Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T20:52:22.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Centrality of Academic Self-Concept to Motivation and Learning

from Part I - The Self and Its Impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2019

K. Ann Renninger  and
Suzanne E. Hidi
By
Herbert W. Marsh ,
Marjorie Seaton ,
Theresa Dicke ,
Philip D. Parker  and
Marcus S. Horwood
K. Ann Renninger
Affiliation:
Swarthmore College, Pennsylvania
Suzanne E. Hidi
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

The construct of self-concept lies at the core of the positive psychology revolution. Historically, as one of the cornerstone constructs in the social sciences, the approach to self-concept has been adapted to focus on how healthy individuals can thrive in life. In this chapter we differentiate between the historical unidimensional perspective of self-concept (centered on self-esteem) and the evolving multifaceted models discriminating between different aspects of self (such as specific academic, social, physical, and emotional components).

We review:

  • the definition of self-concept and the reason it is so important;

  • historical and evolving perspectives of self-concept;

  • general and domain-specific theoretical models with associated empirical research regarding self-concept, motivation, and performance;

  • the way different self-concept domains vary as a function of gender and age;

  • the impact of specific psychological and social traits on self-concept development;

  • the differentiation between multidimensional perspectives of personality and self-concept;

  • theoretical models of academic self-concept formation and its relation to achievement;

  • frame of reference effects in self-concept formation;

