Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- An Introduction to the Second Edition
- Part I An Introduction to Creativity
- Part II Underpinnings of Creativity
- Part III Differential Bases for Creativity
- Part IV Creativity in the World
- Collaborative Creativity
- Manifestations of Creativity
- Index
- References
Manifestations of Creativity
from Part IV - Creativity in the World
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2019
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- An Introduction to the Second Edition
- Part I An Introduction to Creativity
- Part II Underpinnings of Creativity
- Part III Differential Bases for Creativity
- Part IV Creativity in the World
- Collaborative Creativity
- Manifestations of Creativity
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity , pp. 653 - 654Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Acar, S. & Runco, M. A. (2012). Psychoticism and creativity: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, R. S. (1975). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. American Psychologist, 30, 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, P. D., Long, J. S., & Krauze, T. K. (1982). Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. American Sociological Review, 47, 615–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, P. D. & Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review, 39, 596–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, A. (1855/1977). The senses and the intellect (ed. by Robinson, D. N.). Washington, DC: University Publications of America.Google Scholar
Barron, F. X. (1963). Creativity and psychological health: Origins of personal vitality and creative freedom. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Berry, C. (1981). The Nobel scientists and the origins of scientific achievement. British Journal of Sociology, 32, 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, W. D. (1970). Birth order of creative writers. Journal of Individual Psychology, 26, 200–202.Google ScholarPubMed
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, S. H. (2014). Cognitive disinhibition, creativity, and psychopathology. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 198–221). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassandro, V. J. (1998). Explaining premature mortality across fields of creative endeavor. Journal of Personality, 66, 805–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassandro, V. J. & Simonton, D. K. (2010). Versatility, openness to experience, and topical diversity in creative products: An exploratory historiometric analysis of scientists, philosophers, and writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, J. M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science Monthly, 62, 359–377.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. & Drevdahl, J. E. (1955). A comparison of the personality profile (16 P. F.) of eminent researchers with that of eminent teachers and administrators, and of the general population. British Journal of Psychology, 46, 248–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. A. (1964). Relating personality and biographical factors to scientific creativity. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 78 (7, Whole No. 584).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, D. (2014). Virtual genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of genius (pp. 166–182). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The systems model of creativity and its applications. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 533–545). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cziko, G. A. (1995). Without miracles: Universal selection theory and the second Darwinian revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Damian, R. I. & Roberts, B. W. (2015). The associations of birth order with personality and intelligence in a representative sample of U.S. high school students. Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damian, R. I. & Simonton, D. K. (2011). From past to future art: The creative impact of Picasso’s 1935 Minotauromachy on his 1937 Guernica. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damian, R. I. & Simonton, D. K. (2014). Diversifying experiences in the development of genius and their impact on creative cognition. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 375–393). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damian, R. I. & Simonton, D. K. (2015). Psychopathology, adversity, and creativity: Diversifying experiences in the development of eminent African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 623–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, F. (ed.). (1892/1958). The autobiography of Charles Darwin and selected letters. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Elms, A. C. (1988). Freud as Leonardo: Why the first psychobiography went wrong. Journal of Personality, 56, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R. (2015). Of course animals are creative: Insights from Generativity Theory. In Kaufman, A. B. & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), Animal creativity and innovation (pp. 375–390). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Creative genius: A view from the expert-performance approach. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 321–349). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. (1910/1964). Leonardo da Vinci and a memory of his childhood (trans. by A. Tyson). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: A theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1998). Are there additional intelligences? The case for naturalist, spiritual, and existential intelligences. In Kane, J. (ed.), Education, information, and transformation (pp. 111–131). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.Google Scholar
Grosul, M. & Feist, G. J. (2014). The creative person in science. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, H. E. (1974). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Hart, M. H. (2000). The 100: A ranking of the most influential persons in history (revised & updated). Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Pred, R. S. (1988). Making it without losing it: Type A, achievement motivation, and scientific attainment revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. London: Longmans, Green.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2000–2001). Genius, lunatics and poets: Mental illness in prize-winning authors. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 20, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2001). The Sylvia Plath effect: Mental illness in eminent creative writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (ed.). (2014). Creativity and mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, Y. & Kim, J. (2008). Scientific geniuses’ psychopathology as a moderator in the relation between creative contribution types and eminence. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2008). One-hit wonders in classical music: Evidence and (partial) explanations for an early career peak. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. (1944). Configurations of culture growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyaga, S. (2015 ). Creativity and mental illness: The mad genius in question. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zythow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The price of greatness: Resolving the creativity and madness controversy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ludwig, A. M. (1998). Method and madness in the arts and sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 12, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, N. R. F. (1940). The behavioral mechanisms concerned with problem solving. Psychological Review, 47, 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (1972). Father absence, psychopathology, and poetic eminence. Psychological Reports, 31, 843–847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martindale, C. (1995). Fame more fickle than fortune: On the distribution of literary eminence. Poetics, 23, 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R. & Greenberg, D. M. (2014). Openness to experience. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 222–243). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Murray, C. (2014). Genius in world civilization. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 486–608). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Nickles, T. (2003). Evolutionary models of innovation and the Meno problem. In Shavinina, L. V. (ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 54–78). New York: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, F. (1994). Creativity and psychopathology: A study of 291 world-famous men. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 22–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raskin, E. A. (1936). Comparison of scientific and literary ability: A biographical study of eminent scientists and men of letters of the nineteenth century. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31, 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, A. (2015). Flight from wonder: An investigation of scientific creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., Acar, S., Kaufman, J. C., & Halliday, L. R. (2016). Changes in reputation and associations with fame and biographical data. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 1(1), 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, D. S. P., Wagner, M. E., & Schubert, H. J. P. (1977). Family constellation and creativity: Firstborn predominance among classical music composers. Journal of Psychology, 95, 147–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, W. T. (2014). The psychobiography of genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 20–32). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119–1133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (1976). Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate approach to the Cox data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1977). Eminence, creativity, and geographic marginality: A recursive structural equation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 805–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1986). Biographical typicality, eminence, and achievement style. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Galtonian genius, Kroeberian configurations, and emulation: A generational time-series analysis of Chinese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991a). Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 27, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991b). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991c). Personality correlates of exceptional personal influence: A note on Thorndike’s (1950) creators and leaders. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1992). The social context of career success and course for 2,026 scientists and inventors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 452–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1997a). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1997b). Foreign influence and national achievement: The impact of open milieus on Japanese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999a). Significant samples: The psychological study of eminent individuals. Psychological Methods, 4, 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999b). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106, 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, process, and person perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2006). Creativity in Creating Minds: A retrospective evaluation. In Schaler, J. A. (ed.), Howard Gardner under fire: A rebel psychologist faces his critics (pp. 143–168). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2008a). Childhood giftedness and adulthood genius: A historiometric analysis of 291 eminent African Americans. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2008b). Gender differences in birth order and family size among 186 eminent psychologists. Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology, 1, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2008c). Scientific talent, training, and performance: Intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology, 12, 28–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (scientific) creativity: A hierarchical model of disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 441–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (2011). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15, 158–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2012a). Genius. In Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (eds.), Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 492–509). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2012b). Foresight, insight, oversight, and hindsight in scientific discovery: How sighted were Galileo’s telescopic sightings? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2013a). Creative thought as blind variation and selective retention: Why sightedness is inversely related to creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 33, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2013b). What is a creative idea? Little-c versus Big-C creativity. In Chan, J. & Thomas, K. (eds.), Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 69–83). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014a). Creative performance, expertise acquisition, individual-differences, and developmental antecedents: An integrative research agenda. Intelligence, 45, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014b). The mad-genius paradox: Can creative people be more mentally healthy but highly creative people more mentally ill? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 470–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (2014c). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2015). Thomas Alva Edison’s creative career: The multilayered trajectory of trials, errors, failures, and triumphs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2016a). Creativity, automaticity, irrationality, fortuity, fantasy, and other contingencies: An eightfold response typology. Review of General Psychology, 20, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2016b). Reverse engineering genius: Historiometric studies of exceptional talent. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2017a). Domain-general creativity: On producing original, useful, and surprising combinations. In Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Glăveanu, V. P. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity across different domains (pp. 41–60). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2017b). Eminent female psychologists in family context: Historical trends for 80 women born 1847–1950. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 1(2), 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2018a). Cultural-historiometric analyses of creativity. In Leung, A. K.-y., Kwan, L. Y-Y., & Liou, S. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of culture and creativity: Basic processes and applied innovations (pp. 61–82). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2018b). Defining creativity: Don’t we also need to define what is not creative? Journal of Creative Behavior, 52, 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2018c). Intellectual genius in the Islamic Golden Age: Cross-civilization replications, extensions, and modifications. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. & Song, A. V. (2009). Eminence, IQ, physical and mental health, and achievement domain: Cox’s 282 geniuses revisited. Psychological Science, 20, 429–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. & Ting, S.-S. (2010). Creativity in Eastern and Western civilizations: The lessons of historiometry. Management and Organization Review, 6, 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 5015–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J. (2016). A Triangular Theory of Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Bridges, S. L. (2014). Varieties of genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 185–197). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, P. (1985). APA presidential addresses: The relation of integrative complexity to historical, professional, and personal factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 848–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (2010). Why siblings are like Darwin’s Finches: Birth order, sibling competition, and adaptive divergence within the family. In Buss, D. M. & Hawley, P. H. (eds.), The evolution of personality and individual differences (pp. 86–119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (2014). Openness to scientific innovation. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 546–563). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, L. M. (1925–1959). Genetic studies of genius (5 vols.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Terry, W. S. (1989). Birth order and prominence in the history of psychology. Psychological Record, 39, 333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, P. (2012). Creative combination of representations: Scientific discovery and technological invention. In Proctor, R. & Capaldi, E. J. (eds.), Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit processes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. & Stewart, T. C. (2011). The AHA! experience: Creativity through emergent binding in neural networks. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 35, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tweney, R. D. (1989). A framework for the cognitive psychology of science. In Gholson, B., Shadish, W. R., Jr., Neimeyer, R. A., & Houts, A. C. (eds.), The psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 342–366). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walberg, H. J., Rasher, S. P., & Hase, K. (1978). IQ correlates with high eminence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso’s Guernica. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2014). Case studies of genius: Ordinary thinking, extraordinary outcomes. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of genius (pp. 139–165). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, E. M. (2004). Eminence revisited. History of Psychology, 7, 265–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, R. K. (1931). The versatility of genius. Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 460–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, K. B. (2010). Rethinking the size of scientific specialties: Correcting Price’s estimate. Scientometrics, 83, 471–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zusne, L. (1985). Contributions to the history of psychology: XXXVIII. The hyperbolic structure of eminence. Psychological Reports, 57, 1213–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Asal, V., Gill, P., Rethemeyer, R. K., & Horgan, J. (2013). Killing range explaining lethality variance within a terrorist organization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(3), 401–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Averill, J. R. & Nunley, E. P. (2010). Neurosis: The dark side of emotional creativity. In Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 255–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaussart, M. L., Andrews, C. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Creative liars: The relationship between creativity and integrity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, D. W. (2011). Confucianism. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. R. (eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 246–252). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, K. & James, K. (1999). Justice and positive and negative creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claxton, G., Craft, A., & Gardner, H. (2008). Concluding thoughts: Good thinking-education for wise creativity: Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Craft, A., Gardner, H., & Claxton, G. (eds.). (2008). Creativity, wisdom and trusteeship: Exploring the role of education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Cropley, A. J. (2012). Creativity and education: An Australian perspective. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 22(1), 9–25.Google Scholar
