Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T12:37:00.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Trust and the Variety of Its Bases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

Peter Kivisto
Affiliation:
Augustana College, Illinois
Get access

Summary

After emphasizing the importance of trust as a fundamental aspect of our interpersonal and institutional dealings with other people, the chapter reviews the main sociological theories of trust and its social bases.Starting from the assumption that trust is a multifaceted phenomenon, it discusses two dominant theoretical explanations on trust production and its deficit.The first stream is a broadly normative-cultural approach that conceptualizes trust as a means of transcending uncertainty, while the second perspective is based on rational choice that roots self-interest as the fundamental basis of trust.In the final part of the essay, after discussion of the importance of trust in reducing vulnerability, it is argued that by bringing rational and emotional foundations of trust together, we can begin to master trust-related mechanisms for reducing human vulnerability, and hence increasing our well-being.

Emotion, interest, rational choice, risk, trust vulnerability

Barbara A. Misztal is Emeritus Professor of Sociology at the School of Media, Communication, and Sociology, University of Leicester.She has published on the topics of trust, memory, informality, vulnerability, multiple normalities, public intellectuals, political change, forgiveness, and later life.Currently she is researching narratives that make sense of the public sphere.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, J. C. 2006. The Civil Sphere. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. 1974. The Limits of Organization. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Baier, A. 1986. “Trust and Antitrust.” Ethics 96(2): 231260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbalet, J. 2009. “A Characterization of Trust, and Its Consequences.” Theory and Society 38: 367382.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. 2006 Liquid Fear. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Beckett, A. E. 2006. Citizenship and Vulnerability. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Blau, P. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Bok, S. 1979. Lying and Moral Choice in Public Life. Hassocks, UK: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Cheal, D. 2005. Dimensions of Sociological Theory. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94(1): 95120.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, K. (ed.). 2001. Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Cook, S., Hardin, R, and Levi, M. 2005. Cooperation without Trust. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. 1988. “Trust and Political Agency.” In Gambetta, D (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Co-operative Relations (pp. 73–93). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. 1993. “Trust.” In Goodin, R and Pettit, P (eds.), Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (pp. 638–645). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Edwards, B., and Foley, M. 1998. “Civil Society and Social Capital: Beyond Putnam.” American Behavioral Scientist 42(1): 124140.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 2007. Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. 1959 [1950]. Identity and the Life Cycle. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, M. 2012. “Dimensions of Trust.” Current Sociology 60(6): 733750.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust, the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. (ed.). 1988a. “Forward.” In Trust: Making and Breaking Co-operative Relations (ix–xii). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. 1988b. “Can We Trust Trust?” In Gambetta, D (ed.), Trust, Making and Breaking Co-operative Relations (pp. 213–238). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D., and Hamill, H. 2005. Streetwise: How Taxi Drivers Establish Their Customers’ Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. 1963. “A Conception of, and Experiments with, Trust as a Condition of Stable Concerted Actions.” In Harvey, O. J. (ed.), Motivation and Social Interaction (pp. 187–265). New York: The Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1992. Transformation of Intimacy, Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1994a. “Living in Post-Traditional Society.” In Giddens, A and Lash, S (eds.), Reflexive Modernization (pp. 56–109). Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1994b. “Risk, Trust, Reflexivity.” In Giddens, A and Lash, S (eds.), Reflexive Modernization (pp. 184–197). Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481510.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. 1991. “Trusting Persons, Trusting Institutions.” In Zeckahuser, R. J. (ed.), Strategy and Choice (pp. 178–193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. 1996. “Trustworthiness.” Ethics 107: 2642.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. 1999. “Do We Want Trust in Government.” In Warren, M (ed.), Democracy and Trust (pp. 22–41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. 2001. “Conceptions and Explanations of Trust.” In Cook, K. S. (ed.), Trust in Society (pp. 339). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. 2002. Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. 2006. Trust. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Jalava, J. 2003. “From Norms to Trust.”European Journal of Social Theory 62: 173190.Google Scholar
Kolnai, A. 1973. “Forgiveness.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74: 91106.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M., and Tyler, T. R. (eds.). 1996. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lane, C., and Bachmann, R (eds.). 1998. Trust Within and Between Organizations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lapidot, T., Kark, R, and Shamir, B. 2007. “The Impact of the Development and Erosion of Followers’ Trust in Their Leader.” The Leadership Quarterly 18: 1634.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. Translated by Porter, Catherine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lawler, E. J., and Thye, S. R.. 1999. “Bringing Emotions into Social Exchange.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 217244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, M., and Stoker, L. 2000. “Political Trust and Trustworthiness.” Annual Review of Political Science 31: 475507.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. D., and Weigert, A. 1985. “Trust as a Social Reality.” Social Forces 63(4): 967985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 2015. “The Duality of Unity-in-Diversity in Trust Research.” Journal of Trust Research 52: 103108.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and Power. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1988. “Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives.” In Gambetta, Diego (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (pp. 94–107). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1991. Risk: A Sociological Theory. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Messick, D. M., and Kramer, R. M.. 2001. “Trust as a Form of Shallow Morality.” In Cook, K. S. (ed.), Trust in Society (pp. 89–118). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Mishra, A. K. 1996. “Organizational Responses to Crisis: The Centrality of Trust.” In Kramer, R and Tyler, T (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (pp. 261–287). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Misztal, B. A. 1996. Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Misztal, B. A. 2011. The Challenges of Vulnerability: In Search of Strategies for a Less Vulnerable Social Life. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Misztal, B. A. 2012. “Trust: Acceptance of, Precaution Against and Cause of Vulnerability.” In Sasaki, M and Marsh, R. M. (eds.), Trust: Comparative Perspective (pp. 209–223). Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
Möllering, G. 2001. “The Nature of Trust: From Georg Simmel to a Theory of Expectation, Interpretation and Suspension.” Sociology 35(2): 403420.Google Scholar
Möllering, G. 2013. “Trust Without Knowledge? Comment on Hardin’s ‘Government without Trust.’” Journal of Trust Research 31: 5358.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, B. 1996. “Trust, Opportunism and Governance.” Organization Studies 176: 9851010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nooteboom, B., Berger, H, and Noorderhaven., N. G. 1997. “Effects of Trust and Governance on Relational Risk.” Academy of Management Journal 40(2): 308338.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1978. Action Theory and the Human Condition. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Portes, A. 1998. “Social Capital, Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 124.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6(1): 6578.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., and Walker, J. (eds.). 2003. Trust and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons from Experimental Research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Sabel, C. F. 1993. “Studied Trust: Building New Forms of Cooperation in a Volatile Economy.” Human Relations 46(9): 11331170.Google Scholar
Sasaki, M. 2012. “Cross-National Studies of Trust among Seven Nations.” In Sasaki, S and Marsh, R. M. (eds.), Trust: Comparative Perspectives (pp. 347–376). Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
Seligman, A. 1997. The Problem of Trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, A. 1985. “Trust in Social and Political Theory.” In Suttles, G. D. and Zald, M. N. (eds.), The Challenges of Social Control (pp. 5270). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Edited by Wolff, Kurt H.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1990. The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sztompka, P. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tschannen-Moran, M., and Hoy, W. K.. 2000. “A Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Nature, Meaning, and Measurement of Trust.” Review of Educational Research 70(4): 547593.Google Scholar
Uslaner, E. M. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, M. E. (ed.). 1999. Democracy and Trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. 1993. “Calculativeness, Trust and Economic Organization.” Journal of Law and Economics 36(1): 453486.Google Scholar
Woolcock, M. 1998. “Social Capital and Economic Development.” Theory and Society 27 (2): 151207.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, R. 2004. “Trust as an Aspect of Social Structure.” In Alexander, J. C., Marx, C. T., and Williams, C (eds.), Self, Social Structure and Beliefs (pp. 145167). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T. 2003. “Cross-Societal Experimentation on Trust.” In Ostrom, E and Walker, J(eds.), Trust and Reciprocity (pp. 352–370). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Zucker, L. G. 1986. “Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure.” Research in Organizational Behavior 8: 51111.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×