Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:10:35.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Innovation Law and Policy Choices for Climate Change-Related Public–Private Partnerships

from Part III - Environmental Issues: Green Technologies and Agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2018

By
Joshua D. Sarnoff  and
Margaret Chon
Edited by
Margaret Chon ,
Pedro Roffe  and
Ahmed Abdel-Latif
Margaret Chon
Affiliation:
Seattle University School of Law
Pedro Roffe
Affiliation:
International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development
Ahmed Abdel-Latif
Affiliation:
International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi
Get access

Summary

This chapter addresses choices that government policy-makers, private actors, and certain public-private partnerships (PPPs) must make following the Paris Agreement. It discusses the global inequalities that are likely to result from existing unequal patterns of creation and distribution of climate change technologies and associated IP ownership rights. It discusses how costs of accessing climate change technologies protected by IP rights may further exacerbate the current unequal impacts and differential climate change obligations of countries. It presents a typology of public-sector choices in innovation funding and explains how these basic policies may affect the nature, direction, and roles of PPPs in the climate change and energy development domains. It explains why geographical imbalances of wealth and innovation capacity may pose serious problems for technology transfer, particularly when attempting to leverage PPP efforts across jurisdictional borders. It proposes 3 approaches to overcoming the constraints that may result from public-sector policies that rely primarily on PPPs, on private markets, and on IP rights to fund development and transfer of climate change-related technologies.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Public-Private Partnerships, Intellectual Property Governance, and Sustainable Development , pp. 245 - 288
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdel-Latif, Ahmed, et al., Overcoming the Impasse on Intellectual Property and Climate Change at the UNFCCC: A Way Forward, ICTSD Policy Brief No. 11, November 2011 (December 2011).Google Scholar
Agostino, Deborah, Arena, Marika, Azzone, Giovanni, Dal Molin, Martina, & Masella, Cristina, Developing a Performance Measurement System for Public Research Centers, 7 Int. J. of Bus. Sci. & Applied Mgmt. 43 (2012).Google Scholar
Agreement Relating to Community Patents, Dec. 15, 1989, art. 27.Google Scholar
Anderson, Lauren, World Bank calls for Broad Shift in Thinking to hasten WASH, SDG Implementation (Aug. 29, 2017), http://sdg.iisd.org/news/world-bank-calls-for-broad-shift-in-thinking-to-hasten-wash-sdg-implementation/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2017–08–29%20-%20SDG%20Update%20AE&utm_content=2017–08–29%20-%20SDG%20Update%20AE+CID_1ef3d184061a4a424444fd3f204597a4&utm_source=cm&utm_term=World%20Bank%20Calls%20for%20Broad%20Shift%20in%20Thinking%20to%20Hasten%20WASH%20SDG%20Implementation (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Andersen, Stephen O. et al., Technical Summary, in Methodological and Technological Issues in Technology Transfer: A Special Report of IPCC Working Group III 15–16 (2000), www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/spm/srtt-en.pdf (last visited Oct. 10, 2017).Google Scholar
Arun, Korhan & Yildirim, Durmus C., Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Intellectual Property, Patents and R&D, 7 Queen Mary J. Intell. Prop. 226 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, David, Dorn, David, Hanson, Gordon H., Pisano, Gary, & Shu, Pian, Foreign Competition and Domestic Innovation: Evidence from U.S. Patents (NBER Working Paper No. 22879, Nov. 2016), www.nber.org/papers/w22879 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Balta, Wayne, Welcome to the Eco-Patent Commons, CEF EcoInnovator Blog, www.corporateecoforum.com/welcome-to-the-eco-patent-commons/ (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Barnett, Jonathan, Property as Process: How Innovation Markets Select Innovation Regimes, 119 Yale L. J. 384 (2009).Google Scholar
Barton, John H., Intellectual Property and Access to Clean Energy Technologies in Developing Countries: An Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic, Biofuel, and Wind Technologies, International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development Issue Paper No. 2, http://ictsd.net/downloads/2008/11/intellectual-property-and-access-to-clean-energy-technologies-in-developing-countries_barton_ictsd-2007.pdf (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Barton, John H., Mitigating Climate Change Through Technology Transfer: Addressing the Needs of Developing Countries, Chatham House, Energy, Environment and Development Programme: Programme Paper 08/02 (2008).Google Scholar
Bennett, Alan B., Reservation of Rights for Humanitarian Uses, in Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agriculture Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices 41 (Anatole Krattiger et al. eds., 2007).Google Scholar