  • a construct-validity approach to self-concept enhancement interventions; and directions for further research.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning , pp. 36 - 62
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandura, A. (2008a). An agentic perspective on positive psychology. In Lopez, S. J. (Ed.), Positive psychology: Exploring the best in people, Vol. 1: Discovering human strengths (pp. 167–96). Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2008b). Toward an agentic theory of the self. In Marsh, H., Craven, R. G., & McInerney, D. M. (Eds.), Advances in self research, Vol. 3: Self-processes, learning, and enabling human potential (pp. 15–49). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 1–44.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2002). Validating the measurement and structure of self-concept: Snapshots of past, present, and future research. American Psychologist, 57, 897–909.Google Scholar
Calsyn, R. & Kenny, D. (1997). Self-concept of ability and perceived evaluations by others: Cause or effect of academic achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 136–45.Google Scholar
Chen, S., Yeh, Y., Hwang, F., & Lin, S. S. J. (2013). The relationship between academic self-concept and achievement: A multicohort–multioccasion study. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 172–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craven, R. G., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (1991). Effects of internally focused feedback and attributional feedback on enhancement of academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 17–27.Google Scholar
Dai, D. Y. (2002). Incorporating parent perceptions: A replication and extension study of the internal-external frame of reference model of self-concept development. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17(6), 617–45.Google Scholar
Dai, D. Y. (2004). How universal is the big-fish-little-pond effect? American Psychologist, 59, 267–68. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.4.267.Google Scholar
Dai, D. Y. & Rinn, A. N. (2008). The big-fish–little-pond effect: What do we know and where do we go from here? Educational Psychology Review, 20, 283–317. doi: 10.1007/s10648-008-9071-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickhäuser, O. (2005). Teachers’ inferences about students’ self-concepts – the role of dimensional comparison. Learning and Instruction, 15(3), 225–35. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eder, R. A. & Mangelsdorf, S. C. (1997). The emotional basis of early personality development: Implications for the emergent self-concept. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 209–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Competence and motivation: Competence as the core of achievement motivation. In Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 3–12). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G. (1988). A social-cognitive account of the self's development. In Lapsley, D. K. & Power, F. C. (Eds.), Self, ego, and identity: Interpretative approaches (pp. 30–42). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., & Boivin, M. (2003). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 124–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2015). Directionality of the associations of high school expectancy-value, aspirations, and attainment: A longitudinal study. American Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 371–402. doi: 10.3102/0002831214565786.Google Scholar
Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., & Dicke, T. (2017). Extending expectancy-value theory predictions of achievement and aspirations in science: Dimensional comparison processes and expectancy-by-value interactions. Learning and Instruction, 49, 81–91.Google Scholar
Haney, P. & Durlak, J. A. (1998). Changing self-esteem in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 423–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Hansford, B. C. & Hattie, J. A. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement/performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52, 123–42.Google Scholar
Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–22. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105.Google Scholar
Harter, S. (1998). The development of self-representations. In Damon, W. & Eisenberg, N. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 553–617) Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Harter, S. (2012). The construction of the self: Developmental and sociocultural foundations. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. A. (2012). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huang, C. (2011). Self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of longitudinal relations. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 505–28.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). The positive psychology of interested adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1890/1963). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Jansen, M., Schroeders, U., Lüdtke, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2015). Contrast and assimilation effects of dimensional comparisons in five subjects: An extension of the I/E model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1086–101.Google Scholar
Jonkmann, K., Becker, M., Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., & Trautwein, U. (2012). Personality traits moderate the big-fish-little-pond effect of academic self-concept. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 736–46.Google Scholar
Kagan, S. L., Moore, E., & Bredekamp, S. (1995). Considering children's early development and learning: Toward common views and vocabulary (Report N. 95-03). Washington, DC: National Education Goals Pane.Google Scholar
Kling, K. C., Hyde, J. S., Showers, C. J., & Buswell, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 470–500.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129–49.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–95.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1990a). The causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 646–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1990b). A multidimensional, hierarchical self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77–172.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1991). Failure of high ability schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students’ ability levels. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 445–80.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1993). Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research. In Suls, J. (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 59–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement, and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. (pp. 59–98). Leicester: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (2008). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: An important facet of personality. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G., & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol. 1: Personality theories and models (pp. 447–69). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (2016). Cross-cultural generalizability of year in school effects: Negative effects of acceleration and positive effects of retention on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 256–73. doi: 10.1037/edu0000059.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Abduljabbar, A. S., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., Abdelfattah, F., Nagengast, B., ... Abu-Hilal, M. M. (2015). The internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept and achievement relations: Age-cohort and cross-cultural differences. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 168–202.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. & Ayotte, V. (2003). Do multiple dimensions of self-concept become more differentiated with age? The differential distinctiveness hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 687–706.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Chanal, J. P., & Sarrazin, P. G. (2006a). Self-belief does make a difference: A reciprocal effects model of the causal ordering of physical self-concept and gymnastics performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 101–11.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R. G., & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted-and-talented programmes on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285–319.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. & Craven, R. G. (1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In Phye, G. (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 131–93). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133–63.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. L. (1998). Structure, stability, and development of young children's self-concepts: A multicohort–multioccasion study. Child Development, 69, 1030–53.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Debus, R., & Bornholt, L. (2005). Validating young children's self-concept responses: Methodological ways and means to understand their responses. In Teti, D. M. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in developmental science (pp. 138–60). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Ellis, L. A., & Craven, R. G. (2002). How do preschool children feel about themselves? Unravelling measurement and multidimensional self-concept structure. Developmental Psychology, 38, 376–93.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. & Hau, K. T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26 country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. & Hau, K. T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the internal/external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 56–67.