Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T01:15:57.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - What Lessons Does the ‘Replication Crisis’ in Psychology Hold for Experimental Economics?

from Part I - Theory & Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

Alan Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2.8 References

Ball, L., Bardsley, N. and Ormerod, T. (2012). Do Preference Reversals Generalise? Results on Ambiguity and Loss Aversion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 4857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardsley, N., Cubitt, R., Loomes, G., Moffatt, P., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (2010). Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battalio, R. C., Kagel, J. H. and MacDonald, D. N. (1985). Animals’ Choices over Uncertain Outcomes: Some Initial Experimental Results. American Economic Review, 75, 597613.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R. (1978). A Realist Theory of Science. Hassocks: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Bhattacharjee, Y. (2013). The Mind of a Con Man. New York Times, 26 April.Google Scholar
Bornemann-Cimenti, H., Szilagyi, I. S. and Sandner-Kiesling, A. (2016). Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 10631072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, M. J., Ijzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., …, and van’t Veer, A. (2014). The Replication Recipe: What Makes for a Convincing Replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, B. L., Martens, A., and Faucher, E. H. (2010). Two Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-analysis of Mortality Salience Research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 155195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Forsell, E., Ho, T. H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., ..., and Wu, H. (2016). Evaluating Replicability of Laboratory Experiments in Economics. Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf0918CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, H. (1991). The Meaning of Replication and the Science of Economics. History of Political Economy, 23, 123142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, J. (2016). Replication Initiatives Will Not Salvage the Trustworthiness of Psychology. BioMed Central Psychology, 4, 28.Google ScholarPubMed
Cubitt, R. P. (2005). Experiments and the Domain of Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12, 197210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (2016). A Call to Change Science’s Culture of Shaming. Association for Psychological Science Observer, 29(9), 56.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., King, G., Pettigrew, S. and Wilson, T. D. (2016). Comment on ‘Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science’. Science, 351, 1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glass, G. V. (2000). Meta-Analysis at 25. Retrieved 15 August 2016 from www.gvglass.info/papers/meta25.htmlGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, J. D. (1982). On the Relation Between Laboratory Experiments and Social Behaviour: Causal Explanation and Generalisation. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 12, 225249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grether, D. and Plott, C. (1979). Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon. American Economic Review, 69, 623638.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1739–40 [2007]) A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Norton, D. F. and Norton, M. J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. Public Library of Science – Medicine, 2, e124.Google ScholarPubMed
Johnson, D. J., Cheung, F. and Donellan, M. B. (2014). Does Cleanliness Influence Moral Judgements? A direct Replication of Schnall, Benton and Harvey (2008). Social Psychology, 45, 209215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2014). A New Etiquette for Replication. Social Psychology, 45, 310311.Google Scholar
Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results Are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 196217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K., Vianello, M. et al. (2014). Investigating Variation in Replicability: A ‘Many Labs’ Replication Project. Social Psychology, 45, 142152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D., Conroy, M. L., McGreevy, B. P. and Barraclough, D. J. (2004). Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making in Monkeys a Competitive Game. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 4558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levelt, W. J. M., Drenth, P., and Noort, E. (Eds.). (2012). Flawed Science: The Fraudulent Research Practices of Social Psychologist Diederik Stapel. Tilburg: Commissioned by Tilburg University, the University of Amsterdam and the University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Lynott, D., Corker, K. S., Wortman, J., Connell, L., Donnellan, M. B., Lucas, R. E., and O’Brien, K. (2014). Replication of ‘Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth’ by Williams and Bargh (2008). Social Psychology, 45, 216223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, B. A. and Lakens, D. (2014). Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results. Social Psychology, 45, 137141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Science, 349, aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716Google Scholar
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Plott, C. R. and Smith, V. L. (2008). Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. Volume 1. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.Google Scholar
Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can Cognitive Processes Be Inferred from Neuroimaging Data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 5963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, R. and Fode, K. L. (1963). The Effect Experimenter Bias on the Performance of the Albino Rat. Behavioral Science, 8, 183189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R. and Jacobson, L. (1963). Teachers’ Expectancies: Determinants of Pupils’ IQ Gains. Psychological Reports, 19, 115118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanabria, F. and Thraikill, E. (2009). Pigeons (Columba livia) Approach Nash Equilibrium in Experimental Matching Pennies Competitions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 169183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall We Really Do It Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication Is Neglected in the Social Sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnall, S. (2014). Commentary and Rejoinder on Johnson, Cheung and Donnellan (2014a). Clean Data: Statistical Artefacts Wash Out Replication Efforts. Social Psychology. Online article; doi: 10.1027/1864–9335/a000204Google Scholar
Schnall, S., Benton, J. and Harvey, S. (2008). With a Clean Conscience: Cleanliness Reduces the Severity of Moral Judgements. Psychological Science, 19, 12191222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, I., Koenig, M. and Rustichini, A. (2014). Children’s Strategic Theory of Mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 1330713312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schram, A. (2005). Artificiality: The Tension between Internal and External Validity in Economic Experiments. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12, 225237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J. and Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A Terror Management Theory of Social Behavior: The Psychological Functions of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 93159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapel, D. (2014). Faking Science: A True Story of Academic Fraud. Translated by N. J. L. Brown. Available at errorstatistics.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/fakingscience-20141214.pdfGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Science and the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, L. E. and Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth. Science, 322, 606607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, A. (2014). Psychology’s Real Replication Problem: Our Methods Sections. Online article at psychsciencenotes.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/psychologys-real-replication-problem.html accessed 01.08.2016Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×