Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 358, 1177–1187. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1319.Google Scholar

Bateson, P. P. G. (1981). Discontinuities in development and changes in the organization of play in cats. In Immelmann, K., Barlow, G., Petrinovich, L., & Main, M. (Eds.), Behavioral Development (pp. 281–295). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bateson, P. P. G. (2005). Play and its role in the development of great apes and humans. In Pellegrini, A. D. & Smith, P. K. (Eds.), The Nature of Play: Great Apes and Humans (pp. 13–26). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Bekoff, M. (1995). Playing with play: What can we learn about cognition, negotiation, and evolution. In Cummins, D. & Allen, C. (Eds.), The Evolution of Mind (pp. 162–182). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brentano, F. (1874). Psychologie von Empirische Standpunkte. Leipzig: Dunker und Humbolt.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1972). The nature and uses of immaturity. American Psychologist, 27, 687–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callon, M. & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan. In Knorr-Cetina, K. & Cicourel, A. (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociology (pp. 277–303). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Carruthers, P. (2002). Human creativity: Its cognitive basis, its evolution, and its connection with childhood pretence. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 53, 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, M. (1998). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1994). Art as Experience. In Ross, S. D. (Ed.), An Anthology of Aesthetic Theory (pp. 204–220). Albany: State University Of New York Press.Google Scholar

Dissanayake, E. (1974). A hypothesis of the evolution of art from play. Leonardo, 7, 211–217.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H. G. (2011). Truth and Method. Gloucester, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar

Gell, A. (1998). Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. (2015). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Grondin, J. (2001). Play, festival and ritual in Gadamer: On the theme of the immemorial in his later works. In Schmidt, L. K. (Ed.), Language and Linguisticality in Gadamer's Hermeneutics (pp. 51–58). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Groos, K. (1901). The Play of Man. London: Heinemann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haye, A. (2008). Living being and speaking being: Toward a dialogical approach to intentionality. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42, 157–163. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-007-9051-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirsh, D. & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.Google Scholar

Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In Law, J. (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (pp. 103–131). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In Law, J. & Hassard, J. (Eds.), Actor Network Theory and After (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lotman, J. (2005). On the Semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies, 33(1), 206–229 (trans. by Clark, Wilma). Retrieved from www.ut.ee/SOSE/sss/Lotman331.pdf.Google Scholar

Malafouris, L. (2013). How Things Shape the Mind. A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magariños de Morentín, J. (2008). La semiótica de los bordes. Retrieved from www.magarinos.com.ar/Impresion.html.Google Scholar

Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1992). The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar

Pellegrini, A. D., Dupuis, D., & Smith, P. K. (2007). Play in evolution and development. Developmental Review, 27, 261–276. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2006.09.001.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1951). Play, Dreams, and Imitation in Childhood. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, C. (2007). Object use, communication, and signs: The triadic basis of early cognitive development. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 257–276). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosa, A. (2007a). Acts of psyche: Actuations as synthesis of semiosis and action. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 205–237). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosa, A. (2007b). Dramaturgical actuations and symbolic communication: Or how beliefs make up reality. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 293–317). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosa, A. (2015). The reflective mind and reflexivity in psychology: Description and explanation within a psychology of experience. In Marsico, G, Ruggieri, R., & Salvatore, S. (Eds.), Reflexivity and Psychology (Yearbook of Idiographic Science, vol. 6, pp. 17–44). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Rosa, A. & González, F. (2013). Trajectories of experience of real life events: A semiotic approach to the dynamics of positioning. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47: 395–430. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-013-9240-4.Google Scholar

Rosa, A. & Pievi, N. (2013). Semiotic methodology for the analysis of the cultural and individual dynamics of social representations: A view from cultural psychology. Papers on Social Representations, 22, 19.1–19.29.Google Scholar

Rosch, E. & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.Google Scholar

Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (1998). The Guided Mind: A Sociogenetic Approach to Personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2002). Irreversibility of time and ontopotentiality of signs. Estudios de Psicología, 23(1), 49–59.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2014). The Raumaesthetik of Theodor Lipps as a dialogical research programme. Invited Lecture at the 8th International Conference on Dialogical Self. Den Haag, August 21, 2014. Retrieved from www.academia.edu/11513380/Raumaesthetik_of_Theodor_Lipps.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 12, 62–76.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. (1974). Psychology of Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wagner, W., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Marková, I., Duveen, G., & Rose, D. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. Theory and Method of Social Representations [online]. London: LSE Research Online. Retrieved from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2640.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Harré, R. (2012). Positioning theory: Moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 191–206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. (1934/1987). Thinking and speech. In Rieber, Robert W & Carton, Aaron S (Eds.), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 1: Problems of General Psychology (pp. 37–285). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Ahonen, S. (1997). A transformation of history: The official representations of history in East Germany and Estonia, 1986–1991. Culture & Psychology, 3, 41–62.Google Scholar

Anastasiou, D. & Kauffman, J. M. (2013). The social model of disability: Dichotomy between impairment and disability. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38(4), 441–459.Google Scholar

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.Google Scholar

Aran, G. & Hassner, R. E. (2013). Religious violence in Judaism: Past and present. Terrorism and Political Violence, 25(3), 355–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.Google Scholar

Bar-Tal, D. & Antebi, D. (1992). Siege mentality in Israel. Papers on Social Representations, 1, 49–68.Google Scholar

Bauer, M. (1993). Francophone research on popular(izing) science: A commented bibliography, 1960–1992. Unpublished manuscript, Science Museum, London.Google Scholar

Bennich-Björkman, L. (2006). A political culture in exile: The Estonian inter-war generation in Canada and Sweden. Journal of Baltic Studies, 73(1), 68–93.Google Scholar

Bennich-Björkman, L. (2007). The cultural roots of Estonia's successful transition: How historical legacies shaped the 1990s. East European Politics and Societies, 21, 316–347.Google Scholar

Bennich-Björkman, L. & Likić-Brborić, B. (2012). Successful but different: Deliberative identity and the consensus-driven transition to capitalism in Estonia and Slovenia. Journal of Baltic Studies, 43(1), 47–73.Google Scholar

Brüggemann, K. (2015). “One day we will win anyway”: The “Singing Revolution” in the Soviet Baltic republics. In Mueller, W., Gehler, M., & Suppan, A. (Eds.), The Revolutions of 1989: A Handbook (pp. 221–246). Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Caillaud, S. & Flick, U. (2013). New meanings for old habits? Representations of climate change in France and Germany. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 26(3), 39–72.Google Scholar

Callaghan, P. & Augoustinos, M. (2013). Reified versus consensual knowledge as rhetorical resources for debating climate change. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 26(3), 11–38.Google Scholar