Boie, Bertram, The Protection of Intellectual Property Rights through Bilateral Investment Treaties: Is there a TRIPS-plus Dimension? (NCRR Trade Regulation, Working Paper No. 2010/19, Nov. 2010), www.wti.org/media/filer_public/c5/47/c5475d4a-f97c-4a8b-a12a-4ae491c6abb3/the_protection_of_iprs_through_bits.pdf (last visited Jun. 17, 2016).Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. & Risse, Thomas, Public-Private Partnerships: Effective and Legitimate Tools of Transnational Governance?, in Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the Twenty-First Century 195, 196 (Edgar Grande & Louis W. Pauly eds., 2005).Google Scholar
Bouchard, Ron, Qualifying Intellectual Property II: A New Innovation Index for Pharmaceutical Patents & Products, 28 Santa Clara Comp. & High Tech. L.J. 287 (2011).Google Scholar
Branstetter, Lee, Foley, C. Fritz, & Saggi, Kamal, Has the Shift to Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Promoted Technology Transfer, FDI, and Industrial Development?, 2 W.I.P.O. J. 93 (2010).Google Scholar
Brewer, Thomas L., Technology Transfer and Climate Change: International Flows, Barriers, and Frameworks, in Climate Change, Trade and Competitiveness (Lael Brainerd and Isaac Sorkin eds.).Google Scholar
Brewer, Thomas L., The Trade Regime and the Climate Regime: Institutional Evolution and Adaptation, 3 Climate Pol’y 329 (2003).Google Scholar
Brown, Phillip, Lauder, Hugh & Ashton, David, Education, Globalization and the Future of the Knowledge Economy, 7 Eur. Educ. Res. J. 131 (2008), http://orca.cf.ac.uk/19085/1/Brown%20Lauder.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Burleson, Elizabeth, Energy Policy, Intellecutal Property, and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change, 18 Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs. 69 (2009).Google Scholar
Calboli, Irene & Lee, Edward eds., Research Handbook On Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports (2017).Google Scholar
Canada NAFTA Decision, Case No. UNCT/14/2, final award, (Mar. 16, 2017), www.ippractice.ca/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Lilly-v-Canada-NAFTA-Arb-Award.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Carrier, Michael A., Innovation for the 21st Century: Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law (2009).Google Scholar
Carrier, Michael, Innovation for the 21st Century: A Response to Seven Critics, 61 Ala. L. Rev. 597 (2010).Google Scholar
Carroll, Michael W., Copyright, Fair Use, and Creative Commons Licenses, in Risk and Entrepreneurship in Libraries: Seizing Opportunities for Change 18 (Pamela Bluh & Cindy Hepfer eds., 2009).Google Scholar
Carroll, Michael W., One Size Does Not Fit All: A Framework for Tailoring Intellectual Property Rights, 70 Ohio St. L.J. 1361 (2009).Google Scholar
Carroll, Michael W., The Problem of Uniformity Cost in Intellectual Property Law, 55 Am. U. L. Rev. 55 (2008).Google Scholar
Cavazos, Ricardo & Lippoldt, Douglas, The Strengthening of IPR Protection: Policy Complements, 2 W.I.P.O. J. 99 (2010).Google Scholar
Cheung, Tai Ming, Mahnken, Thomas, Seligsohn, Deborah, Pollpeter, Kevin, Anderson, Eric, & Yang, Fan (University of California Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation), Planning for Innovation: Understanding China’s Plans for Technological, Energy, Industrial, and Defense Development (2016), www.uscc.gov/Research/planning-innovation-understanding-china’s-plans-technological-energy-industrial-and-defense (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Chien, Colleen V., Opening up the Patent System: Exclusionary and Diffusionary Levers in Patent Law, 89 So. Calif. L. Rev. 793, 801 (2016).Google Scholar
Chatham House Workshop Report, IPRs and the Innovation and Diffusion of Climate Technologies (2007).Google Scholar
Choi, Jay P., Compulsory Licensing as an Antitrust Remedy, 2 W.I.P.O. J. 74 (2010).Google Scholar
Chon, Margaret, Trademark Goodwill as a Public Good: Brands and Innovations in Corporate Social Responsibility, 21 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 277 (2017).Google Scholar
Cohen, Wesley M., Nelson, Richard R., & Walsh, John P., Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (Or Not) (Nat’l Bureau of Econ. Research, Working Paper No. W7552, 2000), www.nber.org/papers/w7552 (last visited Jun. 16, 2016).Google Scholar
Cohen, Wesley M. & Levin, Richard C., Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure, in 2 Handbook of Industrial Organization 1059 (Richard Schmalensee & Robert Willig eds., 1989).Google Scholar
Cohen, Wesley M. et al., Firm Size & R&D Intensity: A Re-Examination, 35 J. Industrial Econ. 543 (1987).Google Scholar
Competition & Tax Law, Declaration on the Three-Step Test, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property (2009), www.ip.mpg.de (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Conservation Commons, ConserveOnline, http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/commons/ (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Consortium Partners, CTCN, www.ctc-n.org/about-ctcn/consortium-partners (last visited Oct. 10, 2017).Google Scholar
Copenhagen Economics, Are IPRs a Barrier to the Transfer of Climate Change Technologies?, 4 (2009), http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/february/tradoc_142371.pdf (last visited Jul. 23, 2013).Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M., Multilateral Agreements and Policy Opportunities, Policy Dialogue 11(2008), http://policydialogue.org/files/events/Correa_Multilateral_Agreements_and_Policy_Opportunities.pdf (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M., Review of the TRIPS Agreement: Fostering the Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries, 2 J. World Intel. Prop. 939 (1999).Google Scholar
Contreras, Jorge L., Patent Pledges: Between the Public Domain and Market Exclusivity, 2015 Mich. St. L. Rev. 787.Google Scholar
Creative Commons, Open Science, https://creativecommons.org/about/program-areas/open-science (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
David, Paul A., Mitigating “Anticommons” Harms to Research, in Science and Technology: New Moves in “Legal Jujitsu” against Unintended Adverse Consequences of the Exploitation of Intellectual Property Rights on Results of Publicly and Privately Funded Research, 2 W.I.P.O. J. 59 (2010).Google Scholar
Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Martin, Ralf, & Bassi, Samuela, Climate Change Policy, Innovation, and Growth, London Sch. of Econ. & Pol. Sci., at 9–19, www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Dechezlepretre-et-al-policy-brief-Jan-2016.pdf (last visited Jun. 16, 2016).Google Scholar
Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Glachant, Matthieu, Haščič, Ivan, Johnstone, Nick, & Ménière, Yann, Invention and Transfer of Climate Change-Mitigation Technologies: A Global Analysis, 5 Rev. Envt’l. Econ. Pol’y 109 (2011).Google Scholar
Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Glachant, Matthieu, Hascic, Ivan, Johnstone, Nick, & Ménière, Yann, Invention and Transfer of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies on a Global Scale: A Study Drawing on Patent Data 4 (CERNA, Mines Paris Tech, Agence Française de Développement, Working Paper, 2008), https://sallan.org/pdf-docs/Dechezlepretre.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Invention and Transfer of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies on a Global Scale: A Study Drawing on Patent Data 4 (CERNA, Mines Paris Tech, Agence Française de Développement, Working Paper, November 2008), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.153.3100&rep=rep1&type=pdf (last visited Jul. 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Dechezleprêtre, Antoine & Popp, D., Fiscal and Regulatory Instruments for Clean Technology Development in the European Union, London Sch. of Econ. & Pol. Sci., Policy Paper, at 10, 18–20 (Jul. 2015), www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publication/fiscal-and-regulatory-instruments-for-clean-technology-development-in-the-european-union/ (last visited Jun. 18, 2016) (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Deere-Birkbeck, Carolyn, Global Governance in the Context of Climate Change: The Challenges of Increasingly Complex Risk Parameters, 85 Int’l Affairs 1173 (2009).Google Scholar
Derclaye, Estelle, Not Only Innovation But Also Collaboration, Funding, Goodwill and Commitment: Which Role for Patent Laws in Post-Copenhagen Climate Change Action, 9 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 663 (2010).Google Scholar
Díaz-García, Cristina, González-Moreno, Ángela, & Sáez-Martínez, Francisco J., Eco-Innovation: Insights from a Literature Review, 17 Innovation: Organization & Management 6 (2015).Google Scholar
Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper, Reconsidering Experimental Use, Akron L. Rev. (Forthcoming Jun. 2017) https://ssrn.com/abstract=3010401 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Durán-Romero, Gemma & Urraca-Ruiz, Ana, Climate Change and Eco-Innovation. A Patent Data Assessment of Environmentally Sound Technologies, 17 Innovation: Org. & Mgmt. 115 (2015).Google Scholar
Harry, Dykman, Patent Licensing Within the Manufacturer’s Aircraft Association (MAA), 46 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 646 (1964).Google Scholar
European Commission Decision of 13 May 2009, COMP/37.990 (Intel) ¶¶ 1749–53, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/37990/37990_3581_11.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
European Parliament and European Council Directive 2004/27, art. 1.8(6), [2004] OJ L136/34 (EC), https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-1/dir_2004_27/dir_2004_27_en.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
European Patent Office [EPO], Overview of the Latin American and Caribbean Clean Energy Potential and Exploitation Levels, http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/2841b369787d5e72c1257da800335111/$FILE/patents_Latin_America_summary_en.pdf.Google Scholar
EPO-United Nations Environmental Programme [UNEP], Patents and Clean Energy Technologies in Africa, http://www.epo.org/news-issues/technology/sustainable-technologies/clean-energy/patents-africa.html (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Fair, Robert, Does Climate Change Justify Compulsory Licensing of Green Technology, 6 B.Y.U. Int’l L. & Mgmt. Rev. 21 (2009).Google Scholar
Fankauser, Sam, Bowen, Alex, Calel, Raphael, Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Grover, David, Rydge, James, & Sato, Misato, Who Will Win the Green Race? In Search of Environmental Competitiveness and Innovation, 23 Global Envtl. Change 902 (2013).Google Scholar
Fifth Assessment Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) at 14 (2014), (“Regional Key Risks and Potential for Risk Reduction”), www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf (last visited Jun. 16, 2016).Google Scholar
Figueres, Christiana, Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim, Whiteman, Gail, Rockström, Johan, Hobley, Anthony, & Rahmstorf, Stefan, Comment: Three Years to Safeguard Our Climate, 546 Nature 593 (Jun. 29, 2017).Google Scholar
