Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

Chapter 14 - Racial and Ethnic Group Differences in Intelligence in the United States

from Part III - Intelligence and Group Differences

Summary

This chapter focuses on the influence of environmental factors, especially instruction. It provides some of the more compelling reasons for believing that intelligence is changeable as a consequence of environmental factors. Beliefs, especially about intelligence, can have large effects, both beneficial and detrimental, on cognitive performance. Many researchers have identified working memory capacity as a factor that limits performance on cognitively demanding tasks. There is considerable agreement among many researchers on intelligence that both nature and nurture play major roles in determining intelligence and cognitive performance, despite differences of opinion regarding the relative contributions of the two types of factors. The obvious conclusion is that those who aspire to increase intelligence or to enhance people's ability to perform cognitively demanding tasks, by instruction or other environmental means, are not tilting at windmills but are pursuing a reasonable goal.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

References

Bracken, B. A., Keith, L. K., & Walker, C. (1998). Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Brislin, R., Worthley, R., & Macnab, B. (2006). Cultural intelligence: Understanding behaviors that serve people's goals. Group and Organizational Management, 31(1), 40–55.
Brown, R. P., & Day, E. (2006). The difference isn't Black and White: Stereotype threat and the race gap on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 979–985.
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnson, S. K. (1997). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence-Third Edition (TONI-3). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Ceci, S. J. (1996). On intelligence…more or less: A bioecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chan, A., Yeung, D., Chan, Y. L., He, W. J., Cheung, M. C., Lam, J., et al. (2002, February). Different neurocognitive semantic processes for alphabetic and logographic languages. Abstract presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Toronto, Canada.
Chang, D. F., & Demyan, A. (2007). Teachers’ stereotypes of Asians, Blacks, and White students. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(2), 91–114.
Chang, D. F., & Sue, S. (2003). The effects of race and problem type on teachers’ assessment of student behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 235–242.
Cheung, H., & Kemper, S. (1993). Recall and articulation of English and Chinese words by Chinese English bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 21(5), 666–670.
Cheung, F. M., Leong, F. T. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2003). Psychological assessment in Asia: Introduction to the special section. Psychological Assessment, 15, 243–247.
Chincotta, D., & Underwood, G. (1997). Digit span and articulatory suppression: A cross-linguistic comparison. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 89–96.
Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2005). Stereotype threat and the social and scientific contexts of the race achievement gap. American Psychologist, 60(3), 270–271.
DiCerbo, K. E., & Barona, A. (2000). A convergent validity study on the Differential Ability Scales and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition with Hispanic children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18, 344–352.
Fagan, J. F., & Holland, C. R. (2006). Racial equality in intelligence: Predictions from a theory of intelligence as processing. Intelligence, 35(4), 319–334.
Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2007). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Franklin, V. P. (2007). The tests are written for the dogs: The Journal of Negro Education, African American children, and the intelligence testing movement in historical perspective. Journal of Negro Education, 76(3), 216–231.
Frisby, C. L. (1999). Culture and test session behavior: Part II. School Psychology Quarterly, 14(3), 281–303.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays by Clifford Geertz. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Goldberger, N. R., & Veroff, J. B. (Eds.). (1995). The culture and psychology reader. New York: New York University Press.
Hagie, M. U., Gallipo, P. L., & Svien, L. (2003). Traditional culture versus traditional assessment for American Indian students: An investigation of potential test item bias. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(1), 15–25.
Harkness, S., Super, C. M., Barry, O., Zeitlin, M., & Long, J. (2009). Assessing the environment of children's learning: The developmental niche in Africa. In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Multicultural psychoeducational assessment (pp. 133–155). New York, NY: Springer.
Harris, A. M., Reynolds, M. A., & Koegel, H. M. (1996). Nonverbal assessment: Multicultural perspectives. In L. A. Suzuki, P. J. Meller, & J. G. Ponterotto (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications (pp. 223–252). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hedden, T., Park, D. C., Nisbett, R., Ji, L. J., Jing, Q., & Jiao, S. (2002). Cultural variation in verbal versus spatial neuropsychological function across the life span. Neuropsychology, 16(1), 65–73.
Helms, J. E. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing? American Psychologist, 47(9), 1083–1101.
Helms, J. E. (1995). An update of Helms’ White and People of Color Racial Identity models. In J. G. Ponterotto, J. M. Casas, L. A. Suzuki, & C. M. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (pp. 181–198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Helms, J. E. (2002). A remedy for the Black-White score disparity. American Psychologist, 57(4), 303–305.
Helms, J. E. (2004). The 2003 Leona Tyler Award Address: Making race a matter of individual differences within groups. Counseling Psychologist, 32(3), 473–483.
Helms, J. E. (2005). Stereotype threat might explain the black-white test score difference. American Psychologist, 60(3), 269–270.
Helms, J. E. (2006). Fairness is not validity or cultural bias in racial-group assessment: A quantitative perspective. American Psychologist, 61(88), 845–859.
Hintze, J. M. (2009). Curriculum-based assessment. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (4th ed., pp. 397–409). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Hwa-Froelich, D. A., & Matsuo, H. (2005). Vietnamese children and language-based processing tasks. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(3), 230–243.
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Kaufman, A. S. (1990). Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1963). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Loo, S. K., & Rappaport, M. D. (1998). Ethnic variations in children's problem behaviors: A cross-sectional, developmental study of Hawaii school children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39, 567–575.
López, S. R., & Guarnaccia, P. J. J. (2000). Cultural psychopathology: Uncovering the social world of mental illness. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 571–598.
Mainstream science on intelligence. (1994, December 13). Wall Street Journal, p. A18.
Mayer, D. M., & Hanges, P. J. (2003). Understanding stereotype threat effect with “culture-free” tests: An examination of its mediators and measurement. Human Performance, 16(3), 207–230.
McShane, D. (1980). A review of scores of American Indian children on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale. White Cloud Journal, 2, 18–22.
McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc Cross Battery Assessment. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Meller, P. J., & Ohr, P. S. (1996). The assessment of culturally diverse infants and preschoolers. In L. A. Suzuki, P. J. Meller, & J. G. Ponterotto (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological and educational applications (pp. 561–610). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mpofu, E., & Ortiz, S. O. (2009). Equitable assessment practices in diverse contexts. In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Multicultural psychoeducational assessment (pp. 41–76). New York, NY: Springer.
Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System: Administration and scoring manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Naglieri, J. A., Rojahn, J., & Matto, H. C. (2007). Hispanic and non-Hispanic children's performance on PASS cognitive processes and achievement. Intelligence, 35, 568–579.
Naglieri, J. A., & Ronning, M. E. (2000). Comparison of White, African American, Hispanic, and Asian children on the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 328–334.
Nisbett, R. E. (2009). Intelligence and how to get it: Why schools and cultures count. New York, NY: Norton.
Oakland, T. (2009). How universal are test development and use? In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Multicultural psychoeducational assessment (pp. 1–40). New York, NY: Springer.
Okazaki, S., & Sue, S. (2000). Implications of test revisions for assessment with Asian Americans. Psychological Assessment, 12(30, 272–280.
Ortiz, S. O., & Ochoa, S. H. (2005). Advances in cognitive assessment of culturally linguistically diverse individuals. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues (2nd ed., pp. 234–250). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Pedersen, P. (Ed.). (1999). Culture-centered interventions as a fourth dimension of psychology. In P. Pedersen (Ed.), Multiculturalism as a fourth force (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Sage.
Puente, A. E., & Puente, A. N. (2009). The challenge of meaning, abilities and competence in Hispanic/Latinos. In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Multicultural psychoeducational assessment (pp. 417–441). New York, NY: Springer.
Razani, J., Murcia, G., Tabares, J., & Wong, J. (2007). The effects of culture on WASi test performance in ethnically diverse individuals. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21(5), 776–788.
Raven, J. C. (1999). Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
Renteria, L., Tinsley Li, S., & Pliskin, N. H. (2007). Reliability and validity of the Spanish Language Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd Edition) in a sample of American, urban, Spanish-speaking Hispanics. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22(3), 455–470.
Reschly, D. J., & Bergstrom, M. K.Response to intervention. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (4th ed., pp. 434–460). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Reynolds, C. R., & Lowe, P. A. (2009). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (4th ed., pp. 332–374). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Rhodes, R. L., Ochoa, S. H., & Ortiz, S. O. (2005). Assessing culturally and linguistically diverse students: A. practical guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Rivera, L. M. (2008). Acculturation and multicultural assessment: Issues, trends, and practice. In L. A. Suzuki & J. G. Ponterotto (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment (3rd ed., pp. 73–91). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Roid, G. H., & Miller, L. J. (1997). Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.
Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(2), 235–294.
Sackett, P. R., Hardison, C. M., & Cullen, M. J. (2004). On interpreting stereotype threat as accounting for African American-White differences on cognitive tests. American Psychologist, 59(1), 7–13.
Sameroff, A. J., Seifer, R., Barocas, R., Zax, M., & Greenspan, S. (1987). Intelligence quotient scores of 4-year-old children: Social-environmental risk factors. Pediatrics, 79(3), 343–350.
Sattler, J. M. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations (5th ed.). San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler.
Sattler, J. M., & Gwynne, J. (1982). White examiners generally do not impede the intelligence test performance of black children: To debunk a myth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 196–208.
Serpell, R. (2000). Intelligence and culture. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 549–577). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Shinn, M. R., & Baker, S. K. (1996). The use of curriculum-based measurement with diverse learners. In L. A. Suzuki, P. J. Meller, & J. G. Ponterotto (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications (pp. 179–222). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Snyderman, M., & Rothman, S. (1988). The IQ controversy: The media and public policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.
Steele, C. M. (1998). Stereotyping and its threat are real. American Psychologist, 53, 680–681.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 787–811.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (2004). Stereotype threat does not live by Steele and Aronson alone. American Psychologist, 59(1), 47–48.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligences determine success in life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). APA presidential address: Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59(5), 325–338.
Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (1998). Human abilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 479–502.
Suzuki, L. A., Jordan, T., Vraniak, D., Short, E. L., Aguiar, L., & Mogami, T. (2003, August). Meta-analysis of Wechsler studies conducted on American Indian cognitive abilities. Poster session II presented at the 111th American Psychological Association Convention, Toronto, Canada.
Uba, L. (1994). Asian Americans: Personality patterns, identity, and mental health. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2007). Annual estimates of the population by race, Hispanic origin, sex and age for the United States: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2007 (NC-EST2007–04; release date: May 1, 2009). Retrieved December 9, 2009, from www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/NC-EST2007-asrh.html.
U.S. Department of Education. (2005). 27th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2005 (Vol. 2, pp. 116). Data updated as of July 31, 2004. Retrieved December 5, 2009, from www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2005/index.html.
Valencia, R. R., & Suzuki, L. A. (2001). Intelligence testing and minority students: Foundations, performance factors, and assessment issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Valencia, R. R., Suzuki, L. A., & Salinas, M. F. (2001). Test bias. In R. R. Valencia & L. A. Suzuki (Eds.), Intelligence testing and minority students: Foundations, performance factors, and assessment issues (pp. 111–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Verney, S. P., Granholm, E., Marshall, S. P., Malcarne, V. L., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2005). Culture-fair cognitive ability assessment: Information processing and psychophysiological approaches. Assessment, 12(3), 303–319.
Weiss, L. G., Harris, J. G., Prifitera, A., Courville, T., Rolthus, E., Saklofske, D. H., & Holdneck, J. A. (2006) WISC-IV interpretation in a societal context. In L. G. Weiss, D. H. Saklofske, A. Prifitera, & J. A. Holdnack (Eds.), Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – IV: Advanced clinical interpretation (pp. 1–56). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Whaley, A. L. (1998). Issues of validity in empirical tests of stereotype threat theory. American Psychologist, 53, 679–680.
Wicherts, J. M. (2005). Stereotype threat research and the assumptions underlying analysis of covariance. American Psychologist, 60(3), 267–269.