Shifts in Partner Attractiveness

Juliana E. French; Sierra D. Peters; Olivia W. Breedin; Emma E. Altgelt; Andrea L. Meltzer

doi:10.1017/9781108943567.018

14 - Shifts in Partner Attractiveness

from Part III - Postcopulatory Adaptations

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 June 2022

Emma E. Altgelt and

Edited by

Todd K. Shackelford: Affiliation:
Oakland University, Michigan

Book contents

Get access

Summary

In addition to facilitating reproduction and gene propagation, partner attractiveness facilitates pair-bond maintenance. For this reason, partner attractiveness is a core issue for women’s long-term relationships. In this chapter, in addition to explicating the qualities that comprise partner attractiveness for women and their functions, we discuss the extent to which the functional importance of these qualities may shift situationally within the context of women’s committed, long-term relationships. Traits signaling (a) social status, access to resources, and willingness to share resources and (b) physical health and genetic benefits can confer direct benefits to offspring and thus women’s attraction to such traits can facilitate reproduction. Although research to date suggests women’s attraction to traits signaling social status, access to resources, and willingness to share resources does not shift over contexts or the life-course of women’s long-term relationships, women’s attraction to traits signaling physical health and genetic benefits seem to fluctuate across fertility status (though some mixed evidence has emerged). Moreover, the function of such traits may shift as women’s long-term relationships develop over time. We highlight each of these shifts in turn. Traits signaling commitment and trustworthiness (e.g., commitment, supportiveness, warmth, kindness) facilitate long-term relationship maintenance. Given relationship maintenance is consistently important to women, such partner qualities are a stable component of partner attractiveness; nevertheless, we raise the possibility that women’s attraction to such traits may heighten at key milestones in women’s relationship (e.g., during the transition to parenthood, when reaching older age). We end this chapter by proffering an evolutionary developmental relationship life-course model that (a) synthesizes the literature on shifts in partner attractiveness for women and their implications for women’s relationships, (b) suggests new ways of thinking about partner attractiveness, and (c) reveals gaps in empirical knowledge that can pave the way for future research.

Keywords

attraction romantic relationships reproductive success relationship maintenance relationship satisfaction evolutionary psychology relationship science

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology , pp. 374 - 398

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943567.018 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvergne, A., & Lummaa, V. (2010). Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.003 Google Scholar

Arnocky, S., Hodges-Simeon, C. R., Ouellette, D., & Albert, G. (2018). Do men with more masculine voices have better immunocompetence? Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(6), 602–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.003 CrossRef Google Scholar

Barta, W. D., & Kiene, S. M. (2005). Motivations for infidelity in heterosexual dating couples: The roles of gender, personality differences, and sociosexual orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(3), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505052440 CrossRef Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.Google Scholar

Biehle, S. N., & Mickelson, K. D. (2012). First-time parents’ expectations about the division of childcare and play. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026608 Google Scholar

Birnbaum, G. E. (2010). Bound to interact: The divergent goals and complex interplay of attachment and sex within romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509360902 Google Scholar

Birnbaum, G. E., & Finkel, E. J. (2015). The magnetism that holds us together: Sexuality and relationship maintenance across relationship development. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.009 Google Scholar

Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., & Orpaz, A. (2006). When sex is more than just sex: Attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 929–943. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.929 Google Scholar

Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mizrahi, M., Kanat-Maymon, Y., Sass, O., & Granovski-Milner, C. (2016). Intimately connected: The importance of partner responsiveness for experiencing sexual desire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 530–546. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pspi0000069 Google Scholar

Bjorklund, D. F., & Shackelford, T. K. (1999). Differences in parental investment contribute to important differences between men and women. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(3), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00020 Google Scholar

Boothroyd, L. G., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., DeBruine, L. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). Facial correlates of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.009 CrossRef Google Scholar

Burger, H. G., Dudley, E. C., Robertson, D. M., & Dennerstein, L. (2002). Hormonal changes in the menopause transition. Recent Progress in Hormone Research, 57, 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1210/rp.57.1.257 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/S0140525X00023992 Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(1), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600116 Google Scholar

Cantú, S. M., Simpson, J. A., Griskevicius, V., Weisberg, Y. J., Durante, K. M., & Beal, D. J. (2014). Fertile and selectively flirty: Women’s behavior toward men changes across the ovulatory cycle. Psychological Science, 25(2), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508413 Google Scholar

Cárdenas, R. A., & Harris, L. J. (2007). Do women’s preferences for symmetry change across the menstrual cycle? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.08.003 CrossRef Google Scholar

Chaix, R., Cao, C., & Donnelly, P. (2008). Is mate choice in humans MHC-dependent? PLoS Genetics, 4(9), https://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1000184 Google Scholar

Cobey, K. D., Little, A. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2015). Hormonal effects on women’s facial masculinity preferences: The influence of pregnancy, post-partum, and hormonal contraceptive use. Biological Psychology, 104, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.002 Google Scholar

DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Women’s attractiveness judgments of self-resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 47(4), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.006 Google Scholar

Dixson, B. J., Blake, K. R., Denson, T. F., Gooda-Vossos, A., O’Dean, S. M., Sulikowski, D., Rantala, M. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2018). The role of mating context and fecundability in women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity and beardedness. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 93, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.04.007 Google Scholar

Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2011). When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 1012–1032. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024062 Google Scholar

Farrelly, D. (2013). Altruism as an indicator of good parenting quality in long-term relationships: Further investigations using the mate preferences towards altruistic traits scale. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(4), 395–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2013.768595 Google Scholar

Farrelly, D., Clemson, P., & Guthrie, M. (2016). Are women’s mate preferences for altruism also influenced by physical attractiveness? Evolutionary Psychology, 14(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704915623698 Google Scholar

Feinberg, D. R. (2008). Are human faces and voices ornaments signaling common underlying cues to mate value? Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 17(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.20166 Google Scholar

Fessler, D. T. (2002). Reproductive immunosuppression and diet: An evolutionary perspective on pregnancy sickness and meat consumption. Current Anthropology, 43(1), 19–61. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/324128 Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.863723 Google Scholar

Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1). 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614561683 Google Scholar

Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). Ideals, perceptions, and evaluations in early relationship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 933–940. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.933 Google Scholar

Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614561683 Google Scholar

French, J. E., Altgelt, E. E., & Meltzer, A. L. (2019). The implications of sociosexuality for marital satisfaction and dissolution. Psychological Science, 30(10), 1460–1472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619868997 Google Scholar

French, J. E., & Meltzer, A. L. (2019). Maximizing tendencies in marriage: Accentuating the implications of readily observable partner characteristics for intimates’ satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(10), 1468–1481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219832337 Google Scholar

French, J. E., & Meltzer, A. L. (2020). The implications of changing hormonal contraceptive use after relationship formation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(4), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.04.003 CrossRef Google Scholar

Gadassi, R., Bar-Nahum, L. E., Newhouse, S., Anderson, R., Heiman, J. R., Rafaeli, E., & Janssen, E. (2016). Perceived partner responsiveness mediates the association between sexual and marital satisfaction: A daily diary study in newlywed couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0448-2 Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., Dinh, T., Grebe, N. M., Del Giudice, M., & Thompson, M. E. (2019). Psychological cycle shifts redux: Revisiting a preregistered study examining preferences for muscularity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(6), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.05.005 Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., Garver-Apgar, C. E., Simpson, J. A., & Cousins, A. J. (2007). Changes in women’s mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.151 Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000337X CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18(2), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(97)00003-2 CrossRef Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women’s preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265(1399), 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0380 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2005). Women’s sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 272(1576), 2023–2027. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3112 Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2010). Men’s facial masculinity predicts changes in their female partners’ sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle, whereas men’s intelligence does not. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(6), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.06.001 CrossRef Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Yeo, R. A. (1994). Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90018-3 Google Scholar

Garver-Apgar, C. E., Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., Miller, R. D., & Olp, J. J. (2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science, 17(10), 830–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01789.x Google Scholar

Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.55 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1205–1259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035438 Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2004). Division of labor and working-class women’s well-being across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(1), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.1.225 Google Scholar

Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233 Google Scholar

Grebe, N. M., Gangestad, S. W., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Thornhill, R. (2013). Women’s luteal-phase sexual proceptivity and the functions of extended sexuality. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2106–2110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613485965 Google Scholar

Grossman, F. K., Pollack, W. S., & Golding, E. (1988). Fathers and children: Predicting the quality and quantity of fathering. Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.1.82 Google Scholar

Henderson, J. J., & Anglin, J. M. (2003). Facial attractiveness predicts longevity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(5), 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00036-9 Google Scholar

Hicks, L. L., McNulty, J. K., Meltzer, A. L., & Olson, M. A. (2016). Capturing the interpersonal implications of evolved preferences? Frequency of sex shapes automatic, but not explicit, partner evaluations. Psychological Science, 27(6), 836–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616638650 Google Scholar

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 Google Scholar

Jern, P., Kärnä, A., Hujanen, J., Erlin, T., Gunst, A., Rautaheimo, H., … & Zietsch, B. P. (2018). A high-powered replication study finds no effect of starting or stopping hormonal contraceptive use on relationship quality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(4), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.02.008 Google Scholar

Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R., & Smith, M. J. L. (2008). Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9268-y Google Scholar

Jones, B. C., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., Cornwell, R. E., Feinberg, D. R., … & Moore, F. R. (2005). Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 272(1561), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2962 Google Scholar

Jones, B. C., Vukovic, J., Little, A. C., Roberts, S. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Circum-menopausal changes in women’s preferences for sexually dimorphic shape cues in peer-aged faces. Biological Psychology, 87(3), 453–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.04.004 Google Scholar

Jones, M. (1998). Sociosexuality and motivations for romantic involvement. Journal of Research in Personality, 32(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2212 Google Scholar

Jünger, J., Kordsmeyer, T. L., Gerlach, T. M., & Penke, L. (2018a). Fertile women evaluate male bodies as more attractive, regardless of masculinity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(4), 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.007 Google Scholar

Jünger, J., Motta-Mena, N. V., Cardenas, R., Bailey, D., Rosenfield, K. A., Schild, C., … & Puts, D. A. (2018b). Do women’s preferences for masculine voices shift across the ovulatory cycle? Hormones and Behavior, 106, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.10.008 Google Scholar

Kalmuss, D., Davidson, A., & Cushman, L. (1992). Parenting expectations, experiences, and adjustment to parenthood: A test of the violated expectations framework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(3), 516–526. https://doi.org/10.2307/353238 Google Scholar

Kaplan, H., Gurven, M., Winking, J., Hooper, P. L., & Stieglitz, J. (2010). Learning, menopause, and the human adaptive complex. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1204(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05528.x Google Scholar

Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067595 Google Scholar

Keverne, E. B. (1976). Sexual receptivity and attractiveness in the female rhesus monkey. In Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 155–200). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Klimas, C., Ehlert, U., Lacker, T. J., Waldvogel, P., & Walther, A. (2019). Higher testosterone levels are associated with unfaithful behavior in men. Biological Psychology, 146, 107730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107730 Google Scholar

Koehler, N., Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2002). Are human female preferences for symmetrical male faces enhanced when conception is likely? Animal Behaviour, 64(2), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.3063 Google Scholar

Kościński, K. (2011). Life history of female preferences for male faces. Human Nature, 22(4), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-011-9123-7 Google Scholar

Lamb, M. E., Pleck, J. H., Charnov, E. L., & Levine, J. A. (1985). Paternal behavior in humans. American Zoologist, 25(3), 883–894. www.jstor.org/stable/3883043 Google Scholar

Li, N. P. (2007). Mate preference necessities in long- and short-term mating: People prioritize in themselves what their mates prioritize in them. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(3), 528. http://library.allanschore.com/docs/Li2007.pdf Google Scholar

Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 947–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.947 Google Scholar

Lie, H. C., Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2008). Genetic diversity revealed in human faces. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 62(10), 2473–2486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00478.x Google Scholar

Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Petrie, M., Jones, B. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2013). Oral contraceptive use in women changes preferences for male facial masculinity and is associated with partner facial masculinity. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(9), 1777–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.02.014 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2007). Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biological Psychology, 76(3), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.003 Google Scholar

Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Feinberg, D. R. (2008). Symmetry and sexual dimorphism in human faces: Interrelated preferences suggest both signal quality. Behavioral Ecology, 19(4), 902–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn049 Google Scholar

Little, A. C., Saxton, T. K., Roberts, S. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Vukovic, J., … & Chenore, T. (2010). Women’s preferences for masculinity in male faces are highest during reproductive age range and lower around puberty and post-menopause. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(6), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.12.006 Google Scholar

Manning, C. J., Wakeland, E. K., & Potts, W. K. (1992). Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature, 360(6404), 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/360581a0 Google Scholar

Marcinkowska, U. M., Hahn, A. C., Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2019). No evidence that women using oral contraceptives have weaker preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s faces. PLoS One, 14(1), e0210162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210162 Google Scholar

Marcinkowska, U. M., Jasienska, G., & Prokop, P. (2018). A comparison of masculinity facial preference among naturally cycling, pregnant, lactating, and post-menopausal women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(5), 1367–1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1093-3 Google Scholar

Meltzer, A. L. (2017). Wives with masculine husbands report increased marital satisfaction near peak fertility. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000083 Google Scholar

Meltzer, A. L., Makhanova, A., Hicks, L. L., French, J. E., McNulty, J. K., & Bradbury, T. N. (2017). Quantifying the sexual afterglow: The lingering benefits of sex and their implications for pair-bonded relationships. Psychological Science, 28(5), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617691361 Google Scholar

Meltzer, A. L., & McNulty, J. K. (2014) “Tell me I’m sexy… and otherwise valuable”: Body valuation and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12018 Google Scholar

Meltzer, A. L., McNulty, J. K., Jackson, G. L., & Karney, B. R. (2014). Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(3), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034424 Google Scholar

Meltzer, A. L., McNulty, J. K., & Maner, J. K. (2015). Women like being valued for sex, as long as it is by a committed partner. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 475–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0622-1 Google Scholar

Menkin, J. A., Robles, T. F., Wiley, J. F., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2015). Online dating across the life span: Users’ relationship goals. Psychology and Aging, 30(4), 987–993. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039722 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Møller, A. P. (1997). Developmental stability and fitness: A review. The American Naturalist, 149(5), 916–932. https://doi.org/10.1086/286030 Google Scholar

Møller, A. P., & Swaddle, J. P. (1997). Asymmetry, developmental stability and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Muise, A., Schimmack, U., & Impett, E. A. (2016). Sexual frequency predicts greater well-being, but more is not always better. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(4), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615616462 Google Scholar

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1155–1180. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.71.6.1155 Google Scholar

Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2003). The dynamic structure of relationship perceptions: Differential importance as a strategy of relationship maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(11), 1433–1446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256376 Google Scholar

O’Connor, J. J., Re, D. E., & Feinberg, D. R. (2011). Voice pitch influences perceptions of sexual infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491100900109 Google Scholar

Ostovich, J. M., & Sabini, J. (2004). How are sociosexuality, sex drive, and lifetime number of sexual partners related? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(10), 1255–1266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264754 Google Scholar

Owens, R., Driscoll, H., & Farrelly, D. (2020). Variation in women’s mate preferences over the development of a monogamous relationship corresponds with changes in men’s life history strategy. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 6, 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00246-w Google Scholar

Paget, W., & Timæus, I. (1994). A relational Gompertz model of male fertility: Development and assessment. Population Studies 48(2), 333–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000147826 Google Scholar

Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/21557 Google Scholar

Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006). Women’s sexual strategies: The evolution of long-term bonds and extrapair sex. Annual Review of Sex Research, 17(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.2006.10559837 Google Scholar

Pinkhasov, R. M., Shteynshlyuger, A., Hakimian, P., Lindsay, G. K., Samadi, D. B., & Shabsigh, R. (2010). Are men shortchanged on health? Perspective on life expectancy, morbidity, and mortality in men and women in the United States. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 64(4), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02289.x Google Scholar

Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x Google Scholar

Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(5), 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.03.001 Google Scholar

Re, D. E., Tskhay, K. O., Tong, M.-O., Wilson, J. P., Zhong, C.-B., & Rule, N. O. (2015). Facing fate: Estimates of longevity from facial appearance and their underlying cues. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 3(1), 30–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/arc0000015 Google Scholar

Roberts, S. C., Gosling, L. M., Carter, V., & Petrie, M. (2008). MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 275(1652), 2715–2722. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0825 Google Scholar

Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Cobey, K. D., Klapilová, K., Havlíček, J., … & Petrie, M. (2014). Partner choice, relationship satisfaction, and oral contraception: The congruency hypothesis. Psychological Science, 25(7), 1497–1503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614532295 Google Scholar

Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140–187. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859 Google Scholar

Russell, V. M., McNulty, J. K., Baker, L. R., & Meltzer, A. L. (2014). The association between discontinuing hormonal contraceptives and wives’ marital satisfaction depends on husbands’ facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(48), 17081–17086. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414784111 Google Scholar

Schaller, M. (2011). The behavioral immune system and the psychology of human sociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1583), 3418–3426. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0029 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Seal, D. W., Agostinelli, G., & Hannett, C. A. (1994). Extradyadic romantic involvement: Moderating effects of sociosexuality and gender. Sex Roles, 31(1–2), 1–22. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/BF01560274 Google Scholar

Shackelford, T. K., & Larsen, R. J. (1997). Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 456–466. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.456 Google Scholar

Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminate validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 870–883. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.60.6.870 Google Scholar

Simpson, J. A., Gangestad, S. W., Christensen, P. N., & Leck, K. (1999). Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 159–172. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.159 Google Scholar

Stroebe, W., & Stroebe, M. S. (1987). Bereavement and health: The psychological and physical consequences of partner loss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thornhill, R., Chapman, J. F., & Gangestad, S. W. (2013). Women’s preferences for men’s scents associated with testosterone and cortisol levels: Patterns across the ovulatory cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.01.003 CrossRef Google Scholar

Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychological Science, 5(5), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00629.x Google Scholar

Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(3), 175–201. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00005-7 Google Scholar

Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.001 Google Scholar

Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., Miller, R., Scheyd, G., McCollough, J. K., & Franklin, M. (2003). Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women. Behavioral Ecology, 14(5), 668–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arg043 Google Scholar

Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P., Meltzer, A. L., & Tsai, M. H. (2020). Mate preferences for warmth-trustworthiness predict romantic attraction in the early stages of mate selection and satisfaction in ongoing relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(2), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219855048 Google Scholar

van Stein, K. R., Strauß, B., & Brenk-Franz, K. (2019). Ovulatory shifts in sexual desire but not mate preferences: An LH-test-confirmed, longitudinal study. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1474704919848116 Google Scholar

Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Bettens, F., & Paepke, A. J. (1995). MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 260(1359), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0087 Google Scholar

Wood, W., Kressel, L., Joshi, P. D., & Louie, B. (2014). Meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects on women’s mate preferences. Emotion Review, 6(3), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1754073914523073 Google Scholar

Book contents

14 - Shifts in Partner Attractiveness

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive