Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T04:16:00.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - Retention and Persistence of Women and Minorities Along the Engineering Pathway in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

By
Gary Lichtenstein ,
Helen L. Chen ,
Karl A. Smith  and
Theresa A. Maldonado
Edited by
Aditya Johri  and
Barbara M. Olds
Gary Lichtenstein
Affiliation:
Quality Evaluation Designs
Helen L. Chen
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Karl A. Smith
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Theresa A. Maldonado
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering Education and Centers of the Directorate for Engineering at the National Science Foundation
Aditya Johri
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Barbara M. Olds
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Countries around the world rely on the contributions of engineers to support national interests and maintain economic competitiveness. In the United States, government and industry leaders have long regarded engineers and other members of the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce as vital to the nation's economy and security. It is hardly surprising, then, that issues surrounding student retention and persistence in engineering degree programs and the engineering workforce are of special interest to engineering educators.

Since the 1970s, federal policy and funding have specifically focused on attracting and retaining women and minorities in science and engineering fields. Yet progress has been halting. In one comprehensive study, the United States ranked 30th of 35 countries in the proportion of female Ph.D.s in engineering, manufacturing, and construction, and 24th of 30 with respect to growth in the proportion of female Ph.D.s in these sectors (European Commission, 2009, p. 51). In this chapter, we examine the influence of U.S. federal policy on engineering education over the past forty years, with special attention to the impact of efforts to increase the number of women and minorities in the STEM workforce.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research , pp. 311 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
Amelink, C. T., & Creamer, E. G. (2010). Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2010). Handbook on diversity and the law: Navigating a complex landscape to foster greater faculty and student diversity in higher education. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Atman, C. J., Sheppard, S. D., Fleming, L., Miller, R., Smith, K., Stevens, R.,…Lund, D. (2008, June). Moving from pipeline thinking to understanding pathways: Findings from the Academic Pathways Study of engineering undergraduates (AC 2008-1307). In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).Google Scholar
Bellisari, A. (1991). Cultural influences on the science career choices of women. Ohio Journal of Science, 91(3), 129–133.Google Scholar
Bernold, L. E. (2007). Preparedness of engineering freshman to inquiry-based learning. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 133(2), 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besterfield-Sacre, M. E., Atman, C. J., & Shuman, L. J. (1998). Engineering student attitudes assessment. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(2), 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besterfield-Sacre, M. E., Moreno, M., Shuman, L. J., & Atman, C. J. (2001). Gender and ethnicity differences in freshmen engineering attitudes: A cross-institutional study. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorklund, S. A., Parente, J. M., & Sathianathan, D. (2004). Effects of faculty interaction and feedback on gains in student skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(2), 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. F., & Sullivan, A. S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto's Theory. Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 569–590.Google Scholar
Brown, S. V. (2000). The preparation of minorities for academic careers in science and engineering: How well are we doing? In Campbell, G., Denes, R., & Morrison, C. (Eds.), Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise (pp. 239–260). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carnevale, A., Smith, N., & Melton, M. (2011). STEM webinar. Presented at Georgetown Public Policy Institute, Center for Education and the Workforce. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University. August 14, 2012 from
Carter, D. F. (2006). Key issues in the persistence of underrepresented minority students. New Directions for Institutional Research, 130, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. L., Lattuca, L. R., & Hamilton, E. R. (2008). Conceptualizing Engagement: Contributions of Faculty to Student Engagement in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., & Weko, T. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (NCES 2009–161). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).Google Scholar
Chubin, D., May, G. S., & Babco, E. L. (2005). Diversifying the engineering workforce. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewell, B., & Tinto, V. (1999). A comparative study of the impact of differing forms of financial aid on the persistence of minority and majority doctoral students. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.Google Scholar
Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science & Engineering (CEOSE) 2007–2008. (2009). Biennial report to Congress: Broadening participation in America's STEM workforce. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Committee on Gender Differences in Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty. (2010). Gender differences at critical transitions in the careers of science, engineering, and mathematics faculty. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Committee on STEM Education, National Science and Technology Council. (2011). The Federal Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education Portfolio. A Report from the Federal Inventory of STEM Education Fast-Track Committee. Retrieved from
Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering Workforce Pipeline; Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America's science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Committee on Women in Science and Engineering (CWSE). (1994). Women scientists and engineers employed in industry: Why so few? National Research Council. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Cosentino de Cohen, C., & Deterding, N. (2009). Widening the net: National estimates of gender disparities in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, M., & MacLeod, M. (1990). Gender in the college classroom: An assessment of the “chilly climate” for women. Sex Roles, 23(3/4), 101–122. Retrieved from CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daempfle, P. (2003). An analysis of the high attrition rates among first year college science, math, and engineering majors. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 5(1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, M. N., & Foster-Johnson, L. (2001). Mentoring in the preparation of graduate researchers of color. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 549–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In Jones, M. R. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 275–319). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Edmonson, A. C. (2008). The competitive imperative of learning. Harvard Business Review, 86(7/8), 60–67.Google Scholar
Eskandari, H., Sala-Diakanda, S., Furterer, S., Rabelo, L., Crumpton-Young, L., & Williams, K. (2007). Enhancing the undergraduate Industrial Engineering curriculum: Defining desired characteristics and emerging topics. Education Training, 49(1), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinosa, L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 209–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2009). She figures 2009 – Statistics and indicators on gender equality in science. Commission for Science and Research. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Fouad, N., Fitzpatrick, M., & Liu, J. P. (2011). Persistence of women in engineering careers: A qualitative study of current and former female engineers. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(1), 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. F., Sonnert, G., & Nikiforova, I. (2009). Successful programs for undergraduate women in science and engineering: “Adapting” versus “adopting” the institutional environment. Research in Higher Education, 50(4), 333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, C. E. (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls & women: 2004 (U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics 2005–016). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
French, B. F., Immekus, J. C., & Oakes, W. C. (2005). An examination of indicators of engineering students’ success and persistence. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George-Jackson, C. (2011). Stem switching: Examining departures of undergraduate women in STEM fields. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(2), 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georges, A. (1999). Keeping what we've got: The impact of financial aid on minority retention in engineering. NACME Research Letter, 9(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Gibbons, M. (2009). Engineering by the numbers. Washington, DC: American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved from
Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagedorn, L. S., Maxwell, W., Cypers, S., Hye Sun, M., & Lester, J. (2007). Course shopping in urban community colleges: An analysis of student drop and add activities. Journal of Higher Education, 78(4), 464–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.Google Scholar
Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1984). Out of the classroom: A chilly campus climate for women?Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.Google Scholar
Hartline, B. K., & Poston, M. (2009). The mandate for broadening participation: Developing the best minds and solutions. In Boyd, M. & Wesemann, J. L. (Eds.), Broadening participation in undergraduate research: Fostering excellence and enhancing the impact (pp. 13–21). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.Google Scholar
Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women (AAUW).Google Scholar
Hosoi, S. A., & Canetto, S. S. (2011). Women in graduate engineering: Is differential dropout a factor in their underrepresentation among engineering doctorates?Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(1), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtado, S., Eagan, K., & Chang, M. (2010, January). Degrees of success: Bachelor's degree completion rates among initial STEM majors (HERI Research Brief). Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. (2011). Accomplishments and challenges for women in STEM: Implications for future research and programs. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(1), 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2006). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom (3rd ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. J., & Sheppard, S. D. (2004). Relationships between engineering student and faculty demographics and stakeholders working to affect change. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(2), 137–151.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. D., & Lucero, C. (2003). Transforming the academic workplace: Socializing under-represented minorities into faculty life. In Fox, M. A. (Ed.), Pan organizational summit on the U.S. science and engineering workforce (pp. 138–144). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Joint Economic Committee. (2011). Assessing the impact of the great recession on income and poverty across states: Highlights from the Census Bureau's release of data from the 2010 American Community Survey. Washington, DC: United States Congress. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Jones, B. D., Paretti, M. C., Hein, S. F., & Knott, T. W. (2010). An analysis of motivation constructs with first-year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kochhar, R. (2011, July 6). In two years of economic recovery, women lost jobs, men found them. Washington, DC: The Research Center. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Kochhar, R., Fry, R., & Taylor, P. (2011, July 26). Wealth gaps rise to record highs between whites, blacks, Hispanics. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
Kuh, G. D., Jinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kyle, W. (1997). The imperative to improve undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 547–549.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., & Volkwein, J. F. (2006). Engineering change: A study of the impact of EC2000. Final Report. Baltimore, MD: ABET.Google Scholar
