Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:16:18.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

8 - Observation of Work Practices in Natural Settings

from PART III - METHODS FOR STUDYING THE STRUCTURE OF EXPERTISE

By
William J. Clancey
Edited by
K. Anders Ericsson ,
Neil Charness ,
Paul J. Feltovich  and
Robert R. Hoffman
William J. Clancey
Affiliation:
NASA/Ames Research Center
K. Anders Ericsson
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Neil Charness
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Paul J. Feltovich
Affiliation:
University of West Florida
Robert R. Hoffman
Affiliation:
University of West Florida
Get access

Summary

Keywords: Ethnography, Workplace Study, Practice, Participant Observation, Ethnomethodology, Lived Work

Introduction

Expertise is not just about inference applied to facts and heuristics, but about being a social actor. Observation of natural settings begins not with laboratory behavioral tasks – problems fed to a “subject” – but with how work methods are adapted and evaluated by experts themselves, as situations are experienced as problematic and formulated as defined tasks and plans. My focus in this chapter is on socially and physically located behaviors, especially those involving conversations, tools, and informal (ad hoc) interactions. How an observer engages with practitioners in a work setting itself requires expertise, including concepts, tools, and methods for understanding other people's motives and problems, often coupled with methods for work systems design.

By watching people at work in everyday settings (Rogoff & Lave 1984) and observing activities over time in different circumstances, we can study and document work practices, including those of proficient domain practitioners. This chapter introduces and illustrates a theoretical framework as well as methods for observing work practices in everyday (or natural) settings in a manner that enables understanding and possibly improving how the work is done.

In the first part of this chapter, I explain the notion of work practices and the historical development of observation in natural settings. In the middle part, I elaborate the perspective of ethnomethodology, including contrasting ways of viewing people and workplaces, and different units of analysis for representing work observations.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance , pp. 127 - 146
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernard, H. R. (Ed.). (1998). Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Beyer, H. & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco: Morgan-Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R. (1952). Introduction to kinesics. Louisville: University of Louisville Press.Google Scholar
Blomberg, J., Giacomi, J., Mosher, A. & Swenton-Wall, P. (1993). Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In Schuler, D. & Namioka, A. (Eds.), Participatory design: Principles and practices, (pp. 123–155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Blum, B. I. (1996). Beyond programming: To a new era of design. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, B. G., & Shortliffe, E. H. (Eds.). (1984). Rule-based expert systems: The MYCIN experiments of the Heuristic Programming Project. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Button, G., & Harper, R. (1996). The relevance of “work-practice” for design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clancey, W. J. (2001). Field science ethnography: Methods for systematic observation on an arctic expedition. Field Methods, 13, 223–243. August.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancey, W. J. (2002). Simulating activities: Relating motives, deliberation, and attentive coordination. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 471–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancey, W. J. (in press). Participant observation of a Mars surface habitat mission simulation. To appear in Habitation.
Clancey, W. J., Sachs, P., Sierhuis, M., & Hoof, R. (1998). Brahms: Simulating practice for work systems design. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 49, 831–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. M. (1997). Rat-Tale: Sociology's contribution to understanding human and machine cognition. In Feltovich, P. J., Ford, K. M., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), Expertise in context (pp. 293–311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB). (2003). CAIB Report, Volume 1. NASA. [August 2005] http://CAIB.NASA.GOV/news/report/volume1/default.html.
Corbet, J. M., Rasmussen, B., & Rauner, F. (1991). Crossing the border: The social and engineering design of computer integrated manufacturing systems. London: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekker, S. W. A., Nyce, J. M., & Hoffman, R. R. (2003). From contextual inquiry to designable futures: What do we need to get there? IEEE Intelligent Systems, March–April, 74–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewalt, K. M., & Dewalt, B. R. (2002). Participant observation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dourish, P., & Button, G. (1998). On “technomethodology”: Foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design. Human-computer interaction, 13, 395–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehn, P. (1988). Work oriented design of computer artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.Google Scholar
Emery, F. E. (1959). The emergence of a new paradign of work. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University, Centre for Continuing Education.Google Scholar
El Guindi, F. (1998). From pictorializing to visual ethnography. In Bernard, H. R. (Ed.), Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology (pp. 459–511). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press,Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1999). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43, 960–974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feltovich, P., Ford, K., & Hoffman, R. (Eds.). (1997). Human and machine expertise in context. Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Fetterman, D. M. (1998). Ethnography (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Forsythe, D. E. (1999). “It's just a matter of common sense”: Ethnography as invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1969). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (Eds.). (1991). Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hall, Edward T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hall, Edward T. (1959). The silent language. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Harper, R. H. R. (2000). The organisation of ethnography: A discussion of ethnographic fieldwork programs in CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 9, 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R. (1998). How can expertise be defined? Implications of research from cognitive psychology. In Williams, R., Faulkner, W., & Fleck, J. (Eds.), Exploring expertise (pp. 81–100). New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, R. R., Coffey, J. W., & Ford, K. M. (2000). STORM-LK: System to organize representations in meteorology. Deliverable on the contract, “Human-centered system prototype,” National Technology Alliance.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, A., & Sackett, R. (1998). Direct systematic observation of behavior. In Bernard, H. (Ed.), Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press, pp. 301–331.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. (1992). Technology and social interaction: Notes on the achievement of authoritative knowledge in complex settings. IRL Technical Report No. 92-0027. [December 2004] http://www.lifescapes.org/Writeups.htm.
Jordan, B. (1993). Ethnographic workplace studies and computer supported cooperative work. Proceedings of the interdisciplinary workshop on informatics and psychology. Schärding, Austria, June. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. (1996). Ethnographic workplace studies and computer supported cooperative work. In Shapiro, D., Tauber, M., & Traunmüller, R. (Eds.), The design of computer-supported cooperative work and groupware systems (pp. 17–42). Amsterdam: North Holland/Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. (1997). Transforming ethnography – reinventing research. Cultural Anthropology Methods, 9, 12–17, October.Google Scholar
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kling, R., & Star, S. L. (1998). Human centered systems in the perspective of organizational and social informatics. Computers and Society, 28, 22–29, March.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leont'ev A. N. (1979). The problem of activity in psychology. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, (pp. 37–71).Google Scholar
Lesgold, A., Rubinson, H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., & Wang, Y. (1988). Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing x-ray pictures. In Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., and Farr, M. J., (Eds.), The nature of expertise. (pp. 311–342) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. (1952). King Solomon's ring. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (Eds.). (2000). Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardi, B. (1995). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nardi, B., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.) (1999). A web on the wind: The structure of invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8(1–2), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Google Scholar
Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines. An ethnography of a modern job. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
PPS (“Project for Public Spaces”). [December 2004] http://www.pps.org/info/placemakingtools/placemakers/wwhyte.
Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (1984). Everyday cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Scheflen, A. E. (1972). Body language and the social order. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social polity. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 254–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Seah, C., Sierhuis, M., & Clancey, W. J. (2005). Multi-agent modeling and simulation approach for design and analysis of MER mission operations. Proceedings of 2005 international conference on human-computer interface advances for modeling and simulation (SIMCHI'05), ISBN 1-56555-288-1.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Sierhuis, M. (2001). Modeling and simulating work practice. Ph.D. thesis, Social Science and Informatics (SWI), University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, ISBN 90-6464-849-2.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
Squyres, S. W., Arvidson, R. E., Bell, J. F. III. (2004). The Spirit Rover's Athena science investigation at Gusev Crater, Mars, Science, 305, 794–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Star, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged. Merriam-Webster, 2002. http://unabridged.merriam-webster.com (13 Dec. 2004).
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, M., Whalen, J., Moore, R., Raymond, G., Szymanski, M., & Vinkhuyzen, E. (2004). Studying workscapes as a natural observational discipline. In LeVine, P. & Scollon, R. (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press (pp. 208–229).Google Scholar
Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.Google Scholar
Wynn, E. (1991). Taking practice seriously. In Greenbaum, J. & Kyng, M. (Eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 45–64.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×