Castro, P. (2012). Legal innovation for social change: Exploring change and resistance to different types of sustainability laws. Political Psychology, 33(1), 105–121.Google Scholar

Castro, P. (2015). Social representations of sustainability: Researching time, institution, conflict and communication. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, I., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 295–308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Durkheim, É. (1920). Sociologie et philosophie: Représentations individuelles et représentations collectives, détermination du fait moral, jugements de valeur et jugements de realité. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar

Elcheroth, G., Doise, W., & Reicher, S. (2011). On the knowledge of politics and the politics of knowledge: How a social representations approach helps us rethink the subject of political psychology. Political Psychology, 32(5), 729–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2008). Social representations, alternative representations and semantic barriers. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 375–391.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. & Zittoun, T. (2010). Using resources: Conceptualizing the mediation and reflective use of tools and signs. Culture & Psychology, 16(1), 37–62.Google Scholar

Ginges, J., Sheikh, H., Atran, S., & Argo, N. (2016). Thinking from God's perspective decreases biased valuation of the life of a nonbeliever. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(2), 316–319.Google Scholar

Grundmann, R. & Scott, M. (2014). Disputed climate science in the media: Do countries matter. Public Understanding of Science, 23(2), 220–235.Google Scholar

Gubler, J. R. & Kalmoe, N. P. (2015). Violent rhetoric in protracted group conflicts: Experimental evidence from Israel and India. Political Research Quarterly, 68(4), 651–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gustavsson, A. (1996). Reforms and everyday meanings of intellectual disability. In Tøssebro, J., Gustavsson, A., & Dyrendahl, G. (Eds.), Intellectual Disabilities in the Nordic Welfare States (pp. 214–236). Kristiansand: Høyskole Forlaget.Google Scholar

Gustavsson, A. (1997). Integration, stigma and autonomy: Bright and dark sides of the subculture of integration. In Gustavsson, A. & Zakrzewska-Manterys, E. (Eds.), Social Definitions of Disability (pp. 190–208). Warsaw: Zak.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1985). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Hirsch-Hoefler, S., Canetti, D., & Eiran, E. (2016). Radicalizing religion? Religious identity and settlers’ behavior. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39(6), 500–518.Google Scholar

Höijer, B. (2010). Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 19(6), 717–731.Google Scholar

Hroch, M. (2015). European Nations: Explaining Their Formation (trans. by Graham, Karolina). London: Verso.Google Scholar

Jacobi, D. (1977). La vulgarisation scientifique: Un outil pour les formateurs? Education Permanente, 39–40.Google Scholar

Jansen, E. (2007). Summary. In Tannberg, T., Arukaevu, J., & Tamman, H. (Eds.), Eestlane muutuvas ajas: seisuseühiskonnast kodanikuühiskonda [Estonians in a changing world: From estate society to civil society]. Tartu: Eesti Ajalooarhiiv.Google Scholar

Jaspal, R. & Nerlich, B. (2014). When climate science became climate politics: British media representations of climate change in 1988. Public Understanding of Science, 23(2), 122–141.Google Scholar

Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B., & Koteyko, N. (2012). Contesting science by appealing to its norms: Readers discuss climate science in the Daily Mail. Science Communication, 35(3), 383–410.Google Scholar

Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B., & Van Vuuren, K. (2015). Embracing and resisting climate identities in the Australian press: Sceptics, scientists and politics. Public Understanding of Science, 25(7), 807–824. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515584287.Google Scholar

Jodelet, D. (1991). Madness and Social Representations. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Kannike, A. (2006). Creating cultural continuity in the domestic realm: The case of Soviet Estonia. Acta Historica Tallinnensia, 10, 212–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karjahärm, T. (2009). Eesti rahvusliku liikumise mudelid uusimas historiograafias [Models of the Estonian national movement in recent historiography]. Acta Historica Tallinnensia, 14, 146–171.Google Scholar

Kivimäe, J. (1999). Re–writing Estonian history? In Branch, M. (Ed.), National History and Identity: Approaches to the Writing of National History in the North–East Baltic Region Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (pp. 205–211). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar

Kõresaar, E. (2004). Memory and History in Estonian Post-Soviet Life Stories: Private and Public, Individual and Collective from the Perspective of Biographical Syncretism. Tartu, Estonia: University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar

Kronberger, N., Holtz, P., & Wagner, W. (2012). Consequences of media information uptake and deliberation: Focus groups’ symbolic coping with synthetic biology. Public Understanding of Science, 21(2), 174–187.Google Scholar

Lauristin, M. & Vihalemm, P. (2009). The political agenda during different periods of Estonian transformation: External and internal factors. Journal of Baltic Studies, 40(1), 1–28.Google Scholar

Liu, X. S., Vedlitz, A., & Alston, L. (2008). Regional news portrayals of global warming and climate change. Environmental Science & Policy, 11(5), 379–393.Google Scholar

Luke, T. W. (2015). The climate change imaginary. Current Sociology Monograph, 63(2), 280–296.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (1997). The individual and the community: A post-communist perspective. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 7, 3–17.Google Scholar

Meinong, A. (1904). Über Gegenstandstheorie. In Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie (pp. 1–50). Leipzig: Barth Verlag.Google Scholar

Moloney, G., Leviston, Z., Lynam, T., Price, J., Stone-Jovicich, S., & Blair, D. (2014). Using social representations theory to make sense of climate change: What scientists and nonscientists in Australia think. Ecology and Society, 19(3), 1–9.Google Scholar

Morgan, M. & Signorelli, N. (1990). Cultivation Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes toward a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2008). Psychoanalysis – Its Image and Its Public. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Nerlich, B. (2015). Metaphors in science and society: The case of climate science and climate scientists. Language and Semiotic Studies, 1(2), 1–15.Google Scholar

Petersoo, P. (2007). Reconsidering otherness: Constructing Estonian identity. Nations and Nationalism, 13(1), 117–133.Google Scholar

Pratt, D. (2010). Religion and terrorism: Christian fundamentalism and extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(3), 438–456.Google Scholar

Putra, I. E. & Sukabdi, Z. A. (2014). Can Islamic fundamentalism relate to non-violent support? The role of certain conditions in moderating the effect of Islamic fundamentalism on supporting acts of terrorism. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20, 583–589.Google Scholar

Rakfeldt, J. (2015). Home environments, memories, and life stories: Preservation of Estonian national identity. Journal of Baltic Studies, 46(4), 511–542.Google Scholar

Raudsepp, M. (2009). Ethnic self-esteem and intergroup attitudes among the Estonian majority and the non-Estonian minority. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 1(1), 36–51.Google Scholar

Raudsepp, M. & Wagner, W. (2012). The essentially Other: Representational processes that divide groups. In Marková, I. & Gillespie, A. (Eds.), Trust and Conflict: Representation, Culture and Dialogue (pp. 105–122). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Raun, T. U. (2003). Nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Estonian nationalism revisited. Nations & Nationalism, 9(1), 129–147.Google Scholar

Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2015). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sen, R. (2012). Hetero-referentiality and divided societies. In Christie, D. J. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology (vol. 2, pp. 506–510). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sen, R. & Wagner, W. (2009). Cultural mechanics of fundamentalism: Religion as ideology, divided identities and violence in post-Gandhi India. Culture & Psychology, 15(3), 299–326.Google Scholar

Siimets-Gross, H. & Kello, K. (2018). Plurality of legal sources in trials concerning a person's status at the end of the 18th century – cui bono? In Luts, M., Kull, I., & Sein, K. (eds.) Legal Plurality – cui bono? Tartu, Estonia: University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar

Smedslund, J. (1988). Psycho-logic. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Smith, N. & Joffe, H. (2012). How the public engages with global warming: A social representations approach. Public Understanding of Science, 22(1), 16–32.Google Scholar

Swain, J. & French, S. (2000). Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability & Society, 15(4), 569–582.Google Scholar

Tamm, M. (2008). History as cultural memory: Mnemohistory and the construction of the Estonian nation. Journal of Baltic Studies, 39(4), 499–516.Google Scholar

Titma, M. & Rämmer, A. (2006). Estonia: Changing value patterns in a divided society. In. Klingemann, H.-D., Fuchs, D. & Zielonka, J.. (Eds.), Democracy and Political Culture in Eastern Europe (pp. 277–307). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Uzelgun, M. A. & Castro, P. (2014). The voice of science on climate change in the mainstream Turkish press. Environmental Communication, 8(3), 326–344.Google Scholar

Uzelgun, M. A. & Castro, P. (2015). Climate change in the mainstream Turkish press: Coverage trends and meaning dimensions in the first attention cycle. Mass Communication and Society, 18(6), 730–752.Google Scholar

Viires, A. (2001). Eestlaste ajalooteadvus 18.-19. sajandil [Historical consciousness of Estonians in the 18th and 19th centuries]. Tuna, 3, 20–36.Google Scholar

Wagner, W. (2015). Representation in action. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 12–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wagner, W. (2016). Embodied social representation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47(1), 25–31. DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.12113.Google Scholar

Wagner, W. & Hayes, N. (2005). Everyday Discourse and Common Sense: The Theory of Social Representations. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar

Wagner, W., Elejabarrieta, F., & Lahnsteiner, I. (1995). How the sperm dominates the ovum: Objectification by metaphor in the social representation of conception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(6), 671–688.Google Scholar

Wagner, W., Kronberger, N., & Seifert, F. (2002). Collective symbolic coping with new technology: Knowledge, images and public discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(3), 323–343.Google Scholar

Wagner, W., Mecha, A., & Carvalho, M. R. (2008). Discourse and representation in the construction of witchcraft. In Sugiman, T., Gergen, K., Wagner, W., & Yamada, Y. (Eds.), Meaning in Action: Constructions, Narratives and Representations (pp. 37–48). Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar

Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 261–283.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, L. (2009). What's in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of “climate change” and “global warming.” Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 401–420.Google Scholar

Wulf, M. & Grönholm, P. (2010). Generating meaning across generations: The role of historians in the codification of history in Soviet and post-Soviet Estonia. Journal of Baltic Studies, 41(3), 351–382.Google Scholar

Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Arievich, I. & Stetsenko, A. (2014). The “magic of signs”: Developmental trajectory of cultural mediation. In Yasnitsky, A., van der Veer, R., & Ferrari, M. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cultural-Historical Psychology (pp. 217–244). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bakhurst, D. (1991). Consciousness and Revolution in Soviet Philosophy: From Bolsheviks to Evald Ilyenkov. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boujut, J.-F. & Blanco, E. (2003). Intermediary objects as a means to foster co-operation in engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12: 205–219.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1938/1991). The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. Volume 12: Logic: The Theory of Inquiry (ed. by Boydston, Jo Ann). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Elkonin, D. B. (2005). Theories of play. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 43(2), 3–89.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta Konsultit.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1990). Constructing the object in the work activity of primary care physicians. In Engeström, Y. (Ed.), Learning, Working and Imagining (pp. 107–129). Helsinki: Orienta Konsultit.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2005). From individual action to collective activity and back: Developmental work research as an interventionist methodology. In Engeström, Y., Developmental Work Research: Expanding Activity Theory in Practice (pp. 171–199). Berlin, Lehmanns Media.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2007). Enriching the theory of expansive learning: Lessons from the journeys toward coconfiguration. Mind, Culture and Activity, 14(1–2), 23–39.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2008). From Teams to Knots: Activity-theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. & Blackler, F. (2005). On the Life of the Object. Organization, 12(3), 307–330.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. & Engeström, R. (1986). Developmental work research: The approach and an application in cleaning work. Nordisk Pedagogik, 6(1), 2–15.Google Scholar

Ewenstein, B. & Whyte, J. (2009). Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as “epistemic objects.” Organization Studies, 30(1), 7–30.Google Scholar

Fleck, J. (1994). Learning by trying: The implementation of configurational technology. Research Policy, 23, 637–652.Google Scholar

Gal, U., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2008). The dynamics of IT boundary objects, information infrastructures, and organizational identities: The introduction of 3D modelling technologies into architecture, engineering, and construction industry. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 290–304.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.Google Scholar

Hanseth, O. & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Henderson, K. (1999). On Line and on Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Henfridsson, O. & Bygstad, B. (2014). The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 907–931.Google Scholar

Hobday, M. (1998). Product complexity, innovation and industrial organization. Research Policy, 26(6), 689–710.Google Scholar

Houkes, W. & Vermaas, P. E. (2004). Actions versus functions: A plea for an alternative metaphysics of artefacts. The Monist, 87(1), 52–71.Google Scholar

Hyysalo, S. (2005). Objects and motives in a product design process. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 19–36.Google Scholar

Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977a). Dialectical Logic: Essays on Its History and Theory. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar

Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977b). The concept of the ideal. In Philosophy in the USSR: Problems of Dialectical Materialism (pp. 71–99). Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar

Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2010). A theory of digital objects. First Monday, 15(6).Google Scholar

Kaptelinin, V. (2005). The object of activity: Making sense of the sense-maker. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 4–18.Google Scholar

Kaptelinin, V. & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Karpov, Y. V. (2005). The Neo-Vygotskian Approach to Child Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001) Objectual practice. In Schatzki, T., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 175–188). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1992). One turn after the social turn. In McMullin, E. (Ed.), The Social Dimensions of Science (pp. 272–294). Notre Dame, IN: University of Note Dame Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation: Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29–64.Google Scholar

Leiman, M. (1999). The concept of sign in the work of Vygotsky, Winnicot and Bakhtin: Further integration of object relations theory and activity theory. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R-L. (Eds.), Perspectives of Activity Theory (pp. 419–443). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lektorsky, V. A. (1980). Subject Object Cognition. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar

Lektorsky, V. A. (1999). Historical change of the notion of activity. In Chaiklin, S., Hedegaard, M., & Juul-Jensen, U. (Eds.), Activity Theory and Social Practice: Cultural-historical Approaches (pp. 104–113). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar

Leontiev, A. N. (1977) Activity and consciousness. In Philosophy in the USSR: Problems of Dialectical Materialism. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar

Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Mampe, B., Friederici, A., Chistophe, A., & Wermke, K. (2009). Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language. Current Biology, 19(23), 1994–1997.Google Scholar

Martin, D. & Peim, N. (2009). Editorial: Critical perspectives on activity theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 131–138.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1964). The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 (ed. by Struik), K. J.. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar

Miettinen, R. (1998). Object construction and networks in research work: The case of research on cellulose-degrading enzymes. Social Studies of Science, 28(3), 423–463.Google Scholar

Miettinen, R. (1999). The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor network theory as approaches of studying innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(3), 170–195.Google Scholar

Miettinen, R. & Paavola, S. (2014). Beyond the BIM utopia: Approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling. Automation in Construction, 43, 84–91.Google Scholar

Miettinen, R. & Virkkunen, J. (2005). Epistemic objects, artefacts and organizational change. Organization, 12(3), 437–456.Google Scholar

Miller, R. (2011). Vygotsky in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mind, Culture and Activity (2005). 12(1). Perspectives on the object of activity (special issue).Google Scholar

Nardi, B. A. (2005). Objects of desire: Power and passion in collaborative activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 37–51.Google Scholar

Norman, D. A. (2002). The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1988 as The Psychology of Everyday Things.)Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2007). Developing a method for analyzing institutional change. Working Papers 07–1. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1998). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Volume 2 (1893–1913). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Preston, B. (1998). Why is a wing like a spoon? A pluralist theory of function. The Journal of Philosophy, 95(5), 215–254.Google Scholar

Star, S. L. & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.Google Scholar

Teräs, M. (2015). Inter-professional working and learning: Instructional actions and boundary crossing or boundary making in oral healthcare. Journal of Education and Work, 29(5), 614–636.Google Scholar

Teräs, M. & Nuutinen, E. (2010). Ammattikorkeakoulu-ja yliopisto-opiskelijat oppimassa työtä yhdessä [Polytechnic and university students are learning to work together]. Ammattikasvatuksen aikakauskirja [The Finnish journal of vocational and professional education], 12(2), 55–67.Google Scholar

Vinck, D. (2011). Taking intermediary objects and equipping work into account in the study of engineering practices. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Functions (ed. by Cole, Michael, John-Steiner, Vera, Scribner, Sylvia and Soberman, Ellen). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). Instrumental method in psychology. In Wersch, J. V. (Ed.), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology (pp. 134–143). Armonko, NY: Sharp.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Vygotsky Reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models: Representation and Scientific Understanding. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Introduction. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), Culture, Communication and Cognition (pp. 1–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Whyte, J. & Lobo, S. (2010). Coordination and control in project-based work: Digital objects and infrastructures for delivery. Construction Management and Economics, 28(6), 557–567.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 14–23.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (ed. by Holquist, M., trans. by Emerson, C. & Holquist, M.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. M. (1894). Imitation: A chapter in the natural history of consciousness. Mind, 3(9), 26–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, F. (1999). Knowledge creating as dialogical accomplishment: A constructivist perspective. In Montuori, A. & Purser, R. (Eds.), Social Creativity (vol. 1, pp. 133–151). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Barron, F. (1999). All creation is a collaboration. In Montuori, A. & Purser, R. (Eds.), Social Creativity (vol. I, pp. 49–59). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Becker, H. S. (2008). Art Worlds: Updated and Expended. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (1995). Socializing affordances. Theory & Psychology, 5, 467–481.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (pp. 325–339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

de Bono, E. (1970). Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step-by-Step. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1934). Art as Experience. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Dubina, I. N., Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). Creativity economy and a crisis of the economy? Coevolution of knowledge, innovation, and creativity, and of the knowledge economy and knowledge society. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1983). The Human Legacy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. S. (1992). Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gell, A. (1998). Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2010a). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(1), 79–93.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2010b). Principles for a cultural psychology of creativity. Culture & Psychology, 16(2), 147–163.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1), 48–67.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2012). What can be done with an egg? Creativity, material objects and the theory of affordances. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 192–208.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2013a). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A's framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2013b). Creativity and folk art: A study of creative action in traditional craft. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(2), 140–154.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed Creativity: Thinking Outside the Box of the Creative Individual. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2015a). On units of analysis and creativity theory: Towards a “molecular” perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 311–330.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2015b). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2015c). From individual to co-agency. In Gruber, C. W., Clark, M. G., Klempe, S. H., & Valsiner, J., J. (Eds.), Constraints of Agency: Explorations of Theory in Everyday Life (pp. 245–266). London: Springer.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P., Gillespie, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2015). Rethinking Creativity: Perspectives from Cultural Psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P., Lubart, T., Bonnardel, N., Botella, M., de Biaisi, M.-P., Desainte-Catherine, M., Georgsdottir, A., Guillou, K., Kurtag, G., Mouchiroud, C., Storme, M., Wojtczuk, A., & Zenasni, F. (2013). Creativity as action: Findings from five creative domains. Frontiers in Educational Psychology, 4, 1–14.Google Scholar

Gruber, H. (2005). The creative person as a whole: The evolving systems approach to the study of creative work. In Gruber, E. & Bödeker, K. (Eds.), Creativity, Psychology and the History of Science (pp. 35–104). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Gruber, C. W., Clark, M. G., Klempe, S. H., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2015). Constraints of Agency: Explorations of Theory in Everyday Life. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1968). Creativity, Intelligence and Their Educational Implications. San Diego, CA: EDITS/Knapp.Google Scholar

Ingold, T. & Hallam, E. (2007). Creativity and cultural improvisation: An introduction. In Hallam, E. & Ingold, T. (Eds.), Creativity and Cultural Improvisation (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

James, W. (1981). Pragmatism (ed. by Kuklick, B.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Joas, H. (1996). The Creativity of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

John-Steiner, V. (1992). Creative lives, creative tensions. Creativity Research Journal, 5(1), 99–108.Google Scholar

Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M. (2010). Are creative students really welcome in the classrooms? Implicit theories of “good” and “creative” students’ personality among Polish teachers. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1233–1237.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (Eds.). (2005). Creativity Across Domains: Faces of the Muse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Lamm, H. & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(4), 361–388.Google Scholar

Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Lubart, T. I. (2000). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295–308.Google Scholar

Mace, M. A., & Ward, T. (2002). Modeling the creative process: A grounded theory analysis of creativity in the domain of art making. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 179–192.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, J., & Gillespie, A. (2010). A neo-Meadian approach to human agency: Relating the social and the psychological in the ontogenesis of perspective-coordinating persons. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44, 252–272.Google Scholar

May, R. (1974). The Courage to Create. New York: Dell.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1964). Selected Writings: George Herbert Mead (ed. by Reck, A. J.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Montuori, A. & Purser, R. (1997). Le dimensioni sociali della creatività [Social creativity: The challenge of complexity. Pluriverso, 1(2), 78–88.Google Scholar

Moran, S. & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky's contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. In Sawyer, R. K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R. J., Feldman, D. H., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (Eds.), Creativity and Development (pp. 61–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (2000). Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology (ed. by Duveen, G.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Paulus, P. & Nijstad, B. (Eds.). (2003). Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1977). Semiotics and Significs (ed. by Hardwick, C.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1924). The Foundations of Science (trans. by Halstead, G. B.). New York: Science Press.Google Scholar

Potts, J. D., Hartley, J., Banks, J. A., Burgess, J. E., Cobcroft, R. S., Cunningham, S. D., & Montgomery, L. (2008). Consumer co-creation and situated creativity. Industry and Innovation, 15(5), 459–474.Google Scholar

Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–311.Google Scholar

Rothenberg, A. (1971). The process of Janusian thinking in creativity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 24, 195–205.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2015). A commentary on the social perspective on creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2(1), 21–31.Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. K. (1995). Creativity as mediated action: A comparison of improvisional performance and product creativity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2(3), 172–191.Google Scholar

Shweder, R. (1990). Cultural psychology – What is it? In Stigler, J., Shweder, R., & Herdt, G. (Eds.), Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development (pp. 1–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 1119–1133.Google Scholar

Stein, M. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.Google Scholar

Taillard, M., Voyer, B., Glăveanu, V. P., & Gritzali, A. (2014). Value creation and consumption: When consumer creativity generates value in online forums. Advances in Consumer Research, 42, 381–385.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in Minds and Societies. New Delhi: SAGE.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2014). An Invitation to Cultural Psychology. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media Culture Society, 31, 41–58.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.Google Scholar

Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Ward, T. B. (2001). Creative cognition, conceptual combination, and the creative writing of Stephen R. Donaldson. American Psychologist, 56(4), 350–354.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. & Gillespie, A. (2015). Imagination in Human and Cultural Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T., Gillespie, A., Cornish, F., & Psaltis, C. (2007). The metaphor of the triangle in theories of human development. Human Development, 50(4), pp. 208–229.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (ed. by Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. & Souberman, E.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1996). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Baucal, A. & Zittoun, T. (2013). Religion as dialogical resource: A socio-cultural approach. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47(2), 207–219.Google Scholar

Binder, M. D., Hirokawa, N., & Windhorst, U. (Eds.). (2009). Introspection. In Encyclopedia of Neuroscience (p. 2034). Berlin: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_2573.Google Scholar

Blumer, H. (1933). Movies and Conduct. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bogdan, R. J. (2013). Mindvaults: Sociocultural Grounds for Pretending and Imagining. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brentano, F. (1995). Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (2nd edn.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Breux, S., Miserez Caperos, C., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2013). Les jeunes enfants en interaction autour d'une activité cognitive: Quand le genre s'en mêle. Cahiers de Psychologie et Éducation, 49, 13–22.Google Scholar

Brinkmann, S. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry in Everyday Life: Working with Everyday Life Materials. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Brinkmann, S. (2013). Practice of self-observation in the phenomenological traditions. In Clegg, J. W. (Ed.), Self-observation in the Social Sciences (pp. 195–222). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Brinkmann, S. (2014). Getting in touch with the world: Meaning and presence in social science. In Jacobsen, M. H., Drake, M. S., Keohane, K., & Petersen, A. (Eds.), Imaginative Methodologies in the Social Sciences: Creativity, Poetics and Rhetoric in Social Research (pp. 133–154). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Brown, S. & Reavey, P. (2015). Vital Memory and Affect: Living with a Difficult Past. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (2003). Making Stories: Law, Literature, Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bühler, C. (1973). Humanistic psychology as a personal experience. Interpersonal Development, 4(4), 197–214.Google Scholar

Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). The Rational Imagination: How People Create Alternatives to Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cerchia, F. (2009). Young children's use of symbolic resources in an experimental setting testing metaphor comprehension. Psychology & Society, 2(2), 200–211.Google Scholar

Clegg, J. W. (Ed.). (2013). Self-observation in the Social Sciences. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Cornejo, C. (2015). From fantasy to imagination: A cultural history and a moral for cultural psychology. Niels Bohr Lecture presented at Aalborg, Denmark. Retrieved from www.ccp.aau.dk/digitalAssets/98/98719_from-20fantasy-20to-20imagination.pdf.Google Scholar

Corti, K., Reddy, G., Choi, E., & Gillespie, A. (2015). The researcher as experimental subject: Using self-experimentation to access experiences, understand social phenomena, and stimulate reflexivity. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(2) 1–21.Google Scholar

Dahinden, J. & Zittoun, T. (2013). Religion in meaning making and boundary work: Theoretical explorations. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47(2), 185–206.Google Scholar

Danziger, K. (1980). The history of introspection reconsidered. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16(3), 241–262.Google Scholar

Dauphinee, E. (2010). The ethics of autoethnography. Review of International Studies, 36(3), 799–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Abreu, G. & Hale, H. (2011). Trajectories of cultural identity development of young immigrant people: The impact of family practices. Psychological Studies, 56(1), 53–61.Google Scholar

de l'Isle-Adam, V. L. (1886/2000). Tomorrow's Eve (trans. from French by Adams, M.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

de Saint-Laurent, C. (2014). “I would rather be hanged than agree with you!”: Collective memory and the definition of the nation in parliamentary debates on immigration. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 15(3), 22–53.Google Scholar

de Saint-Laurent, C. & Zittoun, T. (2017). Memory in life transitions. In Wagoner, B. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Diep, A. (2011). “On connaît la musique?” Un regard socioculturel sur le travail des musiciens. Master's thesis, University of Neuchâtel. Retrieved from http://doc.rero.ch/record/28829?ln=fr.Google Scholar

Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2010). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1). Retrieved from www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamaki, R.-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the Life Cycle: Selected Papers. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Flaubert, G. (1857/2007). Madame Bovary (trans. from French by Wall, G.). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2005). Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of Self (1st edn.). New York: Other Press.Google Scholar

Fox, K. C. R., Nijeboer, S., Solomonova, E., Domhoff, G. W., & Christoff, K. (2013). Dreaming as mind wandering: Evidence from functional neuroimaging and first-person content reports. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 412. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00412.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1940). An Outline of Psychoanalysis. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1957). Five lectures on psycho-analysis. In Strachey, J. & Freud, A. (Eds.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Volume XI (1910): Five Lectures on Psycho-Analysis, Leonardo da Vinci and Other Works (pp. 1–56). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (2001a). On dreams (1901). In The Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (new edn., vol. 5, pp. 631–714). London: Vintage Classics.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (2001b). The Interpretation of Dreams (original 1900, vol. 4–5). London: Vintage.Google Scholar

Fuhrer, U. (2003). Cultivating Minds: Identity as Meaning-making Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (1972). La religion comme système culturel. In Bradbury, R., Geertz, C., Spiro, M. E., Turner, V. W., & Winter, E. H. (Eds.), Essais d'anthropologie religieuse (pp. 19–66). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Gfeller, F. (2017). Imagination as embodied activity? Combining Zittoun's “imaginary loop model” with Schuetz' “provinces of meaning.” In Sullivan, G., Cresswell, J., Ellis, B. D., Morgan, M., & Schraube, E. (Eds.), Resistance and Renewal in Theoretical Psychology (pp. 136–144). Ontario: Captus University Publications.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2005a). Giving the future form: Non-reflective and reflective uses of symbolic resources. In Gülerce, A., Hofmeister, A., & Staeuble, I. (Eds.), Contemporary Theorizing in Psychology: Global Perspectives. Toronto: Captus University Publications.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2005b). Malcolm X and his autobiography: Identity development and self-narration. Culture & Psychology, 11(1), 77–88.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2006a). Becoming Other: From Social Interaction to Self-reflection. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2006b). Games and the development of perspective taking. Human Development, 49(2), 87–92.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2013). Nuclear brinkmanship: A study in non-linguistic communication. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47(4), 492–508.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A., Cornish, F., Aveling, E.-L., & Zittoun, T. (2008). Living with war: Community resources, self-dialogues and psychological adaptation to World War II. Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1), 35–52.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. & Zittoun, T. (2010a). Studying the movement of thought. In Toomela, A. & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), Methodological Thinking in Psychology: 60 Years Gone Astray? (pp. 69–88). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. & Zittoun, T. (2010b). Using resources: Conceptualizing the mediation and reflective use of tools and signs. Culture & Psychology, 16(1), 37–62.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. & Zittoun, T. (2013). Meaning making in motion: Bodies and minds moving through institutional and semiotic structures. Culture & Psychology, 19(4), 518–532.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. & Zittoun, T. (2015). Social and psychological movement: Weaving individual experience into society. In Wagoner, B., Chaudhary, N., & Hviid, P. (Eds.), Integrating Experiences: Body and Mind Moving between Contexts (pp. 279–294). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. & Zittoun, T. (2016). The gift of a rock: A case study in the emergence and dissolution of meaning. In Bang, J. & Winther-Lindqvist, D. (Eds.), Nothingness: Philosophical Insights to Psychology (pp. 89–106). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Thinking Through Creativity and Culture. Toward an Integrated Model. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Greco Morasso, S. & Zittoun, T. (2014). The trajectory of food as a symbolic resource for international migrants. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 15(1), 28–48.Google Scholar

Green, A. (2005). Key Ideas for a Contemporary Psychoanalysis Misrecognition and Recognition of the Unconscious (1st edn.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Grossen, M., Baucal, A., & Zittoun, T. (2010). Using cultural elements as symbolic resources in and out school: Results of a questionnaire submitted to young persons in three upper secondary schools. Research report SYRES no. 5 (Funding FNS no. 100013-116040/1), Universités de Neuchâtel & Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar

Grossen, M. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (Eds.). (1992). L'Espace thérapeutique: Cadres et contextes. Lausanne, Switzerland: Delachaux & Niestle.Google Scholar

Grossen, M., Zittoun, T., & Ros, J. (2012). Boundary crossing events and potential appropriation space in philosophy, literature and general knowledge. In Hjörne, E., van der Aalsvoort, G., & de Abreu, G. (Eds.), Learning, Social Interaction and Diversity – Exploring Identities in School Practices (pp. 15–33). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar

Gyger Gaspoz, D. (2014). Donner voix à l'espace physique: Lorsque la chambre perpétue et écrit l'histoire de l'adolescent au travers d'objets significatifs. Le cas des jeunes en itinérance géographique. Strenæ. Recherches sur les livres et objets culturels de l'enfance, 7. Retrieved from http://strenae.revues.org/1265.Google Scholar

Habermas, T. (2012). Identity, emotion, and the social matrix of autobiographical memory: A psychoanalytic narrative view. In Berntsen, D. & Rubin, D. C. (Eds.), Understanding Autobiographical Memory: Theories and Approaches (pp. 33–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hale, H. C. (2008). The development of British military masculinities through symbolic resources. Culture & Psychology, 14(3), 305–332.Google Scholar

Hale, H. C. & de Abreu, G. (2010). Drawing on the notion of symbolic resources in exploring the development of cultural identities in immigrant transitions. Culture & Psychology, 16(3), 395–415.Google Scholar

Harris, P. L. (2000). The Work of the Imagination (1st edn.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (2006). The sociological and geographical imaginations. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18(3–4), 211–255.Google Scholar

Hilppö, J. A., Rajala, A., Zittoun, T., Kumpulainen, K., & Lipponen, L. (2016). Interactive dynamics of imagination in a science classroom. Frontline Learning Research, 4(4), 20–29.Google Scholar

Hviid, P. (2015). Borders in education and living – a case of trench warfare. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(1), 44–61.Google Scholar

Hviid, P. & Villadsen, J. W. (2018). Playing and being: Imagination in the life course. In Zittoun, T. & Glăveanu, V. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Culture and Imagination (pp. 137–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jørgensen, D. (2018). The philosophy of imagination. In Zittoun, T. & Glăveanu, V. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Culture and Imagination (pp. 19–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jules et Jim. (1962). [Film] Directed by F. Truffaut. France: SEDIF.Google Scholar