Cropley, A. J. & Cropley, D. H. (2009). Fostering creativity: A diagnostic approach for education and organizations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Cropley, A. J. & Cropley, D. H. (2011). Creativity and lawbreaking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, D. H. (2005). Eleven principles of creativity and terrorism. Paper presented at the Fourth Homeland Security Summit and Exposition, Canberra.Google Scholar
Cropley, D. H. (2010). Summary – The dark side of creativity: A differentiated model. In Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.), The dark side of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, D. H. (2015). Video games and malevolent creativity: Does one thing lead to another? In Kaufman, J. & Green, G. (eds.), Video games and creativity (pp. 61–81). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, D. H. (2017). The dark side of creativity: Previous research and new avenues. In Bathelt, H., Cohendet, P., Henn, S., & Simon, L. (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Innovation and Knowledge Creation (pp. 307–322). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Cropley, D. H. & Cropley, A. J. (2013). Creativity and crime: A psychological approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, D. H. & Cropley, A. J. (2015). The psychology of innovation in organizations. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.). (2010). The dark side of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., White, A. E., & Chiera, B. A. (2014). Layperson perceptions of malevolent creativity: The good, the bad, and the ambiguous. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahmen-Wassenberg, P., Kämmerle, M., Unterrainer, H.-F., & Fink, A. (2016). The relation between different facets of creativity and the dark side of personality. Creativity Research Journal, 28(1), 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deresiewicz, W. (2015). The death of the artist – and the birth of the creative entrepreneur. The Atlantic (January‒February).Google Scholar
Eisenman, R. (2008). Malevolent creativity in criminals. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 116–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekblom, P. & Tilley, N. (2000). Going equipped. British Journal of Criminology, 40(3), 376–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischbacher-Smith, D. (2016). Framing the UK’s counter-terrorism policy within the context of a wicked problem. Public Money and Management, 36(6), 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forgeard, M. J. C. & Mecklenburg, A. C. (2013). The two dimensions of motivation and a reciprocal model of the creative process. Review of General Psychology, 17(3), 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. (2015). The bright and dark side correlates of creativity: Demographic, ability, personality traits and personality disorders associated with divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 27(1), 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabora, L. & Holmes, N. (2010). Dangling from a tassel on the fabric of socially constructed reality: Reflections on the creative writing process. In Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 277–296). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gascon, L. D. & Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Both sides of the coin? Personality, deviance, and creative behavior. In Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 235–254). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, P., Horgan, J., Hunter, S. T., & Cushenbery, L. (2013). Malevolent creativity in terrorist organizations. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, P., Horgan, J. & Lovelace, J. (2011). Improvised explosive device: The problem of definition. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 34, 732–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gino, F. & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 445–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gino, F. & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2014). Evil genius? How dishonesty can lead to greater creativity. Psychological Science, 25(4), 973–981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goncalo, J. A., Vincent, L. C., & Audia, P. G. (2010). Early creativity as a constraint on future achievement. In Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 114–133). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutworth, M. B., Cushenbery, L., & Hunter, S. T. (2016). Creativity for deliberate harm: Malevolent creativity and social information processing theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadi, S. (2017). The dark side of creativity: Adverse childhood experiences, criminal thinking, and creativity. Bachelor of Psychology thesis, University of South Australia.Google Scholar
Hao, N., Tang, M., Yang, J., Wang, Q., & Runco, M. A. (2016). A new tool to measure malevolent creativity: The malevolent creativity behavior scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 682. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00682CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, D. J. (2013). The influence of problem construction, implicit aggression, and task valence on malevolent creativity. Omaha: University of Nebraska Omaha.Google Scholar
Harris, D. J. & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2015). Fast and furious: The influence of implicit aggression, premeditation, and provoking situations on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The effect of emotional intelligence and task type on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ligon, G. S. (2014). Construction or demolition: Does problem construction influence the ethicality of creativity? In Moran, S., Cropley, D. H., & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), The Ethics of Creativity (pp. 170–186). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Henning, B. G. (2005). The ethics of creativity: Beauty, morality, and nature in a processive cosmos. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, K. (2010). Boundless creativity. In Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 134–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, D. C. (2016). The influence of charismatic authority on operational strategies and attack outcomes of terrorist groups. Journal of Strategic Security, 9(2), 14–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, E., Part, R., & Rowell, L. (2017). Children’s and teachers’ conceptions of creativity: Contradictions and implications in classroom instruction creative contradictions in education (pp. 303–331): Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Horace, . (2005). Ars Poetica [The art of poetry] (trans. by A. S. Kline). https://www.poetryintranslation.com/PITBR/Latin/HoraceArsPoetica.php#highlightars+poeticaGoogle Scholar
Horgan, J. G. (2017). Psychology of terrorism: Introduction to the special issue. American Psychologist, 72(3), 199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, K. & Drown, D. (2008). Whether “malevolent” or “negative,” creativity is relevant to terrorism prevention: Lessons from 9/11 and hazardous material trucking. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, J. M. (2010). The innovation dilemma: Some risks of creativity in strategic agency. In Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 91–113). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampylis, P. G. & Valtanen, J. (2010). Redefining creativity – Analyzing definitions, collocations, and consequences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1790/1914). Kant’s critique of judgement (trans by J. H. Bernard). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kapoor, H. (2015). The creative side of the dark triad. Creativity Research Journal, 27(1), 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapoor, H. & Khan, A. (2016). The measurement of negative creativity: Metrics and relationships. Creativity Research Journal, 28(4), 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapoor, H., Tagat, A., & Cropley, D. H. (2016). Fifty shades of creativity: Case studies of malevolent creativity in art, science, and technology. In Reisman, F. K. (ed.), Creativity in arts, science and technology (pp. 25–44). London: KIE Conference Publications.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (ed.) (2014). Creativity and mental illness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Glaveanu, V., & Baer, J. (eds.). (2017). The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. & Dow, G. T. (2011). Malevolent creativity: Does personality influence malicious divergent thinking? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, J. & Mussweiler, T. (2011). Suspicious spirits, flexible minds: When distrust enhances creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1262–1277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBain, R. M. J., Cropley, D. H., & Kavanagh, P. S. (2017). The Devil made me do it: Press and personality in malevolent creativity. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 27(1), 21–44.Google Scholar
McCann, M. (2005). International perspectives on giftedness: Experimental and cultural observations of IQ and creativity with implications for policy and curriculum design. International Education Journal, 6, 125–133.Google Scholar
McIntyre, P. (2006). Creative practice as research: “Testing out” the systems model of Creativity through practitioner based enquiry. In Velila, R. (ed.), Speculation and innovation: Applying practice led research in the creative industries (pp. 201–225). Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
McLaren, R. B. (1993). The dark side of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, S. & Gabora, L. (2012). Evidence that threatening situations enhance creativity. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2014). Creativity creep. New Yorker, September 2, 2014. www.newyorker.com/books/joshua-rothman/creativity-creep?utm_source=tnyandutm_campaign=generalsocialandutm_medium=twitterandmbid=social_twitterGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. & Nemiro, J. (2003). Creativity in the moral domain: Integration and implications. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salcedo-Albarán, E., Kuszewski, A., de León-Beltrán, I., & Garay, L. J. (2009). Rule-breaking from illegality: A trans-disciplinary inquiry. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Eduardo_Salcedo-Albaran/publication/255727411_Rule-Breaking_from_Creativity_to_Illegality_A_Trans-Disciplinary_Inquiry/links/564cb10008ae7ac727e20bd5.pdfGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Wigert, B. (2011). Cantankerous creativity: Honesty–humility, agreeableness, and the HEXACO structure of creative achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 687–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (2001). Creativity in the arts and the sciences. The Kenyon Review, 23(2), 203–220.Google Scholar
Singer, J. K. (2010). Creativity in confinement. In Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 177–203). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spooner, M. T. (2008). Commentary on malevolent creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 128–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2010). The dark side of creativity and how to combat it. In Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 316–328). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatarkiewicz, W. (2011). A history of six ideas: An essay in aesthetics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Walczyk, J. J. & Griffith-Ross, D. A. (2008). Commentary on the functional creativity model: Its application to understanding innovative deception. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 130–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walczyk, J. J., Runco, M. A., Tripp, S. M., & Smith, C. E. (2008). The creativity of lying: Divergent thinking and ideational correlates of the resolution of social dilemmas. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 328–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittkower, R. & Wittkower, M. (1969). Born under Saturn: The character and conduct of artists. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
References
Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1982). The power of the center: A study of composition in the visual arts. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bar, M. & Neta, M. (2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science, 17, 645–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brieber, D., Nadal, M., & Leder, H. (2015). In the white cube: Museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art. Acta Psychologica, 154, 36–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brieber, D., Nadal, M., Leder, H., & Rosenberg, R. (2014). Art in time and space: Context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time. PLoS One, 9, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardenas, R. A. & Harris, L. J. (2006). Symmetrical decorations enhance the attractiveness of faces and abstract designs. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, P. & Graham, W. (1971). Art and ideas: An approach to art appreciation. London: Mills and Boon.Google Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Burke, C., Hsu, A., & Swami, V. (2010). Personality predictors of artistic preferences as a function of the emotional valence and perceived complexity of paintings. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Reimers, S., Hsu, A., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2009). Who art thou? Personality predictors of artistic preferences in a large UK sample: The importance of openness. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2004). Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 4, 55–60.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2011). Neuroaesthetics: A coming of age story. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatterjee, A. & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 370–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, P. & McCrae, R. (1992). NEO-PI-R: Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO- PI-R). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Cupchik, G. C. & Gebotys, R. J. (1988). The search for meaning in art: Interpretative styles and judgments of quality. Visual Arts Research, 14, 38–50.Google Scholar
Dazkir, S. S. & Read, M. A. (2012). Furniture forms and their influence on our emotional responses towards interior environments. Environment and Behavior, 44, 722–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fechner, G. T. (1876). Vorschule der Ästhetik [Primary school of aesthetics]. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Feist, G. & Brady, T. (2004). Openness to experience, non-conformity, and the preference for abstract art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedberg, D. & Gallese, V. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furnham, A. & Avison, M. (1997). Personality and preference for surreal paintings. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 923–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. F. & Bunyan, M. (1988). Personality and art preferences. European Journal of Personality, 2, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Personality, intelligence, and art. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 705–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. & Walker, J. (2001). Personality and judgement of abstract, pop art, and representational paintings. European Journal of Personality, 15, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Puerto, G., Rosselló, J., Corradi, G., Acedo-Carmona, C., Munar, E. & Nadal, M. (2018). Preference for curved contours across cultures. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12, 432–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekkert, P. & van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreitler, H. & Kreitler, S. (1972). Psychology of the arts. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Latto, R., Brain, D., & Kelly, B. (2000). An oblique effect in aesthetics: Homage to Mondrian (1872–1944). Perception, 29, 981–987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leder, H., Bär, S., & Topolinski, S. (2012). Covert painting simulations influence aesthetic appreciation of artworks. Psychological Science, 23, 1479–1481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leder, H. & Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode – developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leder, H., Tinio, P. P. L., & Bar, M. (2011). Emotional valence modulates the preference for curved objects. Perception, 40, 649–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locher, P. J. (2003). An empirical investigation of the visual rightness theory of picture perception. Acta Psychologica, 114, 147–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locher, P. J. (2010). How does a visual artist create an artwork? In Kaufman, J. & Sternberg, R. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 131–144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locher, P., Smith, J. K., & Smith, L. F. (2001). The influence of presentation format and viewer training in the visual arts on the perception of pictorial and aesthetic qualities of paintings. Perception, 30, 449–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locher, P. J. & Wagemans, J. (1993). Effects of element type and spatial grouping on symmetry detection. Perception, 22, 565–587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massaro, D., Savazzi, F., di Dio, C., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., Gilli, G., & Marchetti, A. (2012). When art moves the eyes: A behavioral and eye-tracking study. PLoS One, 7, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McManus, I. C., Cheema, B., & Stoker, J. (1993). The aesthetics of composition: A study of Mondrian. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 11, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, I. C. & Furnham, A. (2006). Aesthetic activities and aesthetic attitudes: Influences of education, background and personality on interest and involvement in the arts. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 555–587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, G. E. & Bloom, P. (2012). Art and authenticity: The importance of originals in judgments of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 558–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nodine, C. F., Locher, P. J., & Krupinski, E. A. (1993). The role of formal art training on perception and aesthetic judgment of art compositions. Leonardo, 26, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nusbaum, E. C. & Silvia, P. J. (2014). Unusual aesthetic states. In Tinio, P. P. L. & Smith, J. K. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts (pp. 519–539). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palumbo, L., Ruta, N., & Bertamini, M. (2015). Comparing angular and curved shapes in terms of implicit associations and approach/avoidance responses. PLoS One, 10, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panga, C. Y., Nadal, M., Müller-Paul, J. S., Rosenberg, R., & Klein, C. (2013). Electrophysiological correlates of looking at paintings and its association with art expertise. Biological Psychology, 93, 246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekarik, A. J. & Schreiber, J. B. (2012). The power of expectation. Curator, 55, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelowski, M., Forster, M., Tinio, P. P. L., Scholl, M., Leder, H. (2017). Beyond the lab: Framework for examining interactions with art in museums. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelowski, M., Leder, H., & Tinio, P. P. L. (2017). Creativity in the visual arts. In Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Glaveanu, V. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity across different domains (pp. 80–109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S. & Seckel, E. (2014). Neurology of visual aesthetics. Indian nymphs, modern art, and sexy beaks. In Shimamura, A. P. & Palmer, S. E. (eds.), Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience (pp. 375–389). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawlings, D. (2003). Personality correlates of liking for ‘unpleasant’ paintings and photographs. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redies, C. (2007). A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sparse and efficient coding of natural stimuli. Spatial Vision, 21, 97–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silvia, P. J. (2009). Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 48–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2013). Interested experts, confused novices: Art expertise and the knowledge emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 31, 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. K. (2014). The museum effect: How museums, libraries, and cultural institutions educate and civilize society. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Smith, J. K. & Smith, L. F. (2001). Spending time on art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19, 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. F. & Smith, J. K. (2006). The nature and growth of aesthetic fluency. In Locher, P., Martindale, C., Dorfman, L., Petrov, V., & Leontiev, D. (eds.). New directions in aesthetics, creativity, and the psychology of art (pp. 47–58). Amityville, NY: Baywood.Google Scholar
Smith, L. F., Smith, J. K., & Tinio, P. P. L. (2017). Time spent viewing art and reading labels. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Specker, E., Tinio, P. P. L., & van Elk, M. (2017). Do you see what I see? An investigation of the aesthetic experience in the laboratory and museum. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swami, V. & Furnham, A. (2014). Personality and aesthetic preferences. In Tinio, P. P. L. & Smith, J. K. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts (pp. 540–561). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. E., Witt, J. K., & Grimaldi, P. J. (2012). Uncovering the connection between artist and audience: viewing painted brushstrokes evokes corresponding action representations in the observer. Cognition, 125, 26–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and parasitic infections in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinio, P. P. L. (2013). From artistic creation to aesthetic reception: The mirror model of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinio, P. P. L. (2017). On viewer motivation, unit of analysis, and the VIMAP. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 152–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinio, P. P. L. & Leder, H. (2009). Natural scenes are indeed preferred, but image quality might have the last word. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinio, P. P. L. & Leder, H. (2013). The means to art’s end: Styles, creative devices, and the challenge of art. In Vartanian, O., Bristol, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), The neuroscience of creativity (pp. 273–298). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinio, P. P. L., Leder, H., & Strasser, M. (2010). Image quality and the aesthetic judgment of photographs: Contrast, sharpness, and grain teased apart and put together. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinio, P. P. L. & Smith, J. K. (2014). Introduction by the editors. In Tinio, P. P. L. & Smith, J. K. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts (pp. 3–5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartanian, O. (2014). Empirical aesthetics: Hindsight and foresight. In Tinio, P. P. L. & Smith, J. K. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts (pp. 6–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Leder, H., Modroño, C., Nadal, M., Rostrup, N., & Skov, M. (2013). Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture, PNAS, 110, 10446–10453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winston, A. S. & Cupchik, G. C. (1992). The evaluation of high art and popular art by naive and experienced viewers. Visual Arts Research, 18, 1–14.Google Scholar
Zeki, S. (1999). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
References
Abraham, A. (2016). The imaginative mind. Human Brain Mapping, 37(11), 4197–4211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews-Hanna, J.R., Smallwood, J., & Spreng, R.N. (2014). The default network and self-generated thought: Component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1316, 29–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1117–1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2011). Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Conscious Cognition, 20, 1604–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, F. & Harrington, D.M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D. (2009). Two forms of perspective taking: Imagining how another feels and imagining how you would feel. In Markman, K. D., Klein, W. M. P., & Suhr, J. A. (eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Beaussart, M. L., Andrews, C. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Creative liars: The relationship between creativity and integrity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Kaufman, S. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Nature Scientific Reports, 5, 10964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Wilkins, R. W., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Silvia, P. J., … & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Creativity and the default network: A functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest. Neuropsychologia, 64, 92–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory and Cognition, 42, 1186–1197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beghetto, R. A. & Dilley, A. E. (2016). Creative aspirations or pipe dreams? Toward understanding creative mortification in children and adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016(151), 85–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berk, L. E., Mann, T. D., & Ogan, A. T. (2006). Make-believe play: Wellspring for the development of self-regulation. In Singer, D. G., Golinkoff, R., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (eds.), Play=learning: How play motivates and enhances young children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth (pp. 74–110). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binning, K. R., Unzueta, M. M., Huo, Y. J., & Molina, L. E. (2009). The interpretation of multiracial status and its relation to social engagement and psychological well-being. Journal of Social Issues, 65(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnelle, V., Ham, T. E., Leech, R., Kinnunen, K. M., Mehta, M. A., Greenwood, R. J., & Sharp, D. J. (2012). Salience network integrity predicts default mode network function after traumatic brain injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 109, 4690–4695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briazu, R. A., Walsh, C. R., Deeprose, C., & Ganis, G. (2017). Undoing the past in order to lie in the present: Counterfactual thinking and deceptive communication. Cognition, 161, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckner, R. L. & Carroll, D. C. (2007). Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, S. H. (2011). Creativity and psychopathology: A shared vulnerability model. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(3), 144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 499–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, A. F., Berger, S. E., & Chang, B. (1981). The relationship of student self-esteem and teacher empathy to classroom learning. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 18 (4) 21–25.Google Scholar
Cooney, G., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2017). The novelty penalty: Why do people like talking about new experiences but hearing about old ones?. Psychological Science, 28(3), 380–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Brigard, F., Spreng, R. N., Mitchell, J. P., & Schacter, D. L. (2015). Neural activity associated with self, other, and object-based counterfactual thinking. Neuroimage, 109, 12–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeYoung, C. G. (2013). The neuromodulator of exploration: A unifying theory of the role of dopamine in personality. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doron, E. (2017). Fostering creativity in school aged children through perspective taking and visual media based short term intervention program. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 150–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., Guo, J., & McAdams, D. P. (2016). The autobiographical author through time: Examining the degree of stability and change in redemptive and contaminated personal narratives. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(5), 428–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Y., Duncan, N. W., Greck, M. De, & Northoff, G. (2011). Is there a core neural network in empathy? An fMRI based quantitative meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 903–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fein, G. G. (1987). Pretend play: Creativity and consciousness. In Görlitz, D. & Wohlwill, J. F. (eds.), Curiosity, imagination, and play: On the development of spontaneous cognitive motivational processes (pp. 281–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Finke, R. (1995). Creative realism. In Smith, S., Ward, T., & Finke, R. (eds.), The creative cognition approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fiorella, L. & Mayer, R. E. (2014). Role of expectations and explanations in learning by teaching. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fong, C. T. (2006). The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1016–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, J., Friedman, R.S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality Psychology and Social Psychology, 87, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galinsky, A. D., Maddux, W. W., Gilin, D., & White, J. B. (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations. Psychological Science, 19(4), 378–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galinsky, A. D. & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, D. & Wilson, T. (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 351, 1351–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Principles for a cultural psychology of creativity. Culture and Psychology, 16(2), 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, T. R., Wu, K., & Winner, E. (2009). Actors are skilled in theory of mind but not empathy. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29(2), 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotlieb, R., Hyde, E., Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Kaufman, S. B. (2016). Cultivating the social–emotional imagination in gifted education: Insights from educational neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377(1), 22–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gotlieb, R., Jahner, E., Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Kaufman, S. B. (2016). How social–emotional imagination facilitates deep learning and creativity in the classroom. In Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C (eds.). Nurturing creativity in the classroom (2nd edn). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gresky, D. M., Eyck, L. L. T., Lord, C. G., & McIntyre, R. B. (2005). Effects of salient multiple identities on women’s performance under mathematics stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 53(9), 703–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., Berk, L., & Singer, D. (2009). A mandate for playful learning in preschool: Presenting the evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoever, I. J., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoff, E. V. (2005). Imaginary companions, creativity, and self-image in middle childhood. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2–3), 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, F. P. (1999). Children, play, and development (3rd edn). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Hurtado, S. (2005). The next generation of diversity and intergroup relations research. Journal of Social Issues, 61(3), 595–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2011). Me, my “self” and you: Neuropsychological relations between social emotion, self-awareness, and morality. Emotion Review, 3(3), 313–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immordino-Yang, M. H., Christodoulou, J. A., & Singh, V. (2012). Rest is not idleness: Implications of the brain’s default mode for human development and education. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immordino-Yang, M. H. & Gotlieb, R. (2017) Embodied brains, social minds, cultural meaning: Integrating neuroscientific and educational research on social-affective development. American Educational Research Journal, Centennial Issue, 54(1), 344–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immordino-Yang, M. H., McColl, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (2009). Neural correlates of admiration and compassion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(19), 8021–8026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Immordino-Yang, M. H., Yang, X. & Damasio, H. (2014) Correlations between social-emotional feelings and anterior insula activity are independent from visceral states but influenced by culture. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jack, A. I., Dawson, A. J., Begany, K. L., Leckie, R. L., Barry, K. P., Ciccia, A. H., & Snyder, A. Z. (2013). fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains. NeuroImage, 66, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, J. D., Weinstein, Y., & Balota, D. A. (2013). Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, R. E., Mead, B. S., Carrasco, J., & Flores, R. A. (2013). The structure of creative cognition in the human brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(330), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kam, J. W., Dao, E., Stanciulescu, M., Tildesley, H., & Handy, T.C. (2013). Mind wandering and the adaptive control of attentional resources. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 952–960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, S. K. & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2015). Multiple identities in social perception and interaction: Challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 547–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Self‐reported differences in creativity by ethnicity and gender. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(8), 1065–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Using creativity to reduce ethnic bias in college admissions. Review of General Psychology, 14(3), 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Waterstreet, M. A., Ailabouni, H. S., Whitcomb, H. J., Roe, A. K. et al. (2010). Personality and self-perceptions of creativity across domains. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29 (3), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. (2012). The need for pretend play in child development. Psychology Today. www.psychologytoday.com/blog/beautiful-minds/201203/the-need-pretend-play-in-child-developmentGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Opening up openness to experience: A four‐factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(4), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. (2015). The emotions that make us more creative. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2015/08/the-emotions-that-make-us-more-creativeGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jimenez, L., Brown, J. B., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, S. B. & Duckworth, A. L. (2015). World-class expertise: A developmental model. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. & Gregoire, C. (2015). Wired to create: Unraveling the mysteries of the creative mind. New York: Perigee, Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & De Young, C. G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamm, C., Decety, J., & Singer, T. (2011). Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. NeuroImage, 54(3), 2492–2502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, N. & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, N. & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201–1205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, 2, 353–383.Google Scholar
Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory (Vol. 9). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubow, R. E., Ingberg-Sachs, Y., Zalstein-Orda, N., & Gewirtz, J. C. (1992). Latent inhibition in low and high “psychotic-prone” normal subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(5),563–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madore, K. P., Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2015). Creativity and memory effects of an episodic-specificity induction on divergent thinking. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1461–1468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madore, K. P., Jing, H. G., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Divergent creative thinking in young and older adults: Extending the effects of an episodic specificity induction. Memory and Cognition, 44(6), 974–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, K. D., Klein, W. M., & Suhr, J. A. (2009). Overview. In Markman, K. D., Klein, W. M., & Suhr, J. A. (eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. vii–xvi). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Mason, R. A. & Just, M. A. (2016). Neural representations of physics concepts. Psychological Science, 27(6), 904–913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAdams, D. P. & Guo, J. (2015). Narrating the generative life. Psychological Science, 26(4), 475–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, R., Kaufman, S. B., & Singer, J. L. (2013). Ode to positive constructive daydreaming. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mischel, W. (2014). The marshmallow test: Mastering self-control (1st edn). New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244(4907), 933–938.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. P., Schirmer, J., Ames, D.L., & Gilbert., D.T. (2011). Medial prefrontal cortex predicts intertemporal choice. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(4), 857–866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montessori, M. (1948). From childhood to adolescence: Including erdkinder and the function of the university (1st English edn 1973). Amsterdam: Montessori-Pierson Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Mooneyham, B. W. & Schooler, J. W. (2013). The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: a review. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(1), 11–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, M., Chiu, C.Y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nestojko, J. F., Bui, D. C., Kornell, N., & Bjork, E. L. (2014). Expecting to teach enhances learning and organization of knowledge in free recall of text passages. Memory and Cognition, 42(7), 1038–1048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109(3), 504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connor, E., McCormack, T., Beck, S. R., & Feeney, A. (2015). Regret and adaptive decision making in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 135, 86–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Hearn, C. C. (2008). Half and half: Writers on growing up biracial and bicultural. Pantheon.Google Scholar
Oleynick, V. C., DeYoung, C. G., Hyde, E., Kaufman, S. B., Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2017). Openness/Intellect: The core of the creative personality. In Feist, G. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oleynick, V. C., Thrash, T. M., LeFew, M. C., Moldovan, E. G., & Kieffaber, P. D. (2014). The scientific study of inspiration in the creative process: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Østby, Y., Walhovd, K. B., Tamnes, C. K., Grydeland, H., Westlye, L. T., & Fjell, A. M. (2012). Mental time travel and default-mode network functional connectivity in the developing brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), 16800–16804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyserman, D. & Lee, S. W. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: Replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1137–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preiss, D. D., Cosmelli, D., Grau, V., & Ortiz, D. (2016). Examining the influence of mind wandering and metacognition on creativity in university and vocational students. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raichle, M. E. & Snyder, A. Z. (2007). A default mode of brain function: A brief history of an evolving idea. Neuroimage, 37(4), 1083–1090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roese, N. J. & Olson, J. M. (2014). What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumble, A. C., Van Lange, P. A., & Parks, C. D. (2010). The benefits of empathy: When empathy may sustain cooperation in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 856–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2006 ). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. & Pina, J. (2013). Imagination and personal creativity. In Taylor, M. (ed.), Oxford handbook of the development of imagination (pp. 379–386). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russ, S. W. (2014). Pretend play in childhood: Foundations of adult creativity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russ, S. W., Robins, A., & Christiano, B. (1999). Pretend play: longitudinal prediction of creativity and affect in fantasy in children. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydell, R. J. & Boucher, K. L. (2010). Capitalizing on multiple social identities to prevent stereotype threat: The moderating role of self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), 239–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sachet, A. B. & Mottweiler, C.M. (2013). The distinction between role-play and object substitution in pretend play. In Taylor, M. (ed.), Oxford handbook of the development of imagination (pp. 175–185). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration (1st edn). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2017). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration (2nd edn). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L. (1996). Searching for memory: The brain, the mind, and the past. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 657–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling, and the wandering mind. Trends Cognitive Science, 15, 319–326.Google ScholarPubMed
Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014). Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P., Forgeard, M., & Kaufman, S. B. (2016). Creativity and aging: What we can make with what we have left. In Seligman, M. E. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F., & Sripada, C. (eds.), Homo Prospectus. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F., & Sripada, C. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 119–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shenk, J. W. (2014). Powers of two: Finding the essence of innovation in creative pairs. New York: Eamon Dolan and Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A. & Bourne, E. J. (1982). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally?. In Marsella, A. & White, G. (eds.), Cultural conceptions of mental health and therapy. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J., Ruby, F. J., & Singer, T. (2013). Letting go of the present: Mind-wandering is associated with reduced delay discounting. Conscious Cognition, 22, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smallwood, J., Schooler, J. W., Turk, D. J., Cunningham, S. J., Burns, P., & Macrae, C. N. (2011). Self-reflection and the temporal focus of the wandering mind. Conscious Cognition. 20, 1120–1126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spreng, R. N. & Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2015). The default network and social cognition. Brain mapping: An encyclopedic reference. Academic Press, 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreng, R. N. & Grady, C. L. (2010). Patterns of brain activity supporting autobiographical memory, prospection, and theory of mind, and their relationship to the default mode network. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1112–1123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taillandier-Schmitt, A., Esnard, C., & Mokounkolo, R. (2012). Self-affirmation in occupational training: Effects on the math performance of French women nurses under stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 67(1–2), 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamir, D. I. & Mitchell, J. P. (2011). The default network distinguishes construals of proximal versus distal events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 2945–2955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, M., Hodges, S. D., & Kohányi, A. (2003). The illusion of independent agency: Do adult fiction writers experience their characters as having minds of their own?. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 22(4), 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. & Gardner, D. (2016). Superforecasting: The art and science of prediction. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Thrash, T. M., Maruskin, L. A., Cassidy, S. E., Fryer, J. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Mediating between the muse and the masses: Inspiration and the actualization of creative ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 26(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E. (2002). Chronesthesia: Conscious awareness of subjective time. In Stuss, D. T. & Knight, R. T. (eds.). Principles of frontal lobe function. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vezzali, L., Gocłowska, M. A., Crisp, R. J., & Stathi, S. (2016). On the relationship between cultural diversity and creativity in education: The moderating role of communal versus divisional mindset. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 152–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1931/2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood (Trans. M. E. Sharpe). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T. B. (1995). What’s old about new ideas? In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 157–178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Waytz, A. G., Hershfield, H. E., & Tamir, D. I. (2015). Mental simulation and meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 336–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zabelina, D. L. & Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2016). Dynamic network interactions supporting internally-oriented cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 40, 86–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Baer, J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 75–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, A. Y. (2003). Understanding the challenge of creativity among African Americans. Inquiry, 22, 13–18.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2014). Creative mortification: An initial exploration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleske-Rechek, A. & Browne, K. (2014). Trends in GRE scores and graduate enrollments by gender and ethnicity. Intelligence, 46, 25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chassell, L. M. (1916). Test for originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7, 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craft, A. (2006). Fostering creativity with wisdom. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., White, A. E., & Chiera, B. A. (2014). Layperson perceptions of malevolent creativity: The good, the bad, and the ambiguous. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 400–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, I., Laurence, F., & Rabinowitch, T. C. (2012). Empathy and creativity in group musical practices: Towards a concept of empathic creativity. In McPherson, G. & Welch, G. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education (pp. 337–353). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, J. E. & Winner, E. (2012). Confronting sadness through art-making: Distraction is more beneficial than venting. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, J. E. & Winner, E. (2013). How children use drawing to regulate their emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 512–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forgeard, M. J. C. (2013). Perceiving benefits after adversity: The relationship between self- reported posttraumatic growth and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forgeard, M. J. C. & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Who cares about imagination, creativity, and innovation, and why? A review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 250–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forgeard, M. J. C. & Mecklenburg, A. C. (2013). The two dimensions of motivation and a reciprocal model of the creative process. Review of General Psychology, 17, 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 269–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. & Clapp, E. (2018). Distributed and participatory creativity as a form of cultural empowerment: The role of alterity, difference and collaboration. In Branco, A. U. & Lopes-de-Oliveira, M. C. (eds.), Alterity, values and socialization: Human development within educational contexts (pp. 51–63). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gocłowska, M. A., Baas, M., Crisp, R. J., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Whether social schema violations help or hurt creativity depends on need for structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 959–971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gocłowska, M. A. & Crisp, R. J. (2013). On counter-stereotypes and creative cognition: When interventions for reducing prejudice can boost divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gocłowska, M. A., Crisp, R. J., & Labuschagne, K. (2013). Can counter-stereotypes boost flexible thinking? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoever, I. J., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 982–996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, E. D. (1931). Materials for study of creative thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 28, 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivcevic, Z. & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The can and cannot do attitude: How self estimates of ability vary across ethnic and socioeconomic groups. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 144–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, K. & Taylor, A. (2010). Positive creativity and negative creativity (and unintended consequences). In Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 33–56). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Non-biased assessment: A supplemental approach. In Frisby, C. L. & Reynolds, C. R. (eds.), Children’s handbook of multicultural school psychology (pp. 824–840). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Self-reported differences in creativity by gender and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1065–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Using creativity to reduce ethnic bias in college admissions. Review of General Psychology, 14, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Why creativity isn’t in IQ tests, why it matters, and why it won’t change anytime soon … Probably. Journal of Intelligence 3, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Finding meaning with creativity in the past, present, and future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 734–749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, A. K-y., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luria, S. R. & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Examining the relationship between creativity and equitable thinking in schools. Psychology in the Schools, 54, 1279–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, S. R., O’Brien, R. L., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity in gifted identification: Increasing accuracy and diversity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377, 44–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martela, F. & Steger, M. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1–15.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. (1994). The courage to create (Reprint edn). New York: W. W. Norton (Original work published 1975)Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives On Psychological Science, 8, 272–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8, 162–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W. & Seagal, J. D. (1999). Forming a story: The health benefits of narrative. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 1243–1254.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saad, C. S., Damian, R. I., Benet-Martínez, V., Moons, W. G., & Robins, R. W. (2013). Multiculturalism and creativity: Effects of cultural context, bicultural identity, and ideational fluency. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmader, T. & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, C. M. & Aronson, J. (1995). Contending with a stereotype: African-American intellectual test performance and stereotype threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). What is the common thread of creativity? Its dialectical relation to intelligence and wisdom. American Psychologist, 56(4), 360–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). WICS: Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity, Synthesized. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59(5), 325–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Applying psychological theories to educational practice. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 150–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2010). College admissions for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2013). Reform education: Teach wisdom and ethics. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(7), 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2014). The development of adaptive competence. Developmental Review, 34, 208–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2018). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12, 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (in press). Positive creativity. In Kostic, A. & Chadee, D. (eds.), Current research in positive psychology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Bonney, C. R., Gabora, L., & Merrifield, M. (2012). WICS: A model for college and university admissions. Educational Psychologist, 47, 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & the Rainbow Project Collaborators (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical and creative skills. Intelligence, 34, 321–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadmor, C. T., Chao, M. M., Hong, Y.-Y., & Polzer, J. T. (2013). Not just for stereotyping anymore: Racial essentialism reduces domain-general creativity. Psychological Science, 24, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torrance, E. P. (1971) Are the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking biased against or in favour of disadvantaged groups? Gifted Child Quarterly, 15, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1973). Non-test indicators of creative talent among disadvantaged children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 17, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travagin, G., Margola, D., & Revenson, T. A. (2015). How effective are expressive writing interventions for adolescents? A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 36, 42–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwick, R. (2013). Disentangling the role of high school grades, SAT® Scores, and SES in predicting college achievement (ETS RR No. 13–09). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.CrossRefGoogle Scholar