Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: June 2012

CHAPTER 10 - Metaphor comprehension and the brain

from Part III - Metaphor understanding

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

References

Anaki, D., Faust, M., & Kravets, S. (1998). Cerebral hemispheric asymmetries in processing lexical metaphors. Neuropsychologia, 36, 353–362.
Beeman, M. J., & Chiarello, C. (1998). Complementary right- and left-hemisphere language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(1), 2–8.
Beeman, M. J., Friedman, R., Grafman, J., Perez, E., Diamond, S., & Lindsay, M. (1994). Summation priming and coarse coding in the right hemisphere. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 26–45.
Bihrle, A., Brownell, H., & Gardner, H. (1986). Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left- and right-brain damaged patients. Brain & Cognition, 5, 399–411.
Bisiach, E., & Vallar, G. (2000). Unilateral neglect in humans. In F. Boller & G. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 459–502). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bookheimer, S. (2002). Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 151–188.
Bottini, G., Corcoran, R., Sterzi, R., Paulesu, E., Schenone, P., Scarpa, P., et al. (1994). The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain, 117, 1241–1253.
Braitenberg, V., & Pulvermüller, F. (1992). Entwurf einer neurologischen Theorie der Sprache. Naturwissenschaften, 79, 103–117.
Broca, P. A. (1865). Sur la faculté du language articulé. Bulletin de la Societe Anatomie de Paris, 6, 493–494.
Brownell, H. (1984). Sensitivity to lexical denotation and connotation in brain damaged patients. Brain & Language, 22, 253–265.
Brownell, H. (2000). Right hemisphere contributions to understanding lexical connotation and metaphor. In Y. Grodzinsky, L. Shapiro, & D. Swinney (Eds.), Language and the brain: Representation and processing (pp. 185–201). San Diego: Academic Press.
Brownell, H., Michel, D., Powelson, J., & Gardner, H. (1983). Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients. Brain & Language, 18, 20–27.
Brownell, H., Simpson, T., Bihrle, A., Potter, H., & Gardner, H. (1990). Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia, 28(4), 375–383.
Chiarello, C. (1985). Hemisphere dynamics in lexical access: Automatic and controlled priming. Brain & Language, 26(1), 146–172.
Chiarello, C. (1988). Right hemisphere contributions to lexical semantics. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Chiarello, C. (1991). Interpretation of word meanings by the cerebral hemispheres: One is not enough. In P. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meaning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chochon, F., Cohen, L., van de Moortele, P., & Dehaene, S. (1999). Differential contributions of the left and right inferior parietal lobules to number processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 617–630.
Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coulson, S., & Matlock, T. (2001). Metaphor and the space structuring model. Metaphor & Symbol, 16, 295–316.
Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. (2002). Conceptual integration and metaphor: An ERP study. Memory & Cognition, 30(6), 958–968.
Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R. D., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature, 380(6574), 499–505.
Decety, J., Grezes, J., Costes, N., Parani, D., Jeannerod, M., Procyk, E., et al. (1997). Brain activity during observation of actions: Influence of action content and subject’s strategy. Brain, 120, 1763–1777.
Deiber, M. P., Ibanez, V., Honda, M., Sadato, N., Raman, R., & Hallett, M. (1998). Cerebral processes related to visuomotor imagery and generation of simple finger movements studied with positron emission tomography. Neuroimage, 7(2), 73–85.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 133–187.
Faust, M., & Weisper, S. (2000). Understanding metaphoric sentences in the two cerebral hemispheres. Brain & Cognition, 43(1–3), 186–191.
Feldman, J., & Narayanan, S. (2004). Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language, 89(2), 385–392.
Fletcher, P., Shallice, T., Frith, C., & Frackowiak, R. (1996). Brain activity during memory retrieval: The influence of imagery and semantic cueing. Brain, 119(5), 1587–1596.
Gagnon, L., Goulet, P., Giroux, F., & Joanette, Y. (2003). Processing of metaphoric and non-metaphoric alternative meanings of words and right- and left- hemispheric lesion. Brain and Language, 87, 217–226.
Gardner, H., & Denes, G. (1973). Connotative judgments by aphasic patients on a pictorial adaptation of the semantic differential. Cortex, 9(2), 183–196.
Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R., & Gerrig, R. (1989). How context makes metaphor comprehension seem “special.”Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 4(3), 145–158.
Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 183–206.
Giora, R., Zaidel, E., Soroker, N., Batori, G., & Kasher, A. (2002). Differential effects of right and left hemisphere damage on understanding sarcasm and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 63–83.
Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., & Bookin, H. B. (1982). On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 85–98.
Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. C. J. Morgan (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.
Hécaen, H., & Consoli, S. (1973). Analyse des troubles de language au cours des lesions de l’aire de Broca. Neuropsychologia, 11, 377–388.
Jeannerod, M., & Decety, J. (1995). Mental motor imagery: A window into the representational stages of action. Current Opinion in Neurology, 5(6), 727–732.
Jeannerod, M., & Frak, V. (1999). Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5(6), 735–739.
Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., & Hannequin, D. (1990). Right hemisphere and verbal communication. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kacinik, N. A. (2003). Hemispheric processing of literal and metaphoric language. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Riverside.
Kacinik, N. A., & Chiarello, C. (2007). Understanding metaphors: Is the right hemisphere uniquely involved?Brain and Language, 100, 188–207.
Kazmerski, V., Blasko, D., & Dessalegn, B. (2003). ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 31(5), 673–689.
Keller, T. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2001). The neural bases of sentence comprehension: A fMRI examination of syntactic and lexical processing. Cereb Cortex, 11(3), 223–237.
Kircher, T., Brammer, M. J., Andreu, N., Williams, S., & McGuire, P. K. (2001). Engagement of right temporal cortex during processing of linguistic context. Neuropsychologia, 39, 798–809.
Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Kim, I. J., & Alpert, N. M. (1995). Topographic representations of mental images in primary visual cortex. Nature, 378, 6556.
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205.
Kutas, M., Lindamood, T., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Word expectancy and event-related brain potentials during sentence processing. In S. K. J. Requin (Ed.), Preparatory states and processes (pp. 217–237). Hillsdale, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum Associates.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Marsolek, C. J., Kosslyn, S. M., & Squire, L. R. (1992). Form-specific visual priming in the right cerebral hemisphere. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 492–508.
Martin, A. (2001). Functional neuroimaging of semantic memory. In R. K. Cabeza, A. (Ed.), Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition (pp. 153–186). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Martin, A., & Chao, L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11(2), 194–201.
Oliveri, M., Romero, L., & Papagno, C. (2004). Left but not right temporal involvement in opaque idiom comprehension: A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(5), 848–855.
Papagno, C. (2001). Comprehension of metaphors and idioms in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: A longitudinal study. Brain, 124, 1450–1460.
Papagno, C., Lucchelli, F., Muggia, S., & Rizzo, S. (2003). Idiom comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease: The role of the central executive. Brain, 126, 2419–2430.
Papagno, C., Tabossi, P., Colombo, M., & Zampetti, P. (2004). Idiom comprehension in aphasic patients. Brain and Language, 89, 226–234.
Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (2001). Understanding metaphors and idioms: A single-case neuropsychological study in a person with Down syndrome. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7(4), 516–528.
Paul, L., Van Lancker-Sidtis, D. R., Schieffer, B., Dietrich, R., & Brown, W. (2003). Communicative deficits in agenesis of the corpus callosum: Nonliteral language and affective prosody. Brain and Language, 85, 313–324.
Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Rivière, D., & Le Bihan, D. (2001). Modulation of parietal activation by semantic distance in a number comparison task. Neuroimage, 14, 1013–1026.
Pulvermüller, F. (1996). Hebb’s concept of cell assemblies and the psychophysiology of word processing. Psychophysiology, 33, 317–333.
Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain’s language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 253–336.
Pulvermüller, F. (2003). The neuroscience of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pynte, J., Besson, M., Robichon, F., & Poli, J. (1996). The time-course of metaphor comprehension: An event-related potential study. Brain & Language, 55, 293–316.
Rapp, A., Leube, D., Erb, M., Grodd, W., & Kircher, T. (2004). Neural correlates of metaphor processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 395–402.
Raskin, A. H. (1992). The words I lost. New York Times. September 19.
Rehak, A., Kaplan, J., & Gardner, H. (1992). Sensitivity to conversational deviance in right-hemisphere damaged patients. Brain & Language, 42, 203–217.
Rinaldi, M., Marangolo, P., & Baldassarri, F. (2002). Metaphor comprehension in right brain-damaged subjects with visuo-verbal and verbal material: A dissociation (re)considered. Cortex, 38, 903–907.
Rodel, M., Landis, T., & Regard, M. (1989). Hemispheric dissociation in semantic relation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 70.
Rossetti, Y., Jacquin-Courtois, S., Rode, G., Ota, H., Michel, C., & Boisson, D. (2004). Does action make the link between number and space representation? Visuo-manual adaptation improves number bisection in unilateral neglect. Psychological Science, 15(6), 426–430.
Rugg, M. D., & Coles, M. (Eds.). (1995). Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
St. George, M., Kutas, M., Martinez, A., & Sereno, M. I. (1999). Semantic integration in reading: Engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. Brain, 122(Pt. 7), 1317–1325.
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tompkins, C. (1990). Knowledge and strategies for processing lexical metaphor after right or left hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33(2), 307–316.
Tompkins, C., Boada, R., & McGarry, K. (1992). The access and processing of familiar idioms by brain-damaged and normally aging adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35(3), 626–638.
Tranel, D., Logan, C. G., Frank, R. J., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Explaining category-related effects in the retrieval of conceptual and lexical knowledge for concrete entities: operationalization and analysis of factors. Neuropsychologia, 35(10), 1329–1339.
Turner, M. (1991). Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Van Lacker, D., & Kemplar, D. (1987). Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients. Brain & Language, 32, 265–277.
Vuilleumier, P., Ortigue, S., & Brugger, P. (2004). The number space and neglect. Cortex, 40, 399–410.
Wernicke, C. (1874). Der Aphasische Symptomenkomplex. Breslau: Max Cohn and Weigert.
Winner, E., & Gardner, H. (1977). The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. Brain, 100, 719–727.
Zaidel, E., Kasher, A., Soroker, N., & Baroti, G. (2002). Effects of right and left hemisphere damage on performance of the “right hemisphere communication battery.”Brain & Language, 80(3), 510–535.
Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., & Umilta, C. (2002). Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138–139.