Kadianaki, I. (2010). Negotiating immigration through symbolic resources: The case of immigrants living in Greece. PhD dissertation. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Klempe, H. (2018). Music and imagination. In Zittoun, T. & Glăveanu, V. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Culture and Imagination (pp. 243–270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Konopásek, Z. (Ed.). (2000). Our Lives as Database. Doing a Sociology of Ourselves: Czech National Transitions in Autobiographical Research Dialogues. Prague: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Nakladatelství Karolinum.Google Scholar

Lawrence, J. A., Benedikt, R., & Valsiner, J. (1992). Homeless in the mind: A case-history of personal life in and out of a close orthodox community. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 1(2), 157–176.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The Savage Mind (original French publication 1962). Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press/Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Levy, R., Ghisletta, P., Le Goff, J.-M., Spini, D., & Widmer, E. (Eds.). (2005). Towards an Interdisciplinary Perspective on the Life Course. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology (trans. by Heider, F. & Heider, G. M.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Livingstone, S. (2005). Internet literacy among children and young people. Findings from the UK children go online project. Research report, London School of Economics.Google Scholar

London, J. (1909/1994). Martin Eden (ed. by Sinclair, A.). London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

Lyons, W. E. (1986). The Disappearance of Introspection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lyra, M. C. D. P. & Valsiner, J. (1998). Construction of Psychological Processes in Interpersonal Communication. Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2016). The Dialogical Mind: Common Sense and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2018). From imagination to well-controlled images: Challenge for the dialogical mind. In Zittoun, T. & Glăveanu, V. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Imagination and Culture (pp. 319–344). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, J., & Gillespie, A. (2010). A neo-Meadian approach to human agency: Relating the social and the psychological in the ontogenesis of perspective-coordinating persons. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44(3), 252–272.Google Scholar

Märtsin, M. (2010). Rupturing otherness: Becoming Estonian in the context of contemporary Britain. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44(1), 65–81.Google Scholar

Märtsin, M., Chang, I., & Obst, P. L. (2016). Using culture to manage the transition into university: Conceptualising the dynamics of withdrawal and engagement. Culture & Psychology, 22(2), 276–295.Google Scholar

Mehmeti, T. (2013). Réussite scolaire de jeunes femmes kosovares: Quels processus psycho-sociaux? Dossiers de Psychologie et Éducation, 70, 1–133.Google Scholar

Miller, P. J., Hoogstra, L., Mintz, J., Fung, H., & Williams, K. (1993). Troubles in the garden and how they get resolved: A young child's transformation of his favorite story. In Nelson, C. A. (Ed.), Memory and Affect in Development (vol. 26, pp. 87–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Mills, C. W. (1959/2000). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moro, C. & Rodriguez, C. (1998). Toward a pragmatical conception of the object: The construction of the uses of the object by the baby in the prelinguistic period. In Lyra, M. C. D. P. & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), Construction of Psychological Processes in Interpersonal Communication (pp. 53–72). Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar

Nathan, T. (2007). Nous ne sommes pas seuls au monde: Les enjeux de l'ethnopsychiatrie. Paris: Points.Google Scholar

Nelson, K. (1996). Language in Cognitive Development: Emergence of the Mediated Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, K. (2007). Young Minds in Social Worlds. Experience, Meaning, and Memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2015). The architecture of social relationships and thinking spaces for growth. In Psaltis, C., Gillespie, A., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (Eds.), Social Relations in Human and Societal Development (pp. 51–70). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Perriault, J. (1989). La logique de l'usage: Essai sur les machines à communiquer. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Psaltis, C. (2011). The constructive role of gender asymmetry in social interaction: Further evidence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 305–312.Google Scholar

Rabardel, P. (2001). Instrument mediated activity in situations. In Blandford, A., Vanderdonckt, J., & Gray, P. (Eds.), People and Computers XV – Interactions Without Frontiers (pp. 17–30). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Reddy, V. (2008). How Infants Know Minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, P. J. & Valsiner, J. (2011). The un-making of a method: From rating scales to the study of psychological processes. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 47–65.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, D. (Ed.). (1993). The Movie that Changed My Life (1st edn.). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Schuetz, A. (1945a). On multiple realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5(4), 533–576.Google Scholar

Schuetz, A. (1945b). The homecomer. American Journal of Sociology, 50(5), 369–376.Google Scholar

Sherif, M. & Sherif, C. W. (1965). Problems of Youth: Transition to Adulthood in a Changing World. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Singer, D. G. & Singer, J. L. (2005). Imagination and Play in the Electronic Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Skyfall. (2012). [Film] Directed by S. Mendes. USA: Sony Pictures.Google Scholar

South Park. (1997). [Animated TV program] Created by T. Parker & M. Stone. USA: Celluloid Studios.Google Scholar

Stankovic, B., Baucal, A., & Zittoun, T. (2009). Uses of symbolic resources in youth: Moving from qualitative to quantitative approach. Psihologija, 42(4), 437–457.Google Scholar

Stenner, P. (2018). Liminality and Experience: A transdisciplinary Approach to the Psychosocial. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Strauss, C. & Quinn, N. (1998). A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tanggaard, L. (2015). The socio-materiality of creativity: A case study of the creative processes in design work. In Glăveanu, V. P., Gillespie, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), Rethinking Creativity: Contributions from Cultural Psychology (pp. 110–124). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Tanggaard, L. & Brinkman, S. (2018). Methodological implications of Imagination. In Zittoun, T. & Glăveanu, V. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Imagination and Culture (pp. 87–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

The Dreamers. (2004). [Film] Directed by B. Bertolucci. UK: Recorded Picture Company.Google Scholar

Toomela, A. (2015). What are higher psychological functions? Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(1) 91–121.Google Scholar

Trevarthen, C. (2012). Embodied human intersubjectivity: Imaginative agency, to share meaning. Cognitive Semiotics, 4(1), 6–56.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the Development of the Children's Action: A Cultural-Historical Theory of Developmental Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (1998). The Guided Mind: A Sociogenetic Approach to Personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2001). Process structure of semiotic mediation in human development. Human Development, 44, 84–97.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in Minds and Societies: Foundations of Cultural Psychology. New Delhi: SAGE.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2013). Foreword: Breaking a Social Taboo: Introspection Restored. In Clegg, J. W. (Ed.), Self-Observation in the Social Sciences (pp. vii–xi). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2014). An Invitation to Cultural Psychology. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2015). Preface. In Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T., & Dazzani, V. (Eds.), Psychology as a Science of Human Being: The Yokohama Manifesto (vol. 13, pp. v–vii). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J., & Lawrence, J. A. (1997). Human development in culture across the life span. In Berry, J. W., Daseb, P. R., & Saraswathi, T. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology (vol. 2, pp. 69–106). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Vermersch, P. (2009). Describing the practice of introspection. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(10/12), 20–57.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). The Psychology of Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1975). Internalization of higher psychological functions. In Cole, M. (Ed.), Mind in Society (pp. 52–57). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language (ed. by Kozulin, A., rev. edn.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.Google Scholar

