of influence: “doing” influence and making decisions in management team meetings’, Journal of Business Communication, 46/1: 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. D., and March, J. G. (1986), Leadership and Ambiguity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, J., and Cienki, A. (2010), ‘Sensegiving in entrepreneurial contexts: the use of metaphors in speech and gesture to gain and sustain support for novel business ventures’, International Small Business Journal, 30/3: 213–41.Google Scholar
Dahl, T., and Lewis, D. R. (1975), ‘Random sampling device used in time management study’, Evaluation, 2/1: 20–2.Google Scholar
Dittrich, K., Guérard, S., and Seidl, D. (2011a), ‘Meetings in the strategy process: toward an integrative framework’, paper presented at the seventy-first annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Antonio, Texas, 12 August.
Dittrich, K., Guérard, S., and Seidl, D. (2011b), The Role of Meetings in the Strategy Process, Business Working Paper no. 102. University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Doyle, M., and Straus, D. (1976), How to Make Meetings Work: The New Interaction Method. New York: Wyden Books.Google Scholar
Doz, Y., and Prahalad, C. K. (1987), ‘A process model of strategic redirection in large complex firms: the case of multinational corporations’, in Pettigrew, A. M. (ed.), The Management of Strategic Change: 63–82. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), ‘Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments’, Academy of Management Journal, 32/3: 543–76.Google Scholar
Fear, W. J. (2012), ‘Discursive activity in the boardroom: the role of the minutes in the construction of social realities’, Group and Organization Management, 37/4: 486–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailbraith, J. R. (1973), Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Guetzkow, H., and Kriesberg, M. (1950), ‘Executive use of the administrative conference’, Personnel, 26/1: 318–23.Google Scholar
Healey, M. P., Hodgkinson, G. P., Whittington, R., and Johnson, G. (forthcoming), ‘Off to plan or out to lunch? Relationships between design characteristics and outcomes of strategy workshops’, British Journal of Management.
Hendry, J., and Seidl, D. (2003), ‘The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the practice of strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 175–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., Whittington, R., Johnson, G., and Schwarz, M. (2006), ‘The role of strategy workshops in strategy development processes: formality, communication, co-ordination and inclusion’, Long Range Planning, 39/5: 479–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J., and Stubbe, M. (2003), Power and Politeness in the Workplace. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hoon, C. (2007), ‘Committees as strategic practice: the role of strategic conversation in a public administration’, Human Relations, 60/6: 921–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, M. (2001), ‘Decision-making in meetings as talk-in-interaction’, International Studies of Management and Organization, 31/3: 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., and Seidl, D. (2008), ‘The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy’, Organization Studies, 29/11: 1391–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L., and Whittington, R. (2007), Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Melin, L., and Whittington, R. (2003), ‘Guest editors’ introduction: micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Prashantham, S., and Floyd, S. W. (2006), Towards a Mid-Range Theory of Strategy, Working Paper no. 035. London: Advanced Institute of Management Research.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., Prashantham, S., Floyd, S. W., and Bourque, N. (2010), ‘The ritualization of strategy workshops’, Organization Studies, 31/12: 1589–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangasharju, H. (1996), ‘Aligning as a team in multiparty conversation’, Journal of Pragmatics, 26/3: 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangasharju, H. (2002), ‘Alignment in disagreement: forming oppositional alliances in committee meetings’, Journal of Pragmatics, 34/10–11: 1447–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangasharju, H., and Nikko, T. (2009), ‘Emotions in organizations: joint laughter in workplace meetings’, Journal of Business Communication, 46/1: 100–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, W., Clarke, I., and Wodak, R. (2014), ‘Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, A. (2010), ‘The challenge of developing cumulative knowledge about strategy as practice’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 91–106. Cambridge Universtiy Press.Google Scholar
Larrue, J., and Trognon, A. (1993), ‘Organization of turn-taking and mechanisms for turn-taking repairs in a chaired meeting’, Journal of Pragmatics, 19/2: 177–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, F., and Maitlis, S. (2014), ‘Emotional dynamics and strategizing processes: a study of strategic conversations in top team meetings’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 202–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1995), Social Systems. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntosh, R., MacLean, D., and Seidl, D. (2010), ‘Unpacking the effectivity paradox of strategy workshops: do strategy workshops produce strategic change?’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 291–309. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McNulty, T., and Pettigrew, A. M. (1999), ‘Strategists on the board’, Organization Studies, 20/1: 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezias, J., Grinyer, P., and Guth, W. D. (2001), ‘Changing collective cognition: a process model for strategic change’, Long Range Planning, 34/1: 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1973), The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., and Theoret, A. (1976), ‘The structure of “unstructured” decision processes’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21/2: 246–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirivel, J. C., and Tracy, K. (2005), ‘Premeeting talk: an organizationally crucial form of talk’, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38/1: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricœur, P. (1981), Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., and Jefferson, G. (1974), ‘A simplest systematics of the organization of turn-taking for conversation’, Language, 50/4: 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzman, H. B. (1989), The Meeting: Gatherings in Organizations and Communities. NewYork: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, M. (2009), ‘Strategy workshops facilitating and constraining strategy making’, Journal of Strategy and Management, 2/3: 277–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, M., and Balogun, J. (2007), Strategy Workshops for Strategic Reviews: A Case of Semi-Structured Emergent Dialogues, Working Paper no. 054. London: Advanced Institute of Management Research.Google Scholar
Seibold, D. R. (1979), ‘Making meetings more successful: plans, formats, and procedures for group problem-solving’, Journal of Business Communication, 16/4: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D., MacLean, D., and MacIntosh, R. (2011), ‘Rules of suspension: a rules-based explanation of strategy workshops in strategy process’, paper presented at seventy-first annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Antonio, Texas, 15 August.
Spee, P., and Jarzabkowski, P. (2011), ‘Strategic planning as communicative process’, Organization Studies, 32/9: 1217–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starker, S. (1978), ‘Case conference and tribal ritual: some cognitive, social, and anthropologic aspects of the case conference’, Journal of Personality and Social Systems, 1/1: 3–14.Google Scholar
Tepper, S. (2004), ‘Setting agendas and designing alternatives: policymaking and the strategic role of meetings’, Review of Policy Research, 21/4: 523–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, L. D. (1987), ‘The conference as an administrative strategy for building organizational commitment: the CWA experience’, Labour Studies Journal, 26/1: 48–61.Google Scholar
Tracy, K. (2007), ‘The discourse of crisis in public meetings: case study of a school district's multimillion dollar error’, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35/4: 418–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, V. (1982), From Ritual to Theater: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: PAJ.Google Scholar
Vaara, E., Sorsa, V., and Pälli, P. (2010), ‘On the force potential of strategy texts: a critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization’, Organization, 17/6: 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Aaken, D., Koob, C., Rost, K., and Seidl, D. (2013), ‘Ausgestaltung und Erfolg von Strategieworkshops: eine empirische Analyse’, Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 65/7: 588–616.Google Scholar
Van Praet, E. (2009), ‘Staging a team performance: a linguistic ethnographic analysis of weekly meetings at a British embassy’, Journal of Business Communication, 46/1: 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Praet, E. (2010), ‘The dual voice of domination: ritual and power in a British embassy’, Text and Talk, 30/2: 213–33.Google Scholar
Van Vree, W. (1999), Meetings, Manners and Civilization: The Development of Modern Meeting Behaviour. Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Werle, F., and Seidl, D. (2012), Interorganizational Strategizing as Extension of Sensemaking Capacities, Business Working Paper no. 317. University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Molloy, E., Mayer, M., and Smith, A. (2006), ‘Practices of strategising/organising: broadening strategy work and skills’, Long Range Planning, 39/6: 615–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R., Kwon, W., and Clarke, I. (2011), ‘“Getting people on board”: discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings’, Discourse and Society, 22/5: 592–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×