Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:12:45.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Modeling the Individual

Bridging Nomothetic and Idiographic Levels of Analysis

from Part VI - Intensive Longitudinal Designs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

By
Peter C. M. Molenaar  and
Adriene M. Beltz
Edited by
Aidan G. C. Wright  and
Michael N. Hallquist
Aidan G. C. Wright
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Michael N. Hallquist
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

The necessity of using subject-specific data analysis of nonergodic psychological processes is explained while emphasizing the difference between interindividual and intraindividual variation. The chapter argues that subject-specific data analysis not only matches the principles underlying developmental systems theory, which is relevant to obtaining a comprehensive understanding of change in human psychopathology, but also enables testing of all principles of person-oriented theory, which is fundamental to the formation and implementation of individualized treatments. A new generalized perspective on measurement equivalence in subject-specific data analysis is introduced. The importance of adaptive optimal control of psychological processes within the context of subject-specific data analysis is emphasized. In addition, some broader aims of subject-specific data analysis are considered, including principled ways to bridge the nomothetic and idiographic levels of analysis.

Keywords

ergodicityintra- and interindividual variationprinciples of person-oriented theorymeasurement equivalenceoptimal control
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology , pp. 327 - 336
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beltz, A. M., Beekman, C., Molenaar, P. C. M., & Buss, K. A. (2013). Mapping Temporal Dynamics in Social Interactions with Unified Structural Equation Modeling: A Description and Demonstration Revealing Time-Dependent Sex Differences in Play Behavior. Applied Developmental Psychology, 17, 152–168.Google Scholar
Beltz, A. M., Wright, A. G. C., Sprague, B. N., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2016). Bridging the Nomothetic and Idiographic Approaches to the Analysis of Clinical Data. Assessment, 23, 447–458.Google Scholar
Bergman, L. R., Magnusson, D., & El-Khouri, B. (2003). Studying Individual Development in an Interactive Context: A Person-Oriented Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Birkhoff, G. (1931). Proof of the Ergodic Theorem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 17, 656–660.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the Mind: Conceptual Issues in Contemporary Psychometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bulteel, K., Tuerlinckx, F., Brose, A., & Ceulemans, E. (2016). Clustering Vector Autoregressive Models: Capturing Qualitative Differences in Within-Person Dynamics. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1540.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1952). The Three Basic Factor-Analytic Designs – Their Interrelations and Derivatives. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 499–520.Google Scholar
Ceulemans, E., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2006). Selecting among Three-Mode Principal Component Models of Different Types and Complexities: A Numerical Convex Hull Based Method. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59, 133–150.Google Scholar
Choe, G. H. (2005). Computational Ergodic Theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. D. (1954). Scientific Personality Diagnosis. Acta Psychologica, 10, 220–241.Google Scholar
Dolan, C. V. (2010). MKFM6: Multi-Group, Multi-Subject Stationary Time Series Modeling Based on the Kalman Filter (Computer Software). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Epskamp, S., Waldorp, L. J., Mottus, R., & Borsboom, D. (2017). Discovering Psychological Dynamics: The Gaussian Graphical Model in Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Data. arXiv:1609.04156v5 [stat.ME], 15 September.Google Scholar
Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J. T., Kiebel, S. J., Nichols, T. E., & Penny, W. D. (Eds.). (2007). Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, K. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2012). Group Search Algorithm Recovers Effective Connectivity Maps for Individuals in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Samples. NeuroImage, 63, 310–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., Iyer, S. P., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2014). Organizing Heterogeneous Samples Using Community Detection of GIMME-Derived Resting State Functional Networks. PLoS-ONE, 9, e91322.Google Scholar
Hannan, E. J. (1970). Multiple Time Series. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Isidori, A. (1985). Nonlinear Control Systems. London: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Lamiell, J. T. (2003). Beyond Individual and Group Differences: Human Individuality, Scientific Psychology, and William Stern’s Critical Personalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mäkikangas, A., & Kinnunen, U. (2016). The Person-Oriented Approach to Burnout: A Systematic Review. Burnout Research, 3, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M. (1987). Dynamic Assessment and Adaptive Optimisation of the Therapeutic Process. Behavioral Assessment, 9, 389–416.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A Manifesto on Psychology as Idiographic Science: Bringing the Person back into Scientific Psychology, This Time Forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 201–218.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2010a). Testing All Six Person-Oriented Principles in Dynamic Factor Analysis. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 255–259.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2010b). Note on Optimization of Psychotherapeutic Processes. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 208–213.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2014). Equivalent Dynamic Models. Sells Award Address. 54th Annual Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology Meeting, Nashville, TN, October 8‒11.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2015). On the Relation between Person-Oriented and Subject-Specific Approaches. Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 1, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The New Person-Specific Paradigm in Psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 112–117.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2015). Systems Methods for Developmental Research. In Overton, W. F. & Molenaar, P. C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science (7th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 652–682). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., & Newell, K. M. (Eds.). (2010). Individual Pathways of Change: Statistical Models for Analyzing Learning and Development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). The Relationship between the Structure of Interindividual and Intraindividual Variability: A Theoretical and Empirical Vindication of Developmental Systems Theory. In Staudinger, U. M. & Lindenberger, U. (Eds.), Understanding Human Development: Dialogues with Lifespan Psychology (pp. 339–360). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., Sinclair, K. O., Rovine, M. J., Ram, N., & Corneal, S. E. (2009). Analyzing Developmental Processes on an Individual Level Using Non-Stationary Time Series Modeling. Developmental Psychology, 45, 260–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., Lerner, R. M., & Newell, K. M. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of Developmental Systems Theory & Methodology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Molenaar, P. C. M., Beltz, A. M., Gates, K. M., & Wilson, S. J. (2016). State Space Modeling of Time-Varying Contemporaneous and Lagged Relations in Connectivity Maps. NeuroImage, 125, 791–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesselroade, J. R., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2016). Some Behavioral Measurement Concerns and Proposals. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 396–412.Google Scholar
Schiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological Momentary Assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–31.Google Scholar
Sterba, S. K., & Bauer, D. J. (2010a). Matching Method with Theory in Person-Oriented Developmental Psychopathology Research. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterba, S. K., & Bauer, D. J. (2010b). Statistically Evaluating Person-Oriented Methods Revisited. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 287–294.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J., Molenaar, P. C. M., Lyra, M. C. D. P., & Chaudary, N. (Eds.). (2009). Dynamic Process Methodology in the Social and Developmental Sciences. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Voelkle, M. C., Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., & Lindenberger, U. (2014). Toward a Unified Framework for the Study of Between-Person and Within-Person Structures: Building a Bridge between Two Research Paradigms. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 193–213.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Molenaar, P. C. M., Harsh, S., Freeman, K., Xie, J., Zhou, J., … Rovine, M. J. (2014). Personalized State-Space Modeling of Glucose Dynamics for Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuously Monitored Glucose, Insulin Dose and Meal Intake: An Extended Kalman Filter Approach. Journal of Diabetes Technology and Science, 8, 331–345.Google Scholar
Ward, J. H. Jr. (1963). Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wohlwill, J. F. (1973). The Study of Behavioral Development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×