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2001a). Reunification of East and West German school systems: Longitudinal multilevel modeling study of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 321–50.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Kong, C. K., & Hau, K. (2001b). Extension of the internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept formation: Importance of native and non-native languages for Chinese students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 543–3. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.543.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Kuyper, H., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Seaton, M. (2014). Big-fish-little-pond social comparison and local dominance effects: Integrating new statistical models, methodology, design, theory, and substantive implications. Learning and Instruction, 33, 50–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.002Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., & Hau, K. (2006b). A multimethod perspective on self-concept research in educational psychology: A construct validity approach. In Eid, M. & Diener, E. (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 441–56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. & O'Mara, A. (2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 542–52.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. & O'Mara, A. J. (2010). Long-term total negative effects of school-average ability on diverse educational outcomes: Direct and indirect effects of the big-fish-little-pond effect. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 51–72.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. & Parker, J. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 213–31.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., & Pekrun, R. (2018a). Three paradoxical effects on academic self-concept across countries, schools, and students: Frame-of-reference as a unifying theoretical explanation. European Psychologist. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000332.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. & Peart, N. (1988). Competitive and cooperative physical fitness training programs for girls: Effects on physical fitness and on multidimensional self-concepts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 390–407.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Arens, A. K., Parker, P. D., Guo, J., & Dicke, T. (2018b). An integrated model of academic self-concept development: Academic self-concept, grades, test scores, and tracking over 6 years. Developmental Psychology. 54(2), 263–80.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Guo, J., Dicke, T., Lichtenfeld, S. (2017). Long-term positive effects of repeating a year in school: Six-year longitudinal study of self-beliefs, anxiety, social relations, school grades, and test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 425–38. doi: 10.1037/edu0000144.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. & Perry, C. (2005). Self-concept contributes to winning gold medals: Causal ordering of self-concept and elite swimming performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 27, 71–91.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. & Richards, G. (1988). The Outward Bound bridging course for low achieving high-school males: Effect on academic achievement and multidimensional self-concepts. Australian Journal of Psychology, 40, 281–98.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Richards, G., & Barnes, J. (1986a). Multidimensional self-concepts: A long-term follow-up of the effect of participation in an Outward Bound program. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 475–92.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Richards, G., & Barnes, J. (1986b). Multidimensional self-concepts: The effect of participation in an Outward Bound program. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 173–87.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. & Seaton, M. (2015). The big-fish–little-pond effect, competence self-perceptions, and relativity: Substantive advances and methodological innovation. In Elliott, A. J. (Ed.), Advances in Motivation Science, 2, 127–84. New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O'Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319–50.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. & Shavelson, R. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107–25.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Tracey, D. K., & Craven, R. G. (2006c). Multidimensional self-concept structure for preadolescents with mild intellectual disabilities: A hybrid multigroup-mimic approach to factorial invariance and latent mean differences. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 795–818.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2007). The big-fish–little-pond effect: Persistent negative effects of selective high schools on self-concept after graduation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 631–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006d). Integration of multidimensional self-concept and core personality constructs: Construct validation and relations to well-being and achievement. Journal of Personality, 74, 403–56.Google Scholar
Marx, R. W. & Winne, P. H. (1978). Construct interpretations of three self-concept inventories. American Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 99–109.Google Scholar
Möller, J. & Husemann, N. (2006). Internal comparisons in everyday life. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 342–53. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.342.Google Scholar
Möller, J. & Köller, O. (2001). Dimensional comparisons: An experimental approach to the internal/external frames of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 826–35.Google Scholar
Möller, J. & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Dimensional comparison theory. Psychological Review, 120(3), 544–60. doi: 10.1037/a0032459.Google Scholar
Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1129–67.Google Scholar
Möller, J. & Savyon, K. (2003). Not very smart thus moral: Dimensional comparisons between academic self-concept and honesty. Social Psychology of Education, 6, 95–106. doi: 10.1023/A:1023247910033.Google Scholar
Nagengast, B. & Marsh, H. W. (2012). Big fish in little ponds aspire more: Mediation and cross-cultural generalizability of school-average ability effects on self-concept and career aspirations in science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1033–53.Google Scholar
O'Mara, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. (2006). Do self-concept interventions make a difference? A synergistic blend of construct validation and meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 41, 181–206.Google Scholar
Pinxten, M., De Fraine, B., Damme, J., & D'Haenens, E. (2010). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Effects of type of achievement measure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 689–709.Google Scholar
Pohlmann, B. & Möller, J. (2009). On the benefit of dimensional comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 248–58. doi: 10.1037/a0013151.Google Scholar
Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 403–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2010). Big-fish-little-pond effect generalizability and moderation – two sides of the same coin. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 390–433.Google Scholar
Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Craven, R. G., & Yeung, A. S. (2015). The reciprocal effects model revisited: Extending its reach to gifted students attending academically selective schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(3), 143–56. doi: 10.1177/0016986215583870.Google Scholar
Shavelson, R. J. & Bolus, R. (1982). Self-concept: The interplay of theory and methods. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–41.Google Scholar
Skaalvik, E. M. & Skaalvik, S. (2002). Internal and external frames of reference for academic self-concept. Educational Psychologist, 37, 233–44.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. C. & DuBois, D. L. (2005). Effects of self-beliefs on academic achievement and vice-versa: Separating the chicken from the egg. In Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & McInerney, D. M. (Eds.), International advances in self research (pp. 203–30). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relations between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A systematic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111–33.Google Scholar
Van Zanden, B. E., Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Parker, P. D., Guo, J., & Duineveld, J. J. (2016). How well do parents know their adolescent children? Extending the internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept to parents. Learning and Instruction, 47, 25–32.Google Scholar
Watson, D., Suls, J., & Haig, J. (2002). Global self-esteem in relation to structural models of personality and affectivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 185.Google Scholar
Wells, L. E. & Marwell, G. (1976). Self-esteem: Its conceptualisation and measurement. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wylie, R. C. (1979). The Self-concept, Vol. 2: Theory and research on selected topics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Xu, M. K. (2010). Frame of reference effects in academic self-concept: An examination of the big-fish-little-pond effect and the internal/external frame of reference model for Hong Kong adolescents. PhD thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Zeidner, M. H. & Schleyer, E. J. (1999). The big-fish-little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 305–29.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×