Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:45:02.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Rules for Coding Scheme Development

from Part III - Methodology and Procedures of Interaction Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2018

By
Franziska Tschan ,
Jasmin Zimmermann  and
Norbert K. Semmer
Edited by
Elisabeth Brauner ,
Margarete Boos  and
Michaela Kolbe
Elisabeth Brauner
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Margarete Boos
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Michaela Kolbe
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 191 - 207
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annett, J. (2003). Hierarchical task analysis. In Hollnagel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task design (Vol. 2, pp. 17–35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.1201/9781410607775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annett, J., Cunningham, D., & Mathias-Jones, P. (2000). A method for measuring team skills. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1076–1094. doi:10.1080/00140130050084888CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakeman, R. (2000). Behavioral observation and coding. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 138–159). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511527685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis; a method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ballard, D. I., Tschan, F., & Waller, M. J. (2008). All in the timing – Considering time at multiple stages of group research. Small Group Research, 39(3), 328–351. doi:10.1177/1046496408317036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, J., Weingart, L., & Olekalns, M. (2004). Baubles, bangles, and beads: Modeling the evolution of negotiating groups over time. In Neale, M. A., Mannix, E. A., & Bloung-Lyons, S. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Time in groups (Vol. 6, pp. 39–64). New York, NY: Elsevier Science Press. doi:S0738-3991(02)00012-5/S1534-0856(03)06003-1Google Scholar
Carr, L. J. (1929). Experimental sociology: A preliminary note on theory and method. Social Forces, 8, 63–74. doi:10.2307/2570053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorney, J. M., McMurtry, C. M., Chambers, C. T., & Bakeman, R. (2015). Developing and modifying behavioral coding schemes in pediatric psychology: a practical guide. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 40(1), 154–164. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsu099CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cristancho, S. M., Apramian, T., Vanstone, M., Lingard, L., Ott, M., & Novick, R. J. (2013). Understanding clinical uncertainty: What is going on when experienced surgeons are not sure what to do? Academic Medicine, 88(10), 1516–1521. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a3116fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, W. A., Diez, M. E., & Hamilton, M. (1984). Coding Naturalistic Negotiation Interaction. Human Communication Research, 10(3), 403–425. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00025.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filsinger, E. E. (1983). Choices among marital observation coding systems. Family Process, 22(3), 317–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1983.00317.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Futoran, G. C., Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1989). Tempo – a Time-Based System for Analysis of Group-Interaction Process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(3), 211–232. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1003_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M. (2012). Mindset theory of action phases. In van Lange, P. A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 526–545). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446249215.n26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., & Nägele, C. (2007). Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 127–142. doi:S0738-3991(02)00012-5/j.obhdp.2006.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzo, R. A., Wagner, D. B., Maguire, E., Herr, B., & Hawley, C. (1986). Implicit theories and the evaluation of group-process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(2), 279–295. doi:S0738-3991(02)00012-5/0749-5978(86)90056-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 45–99. doi:S0738-3991(02)00012-5/S0065-2601(08)60248-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healey, A. N., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. A. (2006). Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics, 49(5–6), 589–604. doi:10.1080/00140130600568899CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1983). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness: An investigation of group phases. Human Communication Research, 9(4), 291–305. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00700.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunziker, S., Buhlmann, C., Tschan, F., Balestra, G., Legeret, C., Schumacher, C., Semmer, N. K., Hunziker, P., & Marsch, S. (2010). Brief leadership instructions improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a high-fidelity simulation: A randomized controlled trial. Critical Care Medicine, 38(4), 1086–1091. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cf7383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an Introduction. In Lerner, G. H. (Ed.), Conversation Analysis. Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–23). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/pbns.125.02jefCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2011). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43(2), 130–158. doi:10.1177/1046496411429599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, S., Tschan, F., Beldi, G., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Semmer, N. K. (2016). Noise peaks influence communication in the operating room. An observational study. Ergonomics, 59(12), 1541–1552. doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1159736CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, N. L. (2010). Group task. In Levine, J. M. & Hogg, M. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (pp. 385–390). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412972017.n116Google Scholar
Kerr, N. L., Aronoff, J., & Messé, L. A. (2000). Methods of small group research. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 160–189). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511996481.013Google Scholar
Koeszegi, S. T., & Vetschera, R. (2010). Analysis of negotiation processes. In Kilgour, D. M. & Eden, C. (Eds.), Handbook of group decision and negotiation (pp. 121–138). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9097-3_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolbe, M., Künzle, B., Zala Mezö, E., Wacker, J., & Grote, G. (2009). Measuring coordination behavior in anaesthesia teams during induction of general anaesthetics. In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery: Analysing behavior in the operating theatre (pp. 203–221). London, UK: Ashgate. doi:10.7748/nm.17.8.9.s12Google Scholar
Lingard, L., Espin, S., Whyte, S., Regehr, G., Baker, G. R., Reznick, R., Bohnen, J., Orser, B., Doran, D., & Grober, E. (2004). Communication failures in the operating room: An observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 13(5), 330–334. doi:10.1136/qshc.2003.008425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lingard, L., Reznick, R., Espin, S., Regehr, G., & DeVito, I. (2002). Team communications in the operating room: Talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices. Academic Medicine, 77(3), 232–237. doi:10.1097/00001888-200203000-00013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. doi:10.2307/259182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. E., & Altermatt, W. T. (2001). Observation and analysis of group interaction over time: Some methodological and strategic consequences. In Hogg, M. A. & Tindale, R. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 525–556). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers. doi:10.1002/9780470998458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Dynamics in groups and teams: Groups as complex action systems. In Poole, M. S. & van de Ven, A. H. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and development (pp. 50–73). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, R. A., & Seibold, D. R. (2012). Coding group interaction. In Hollingshead, A. B. & Pool, M. S. (Eds.), Research methods for studying groups and teams, a guide to approaches, tools, and technologies (pp. 329–357). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyers, R. A., Seibold, D. R., & Brashers, D. (1991). Argument in initial group decision‐making discussions: Refinement of a coding scheme and a descriptive quantitative analysis. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55(1), 47–68. doi:10.1080/10570319109374370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. G. (1966). Task effects on group interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(5), 545–554. doi:10.1037/h0023897CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poole, M. S. (2009). Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences in decision making. Communication Monographs, 50(3), 206–232. doi:10.1080/03637758309390165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, R. D., Ray, J. M., Eckerman, D. A., Milkosky, L. M., & Gillins, L. J. (2011). Operations analysis of behavioral observation procedures: A taxonomy for modeling in an expert training system. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 616–634. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0140-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roter, D., & Larson, S. (2002). The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): Utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Education and Counseling, 46(4), 243–251. https://doi.org/S0738-3991(02)00012-5/S0738-3991(02)00012-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seelandt, J. C., Tschan, F., Keller, S., Beldi, G., Jenni, N., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Semmer, N. K. (2014). Assessing distractors and teamwork during surgery: Developing an event-based method for direct observation. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(11), 918–929. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002860CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanton, N. A. (2006). Hierarchical task analysis: developments, applications, and extensions. Applied Ergonomics, 37(1), 55–79. doi:S0738-3991(02)00012-5/j.apergo.2005.06.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staw, B. M. (1975). Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 414–432. doi:S0738-3991(02)00012-5/0030-5073(75)90060-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschan, F. (1995). Communication enhances small group performance if it conforms to task requirements: The concept of ideal communication cycles. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(3), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1703_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschan, F. (2002). Ideal cycles of communication (or cognitions) in triads, dyads, and individuals. Small Group Research, 33(6), 615–643. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496402238618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschan, F., Seelandt, J., Keller, S., Semmer, N. K., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Beldi, G. (2015). Impact of case-relevant and case-irrelevant communication within the surgical team on surgical site infection. British Journal of Surgery, 102(13), 1718–25. doi:10.1002/bjs.9927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Hunziker, P., & Marsch, S. (2011). Decisive action vs. joint deliberation: Different medical tasks imply different coordination requirements. In Duffy, V. G. (Ed.), Advances in human factors and ergonomics in healthcare (pp. 191–200). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1201/EBK1439834978Google Scholar
Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Hunziker, S., & Marsch, S. U. (2012). Group research using high-fidelity experimental simulations. In Hollingshead, A. B. & Poole, M. S. (Eds.), Research methods for studying groups and teams: A guide to approaches, tools, and technologies (pp. 58–78). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.1177/1046496412473662Google Scholar
Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Nägele, C., & Gurtner, A. (2000). Task adaptive behavior and performance in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3(4), 367–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430200003004003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Vetterli, M., Gurtner, A., Hunziker, S., & Marsch, S. U. (2011). Developing observational categories for group process research based on task and coordination-requirement analysis: Examples from research on medical emergency-driven teams. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in Human and Primate Groups (pp. 93–115). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15355-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschan, F., Vetterli, M., Semmer, N. K., Hunziker, S., & Marsch, S. C. (2011). Activities during interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A simulator study. Resuscitation, 82(11), 1419–1423. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschan, F., & von Cranach, M. (1996). Group task structure, processes and outcome. In West, M. (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 95–121). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Waller, M. J. (1999). The timing of adaptive group responses to nonroutine events. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 127–137. doi:10.2307/257088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, M. J., & Kaplan, S. A. (2016). Systematic behavioral observation for emergent team phenomena: Key considerations for quantitative video-based approaches. Organizational Research Methods, 21(2), 1–16. doi:10.1177/1094428116647785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingart, L., Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2004). Quantitative coding of negotiation behavior. International Negotiation, 9, 441–455. doi:10.1163/1571806053498805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingart, L. R. (1992). Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 682–693. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.5.682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingart, L. R. (1997). How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group processes. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 189–239). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Weldon, E., Jehn, K. A., & Pradhan, P. (1991). Processes that mediate the relationship between a group goal and improved group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 555–569. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.555CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoder, P. J., & Symons, F. J. (2010). Observational measurement of behavior. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Yule, S., Flin, R., Maran, N., Rowley, D., Youngson, G., & Paterson-Brown, S. (2008). Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: Reliability testing of the NOTSS behavior rating system. World Journal of Surgery, 32(4), 548–556. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9320-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×