Wagoner, B., Jensen, E., & Oldmeadow, J. A. (2012). Changing times, changing science. In Wagoner, B., Jensen, E., & Oldmeadow, J. A. (Eds.), Culture and Social Change: Transforming Society Through the Power of Ideas (pp. 1–15). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation: An organismic-developmental approach to language and the expression of thought. New York: John Wiley & Son.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Action. /Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Winnicott, D. W. (1968). On “the use of an object.” In Winnicott, C., Shepherd, R., & Davis, M. (Eds.), Psycho-Analytic Explorations (pp. 217–246). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Winnicott, D. W. (2001). Playing and Reality. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.Google Scholar

Young, S. D. (2000). Movies as equipment for living: A developmental analysis of the importance of film in everyday life. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 17(4), 447–468.Google Scholar

Zagórska, W., & Tarnowski, A. (2004, July). Historical re-enactment in young adulthood: Experiences and psychological functions. Poster presented at the 18th Biennial ISSBD meeting, Ghent, Belgium.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2001, December). Engendrements symboliques. Devenir parent: Le choix du prénom. PhD thesis, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2003). The hidden work of symbolic resources in emotions. Culture & Psychology, 9(3), 313–329.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2004a). Donner la vie, choisir un nom: Engendrements symboliques. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2004b). Symbolic competencies for developmental transitions: The case of the choice of first names. Culture and Psychology, 10(2), 131–161.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2006a). Difficult secularity: Talmud as symbolic resource. Outlines. Critical Social Studies, 8(2), 59–75.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2006b). Transitions: Development Through Symbolic Resources. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2007a). Dynamics of interiority: Ruptures and transitions in the self development. In Simão, L. & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), Otherness in Question: Development of the Self (pp. 187–214). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2007b). Symbolic resources and responsibility in transitions. Young. Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 15(2), 193–211.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2008). Janet's emotions in the whole of human conduct. In Diriwaechter, R. & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), Striving for the Whole: Creating Theoretical Synthesis (pp. 111–129). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2010). How does an object become symbolic? Rooting semiotic artefacts in dynamic shared experiences. In Wagoner, B. (Ed.), Symbolic Transformations: The Mind in Movement through Culture and Society (pp. 173–192). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2011a). A girl like a will-o’-the whisp: Listening to reports of cultural experiences as a methodological mean of accessing the preconscious dynamics of sense making. In Salvatore, S. & Zittoun, T. (Eds.), Cultural Psychology and Psychoanalysis: Pathways to Synthesis (pp. 151–179). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2011b). Freud and cultural psychology. In Salvatore, S. & Zittoun, T. (Eds.), Cultural Psychology and Psychoanalysis: Pathways to Synthesis (pp. 67–86). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2012a). Lifecourse. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 513–535). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2012b). On the emergence of the subject. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46(3), 259–273.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2012c). The art of noise: Comment on the sound of silence. Culture & Psychology, 18(4), 30–41.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2013a). On the use of a film: Cultural experiences as symbolic resources. In Kuhn, A. (Ed.), Little Madnesses: Winnicott, Transitional Phenomena and Cultural Experience (pp. 135–147). London: Tauris.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2013b). Religious traditions as means of innovation: The use of symbolic resources in the life course. In Zock, H. & Buitelaar, M. (Eds.), Religious Voices in Self-Narratives Making Sense of Life in Times of Transitions (pp. 129–148). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2014a). Three dimensions of dialogical movement. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 99–106.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2014b). Trusting for learning. In Linell, P. & Marková, I. (Eds.), Trust and Language (pp. 125–151). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2015a). Compatibility between early psychoanalysis and pragmatism. In Rosenbaum, P. J. (Ed.), Making Our Ideas Clear: Pragmatism in Psychoanalysis (pp. 23–42). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2015b). From Vico to the sociocultural imagination. Culture & Psychology, 21(2), 251–258.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2015c). Social relations and the use of symbolic resources in learning and development. In Psaltis, C., Gillespie, A., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (Eds.), Social Relations in Human and Societal Development Social Relations in Human and Societal Development (pp. 134–146). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2015d). Studying “higher mental functions”: The example of imagination. In Valsiner, J., Marsico, G., Chaudhary, N., Sato, T., & Dazzani, V. (Eds.), Psychology as a Science of Human Being: The Yokohama Manifesto (vol. 13, pp. 129–147). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2016a). Imagining self in a changing world: An exploration of “Studies of Marriage.” In Han, M. & Cunha, C. (Eds.), The Subjectified and Subjectifying Mind (pp. 85–116). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2016b). Reflexivity, or learning from living. In Marsico, G., Ruggieri, R. A., & Salvatore, S. (Eds.), Reflexivity and Psychology (vol. 6, pp. 143–167). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2016c). Symbolic resources and sense-making in learning and instruction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(1), 1–20.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2016d). The sound of music. In Klempe, H. (Ed.), Cultural Psychology of Musical Experience (pp. 21–39). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2018). The Velvet Revolution of land and minds. In Wagoner, B., Moghaddam, F. M., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Psychology of Radical Social Change: From Rage to Revolution (pp. 140–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T., Cornish, F., Gillespie, A., & Aveling, E.-L. (2008). Using social knowledge: A case study of a diarist's meaning making during World War II. In Wagner, W., Sugiman, T., & Gergen, K. (Eds.), Meaning in Action: Constructions, Narratives and Representations (pp. 163–179). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. & de Saint-Laurent, C. (2015). Life-creativity: Imagining one's life. In Glăveanu, V. P., Gillespie, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), Rethinking Creativity: Contributions from Cultural Psychology (pp. 58–75). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T., Duveen, G., Gillespie, A., Ivinson, G., & Psaltis, C. (2003). The uses of symbolic resources in transitions. Culture & Psychology, 9(4), 415–448.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. & Gillespie, A. (2012). Using diaries and self-writings as data in psychological research. In Abbey, E. & Surgan, S. E. (Eds.), Emerging Methods in Psychology (pp. 1–26). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. & Gillespie, A. (2013). Symbolic resources. In Keith, K. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 1259–1262). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. & Gillespie, A. (2014). Sculpture and art installations: Towards a cultural psychological analysis. In Wagoner, B., Chaudhary, N., & Hviid, P. (Eds.), Cultural Psychology and Its Future: Complementarity in a New Key (pp. 167–177). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. & Gillespie, A. (2015a). Integrating experiences: Body and mind moving between contexts. In Wagoner, B., Chaudhary, N., & Hviid, P. (Eds.), Integrating Experiences: Body and Mind Moving Between Contexts (pp. 3–49). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar