Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Cambridge Handbooks in Anthropology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Conceiving Kinship in the Twenty-First Century
- Part I Opening Frameworks
- Part II The (Non)Biological Basis of Relatedness
- Part III Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
- 12 Kinship Knowledge and the State: The Case of Argentina’s Adult “Living Disappeared”
- 13 Kinship, Affliction, Proximity, and Unfinished Healing in India
- 14 Reproductive Remix: Law, Kinship, and Origin Stories
- 15 Selecting for Sons: Kinship As a Product of Desire
- Part IV Transnational Connections
- Part V Technological Conceptions
- Part VI Kinship and the Nation-State
- Index
- References
15 - Selecting for Sons: Kinship As a Product of Desire
from Part III - Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Cambridge Handbooks in Anthropology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Conceiving Kinship in the Twenty-First Century
- Part I Opening Frameworks
- Part II The (Non)Biological Basis of Relatedness
- Part III Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
- 12 Kinship Knowledge and the State: The Case of Argentina’s Adult “Living Disappeared”
- 13 Kinship, Affliction, Proximity, and Unfinished Healing in India
- 14 Reproductive Remix: Law, Kinship, and Origin Stories
- 15 Selecting for Sons: Kinship As a Product of Desire
- Part IV Transnational Connections
- Part V Technological Conceptions
- Part VI Kinship and the Nation-State
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship , pp. 344 - 368Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bamford, Sandra and Leach, James. 2009. Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Bélanger, Danièle. 2006. “Indispensable Sons: Negotiating Reproductive Desires in Rural Vietnam.” Gender, Place and Culture 13(3): 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bùi Minh Huệ. 13 Aug. 2014. “Gìn Giữ Gia Đình Việt Trước Sự Xâm Lăng Văn Hóa” [Preserving the Vietnamese family in the face of cultural aggression]. Gia Đình và Xã Hội [Family and Society].Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet (ed.) 2000. Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chu Thị Bích Huệ. 11 Jan. 2011. “Chuẩn Mực Văn Hóa Gia Đình Là Nền Tảng Của Hạnh Phúc” [The family’s cultural standards are the foundation for happiness]. Gia Đình và Xã Hội [Family and Society].Google Scholar
Colen, Shellee. 1995. “‘Like a Mother to Them’: Stratified Reproduction and West Indian Childcare Workers and Employers in New York.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, ed. Ginsburg, Faye D. and Rapp, Rayna, 78–102. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, Deborah. 2000. “Mythical Mothers and Dichotomies of Good and Evil: Homeless Mothers in the United States.” In Ideologies and Technologies of Motherhood: Race, Class, Sexuality, Nationalism, ed. Ragoné, Helena and Twine, France Winddance, 263–294. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fortes, Meyer. 1959. Oedipus and Job in West African Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1964 [1911]. “Formulations on the Two Principles of Mental Functioning.” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, XII, 213–226. Translated by James Strachey. London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1985 [1913] “Totem and Taboo.” In The Origins of Religion: Totem and Taboo, Moses and Monotheism and Other Works, 43–224. Translated by James Strachey. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine. 2016 [1999]. Women’s Bodies, Women’s Worries: Health and Family Planning in a Vietnamese Rural Community. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine. 2014. Haunting Images: A Cultural Account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine. 2016. “Silence As a Response to Everyday Violence: Understanding Domination and Distress through the Lens of Fantasy.” Ethos 44(4): 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine. 2018. “Domestic Moods: Maternal Mental Health in Northern Vietnam.” Medical Anthropology 37(7): 582–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gammeltoft, Tine M. and Buch Segal, Lotte. 2016. “Introduction: Anthropology and Psychoanalysis: Explorations at the Edges of Culture and Consciousness.” Ethos 44(4): 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammeltoft, Tine M. and Wahlberg, Ayo. 2014. “Selective Reproductive Technologies.” Annual Review of Anthropology 43: 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, Susan. 2014. “‘Bare Sticks’ and Other Dangers to the Social Body: Assembling Fatherhood in China.” In Globalized Fatherhood, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C., Chavkin, Wendy and Navarro, Jose-Alberto, 359–381. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Guilmoto, Christophe. 2009. “The Sex Ratio Transition in Asia.” Population and Development Review 35(3): 519–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilmoto, Christophe. 2012. “Son Preference, Sex Selection, and Kinship in Vietnam.” Population and Development Review 38(1): 31–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thư, Hà. 5 Nov. 2012a. “Giảm Thiểu Mất Cân Bằng Giới Tính Khi Sinh: ‘Việt Nam Sẽ Làm Được!’” [Reducing the imbalanced sex ratio at birth: ‘Vietnam will be able to do it’]. Gia Đình và Xã Hội [Family and Society].Google Scholar
Thư, Hà. 12 Nov. 2012b. “Hệ Lụy của Mất Cân Bằng Giới Tính Khi Sinh: Tai Họa cho Sự Phát Triển Bền Vững” [Implications of the imbalanced sex ratio at birth: a disaster for stable development]. Gia Đình và Xã Hội [Family and Society].Google Scholar
Van Luong, Hy. 1989. “Vietnamese Kinship: Structural Principles and the Socialist Transformation in Northern Vietnam.” The Journal of Asian Studies 48(4): 741–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, Susan. 2002 [1952]. “The Nature and Function of Phantasy.” In Developments in Psychoanalysis, ed. Riviere, Joan, 67–121. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Jellema, Kate. 2007. “Everywhere Incense Burning: Remembering Ancestors in Đổi Mới Vietnam.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 38(3): 467–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1988a. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book I: Freud’s Papers on Technique 1953–1954, ed. Miller, Jacques-Alain, translated by Sylvana Tomaselli. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1988b The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book II: The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954–1955, ed. Miller, Jacques-Alain, translated by Sylvana Tomaselli. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 2002 [1966–1967]. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book XIV: The Logic of Phantasy. Translated by Cormac Gallagher. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 2006 [1966]. Écrits. Translated by Bruce Fink in collaboration with Héloïse Fink and Russell Grigg. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Laplanche, Jean and Pontalis, Jean-Bertrand. 2006 [1973]. The Language of Psycho-Analysis. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 2007[1927]. Sex and Repression in Savage Society. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller, Barbara. 2001. “Female-Selective Abortion in Asia: Patterns, Policies, and Debates.” American Anthropologist 103(4): 1083–1095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PAVE. 2016b. Intimate Partner Violence and Depression during Pregnancy and after Birth. Research Update. Hanoi.Google Scholar
Peletz, Michael. 2001. “Ambivalence in Kinship since the 1940s.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Franklin, Sarah and McKinnon, Susan, 413–444. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Gayle. 1975. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Toward an Anthropology of Women, ed. Reiter, Rayna R., 157–210. New York/London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Sangren, P. Steven. 2009. “‘Masculine Domination’: Desire and Chinese Patriliny.” Critique of Anthropology 29(3): 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangren, P. Steven. 2013. “The Chinese Family As Instituted Fantasy: Or, Rescuing Kinship Imaginaries from the ‘Symbolic.’” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 19: 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1992. Death without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiro, Melford E. 1997. Gender Ideology and Psychological Reality: An Essay on Cultural Reproduction. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stasch, Rupert. 2009. Society of Others: Kinship and Mourning in a West Papuan Place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNFPA. 2011. Son Preference in Vietnam: Ancient Desires, Advancing Technologies. Hanoi: United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).Google Scholar
UNFPA. 2014. Policy Brief: The Imbalanced Sex Ratio at Birth in Vietnam – Connecting Research and Policy for Change. Hanoi: United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).Google Scholar
United Nations. 2017. World Population Prospects 2017. United Nations: Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/, accessed July 13, 2017.Google Scholar
Van Bich, Pham. 1999. The Vietnamese Family in Change: The Case of the Red River Delta. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Wahlberg, Ayo and Gammeltoft, Tine M.. 2017. Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Weiss, Meira. 1994. Conditional Love: Parents’ Attitudes towards Handicapped Children. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Werner, Jayne. 2009. Gender, Household and State in Post-Revolutionary Vietnam. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegersma, Nancy. 1988. Vietnam: Peasant Land, Peasant Revolution: Patriarchy and Collectivity in the Rural Economy. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Margery. 1972. Women and the Family in Rural Taiwan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar