Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:49:44.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Issues and New Directions in Personality Disorder Genetics

from Part I - Etiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2020

By
Kerry L. Jang  and
Fiona Choi
Edited by
Carl W. Lejuez  and
Kim L. Gratz
Carl W. Lejuez
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Kim L. Gratz
Affiliation:
University of Toledo, Ohio
Get access

Summary

Much of the focus of personality disorder genetics has been aimed at identifying putative genes. Most of the research has been accomplished using a classical monozygotic and dizygotic twin design or adoption study methodologies. This vast body of research has repeatedly shown that the observed variability in personality disorder measures are directly attributable to the action of genes, but few, if any genetic loci have been reliably identified. The chapter explores the reasons for this failure such as the impact of a grand unitary theory of personality function that has created concepts and measures that are poorly suited for genetic studies. Moreover, there are inherent problems in genetic methodology, despite the faith in the latest gene hunting methods that have not been able to overcome psychometric and conceptual issues with personality constructs and measures. Indeed, attempts to revise measures and diagnostic entities have likely exacerbated the problems. Suggestions to overcome these issues, from shifting focus from descriptive personality constructs to active personality constructs such as behavioral choice, the development of personality endophenotypes, and new methods to incorporate data from unrelated individuals in gene hunting studies to increase power and detect small effects of multiple genes are discussed.

Keywords

personalitypersonality disordergeneticstwinsendophenotypespleiotrophygenomic-relatedness-matrix residual maximum likelihood analysis (GREML)heritabilitygene-environment interactionDSM-V
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Disorders , pp. 29 - 39
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, G. (1937). Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., & Caspi, A. (2014). The behavioural genetics of personality development in adulthood: Classic, contemporary, and future trends. European Journal of Personality, 28(3), 244–255.Google Scholar
Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., Hülsheger, U. R., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2010). Nature and nurture of the interplay between personality traits and major life goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 366–379.Google Scholar
Briley, D. A., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2013). Explaining the increasing heritability of cognitive ability across development. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1704–1713.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., Hariri, A. R., Holmes, A., Uher, R., & Moffitt, T. E. (2010). Genetic sensitivity to the environment: The case of the serotonin transporter gene and its implications for studying complex diseases and traits. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloninger, C. R. (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 573–588.Google Scholar
Cloninger, R. (2012). Genetics of personality disorders. In Nurnberger, J. I. & Berrettini, W. H. (Eds.), Principles of Psychiatric Genetics (pp. 316–323). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derringer, J., Krueger, R. F., Dick, D. M., Saccone, S., Grucza, R. A., Agrawal, A., … Schuckit, M. A. (2010). Predicting sensation seeking from dopamine genes: A candidate-system approach. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1282–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, S. G., & Kline, P. (1995). The big three or the big five—the EPQ-R vs the NEO-PI: A research note, replication and elaboration. Personality and Individual Differences, 18(6), 801–804.Google Scholar
Ersche, K. D., Turton, A. J., Chamberlain, S. R., Müller, U., Bullmore, E. T., & Robbins, T. W. (2012). Cognitive dysfunction and anxious-impulsive personality traits are endophenotypes for drug dependence. American Journal of Psychiatry,169, 926–936.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1994). The big five or giant three: Criteria for a paradigm. In Halverson, C. F. Jr., Kohnstamm, G. A., & Martin, R. P. (Eds.), The Developing Structure of Temperament and Personality from Infancy to Adulthood (pp. 37–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Felson, J. (2014). What can we learn from twin studies? A comprehensive evaluation of the equal environments assumption. Social Science Research, 43, 184–199.Google Scholar
Fosse, R., Joseph, J., & Richardson, K. (2015). A critical assessment of the equal-environment assumption of the twin method for schizophrenia. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6, 62.Google Scholar
Franić, S., Borsboom, D., Dolan, C. V., & Boomsma, D. I. (2014). The big five personality traits: Psychological entities or statistical constructs? Behavior Genetics, 44(6), 591–604.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.Google Scholar
Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003). The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 636–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottlieb, G. (1984). Evolutionary trends and evolutionary origins: Relevance to theory in comparative psychology. Psychological Review, 91(4), 448–456.Google Scholar
Heck, A., Lieb, R., Ellgas, A., Pfister, H., Lucae, S., Roeske, D., … Ising, M. (2009). Investigation of 17 candidate genes for personality traits confirms effects of the HTR2A gene on novelty seeking. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 8, 464–472.Google Scholar
Hopwood, C. J., Donnellan, M. B., Blonigen, D. M., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., Iacono, W. G., & Burt, S. A. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on personality trait stability and growth during the transition to adulthood: A three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 545–556.Google Scholar
Hur, Y. M., & Craig, J. M. (2013). Twin registries worldwide: An important resource for scientific research. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N., & Messnick, S. (1962). Response styles on the MMPI: Comparison of clinical and normal samples. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 285–299.Google Scholar
Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., & Vernon, P. A. (1998). A twin study of genetic and environmental contributions to gender differences in traits delineating personality disorder. European Journal of Personality, 12(5), 331–344.Google Scholar
Jang, K. L., & Vernon, P. A. (2018). Genetics. In J. Livesley, W. (Ed.), Handbook of Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment (pp. 177–195). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kandler, C., & Papendick, M. (2017). Behavior genetics and personality development: a methodological and meta-analytic review. In Specht, J. (Ed.), Personality Development Across the Lifespan (pp. 473–495). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kirschner, M. W., & Gerhart, J. C. (2005). The Plausibility of Life: Resolving Darwin’s Dilemma. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. W. (2013). Do genes influence personality? Psychology Today, July 11. Retrieved from www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/under-the-influence/201307/do-genes-influence-personality.Google Scholar
Lenzenweger, M. F., Lane, M. C., Loranger, A. W., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). DSM-IV personality disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biological Psychiatry, 62(6), 553–564.Google Scholar
Livesley, W. J. (2008). Research trends and directions in the study of personality disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 31(3), 545–559.Google Scholar
Livesley, W. J., Jackson, D. N., & Schroeder, M. L. (1992). Factorial structure of traits delineating personality disorders in clinical and general population samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 432–440.Google Scholar
Livesley, W. J., Schroeder, M. L., Jackson, D. N., & Jang, K. L. (1994). Categorical distinctions in the study of personality disorder: Implications for classification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(1), 6–17.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2015). A more nuanced view of reliability: Specificity in the trait hierarchy. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 19, 97–112.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215.Google Scholar
Middeldorp, C. M., Ruigrok, P., Cath, D. C., Van Dyck, R., and Boomsma, D. I. (2002). Candidate genes for mood disorders in humans: A literature review. American Journal of Human Genetics, 114, 768.Google Scholar
Middeldorp, C. M., Slof-Op, M. C. T., Landt, S. O., Medland, S. E., van Beijsterveldt, C. E., Bartels, M., … Boomsma, D. I. (2010). Anxiety and depression in children and adults: Influence of serotonergic and neurotrophic genes? Genes, Brain and Behavior, 9, 808–816.Google Scholar
Mohammad, S. M., & Kiritchenko, S. (2013). Using nuances of emotion to identify personality. Paper presented at the ICWSM Workshop on Computational Personality Recognition. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.6352.Google Scholar
Mõttus, R., Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., Riemann, R., & McCrae, R. R. (2017). Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 474–490.Google Scholar
Munafò, M. R., Durrant, C., Lewis, G., & Flint, J. (2009). Gene–environment interactions at the serotonin transporter locus. Biological Psychiatry, 65, 211–219.Google Scholar
Munafò, M. R., Freimer, N. B., Ng, W., Ophoff, R., Veijola, J., Miettunen, J., … Flint, J. (2009). 5-HTTLPR genotype and anxiety-related personality traits: A meta-analysis and new data. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 150B(2), 271–281.Google Scholar
Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families. London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Neale, M. C., Eaves, L. J., & Kendler, K. S. (1994). The power of the classical twin study to resolve variation in threshold traits. Behavior Genetics, 24(3), 239–258.Google Scholar
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Monographs in Population Biology, vol. 37. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. M. (2015). The alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 14(2), 234–236.Google Scholar
Paris, J. (2011). Endophenotypes and the diagnosis of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 260–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., & McClearn, G. E. (1990). Behavioral Genetics: A Primer (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., & von Stumm, S. (2018). The new genetics of intelligence. Nature Reviews Genetics, 19, 148–159.Google Scholar
Qiu, F., Akiskal, H. S., Kelsoe, J. R., & Greenwood, T. A. (2017). Factor analysis of temperament and personality traits in bipolar patients: Correlates with comorbidity and disorder severity. Journal of Affective Disorders, 207, 282–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reichborn-Kjennerud, T. (2008). Genetics of personality disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 31(3), 421–440.Google Scholar
Risch, N., Herrell, R., Lehner, T., Liang, K. Y., Eaves, L., Hoh, J. … Merikangas, K. R. (2009). Interaction between the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR), stressful life events, and risk of depression: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301, 2462–2471.Google Scholar
Ruocco, A. C., Amirthavasagam, S., & Zakzanis, K. K. (2012). Amygdala and hippocampal volume reductions as candidate endophenotypes for borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies. Psychiatry Research, 201(3), 245–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruocco, A. C., & Carcone, D. (2016). A neurobiological model of borderline personality disorder. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 24(5), 311–329.Google Scholar
Savitz, J., Van Der Merwe, L., & Ramesar, R. (2008). Personality endophenotypes for bipolar affective disorder: a family‐based genetic association analysis. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 7(8), 869–876.Google Scholar
Siever, L. J. (2005). Endophenotypes in the personality disorders. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 7(2), 139–151.Google Scholar
Torgersen, S. (2009). The nature (and nurture) of personality disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(6), 624–632.Google Scholar
Torgersen, S., Myers, J., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T., Røysamb, E., Kubarych, T. S., & Kendler, K. S. (2012). The heritability of Cluster B personality disorders assessed both by personal interview and questionnaire. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26(6), 848–866.Google Scholar
Trull, T. J., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). Dimensional models of personality: The five-factor model and the DSM-5. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 15(2), 135–146.Google Scholar
Verweij, K. J., Zietsch, B. P., Medland, S. E., Gordon, S. D., Benyamin, B., Nyholt, D. R., … Wray, N. R. (2010). A genome-wide association study of Cloninger’s Temperament scales: Implications for the evolutionary genetics of personality. Biological Psychology, 85(2), 306–317.Google Scholar
Verweij, K. J., Yang, J., Lahti, J., Veijola, J., Hintsanen, M., Pulkki-Råback, L., … Zietsch, B. P. (2012). Maintenance of genetic variation in human personality: Testing evolutionary models by estimating heritability due to common causal variants and investigating the effect of distant inbreeding. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 66(10), 3238–3251.Google Scholar
Vinkhuyzen, A. A. E., Pedersen, N. L., Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Magnusson, P. K. E., Iacono, W. G., … Wray, N. R. (2012). Common SNPs explain some of the variation in the personality dimensions of neuroticism and extraversion. Translational Psychiatry, 2(4), e102.Google Scholar
Wakefield, J. (2016). Diagnostic issues and controversies in DSM-5: Return of the false positives problem. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 105–132.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitfield, C. W., Cziko, A.-M., & Robinson, G. E. (2003). Gene expression profiles in the brain predict behavior in individual honey bees. Science, 302(5643), 296–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Widiger, T. A. (2007). Dimensional models of personality disorder. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 6(2), 79–83.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., & Lowe, J. R. (2008). A dimensional model of personality disorder: Proposal for DSM-V. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 31(3), 363–378.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×