Fisher, William, Intellectual Property and Innovation: Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Perspectives, 37 Industrial Property, Innovation, and the Knowledge-Based Economy, Beleidsstudies Technologie Economie (2001), cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/tfisher/Innovation.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Foray, Dominique, Technology Transfer in the TRIPS Age: The Need for New Types of Partnerships between the Least Developed and Most Advanced Economies (2009), www.ictsd.org/downloads/2012/02/technology-transfer-in-the-trips-age.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Frischmann, Brett M., An Economic Theory of Infrastructure and Commons Management, 89 Minn. L. Rev. 917 (2005).Google Scholar
Frischmann, Brett M., Infrastucture: The Social Value of Shared Resources (2012).Google Scholar
Frischmann, Brett, Innovation and Institutions: Rethinking the Economics of U.S. Science and Technology Policy, 24 Vt. L. Rev. 347 (2000).Google Scholar
Gantz, David A. & Ala’i, Padideh, Climate Change Innovation, Products and Services Under the GATT/WTO System, in Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Climate Change 271 (Joshua D. Sarnoff, ed., 2016).Google Scholar
Ge, Mengpin, Friedrich, Johannes, & Damassa, Thomas, 6 Graphs Explain the World’s Top 10 Emitters (Cumulative CO2 Emissions 1850–2011), World Resources Institute (2014), www.wri.org/blog/2014/11/6-graphs-explain-world%E2%80%99s-top-10-emitters (last visited Jun. 16, 2016).Google Scholar
Global Environmental Facility, Organization, www.thegef.org/about/organization (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Governing Knowledge Commons (Brett M. Frischmann, Michael J. Madison, & Katherine J. Strandburg eds., 2014).Google Scholar
Green Climate Fund, GFC in Numbers, 2017, www.greenclimate.fund/documents/20182/24871/GCF_in_Numbers.pdf/226fc825-3c56-4d71-9a4c-60fd83e5fb03 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Green Exchange (2012), www.greenexchange.com (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
The Guardian, Earth’s Oceans are Warming 13% Faster Than Thought, and Accelerating (Mar. 10, 2017), www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/mar/10/earths-oceans-are-warming-13-faster-than-thought-and-accelerating, (last visited Oct. 10, 2017).Google Scholar
Hall, Bronwyn & Helmers, C., The Role of Patent Protection in (Clean/Green) Technologies 7 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 16323, 2010), www.nber.org/papers/w16323 (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Hazucha, Branislav, International Standards and Essential Patents: From International Harmonization to Competition of Technologies (2010).Google Scholar
Hemphill, C. Scott, Network Neutrality and the False Promise of Zero-Price Regulation, 25 Yale J. Reg. 135 (2008).Google Scholar
Holzapfel, Henrik & Sarnoff, Joshua D., A Cross-Atlantic Dialog on Experimental Use and Research Tools, 48 IDEA 123 (2008).Google Scholar
International Council on Human Rights Policy, Beyond Technology Transfer: Protecting Human Rights in a Climate-Constrained World, in Sarnoff, Joshua D., Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Climate Change (2016).Google Scholar
Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Int’l., Inc., 137 S.Ct. 1523 (2017).Google Scholar
International HapMap Project (2011), http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel & Lybecker, Kristina, Challenges to Technology Transfer: A Literature Review of the Constraints on Environmental Technology Dissemination (2009) http://ssrn.com/abstract=1456222 (last visited Jul. 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Joskow, Paul L. & Rose, Nancy L., The Effects of Economic Regulation, in Handbook of Industrial Organization 1464 (1989).Google Scholar
Kapczynski, Amy, The Cost of Price: Why and How to Get Beyond Intellectual Property Internalism, 59 UCLA L. Rev. 970 (2012).Google Scholar
Khan, B. Zorina, Antitrust and Innovation Before the Sherman Act, 77 Antitrust L.J. 757 (2011).Google Scholar
Kim, Chulhyun & Kim, Moon-Soo, Identifying Core Environmental Technologies Through Patent Analysis, 17 Innovation: Org. & Mgt. 139 (2015).Google Scholar
Kristensen, Henrik, Vinding, K. F., Grieger, K., & Hansen, S. F., Adopting Eco-Innovation in Danish Polymer Industry Working with Nanotechnology: Drivers, Barriers and Future Strategies, 6 Nanotech. L. & Bus. 416 (2009).Google Scholar
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, 568 U.S. 519 (2013).Google Scholar
Kunstadt, R. & Maggioni, I., A Proposed “U.S. Public Patent Pool,” les Nouvelles, 10 (2011).Google Scholar
Lee, Bernice, Iliev, Ilian, & Preston, Felix, A Chatham House Report: Who Owns Our Low Carbon Future? Intellectual Property and Energy Technologies, Royal Institute of International Affairs, (2009).Google Scholar
Lee, Peter, Inverting the Logic of Scientific Discovery: Applying Common Law Patentable Subject Matter Doctrine to Constrain Patents on Biotechnology Research Tools, 19 Harv. J.L. & Tech 84 (2005).Google Scholar
Lee, Peter, Patents, Paradigm-Shifts, and Progress in Biomedical Science, 114 Yale L.J. 69 (2004).Google Scholar
Lee, Peter, Toward a Distributive Commons in Patent Law, 2009 Wis. L. Rev. 974 (2009).Google Scholar
Lemley, Mark, Industry-Specific Antitrust Policy for Innovation, 2011 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 637 (2011).Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence, Code: Version 2.0 (2006).Google Scholar
Levin, Richard C., Klevorick, Alvin K., Nelson, Richard R., & Winter, Sidney G., Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development, 18 Brookings Papers on Econ. Activity 783 (1987).Google Scholar
Li, Yahong, Imitation to Innovation in China: The Role of Patents in Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries 70 (2010).Google Scholar
Liberti, Lahra, Intellectual Property Rights in International Investment Agreements (OECD, Working Paper No. 2010/01, 2010), www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/WP-2010_1.pdf (last visited Jun. 17, 2016).Google Scholar
Love, James & Hubbard, Tim, Paying for Public Goods, in Code: Collaborative Ownership and the Digital Economy 207 (James Love, Tim Hubbard, & Rishab Aiyer Ghosh eds., 2005).Google Scholar
Madison, Michael, Frischmann, Brett M., & Strandburg, Katherine, The University as Constructed Cultural Commons, 30 Wash. U. J. L. & Pol’y 365 (2009).Google Scholar
Magat, Wesley A. & Viscusi, W. Kip, Informational Approaches to Regulation (1992).Google Scholar
Mandel, Gregory N., When to Open Infrastructure Access, 35 Ecology L. Q. 205 (2008).Google Scholar
Manne, Geoffrey, Assuming More Than We Know About Innovation Markets: A Review of Michael Carrier’s Innovation in the 21st Century, 61 Ala. L. Rev. 553 (2010).Google Scholar
Mara, Kaitlin, New Climate Technologies Rarely Reaching Developing Countries, Panel Says, IP Watch (Jul. 13, 2010), www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2010/07/13/new-climate-technologies-rarely-reaching-developing-countries-panel-says (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith, Research and Development Subsidies: A Need for WTO Disciplines? E15 Initiative, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development [ICTSD] and World Economic Forum (2015), http://e15initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/E15_Subsidies_Maskus_final.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith E., The Curious Economics of Parallel Imports, 2 W.I.P.O. J. 123 (2010).Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith E. & Okediji, Ruth, Intellectual Property Rights and International Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change: Risks, Opportunities and Policy Options, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development 10 (2010), http://ictsd.org/i/publications/97782/ (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith E. & Okediji, Ruth L., Legal and Economic Perspectives on International Technology Transfer in Environmentally Sound Technologies, in Intellectual Property Rights: Legal and Economic Challenges for Development 392 (2014).Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith & Ridley, William, Intellectual Property-Related Preferential Trade Agreements and the Composition of Trade (draft of Mar. 17, 2017) (on file with the author).Google Scholar
Merck KGAA v. Integra LifeSciences I Ltd., 545 U.S. 193 (2005).Google Scholar
Merges, Robert P. & Nelson, Richard R., On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope, 90 Colum. L. Rev. 839 (1990).Google Scholar
Mimura, Carol, Technology Licensing for the Benefit of the Developing World: UC Berkeley’s Socially Responsible Licensing Program, 21 J. Assoc. Univ. Tech. Managers 15 (2007).Google Scholar
Montes, Manuel F., Industrialization, Inequality and Sustainability: What Kinds of Industry Policy Do We Need?, South Center Policy Brief (Aug. 2017), www.southcentre.int/policy-brief-44-august-2017/ (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
National Academies of Science, Engineering & Medicine, Returns to Federal Investments in the Innovation System: Proceedings of a Workshop – in Brief, (Oct. 2017), https://doi.org/10.17226/24905 (last visited Oct. 12, 2017).Google Scholar
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Batelle, www.battelle.org/our-work/laboratory-management/national-renewable-energy-laboratory (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
National Research Council, Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public Interest, National Academies Press 7 (2010).Google Scholar
O’Connor, Sean, Origins of Patent Exhaustion: Jacksonian Politics, ‘Patent Farming,’ and the Basis of the Bargain (Mar. 8, 2017), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2920738 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, National Systems for Financing Innovation (1995).Google Scholar
Nesta, Lionel, Vona, Francesco, & Nicolli, Francesco, Environmental Policies, Product Market Regulation and Innovation in Renewable Energy (2012) (unpublished manuscript), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2192441 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, 639 Fed. App’x 639 (Fed. Cir. 2016), cert. granted, 137 S.Ct. 2239 (U.S. Nov. 23, 2016).Google Scholar
Oliva, Maria J. et al., Climate Change, Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (2008), http://ictsd.org/i/publications/31159 (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar
OMB 2013 Budget Report (Apr. 29, 2013).Google Scholar
Ordover, Janusz A., Economic Foundations and Considerations in Protecting Industrial and Intellectual Property, 53 Antitrust L. J. 503 (1984).Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions (1990).Google Scholar
Panel Report, Canada – Patent Protection of Pharmaceutical Products, WTO Doc. WT/DS114/R, ¶¶ 7.54–7.57, 7.69 (adopted Apr. 7, 2000), www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/7428d.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Parson, Edward A., Starting the Dialog on Climate Engineering Governance: A World Commission, Centre for International Governance Innovation, www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/Fixing%20Climate%20Governance%20PB%20no8_0.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Peritz, Rudolph J. R., Competition Within Intellectual Property Regimes: The Instance of Patent Rights, in Intellectual Property and Competition Law: New Frontiers 27 (Steven Anderman & Ariel Ezrachi eds., 2011).Google Scholar
Polar Information Commons, Welcome to the Polar Information Commons (PIC), www.polarcommons.org/ (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Porter, Michael E., Clusters of Innovation: Regional Foundations of U.S. Competitiveness, Council on Competitiveness (2001).Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W., Owen-Smith, Jason, & Smith-Doerr, Laurel, The Science Of Science Policy: A Handbook (Kaye H. Fealing et al. eds., 2011).Google Scholar
Prakash, Aseem, Greening the Firm: The Politics of Corporate Environmentalism (2000).Google Scholar
Prins, Gwyn et al., The Hartwell Paper: A New Direction for Climate Policy After the Crash of 2009, 5 (2010), http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27939/ (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Public Library of Science, Welcome to PLOS, www.plos.org (last visited Nov. 18, 2017).Google Scholar
Radka, Mark, Some Perspectives About the Climate Technology Centre/Climate Technology Network, U.N. Environment Programme (2012), http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/ad_hoc_working_groups/lca/application/pdf/some_perspectives_about_the_ctc_ctn.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Rai, Arti K. & Eisenberg, Rebecca S., Bayh-Dole Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine, 66 Law & Contemp. Probs. 294 (2003).Google Scholar
Reichman, Jerome H., Comment: Compulsory Licensing of Patented Pharmaceutical Inventions: Evaluating the Options, 37 J.L. Med. & Ethics 253 (2009).Google Scholar
Reichman, Jerome H., Intellectual Property in International Perspective: Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law Symposium, 48 Hous. L. Rev. 1137 (2009).Google Scholar
Reynolds, Jesse L., Solar Climate Engineering, Law, and Regulation, in The Oxford Handbook on the Law and Regulation of Technology 799 (Roger Brownsword, Eloise Scotford & Karen Yeung eds., 2016), https://ssrn.com/abstract=2862471 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Reynolds, Jesse L., Contreras, Jorge L., & Sarnoff, Joshua D., Solar Climate Engineering and Intellectual Property: Toward a Research Commons, 18 Minn. J. L., Sci. & Tech. 1 (2017).Google Scholar
Rimmer, Matthew, Intellectual Property and Climate Change: Inventing Clean Technologies (2001).Google Scholar
Rismann, Jeffrey & Orvis, Robbie, Carbon Capture and Storage: An Expensive Option for Reducing U.S. CO2 Emissions, Forbes (May 3, 2017), www.forbes.com/sites/energyinnovation/2017/05/03/carbon-capture-and-storage-an-expensive-option-for-reducing-u-s-co2-emissions/#420d40956482 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Rosch, J. Thomas, Antitrust Regulation of Innovation Markets: Remarks at the ABA Antitrust Intellectual Property Conference (2009), www.ftc.gov/speeches/rosch/090205innovationspeech.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Ruggles, C.O., Problems of Public-Utility Rate Regulation and Fair Return, 32 J. Pol. Econ. 543 (1924).Google Scholar
Ruttan, Vernon W., Is War Necessary for Economic Growth? Military Procurement and Technology Development (2006).Google Scholar
Sallet, Jonathan, Paisley, Ed & Masterman, Justin, The Geography of Innovation: The Federal Government and the Growth of Regional Innovation Clusters, Science Progress 1 (2009), www.scienceprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/eda_paper.pdf (last visited Jul. 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Sampath, Padmashree Gehl & Roffe, Pedro, Unpacking the International Technology Transfer Debate: Fifty Years and Beyond Research, ICTSD Issue Paper No. 36, 17, 19 (Nov. 2012), www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2012/11/unpacking-the-international-technology-transfer-debate-fifty-years-and-beyond.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela, Reverse Engineering Under Siege, Berkeley School of Information 1–3, http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~pam/papers/CACM%20on%20Bunner.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Sarnoff, Joshua D., Government Choices in Innovation Funding (with Reference to Climate Change), 62 Emory L. J. 1087 (2013).Google Scholar
Sarnoff, Joshua D., Intellectual Property and Climate Change, with an Emphasis on Patents and Technology Transfer, in The Oxford Handbook of International Climate Change Law 391 (Gray, Kevin R., Richard Tarasofsky, & Cinnamon P. Carlarne eds., 2016).Google Scholar
Sarnoff, Joshua D., Patent Eligible Inventions after Bilski: History and Theory, 63 Hastings L. J. 53 (2011).Google Scholar
Sarnoff, Joshua D., The Likely Mismatch Between Federal R&D Funding and Desired Innovation, 18 Vanderbilt J. Enter. & Tech. L. 363 (2016).Google Scholar
Sarnoff, Joshua D., The Patent System and Climate Change, 16 Va. J. L. & Tech. 301 (2011).Google Scholar
Sarnoff, Joshua D. & Holman, Christopher, Recent Developments Affecting the Enforcement, Procurement, and Licensing of Research Tool Patents, 23 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 1299 (2008).Google Scholar
Sarnoff, Joshua D. (ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Climate Change (2016).Google Scholar
Schuiling, R. D. & Tickel, Oliver, Olivine Against Climate Change and Ocean Acidification, Innovation Concepts, www.innovationconcepts.eu/res/literatuurSchuiling/olivineagainstclimatechange23.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Science Commons, About Science Commons, http://sciencecommons.org/about (last visited Nov. 19, 2017) (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Scotchmer, Suzanne, Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law, Winter 1991 J. Econ. Persp. 33 (2009).Google Scholar
So, Anthony D., Sampat, Bhaven N, Rai, Arti K, Cook-Deegan, Robert, Reichman, Jerome H, Weissman, Robert, & Kapczynski, Amy, Is Bayh-Dole good for developing countries? Lessons from the US experience, 6 PLoS Biol. (2008) http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0060262 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Srinivas, K. Ravi, Climate Change, Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights, Research and Information System for Developing Countries, Discussion Paper No. 153, 26 (2009), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1440742 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E., Lecture, Economic Foundations of Intellectual Property Rights, 57 Duke L. J. 1693 (2008).Google Scholar
Strandburg, Katherine J., Users as Innovators: Implications for Patent Doctrine, 79 U. Colo. L. Rev. 467 (2008).Google Scholar
Styianou, Konstantinos, An Innovation-Centric Approach of Telecommunications Infrastructure Regulation, 16 Va. J.L. & Tech. 221 (2011).Google Scholar
Sundaram, Jomo Kwame, Chowdhury, Anis, Sharma, Krishnan, & Platz, Daniel, Public-Private Partnerships and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Fit for Purpose? 6 (U.N. Dept. of Econ. & Soc. Affairs, DESA Working Paper No. 148, ST/ESA/2016/DWP/148, Feb. 2016).Google Scholar
Szakalski, Dustin, Progress in the Aircraft Industry and the Role of Patent Pools and Cross-Licensing Agreements, 15 UCLA J. L. & Tech. 1 (2011).Google Scholar
Takalo, Tuomas, Rationales and Instruments for Public Innovation Policies, Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers, Paper No. 1 (2013), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2217502 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
United Nations [U.N.] Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action Under the Convention Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention on its Seventh Session, U.N. Doc. FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/14, at 156 (Nov. 20, 2009).Google Scholar
U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs [UNDESA], Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
UNDESA, World Economic and Social Survey 2009 (2009).Google Scholar
UNDESA, World Economic and Social Survey 2010 (2010).Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme [UNEP], The Adaptation Gap Finance Report 2016, at 3 (May 2016), http://web.unep.org/adaptationgapreport/2016 (last visited Jun. 16, 2016).Google Scholar
UNEP, EPO and ICTSD, Patents and Clean Energy: Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Policy: Final Report (2010), http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/cc5da4b168363477c12577ad00547289/$FILE/patents_clean_energy_study_en.pdf (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar
U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change [UNFCCC], 1771 U.N.T.S. 107, signed Jun. 1992, entered into force Mar. 21, 1994.Google Scholar
UNFCCC, Paris Agreement, FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1, Draft Decision –/CP.21 Annex (2015), http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf (last visited Dec. 21, 2015).Google Scholar
UNFCCC, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventeenth Session, Held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011: Decision 4/CP.17 Technology Executive Committee – Modalities and Procedures, UNFCCC, Report No. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1 ¶ 4 (a)-(f) (2011).Google Scholar
UNFCCC, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Eighteenth Session, Held in Doha from 26 November to 8 December 2012, UNFCCC, Report No. FCCC/CP/2012/8/Add.2. ¶ 10, (2012).Google Scholar
UNFCCC, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Nineteenth Session, Held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013: Decision 3/CP19, Long-term Climate Finance, UNFCCC, Report No. FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1 ¶¶ 7–9 (2013).Google Scholar
UNFCCC, Report on Activities and Performance of the Technology Executive Committee for 2012, UNFCCC, Report No. FCCC/SB/2012/2 ¶ 35(g) (2012).Google Scholar
UNFCCC, Support for Implementing Climate Technology Activities, TT:CLEAR, http://unfccc.int/ttclear/support/technology-mechanism.html (last visited Oct. 10, 2017).Google Scholar
UNFCCC, Technology Mechanism (2013), http://unfccc.int/ttclear/templates/render_cms_page?TEM_home (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
UNFCCC, TT:CLEAR, http://unfccc.int/ttclear/support/technology-mechanism.html (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
UNFCCC Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action Under the Convention, Ideas and proposals on the elements contained in paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan, 23 UNFCCC (2009), http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/awglca5/eng/misc01.pdf.Google Scholar
UNFCCC Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action Under the Convention, Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention on its Seventh Session, UNFCCC Doc. No. FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/14, 156 (2009), http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/awglca7/eng/14.pdf.UNFCCC, Draft Decision CP.16, Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (2010), ¶¶ IV.A.98–99, http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_16/application/pdf/cop16_lca.pdf (last visited Nov. 23, 2015).Google Scholar
[U.N.] Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, Sustainable Development Goal 9, U.N. Dep’t of Econ. and Soc. Affairs, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg9 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
[U.N.] Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, Sustainable Development Goal 13, U.N. Dep’t of Econ. and Soc. Affairs, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg13 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
[U.N.] Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, Sustainable Development Goal 17, U.N. Dep’t of Econ. and Soc. Affairs, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg17 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
U.S. Code 15 U.S.C. 3710 §12(d)(1) (1986) ([Commerce and trade] Cooperative research and development agreements).Google Scholar
17 U.S.C. §506(a) (2006) ([Copyrights] Criminal offenses).Google Scholar
18 U.S.C. §2319(a) (2006) (Criminal infringement of a copyright).Google Scholar
35 U.S.C. §201(b) (2006) ([Patents] Definitions).Google Scholar
35 U.S.C. § 202(c)(4) (2006) ([Patents] Disposition of rights).Google Scholar
35 U.S.C. § 203(a) (2006) ([Patents] March-in rights).Google Scholar
35 U.S.C. § 207(a)(2) (2006) ([Patents] Domestic and foreign protection of federally owned inventions).Google Scholar
35 U.S.C. § 271(e) (2006) ([Patents] Infringement of Patent).Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. §4701 et seq. (2006) ([The Public Health and Welfare] Congressional findings and declaration of policy).Google Scholar
U.S. Department Energy Off. Sci., Human Genome Project Information (2011), www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/home.shtml (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/NNSA Overseas Presence Advisory Board’s Overseas Corps Training Program Agreement, http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/DOE-Overseas-Corps-Training-Program.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State, Memorandum of Understanding Signed Between the Government of India and the Government of the United States, (Nov. 30, 2009), https://2009–2017.state.gov/p/sca/rls/press/2009/132776.htm (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State, Memorandum of Understanding to Enhance Cooperation on Climate Change, Energy and Environment Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the People’s Republic of China (Jul. 2009), https://2009–2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2009/july/126592.htm (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [U.S. EPA], Climate Leadership Awards, http://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/awards/index.html (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
U.S. EPA, Energy Star® – The Power to Protect the Environment Through Energy Efficiency, EPA 430-R-03–008, 2–3 (2003).Google Scholar
U.S. EPA, Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Data, (2016), www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/global.html (last visited Jun. 15, 2016).Google Scholar
U.S. Global Climate Change Research Program, Climate Science Special Report (CSSR) (Jun. 28, 2017), www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/climate/2017/climate-report-final-draft-clean.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Van Overwalle, Geertrui, Individualism, Collectivism and Openness in Patent Law: Promoting Access Through Exclusion, Individualism and Collectiveness in Intellectual Property Law (Jan Rósen, ed., 2011), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1718687 (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Verizon v. Trinko, 540 U.S. 398 (2004).Google Scholar
Wessner, Charles W. & Wolff, Alan W. eds., Rising to the Challenge: U.S. Innovation Policy for the Global Economy 53 (2012).Google Scholar
World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change, World Bank (2009).Google Scholar
World Energy Council, World Energy Resources: Carbon Capture and Storage 2016, www.worldenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/WEResources_CCS_2016.pdf (last visited Nov. 19, 2017).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization [WTO], Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (April 15, 1994), Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, Legal Instruments – Result of the Uruguay Rounds 33 I.L.M. 81 (1994).Google Scholar
WTO & UNEP, Trade and Climate Change WTO-UNEP Report (2009).Google Scholar
Yu, Peter K., Enforcement, Economics and Estimates, 2 W.I.P.O. J. 1 (2010).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×