Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:59:57.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neuropsychological assessment of attention and executive functioning

from Psychology, health and illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Melissa Lamar
Affiliation:
King's College London
Amir Raz
Affiliation:
Columbia University and the New York State Psychiatric Institute
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

This chapter describes the cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychological assessment of attention and executive functioning. Each cognitive construct is defined within a theoretical framework. Additional information highlights the neuroanatomical and neurochemical underpinnings of specific aspects of attention and executive functioning. Adequate assessment of attention and executive functioning requires at least a basic knowledge of these features in order to choose the neuropsychological test measures best suited for a particular patient or clinical population.

Attention

Attention is one of the oldest issues in cognitive neuropsychology; its role in assessment is equally as historic and remains integral to the successful evaluation of a presenting patient. Attention is the process of selecting for active processing specific aspects of the physical environment (e.g. objects) or ideas stored in memory (Raz, 2004). Originally, attention was thought of as a unitary concept akin to a filter (Broadbent, 1958) or a spotlight (Shalev & Algom, 2000). More recent theories suggest that attention is a system of disparate networks including alerting, orienting and selection (Fan et al., 2002).

Alerting involves particular changes in the internal state of an individual in preparation for perceiving a stimulus otherwise thought of as vigilance. Alerting is critical for optimal performance in tasks involving higher cognitive functions. With the use of neuroimaging technologies, alerting has been associated with the frontal and parietal regions of the right hemisphere. Lesions within these regions will reduce the ability to maintain the alert state.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Army Individual Test Battery (1944). Manual of directions and scoring. Washington, D C: Adjutant General's Office, The War Department.
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–9.Google Scholar
Barnea, A., Rassis, A., Raz, A. & Zaidel, E. (in press) Performance of adults and children on the lateralized attention network test (LANT). Brain and Cognition.Google Scholar
Beane, M. & Marrocco, R. T. (2004). Norepinephrine and acetylcholine mediation of the components of reflexive attention: implications for attention deficit disorders. Progression in Neurobiology, 74(3), 167–81.Google Scholar
Bilder, R. M. & Goldberg, E. (1987). Motor perseverations in schizophrenia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2(3), 195–214.Google Scholar
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon Press.
Coull, J. T., Nobre, A. C. & Frith, C. D. (2001). The noradrenergic alpha2 agonist clonidine modulates behavioural and neuroanatomical correlates of human attentional orienting and alerting. Cerebral Cortex, 11(1), 73–84.Google Scholar
Craik, F. I. M. (1990). Changes in memory with normal aging: a functional view. In Wurtman, R. J. (Ed.). Alzheimer's disease (Advances in neurology) Vol. 51. New York: Raven Press.
Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E. & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis–Kaplan executive function system (D-KEFS). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
Deth, R., Kuznetsova, A. & Waly, M. (2004). Attention-related signaling activities of the d4 dopamine receptor. In Posner, M. (Ed.). Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 269–82) New York: Guilford Press.
Diller, L., Ben-Yishay, Y., Gerstman, L. J.et al. (1974). Studies in cognition and rehabilitation in hemiplegia. (No. 50). New York: Behavioral Science Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University Medical Center.
Elliott, R., Dolan, R. J. & Frith, C. D. (2000). Dissociable functions in the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from human neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 308–17.Google Scholar
Ellis, K. A. & Nathan, P. J. (2001). The pharmacology of human working memory. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 4(3), 299–313.Google Scholar
Eriksen, B. & Eriksen, C. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perceptual Psychophysics, 16, 143–9.Google Scholar
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A. & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 340–7.Google Scholar
Fuster, J. M. (1997). The Prefrontal Cortex: Anatomy, Physiology, and Neuropsychology of the Executive Lobe (2nd edn.). New York: Lippincott-Raven Press.
Goldberg, E., Podell, K., Bilder, R. & Jaeger, J. (2000). The executive control battery. Melbourne: Psychology Press.
Grant, D. A. & Berg, E. A. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a weight-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 404–11.Google Scholar
Heilman, K. M. & Abell, T. (1980). Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology, 30(3), 327–30.Google Scholar
Lamar, M., Podell, K., Carew, T.G.et al. (1997). Perseverative behavior in Alzheimer's disease and subcortical ischemic vascular dementia. Neuropsychology, 11(4), 523–34.Google Scholar
Lamar, M., Zonderman, A. B. & Resnick, S. (2002). Contribution of specific cognitive processes to executive functioning in an aging population. Neuropsychology, 16(2), 156–62.Google Scholar
Lezak, M. D. (1982). The problem of assessing executive functions. International Journal of Psychology, 17, 281–97.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1980). Higher cortical functions (pp. 246–360). New York: Basic Books.
Milner, B. (1971). Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. British Medical Bulletin, 27(3), 272–7.Google Scholar
Petrides, M. & Milner, B. (1982). Deficits on subject-ordered tasks after frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia, 20, 249–62.Google Scholar
Porteus, S. D. (1959). The Maze Test and clinical psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Pacific Books.
Posner, M. I. & Rothbart, M. K. (1998). Attention, self-regulation and consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353(1377), 1915–27.Google Scholar
Raz, A. (2004). Attention. In Encyclopedia of applied psychology (pp. 203–8). Oxford: Elsevier, Inc.
Robertson, L. C., Lamb, M. R. & Knight, R. T. (1988). Effects of lesions of temporal–parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 8(10), 3757–69.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. D., Tunbridge, E. M., Bhagwagar, Z., Drevets, W. C., Sahakian, B. J. & Carter, C. S. (2003). Tryptophan depletion alters the decision-making of healthy volunteers through altered processing of reward cues. Neuropsychopharmacology, 28(1), 153–62.Google Scholar
Shalev, L. & Algom, D. (2000). Stroop and Garner effects in and out of Posner's beam: reconciling two conceptions of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 997–1017.Google Scholar
Smith, E. E. & Jonides, J. (1998). Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95(20), 12061–8.Google Scholar
Spreen, O. & Benton, A. L. (1969). Neurosensory centre comprehensive examination for aphasia (NCCEA). Victoria, British Columbia:University of Victoria Neuropsychology Laboratory.
Stroop, J. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–61.Google Scholar
Stuss, D. T. & Alexander, M. P. (2000). Executive functions and the frontal lobes: a conceptual view. Psychology Research, 63(3-4), 289–98.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1945). A standardized memory scale for clinical use. Journal of Psychology, 19, 87–95.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. A. (1981). The Wechsler adult intelligence scale–revised. San Antonio TX: Psychology Corporation.
Wilson, B., Cockburn, J. & Baddeley, A. (2003). The rivermead behavioral memory test (RBMT-II). Harcourt Assessment: Oxford, England.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×