Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T05:56:02.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

28 - Defining Moral Responsibility for School Leaders in Times of Democratic Crisis

from Part III - Emerging Ethical Pathways and Frameworks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2024

Sheron Fraser-Burgess
Affiliation:
Ball State University, Indiana
Jessica Heybach
Affiliation:
Florida International University
Dini Metro-Roland
Affiliation:
Western Michigan University
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides a rationale for, and outlines of, a democratic ethical framework for defining the moral responsibilities of school leaders working within political conditions of growing inequality, authoritarian state governments, and populist parental-rights movements. Facing these conditions, many leaders are tempted toward a position of liberal neutrality, a (false) removal of politics designed to minimize anger or retribution by parents and legislatures. A democratic, communal ethic orients the responsibilities of the school leader around democratic values, and the educational interests of the students. Moral responsibility requires leaders to embrace liberalism’s pluralism but also its strong egalitarianism, by educating students in both the hopeful and the tragic forms of knowledge and shared social existence that constitute the national democratic project.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attewell, P., and Newman, K. S.. Growing Gaps: Educational Inequality around the World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bayless, K. “‘Attack on Public Education’: Missouri’s ‘Parents Bill of Rights’ Follows National Strategy.” Kansas City Star, April 14, 2022.Google Scholar
Ben-Ghiat, R. “Strongmen: The Politics of Domination.” New Republic, May 2022.Google Scholar
Bialystok, L. “‘Politics without ‘Brainwashing’: A Philosophical Defence of Social Justice Education.” Curriculum Inquiry 44, no. 3 (2014): 413440.Google Scholar
Biesta, G.Educational Leadership for What? An Educational Examination.” In The Wiley International Handbook of Educational Leadership, edited by Waite, D. and Bogotch, I., 1527. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2017.Google Scholar
Boyte, H. C.Populism: Bringing Culture Back In.” The Good Society 21, no. 2 (2012): 300319.Google Scholar
Carter, P., and Merry, M.. Wall to Wall: Examining the Ecology of Racial and Education Inequality with Research. Washington, DC: Spencer Foundation, December 2021.Google Scholar
Csaky, Z. “Nations in Transit 2021: The Antidemocratic Turn.” Freedom House, 2021. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/NIT_2021_final_042321.pdf.Google Scholar
Diliberti, M. K., and Schwartz, H.. “District Leaders’ Concerns about Mental Health and Political Polarization in Schools.” RAND Corporation, 2022. www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA956-8.html.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence. The Democracy Index 2021: The China Challenge. New York: Economist Intelligence, 2022.Google Scholar
Furman, G. C.The Ethic of Community.” Journal of Educational Administration 42, no. 2 (2004): 215235.Google Scholar
Glaude, E. Jr. Democracy in Black: How Race Still Enslaves the American Soul. New York: Broadway Books, 2017.Google Scholar
Gunzenhauser, M. G. The Active/Ethical Professional: A Framework for Responsible Educators. New York: Continuum International, 2012.Google Scholar
Kamenetz, A. “The Education Culture War Is Raging. But for Most Parents, It’s Background Noise.” National Public Radio, April 29, 2022. www.npr.org/2022/04/29/1094782769/parent-poll-school-culture-wars.Google Scholar
Keena, J. A., Latner, M., McGann, A. J., and Smith, C. A.. Gerrymandering the States: Partisanship, Race, and the Transformation of American Federalism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Knight Abowitz, K.Reclaiming Community.” Educational Theory 49, no. 2 (1999): 143159.Google Scholar
Knight Abowitz, K., and Sellers, K. M.. “Pragmatist Thinking for a Populist Moment: Contingency and Re-Valuing in Education Governance.” September 2021. Ohio Valley Philosophy of Education Society, Nashville, IN.Google Scholar
Knight Abowitz, K., with Thompson, S. R.. Publics for Public Schools: Democracy, Legitimacy, and Leadership. New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. On Populist Reason. London: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar
Levesque, B. “Arizona Bill Passes: Parents Can Sue Teachers for ‘Usurping’ Parental Rights.” Los Angeles Blade, April 20, 2011.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. E., and Diamond, J. D.. Despite the Best Intentions: How Racial Inequality Thrives in Good Schools. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
McGlone, D., and Needham, E.. “The Most Gerrymandered States Ranked by Efficiency Gap and Seat Advantage.” Azavea, July 19, 2019. www.azavea.com/blog/2017/07/19/gerrymandered-states-ranked-efficiency-gap-seat-advantage/.Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. For a Left Populism. New York: Verso, 2018.Google Scholar
Nordgren, R. D.Age of Turmoil: Surging Nativist Populism and Its Possible Impact on Public Education.” Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development 28 (2017): 115.Google Scholar
Overholser Keohane, N.Leadership, Equality and Democracy.” Daedalus 145, no. 3 (2016): 820.Google Scholar
Pappas, G. F. John Dewey’s Ethics: Democracy as Experience. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Pendharkar, E.Efforts to Ban Critical Race Theory Now Restrict Teaching for a Third of America’s Kids.” Education Week 41, no. 21 (February 9, 2002).Google Scholar
Petersen, A. Works Righteousness: Material Practice in Ethical Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Politkoff, M., Silver, D., Rapaport, A., Saavedra, A., and Garland, M.. A House Divided?: What Americans Really Think about Controversial Topics in Schools. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Repucci, S., and Slipowitz, A.. “Freedom in the World 2022: The Global Expansion of Authoritarian Rule.” Freedom House, 2022. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2022/global-expansion-authoritarian-rule.Google Scholar
Sant, E. Political Education in Times of Populism: Towards a Radical Democratic Education. Manchester: Springer, 2021.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. P., and Gross, Steven Jay. Ethical Educational Leadership in Turbulent Times: (Re)solving Moral Dilemmas. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2008.Google Scholar
Shields, C. M. Transformative Leadership in Education: Equitable Change in an Uncertain and Complex World. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Simpson, D. J., and Sacken, D.. Ethical Dilemmas in Schools: Collaborative Inquiry, Decision-Making, and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Starratt, R. J. Ethical Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2004.Google Scholar
Starratt, R. J.Ethics and Social Justice: Strangers Passing in the Night?” In International Handbook of Educational Leadership, edited by Bogotch, I. and Shields, C. M., 6780. New York: Springer International Handbooks of Education, 2014.Google Scholar
Stitzlein, S. M. American Public Education and the Responsibility of Its Citizens: Supporting Democracy in the Age of Accountability. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Stitzlein, S. M. Learning How to Hope: Reviving Democracy through Our Schools and Civil Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Strike, K. Ethical Leadership in Schools: Creating Community in an Environment of Accountability. New York: Corwin Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Talisse, R. B. Overdoing Democracy: Why We Must Put Politics in Its Place. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Tenuto, P. L., and Gardiner, M. E.. “Interactive Dimensions for Leadership: An Integrative Literature Review and Model to Promote Ethical Leadership Praxis in a Global Society.” International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice 21, no. 5 (2017): 593607.Google Scholar
West, C. Democracy Matters: Winning the Fight against Imperialism. New York: Penguin, 2004.Google Scholar
West, C. Prophetic Thought in Postmodern Times. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×