Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T10:23:05.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Intercultural Simulations

Theory and Practice

from Part I - Theoretical Foundations of Intercultural Training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

By
Michael B. Salzman
Edited by
Dan Landis  and
Dharm P. S. Bhawuk
Dan Landis
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, Hilo
Dharm P. S. Bhawuk
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, Manoa
Get access

Summary

This chapter briefly surveys the field of intercultural sensitivity training programs and focuses on intercultural simulations as a method to replicate real intercultural interactions and allow participants to experience important aspects of intercultural interactions and to consider their experience in the light of the cultural and cross-cultural context of the interactions. These replications reveal the underlying dynamics and sources of perceptual and interpretative bias that may confound intercultural interaction, such as the fundamental attribution error, ethnocentric, and homogeneity biases that may produce confusion, misattribution, and even conflict. The chapter identifies numerous typologies and situates simulations in an experiential category. The chapter describes two experiential methods in some detail and provides suggestions for extracting insights made available to participants by elevating the saliency of culture to the interpretation of the interactions. Strengths and potential limitations are identified.

Keywords

simulationsinterculturalattributioncultural contextcognitive errortypologies
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Training , pp. 258 - 280
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, R. D. (1983). The intercultural sensitizer or culture assimilator: A cognitive approach. In Landis, D. & Brislin, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training: Issues in training methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 186–217). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ansbacher, H., & Ansbacher, R. (1946). The individual psychology of Alfred Adler. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Becker, E. (1971). The birth and death of meaning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Berney, M. G. (1999). Field studies: Individual and group trips, expeditions and hunts. In Fowler, S. M. & Mumford, M. G. (Eds.), Intercultural sourcebook: Cross-cultural training methods (Vol. 2, pp. 175–183). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Bhawuk, D. P. S. (1990). Cross-cultural orientation programs. In Brislin, R. (Ed.), Applied cross-cultural psychology (pp. 325–346). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Blohm, J. M. (1995). Markhall: A comparative corporate-culture simulation. In Fowler, S. M. & Mumford, M.G. (Eds.), Intercultural sourcebook: Cross-cultural training method (pp.109–116). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1989). Intercultural communication training. In Asante, M. K., Gudykunst, W. B., & Newmark, E. (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1993). Understanding culture’s influence on behavior. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W., Cushner, K., Cherrie, C., & Yong, M. (1986). Intercultural interactions: A practical guide. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W., Landis, D., & Brandt, M. E. (1983). Conceptualization of intercultural behavior and training. In Landis, D. & Brislin, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training. Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
Cushner, K., & Brislin, R. W. (1996). Intercultural interactions: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cushner, K., & Landis, D. (1996). Handbook of intercultural training. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Eun, D., & Patton, B. (1996). The grocery store. Program on Negotiation. Cambridge, MA:Harvard Law School.Google Scholar
Fiedler, F. E., Mitchell, T. R., & Triandis, H. C. (1971). The culture assimilator: An approach to cross-cultural training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 95–102.Google Scholar
Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological bulletin, 51, 327–358.Google Scholar
Fowler, S. M., & Blohm, J. M. (2004). An analysis of methods of intercultural training. In Landis, D., Bennett, J. M., & Bennett, M. J. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (3rd ed., pp. 37–86). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, S. M., & Mumford, M. G. (1995). Intercultural sourcebook: Cross-cultural training methods. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1982). The self-serving attribution bias: Beyond self-presentation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 172–179.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., & Rosenfield, D. (1979). Whites ethnocentrism and their attributions for the behavior of Blacks: A motivational bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 643–657.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T.(1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 29. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Gochenour, T. (1977a). The albatross. In Batchelder, D. & Warner, E. G. (Eds.), Beyond experience: The experiential approach to cross-cultural education (pp. 131–136). Brattleboro, VT: Experiment Press.Google Scholar
Gochenour, T. (1977b). The owl. In Batchelder, D. & Warner, E. G. (Eds.), Beyond experience: The experiential approach to cross-cultural education (pp. 125–130). Brattleboro, VT: Experiment Press.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B., & Hammer, M. R. (1983). Basic training design: Approaches to Intercultural training. Handbook of intercultural training, 118–154. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-027533-8.50011-7Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., Pedersen, P. B., & Hofstede, G. H. (2002). Exploring culture: Exercises, stories and synthetic cultures. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1996).The clash of civilizations: Remaking of world order. New York, NY: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Kohls, L. R. (1999a). Conceptual model for country/area studies. In Fowler, S. M. & Mumford, M. G. (Eds.), Intercultural sourcebook: Cross-cultural training methods (Vol. 2, pp. 143–153).Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Kraemer, A. J. (1999). A method for developing deep cultural self-awareness through intensive practice. In Fowler, S. M. & Mumford, M. G. (Eds.), Intercultural sourcebook: Cross-cultural Training Methods (Vol. 2, pp. 225–239). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press Activities and Multicultural Counseling Competence Training.Google Scholar
Linville, P. W. (1998). The heterogeneity of homogeneity. In Darley, J. M. & Cooper, J. (Eds.), Attribution and social interaction: The legacy of Edward E. Jones (pp. 423–462). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Marsella, A. J. (2005). Culture and conflict. Understanding, negotiating, and reconciling conflicting constructions of reality. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 651–673.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.Google Scholar
Pusch, M. D. (2004). Intercultural training in historical perspective. In Bennett, J. M., Bennett, M. J., & Landis, D. (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortion in the attribution process. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Safiere, D. M. H. (1995). Ecotonos: A multicultural problem-solving simulation. In Fowler, S. M. & Mumford, M. G. (Eds.), Intercultural sourcebook cross-cultural training methods (Vol. 1, pp. 83–91). Boston, MA: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. (1990). The construction of an intercultural sensitizer for training non-Navajo personnel. The Journal of American Indian Education, 30, 25–33.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. (1991). A Navajo intercultural Sensitizer. Fairbanks, AK: Center for Cross-Cultural Studies College of Rural Alaska, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. (1995). Attributional discrepancies and biases in cross-cultural interactions. The Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 23, 181–193.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. (2001a). Cultural trauma and recovery: Perspectives from terror management theory. Trauma, Violence & Abuse: A Review Journal, 2(2), 172–191.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. (2001b). Globalization, culture & anxiety. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 10(4), 337–352.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. (2003). Existential anxiety, religious fundamentalism, the “clash of civilizations” and terror management theory. Cross Cultural Psychology Bulletin 37(3), 10–16.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. (2006, July). Multiculturalism and the limits of cultural relativism. In D. P. S. Bhawuk (Convenor), Hawaii as a Model of Multiculturalism for the Global Village: Issues and Prospects. Symposium conducted at the XVII International Congress International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology. Spetses, Greece.Google Scholar
Salzman, M. (2012). Ethno-cultural conflict and cooperation in Hawai‘i. In Landis, D. & Albert, R. (Eds.), Handbook of ethno-political conflict (pp. 21–44). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1954). Experimental study of positive and negative intergroup attitudes between experimentally produced groups. Robber’s Cave Study. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Shirts, G. (1974). BAFA-BAFA: A cross-cultural simulation. Del Mar, CA: Simile II.Google Scholar
Shirts, G. (2013). Starpower. Del Mar, CA: Simile II.Google Scholar
Simon, B. (1992). The perception of ingroup homogeneity: Reintroducing the intergroup context. European Review of Social Psychology. 3(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Sisk (1995). Simulation games as training tools. In Fowler, S. M. & Mumford, M. G. (Eds.), Intercultural sourcebook: Cross-cultural training methods (pp. 81–92). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London & New York: Zen Books.Google Scholar
Steinwachs, B. (1995). Barnga: A game for all seasons. In Fowler, S. M. & Mumford, M. G. (Eds.), Intercultural sourcebook: Cross-cultural training methods. Boston, MA: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, E. C. (1966). The simulation of cultural differences. Journal of Communication, 16(4), 291–305.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96–102.Google Scholar
Thiagaraja, S. (1990). Barnga. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1977). Theoretical framework for evaluation of cross-cultural training effectiveness. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1, 19–45.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wight, A. (1999). Cross-cultural analysis as a training tool. In Fowler, S. M. & Mumford, M. G. (Eds.), Intercultural sourcebook: Cross-cultural training methods (Vol. 1, pp. 127–140). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×