Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-26T22:23:13.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

38 - Human dignity in French law

from Part IV - Legal implementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Stéphanie Hennette-Vauchez
Affiliation:
Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense
Marcus Düwell
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jens Braarvig
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Roger Brownsword
Affiliation:
King's College London
Dietmar Mieth
Affiliation:
Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
Get access

Summary

As most of the contributions to this part of the handbook have underlined, human dignity certainly is a foundational concept of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The UDHR however, can hardly be described as foundational – or even central – to the French legal order. Although it was signed in Paris, the technical fact that France never ratified the Declaration is quite emblematic of its actual standing within the French legal order. That is to say, the human dignity concept that underpins the Declaration has a rather limited echo in French law. Although it did have a strong philosophical and political influence in the post-war decades, it remained essentially absent from legal norms; mostly, it was an a-juridical principle. When, later on, it eventually was articulated as a legal (constitutional) concept, its meaning began to be intensely debated and some of its normative uses did in fact part with its function as a basis of and premise for human rights. To this day, both the meaning and the importance of a legal principle of human dignity remain uncertain in France.

Human dignity: an uncertain concept

France prides itself on the global influence of its 1789 Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen, and gloriously tends to speak and stand up to the world as the land of human rights. But the 1789 Declaration ignores human dignity, and the dignity of man that the UDHR promoted was mostly absent from French law until well into the 1990s (Girard and Hennette-Vauchez 2005); it remained, in other words, a concept that legal theorists and human rights activists would refer to as the ultimate justification for human rights, but that was only very marginally used in positive law.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity
Interdisciplinary Perspectives
, pp. 368 - 374
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beyleveld, D., and Brownsword, R. 2001. Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Brownsword, R. 2003. ‘Bioethics Today, Bioethics Tomorrow: Stem Cell Research and the Dignitarian Alliance’, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 17: 15–51Google ScholarPubMed
Brownsword, R. 2005. ‘Stem Cells and Cloning: Where the Regulatory Consensus Fails’, New England Law Review 39: 535–71Google Scholar
Conseil d’Etat. 2010. ‘Etude sur les possibilités juridiques d'interdiction du port du voile integral’, (in English) (accessed 22 April 2013)
Girard, C., and Hennette-Vauchez, S. 2005. La dignité de la personne humaine: Recherche sur un processus de juridicisation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar
Gomez, M. 2008. ‘La constitution pourrait s'ouvrir à la bioéthique’, La Croix, 9 January 2008
Hennette-Vauchez, S. 2004. ‘Kant contre Jehovah? Refus de soins et dignité de la personne humaine’, Recueil Dalloz 3154–60
Hennette-Vauchez, S. 2009. ‘Une dignitas humaine? Vielles outres, vin nouveau’, Droits. Revue française de théorie juridique No. 48, 59–85
Hennette-Vauchez, S. 2011. ‘A Human Dignitas? Remnants of the Ancient Legal Concept in Contemporary Dignity Jurisprudence’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 9(1): 32–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Floch, E. 2003. ‘Les projets de constitution de Vichy (1940–1944)’, PhD dissertation. Université Paris II Panthéon Assas
Marella, M. R. 2006. ‘The Old and New Limits to the Freedom of Contract in Europe’, European Review of Contract Law 2: 257–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, B. 1998. Constitution et ethique biomédicale, Lenoir, N., Mathieu, B. and Maus, D. (eds.). La Documentation Française, 50–1
Revet, T. 1999. ‘La dignité de la personne humaine en droit du travail’, in Pavia, M. L. and Revet, T. (eds.), La dignité de la personne humaine. Paris: EconomicaGoogle Scholar
Veil, S. 2008. Redécouvrir le Préambule de la Constitution: Rapport au President de la République. Paris: La Documentation FrançaiseGoogle Scholar
Whitman, J. Q. 2000. ‘Enforcing Civility and Respect: Three Societies’, Yale Law Journal 109: 1279–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, J. Q. 2003. ‘On Nazi “Honor” and New European “Dignity’, in Joerges, C. and Ghaleigh, N. S. (eds.), Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and Its Legal Tradition. Oxford: Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×