Lee, C. (1991). Achieving diversity: Issues in the recruitment and retention of underrepresented racial/ethnic students in higher education: A review of the literature. Alexandria, VA: National Association of College Admission Counselors.Google Scholar
Lee, J., & Clery, S. (2004). Key trends in higher education. Bethesda, MD: JBL Associates. Retrieved from
Li, Q., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2009). Development of a classification system for engineering student characteristics affecting college enrollment and retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, G., Loshbaugh, H. G., Claar, B., Chen, H., Jackson, K., & Sheppard, S. D. (2009). An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision-making among undergraduate engineering majors. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, G., Loshbaugh, H. G., Claar, B., Bailey, B., & Sheppard, S. D. (2007, June). Should I stay or should I go? Engineering students’ persistence is based on little experience or data. ASEE09-122209 In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. Washington, DC: The American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, G., McCormick, A., Puma, J., & Sheppard, S. (2010). Comparing undergraduate experience of engineers to all other majors: Significant differences are programmatic. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. S. (2001). From scarcity to visibility: Gender differences in the careers of doctoral scientists and engineers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Lord, S., Camacho, M., Layton, R., Long, R., Ohland, M., & Wasburn, M. (2009). Who's persisting in engineering? A comparative analysis of female and male Asian, Black, Hispanic, Native American, and White students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 15(2), 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowell, B. L., Salzman, H., Bernstein, H., & Henderson, E. (2009, October). Steady as she goes? Three generations of students through the science and engineering pipeline. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Lucena, J. (2005). Defending the nation: U.S. policymaking to create scientists and engineers from Sputnik to the ‘War Against Terrorism.’ Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Malcom, S., George, Y. S., & Van Horne, V. V. (Eds). (1996). The effect of the changing policy climate on science, mathematics, and engineering diversity. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Malcom, S., Hall, P., & Brown, J. (1976). The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science. Office of Opportunities in Science (Report 76-R-3). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).Google Scholar
Malcom, L., & Malcom, S. (2011, Summer). The double bind: The next generation. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, G. S., & Chubin, D. E. (2003, January). A retrospective on undergraduate engineering success for underrepresented minority students. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, A., Lichtenstein, G., Chen, H., Puma, J., & Sheppard, S. (2013). Is the supply of engineering majors a problem of many losses or few gains? Persistence and migration of engineering majors compared to other fields. Manuscript submitted for publication.
McKeachie, W., Pintrich, P., Yi-Guang, L., & Smith, D. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Miner-Rubino, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2004). Working in a context of hostility toward women: Implications for employees’ well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(2), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moller-Wong, C., & Eide, A. (1997). An engineering student retention study. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, L. K., & Daniel, L. G. (2008). Perceptions of a chilly climate: Differences in traditional and non-traditional majors for women. Research in Higher Education, 49(3), 256–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muraskin, L., Lee, J., Wilner, A., & Swail, W. S. (2004). Raising the graduation rates of low-income college students. Washington, DC: Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education. Retrieved from Google Scholar
National Academy of Engineering. (2012, April 2). EEES Research-Informed practices for student recruitment, retention, and success. Retrieved from
National Academy of Sciences. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC). (1986). Engineering infrastructure diagramming and modeling. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering. (2012). Community colleges in the evolving STEM education landscape: Summary of a summit. In Olson, S. & Labov, J. B. (Rapporteurs), Planning Committee on Evolving Relationships and Dynamics Between Two- and Four-Year Colleges, and Universities. Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Division on Policy and Global Affairs. Board on Life Sciences, Division on Earth and Life Studies. Board on Science Education, Teacher Advisory Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Engineering Education Program Office, National Academy of Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation (NSF). (1964). Annual report. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation (NSF). (2012). NSB science and engineering indicators report. Retrieved from
National Science Foundation (NSF). (2006). NSB science and engineering indicators report. Retrieved from
National Science Foundation (NSF). (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011 (Special Report NSF11–309). Arlington, VA: Division of Science Resources Statistics. Retrieved from
National Science Foundation Act of 1950, Public Law 81–507. Retrieved from
Nelson, D. J., & Rogers, D. C. (2007). A national analysis of minorities in science and engineering faculties at research universities. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Ngo, B. (2006). Learning from the margins: The education of Southeast and South Asian Americans in context. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 9(1), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel. (1994). Reshaping the graduate education of scientists and engineers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel, National Research Council. (1994). Women scientists and engineers employed in industry: Why so few?Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Ohland, M. W., Brawner, C. E., Camacho, M. M., Layton, R. A., Long, R. A., Lord, S. M., & Wasburn, M. H. (2011). Race, gender, and measures of success in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohland, M. W., Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., & Layton, R. (2008). Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Meara, K. (2012). Because I can: Exploring faculty civic agency. Kettering Foundation Working Paper (2012-1). Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.Google Scholar
Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L., & Orfield, G. (2011, Summer). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packard, B. W., Gagnon, J., LaBelle, O., Jeffers, K., & Lynn, E. (2011). Women's experiences in the STEM community college transfer pathway. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(2), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, S. E. (2008). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Pelz, D., & Andrews, F. (1966). Scientists in organizations: Productive climates for research and development. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Peter, K., & Horn, L. (2005). Gender differences in participation and completion of undergraduate education and how they have changed over time (U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics 2005–169). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
President's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. (2011). Jobs Council solutions: Graduate 10,000 more engineers. Retrieved from
Preston, A. (2004). Leaving science: Occupational exit from scientific careers. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Preston, A. (2006). Women leaving science. Retrieved from
Reybold, L. E., & Alamia, J. (2008). Academic transitions in education: A developmental perspective on women's faculty experiences. Journal of Career Development, 35(3), 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, M. E. (2011). Unique challenges for women of color in STEM transferring from community colleges to universities. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riegle-Crumb, C., & King, B. (2010). Questioning a white male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 656–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, M., & Atwater, M. M. (2005). Traveling the road to success: A discourse on persistence throughout the science pipeline with African American students at a predominantly white institution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 691–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, B. R., Silverberg, L. A., & Hall, R. M. (1996). The chilly classroom climate: A guide to improve the education of women. Washington, DC: National Association for Women in Education.Google Scholar
Satcher, D. (2001). Our commitment to eliminate racial and ethnic health disparities. Yale Journal of Health Policy Law and Ethics, 1(1), 1–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Smith, K. A. (2011). Cooperative learning: Lessons and insights from thirty years of championing a research-based innovative practice. FIE-CL-1240-10 In Proceedings of the 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD.CrossRef
Smith, K. A., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1981). Structuring learning goals to meet the goals of engineering education. Engineering Education, 72(3), 221–226.Google Scholar
Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices (Cooperative learning and problem based learning). Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1997). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education.Google Scholar
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staniec, J. F. (2004). The effects of race, sex, and expected returns on the choice of college major. Eastern Economic Journal, 30(4), 549–562.Google Scholar
Terenzini, P. T., Cabrera, A. F., Colbeck, C. L., Parente, J., & Bjorklund, S. (2001). Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: Students’ reported learning gains. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tinto, V. (2002). Taking student retention seriously: Rethinking the first year of college. Speech delivered at the annual meeting of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admission Officers, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Townsend, B. K. (2007). Interpreting the influence of community college attendance upon baccalaureate attainment. Community College Review, 35(2), 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenor, J. M., Yu, S. L., Waight, C. L., Zerda, K. S., & Sha, T. L. (2008). The relations of ethnicity to female engineering students’ educational experiences and college and career plans in an ethnically diverse learning environment. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsapogas, J. (2004). The role of community colleges in the education of recent science and engineering graduates (InfoBrief NSF 04–315). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences.Google Scholar
Tsui, L. (2010). Overcoming barriers: Engineering program environments that support women. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16(2), 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). Age & sex in the United States, 2008. Retrieved from .
U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations. (1976). Appropriations for HUD and independent agencies, 1977, 94th Congress, 2nd Session.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1988, June). Educating scientists and engineers: Grade school to grad school (OTA-SET-377). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1989, March). Higher education for science and engineering – A background paper (OTA-BP-SET-52). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Y. (2006). Mi fuerza/My strength: The academic and personal experiences of Chicana/Latina transfer students in math and science. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (Publication No. AAI3243278).
Varma, R., & Hahn, H. (2007). Gender differences in students’ experiences in computing education in the United States. International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(2), 361–367.Google Scholar
Vaughn, R. L, & Seifer, S. (2004). Quick guide: Service-learning in engineering education. National Service Learning Clearinghouse.
Wyer, M. (2003). Intending to stay: Images of scientists, attitudes toward women, and gender as influences on persistence among science and engineering majors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×