Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of boxes
- List of contributors
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Introduction: what is strategy as practice?
- Part I Ontological and Epistemological Questions
- Part II Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
- 8 Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice
- 9 An activity theory approach to strategy as practice
- 10 A Bourdieusian perspective on strategizing
- 11 An economies-of-worth perspective on strategy as practice: justification, valuation and critique in the practice of strategy
- 12 A Wittgensteinian perspective on strategizing
- 13 A Foucauldian perspective on strategic practice: strategy as the art of (un)folding
- 14 A narrative approach to strategy as practice: strategy-making from texts and narratives
- 15 Actor–network theory and strategy as practice
- Part III Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories
- Part IV Methodological Resources
- Part V Substantive Topic Areas
- Index
- References
10 - A Bourdieusian perspective on strategizing
from Part II - Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of boxes
- List of contributors
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Introduction: what is strategy as practice?
- Part I Ontological and Epistemological Questions
- Part II Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
- 8 Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice
- 9 An activity theory approach to strategy as practice
- 10 A Bourdieusian perspective on strategizing
- 11 An economies-of-worth perspective on strategy as practice: justification, valuation and critique in the practice of strategy
- 12 A Wittgensteinian perspective on strategizing
- 13 A Foucauldian perspective on strategic practice: strategy as the art of (un)folding
- 14 A narrative approach to strategy as practice: strategy-making from texts and narratives
- 15 Actor–network theory and strategy as practice
- Part III Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories
- Part IV Methodological Resources
- Part V Substantive Topic Areas
- Index
- References
Summary
The firm is not a homogeneous entity that can be treated as a rational subject – the ‘entrepreneur’ or the ‘management’ – oriented towards a single, unified objective. It is determined (or guided) in its ‘choice’ not only by its position in the structure of the field of production, but also by its internal structure, which, as a product of all its earlier history, still orients its present… Its strategies are determined through innumerable decisions, small and large, ordinary and extraordinary, which are, in every case, the product of the relationship between, on the one hand, interests and dispositions associated with positions in relations of force within the firm and, on the other, capacities to make those interests or dispositions count, capacities which also depend on the weight of the different agents concerned in the structure, and hence on the volume and structure of their capital.
Bourdieu (2005: 69)Introduction
With the spread of strategy-as-practice research (see introduction, this volume; Heracleous and Jacobs 2011; Vaara and Whittington 2012), the focus has been on how strategy is actually performed in organizations. Strategy is more than something written in a strategic plan (Whittington and Cailluet 2008) or just relying on top management decision-making. SAP researchers have built upon major social theories (Sandberg and Tsoukas 2011; Seidl and Whittington 2014; Vaara and Whittington 2012) to define practice from different perspectives, but mostly emphasizing that practice is a human activity in relation with a strong social context. It is no surprise that the ideas of the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu (1930–2002) have been used from the very beginning of strategy-as-practice research in some seminal works, such as those by Jarzabkowski (2005), Whittington (2006) and Chia and Holt (2006). In nearly ten years Bourdieu's work has spread among strategy-as-practice studies. It has mostly been used to study how strategy emerges and becomes established in the actions of individuals and institutions (Chia and Holt 2006; 2009); to explore how strategizing bridges the relationship between the micro levels of human activity and the macro levels of social and institutional context (Gomez and Bouty 2011); to investigate strategists, as legitimate entrepreneurs (De Clercq and Voronov 2009) or corporate elites (MacLean, Harvey and Chia 2010); and how strategic practices and discourses maintain domination from corporate management (Laine and Vaara 2007; Kerr and Robinson 2012).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 184 - 198Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
, , and (2009), ‘How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship’, Academy of Management Annals, 3/1: 65–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979), ‘Les trois états du capital culturel’, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 30: 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
, and (2011), ‘Rational decision making as performative praxis: explaining rationality's éternel retour’, Organization Science, 22/3: 573–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘Pierre Bourdieu’, in (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Major Classical Social Theorists: 274–309. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Strategy-as-practice: reflections on the research agenda’, European Management Review, 1/1: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006), ‘Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2009), Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2009), ‘Toward a practice perspective of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial legitimacy as habitus’, International Small Business Journal, 27/4: 395–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2008), ‘Bourdieu and organizational analysis’, Theory and Society, 37/1: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005), ‘Bourdieu and social work’, Social Service Review, 79/4: 689–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), La fabrique de la stratégie: Une perspective multidimensionnelle. Paris: Vuibert.Google Scholar
, and (2006), ‘Pierre Bourdieu: critique et réflexivité comme attitude analytique’, Revue Française de Gestion, 165: 15–34.Google Scholar
, , , and (2009), ‘Analysing, accounting for and unmasking domination: on our role as scholars of practice, practitioners of social science and public intellectuals’, Organization, 16/6: 779–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2011), ‘The emergence of an influential practice: food for thought’, Organization Studies, 32/7: 921–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘What if the academy actually mattered?’, Academy of Management Review, 19/1: 11–16.Google Scholar
, and (1984), ‘Structural inertia and organizational change’, American Sociological Review, 49/2: 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), ‘The structure and significance of strategic episodes: social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2011), Crafting Strategy: Embodied Metaphors in Practice. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2003), ‘Guest editors’ introduction: micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2012), ‘From symbolic violence to economic violence: the globalizing of the Scottish banking elite’, Organization Studies, 33/2: 247–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Le travail sociologique de Pierre Bourdieu: Dettes et critiques. Paris: Éditions La Découverte.Google Scholar
, and (2007), ‘Struggling over subjectivity: a discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group’, Human Relations, 60/1: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2009), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2011), ‘Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organization’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 20/1: 52–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007), ‘New practice creation: an institutional perspective on innovation’, Organization Studies, 28/7: 993–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2010), ‘Dominant corporate agents and the power elite in France and Britain’, Organization Studies, 31/3: 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2012), ‘Reflexive practice and the making of elite business careers’, Management Learning, 43/4: 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2014), ‘Pathways to power: class, hyper-agency and the French corporate elite’, Organization Studies, 35/6: 825–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), ‘Orchestral manoeuvres in the dark: understanding failure in organizational strategizing’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 109–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Strategic practices as enablers and disablers of championing activity’, Strategic Organization, 3/2: 157–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1999), ‘Reflecting on the strategy process’, Sloan Management Review, 40/3: 21–30.Google Scholar
, and (1992), ‘Cycles of organizational change’, Strategic Management Journal, 13/S2: 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2012), ‘Financialization through hybridization: the subtle power of financial controlling’, in , and (eds.), Finance: The Discreet Regulator: How Financial Activities Shape and Transform the World: 19–39. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2007), ‘Reflexivity and the institutional entrepreneur: a historical exploration’, Organization Studies, 28/7: 1123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2012), Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1998), ‘Business planning as pedagogy: language and control in a changing institutional field’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43/2: 257–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing’, Organization Science, 13/3: 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005), ‘Book review essay: understanding Bourdieu's contribution to organization and management studies’, Academy of Management Review, 30/4: 855–77.Google Scholar
, , and (2014), ‘Relevance or “relevate”? How university business schools can add value through reflexively learning from strategic partnerships with business’, Management Learning, 45/3: 267–88.Google Scholar
(1992), ‘The character and significance of strategy process research’, Strategic Management Journal, 13/S2: 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2009), ‘Researching strategy practices: a genealogical social theory perspective’, Organization Studies, 30/7: 713–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1993), ‘Strategic groups: a cognitive perspective’, Strategic Management Journal, 14/2: 103–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: how middle managers interpret and sell change every day’, Journal of Management Studies, 42/7: 1413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘The role of micro-strategies in the engineering of firm evolution’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2011), ‘Grasping the logic of practice: theorizing through practical rationality’, Academy of Management Review, 36/2: 338–60.Google Scholar
(1997), ‘Practices and actions: a Wittgensteinian critique of Bourdieu and Giddens’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27/3: 283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Peripheral vision: the sites of organizations’, Organization Studies, 26/3: 465–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2014), ‘Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: towards taller and flatter ontologies’, Organization Studies, 35/10: 1407–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2012), ‘From practice to field: a multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change’, Academy of Management Journal, 55/4: 877–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2011), ‘Does practice-based research on strategy lead to practically relevant knowledge? Implications of a Bourdieusian perspective’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47/1: 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995), ‘The science of complexity: an alternative perspective for strategic change processes’, Strategic Management Journal, 16/6: 477–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2014), ‘Apostasy versus legitimacy: relational dynamics and routes to resource acquisition in entrepreneurial ventures’, International Small Business Journal, 32/5: 571–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1995), ‘Chaos theory and organization’, Organization Science, 6/1: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2012), ‘How to make strategy research connect with broader issues that matter?’, Strategic Organization, 10/3: 248–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2011), ‘How can a Bourdieusian perspective aid the analysis of MBA education?’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10/1: 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2012), ‘Strategy as practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992), ‘Suggestions for studying strategy process: a research note’, Strategic Management Journal, 13/S1: 169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), ‘Strategy practice and strategy process: family differences and the sociological eye’, Organization Studies, 28/10: 1575–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2008), ‘The crafts of strategy: special issue introduction’, Long Range Planning, 41/3: 241–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), ‘Thinking and acting strategically: new challenges for interrogating strategy’, European Management Review, 1/1: 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by