Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T11:47:14.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 24 - Shared Space for Organizations

Enablers for Innovative Projects

from Part IV - New Directions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2017

By
Kim van Oorschot
Edited by
Shankar Sankaran ,
Ralf Müller  and
Nathalie Drouin
Shankar Sankaran
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Ralf Müller
Affiliation:
BI Norwegian Business School
Nathalie Drouin
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Project Management , pp. 357 - 369
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akkermans, H. & van Oorschot, K. E. (2016). Pilot error? Managerial decision biases as explanation for disruptions in aircraft development. Project Management Journal, 47(2), 79–102, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anvari, B., Bell, M. G. H., Sivakumar, A., & Ochieng, W. Y. (2015). Modelling shared space users via rule-based social force model. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 51(2015), 83–103, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.10.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASML. Customer Co-Investment Program. Retrieved from www.asml.com/management-board-report/customer-coinvestment-program/en/s48039?dfp_fragment=ifrs_cip.Google Scholar
Aubry, M., Hobbs, B., & Thuillier, D. (2007). A new framework for understanding organizational project management through the PMO. International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), 328–336, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barczak, G., Griffin, A., & Kahn, K. B. (2009). Perspective: Trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(1), 3–23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00331.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, M. J. & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/30040711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. C. & Grahovac, J. (2012). Learning, imitation, and the use of knowledge: A comparison of markets, hierarchies, and teams. Organization Science, 23(5), 1249–1263, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantamessa, M. & Villa, A. (2000). Product and process design effort allocation in concurrent engineering. International Journal of Production Research, 38(14), 3131–3147, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/002075400418180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Černe, M., Nerstad, C. G. L., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2014). What goes around comes around: Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity, Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 172–192, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chick, S. E., Huchzermeier, A., & Netessine, S. (2014). Europe’s solution factories. Harvard Business Review, 92(4), 111–115.Google Scholar
Conboy, K. (2009). Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Information Systems Research, 20(3), 329–354, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2010). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 64–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. G. (2008). The stage-gates idea-to-launch process: Update, what’s new, and NexGen systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 213–232, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00296.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. G. (2013). Where are all the breakthrough new products? Using portfolio management to boost innovation. Research-Technology Management, 56(5), 25–33, http://dx.doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5605123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S., & Kleinschmidt, E. (2001). Portfolio management for new product development: Results of an industry practices study. R&D Management, 31(4), 361–380, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00225.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. G. & Sommer, A. F. (2016). The Agile–Stage-Gate hybrid model: A promising new approach and a new research opportunity. Journal of Product Innovation Management (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: a longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650–675, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingsøyr, T., Dyba, T., & Moe, N. B. (2010). Agile software development, current research and future directions. Springer Heidelberg: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eling, K., Langerak, F., & Griffin, A. (2013). A stage-wise approach to exploring performance effects of cycle time reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 626–641, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, M., & Highsmith, J. (2001). The agile manifesto. Software Development, 9(8), 28–35.Google Scholar
Gersick, C. J. G. (1994). Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 9–45, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton-Baillie, B. (2008). Towards shared space. Urban Design International, 13(2), 130–138, http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/udi.2008.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S.H. & Rouse, E.D. (2015). An inductive study of feedback interactions over the course of creative projects. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 375–404, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hendry, K. & Kiel, G. C. (2004). The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organisational control perspectives. Corporate Governance, 12 (4), 500–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobday, M. (1998). Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Research Policy, 26(6), 689–710, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00044-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobday, M. (2000). The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy, 29(7–8), 871–893, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, M. H. & Chang, C. M. (2014). Examining interpersonal trust as a facilitator and uncertainty as an inhibitor of intra-organizational knowledge sharing. Information Systems Journal, 24(2), 119–142, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/isj.12000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1675, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, M. G., El Arbi, F., & Ahlemann, F. (2015). Successful portfolio management beyond project selection techniques: Understanding the role of structural alignment. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 126–139, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaisti, M., Rantala, V., Mujunen, T., Hyrynsalmi, S., Könnölä, K., Mäkilä, T., & Lehtonen, T. (2013). Agile methods for embedded systems development – a literature review and a mapping study. EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems, 2013(1), 1–16, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1687-3963-2013-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaparias, I., Bell, M. G. H., Miri, A., Chan, C., & Mount, B. (2012). Analysing the perceptions of pedestrians and drivers to shared space. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(3), 297–310, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnan, V., Eppinger, S. D., & Whitney, D. E. (1997). A model-based framework for overlapping product development activities. Management Science, 43(4), 437–451, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.4.437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. & Makhija, M. (2009). Flexibility in internationalization: Is it valuable during an economic crisis? Strategic Management Journal, 30(5), 537–555, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111–125, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinthal, D. A. & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loch, C. H. & Terwiesch, C. (1998). Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Management Science, 44(8), 1032–1048, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.8.1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loch, C.H. & Terwiesch, C. (1999). Accelerating the process of engineering change orders: Capacity and congestion effects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(2), 145–159, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1620145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loch, C. H. & Terwiesch, C. (2005). Rush and be wrong or wait and be late? A model of information in collaborative processes. Production and Operations Management, 14(3), 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, D., Srikanth, K., & Bharadwaj, A. (2014). Efficacy of R&D work in offshore captive centers: An empirical study of task characteristics, coordination mechanisms, and performance. Information Systems Research, 25(4), 846–864, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. (2006). Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management Journal, 27(3), 201–214, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, E. F. III, Kahn, K. B., & Barczak, G. (2001). An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(2), 110–120, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1820110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGaughey, S. L., Liesch, P. W., & Poulson, D. (2000). An unconventional approach to intellectual property protection: The case of an Australian firm transferring shipbuilding technologies to China. Journal of World Business, 35(1), 1–20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(99)00031-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody, S. & Melia, S. (2014). Shared space: Research, policy and problems. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Transport, 167(6), 384–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2009). Learning and innovation in international strategic alliances: An empirical test of the role of trust and tacitness. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 1031–1056, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00840.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, J.S., Teasley, S., Covi, L., & Olson, G. (2002). The (currently) unique advantages of co-located work. In Hinds, P. J., Kiesler, S. (Eds.), Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, A., & Lawson, B. (2013). Help or hindrance? Causal ambiguity and supplier involvement in new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 794–808, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafii, F. (1995). How important is physical collocation to product development success? Business Horizons, January–February, 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, Z., Rogers, K. S., & Nord, W. R. (1993). Toward a political framework for flexible management of decline. Organization Science, 4(1), 76–91, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.1.76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethi, R., & Iqbal, Z. (2008). Stage-gate controls, learning failure, and adverse effects on novel new products. Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 118–134, http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.1.118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidhu, J. S., Commandeur, H. R., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organization Science, 18(1), 20–38, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, A. F., Hedegaard, C., Dukovska-Popovska, I., & Steger-Jensen, K. (2015). Improved product development performance through Agile/Stage-Gate hybrids–The next-generation Stage-Gate process? Research-Technology Management, 158(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Srikanth, K., & Puranam, P. (2014). The firm as a coordination system: Evidence from software services offshoring. Organization Science, 25(4), 1253–1271, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sydow, J., Lindkvist, L., & DeFillippi, R. (2004). Project-Based organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge: Editorial. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1475–1489, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840604048162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terwiesch, C., Loch, C. H., & De Meyer, A. (2002). Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering: Alternative coordination strategies. Organization Science, 13(4), 402–419, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.402.2948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushman, M. L., Newman, W. H., & Romanelli, E. (2004). Convergence and upheaval: Managing the unsteady pace of organizational evolution. In Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (Eds.), Managing Strategic Innovation and Change: A Collection of Readings. New York: Oxford University Press, 530–540.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, K. E., Akkermans, H., Sengupta, K., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2013). Anatomy of a decision trap in complex new product development projects. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 285–307, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oorschot, K. E., Sengupta, K., Akkermans, H. A., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2010). Get fat fast: Surviving stage-gates in NPD. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 828–839, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00754.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigden, R., & Wang, X. (2009). Coevolving systems and the organization of agile software development. Information Systems Research, 20(3), 355–376.Google Scholar
Walrave, B., van Oorschot, K. E., & Romme, A. G. L. (2011). Getting trapped in the suppression of exploration: A simulation model. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1727–1751, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01019.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walrave, B., van Oorschot, K.E., & Romme, A. G. L. (2015). How to counteract the suppression of exploration in publicly traded corporations. R & D Management, 45(5), 458–473, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01019.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, J. D., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1113–1137, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, M., Prabhu, J., & Chandy, R. (2007). Managing the future: CEO attention and innovation outcomes. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 84–101, http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.4.84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, A., & Ravishankar, M. N. (2014). Knowledge transfer in IT offshoring relationships: The roles of social capital, efficacy and outcome expectations. Information Systems Journal, 24(2), 167–202, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/isj.12027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×