Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T01:42:02.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Western Asia: East Anatolia as a Transition Zone

from Part II - Case Studies for Areal Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

Raymond Hickey
Affiliation:
Universität Duisburg–Essen
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blau, Joyce, 1975. Le Kurde de ’Amādiya et de Djabal Sindjār: Analyse Linguistique, Textes Folkloriques, Glossaires. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Borghero, Roberta, 2005. The Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Ashitha. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brustad, Kristen, 2000. The Syntax of Spoken Arabic: A Comparative Study of Moroccan, Egyptian, Syrian, and Kuwaiti Dialects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bulut, Christiane, 2002. Evliya Çelebi as a linguist and dialectologist: Seventeenth century East Anatolian and Azeri Turkic dialects. In Tezcan, Nuran and Atlansoy, Kadir (eds), Evliya Çelebi ve Seyahatname, pp. 4964. Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Bulut, Christiane, 2006. Turkish elements in spoken Kurmanji. In Boeschoten, Hans and Johanson, Lars (eds), Turkic Languages in Contact: Proceedings of the Wassenaar Meeting, Feb. 1996, pp. 95121. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Bulut, Christiane, 2007. Iraqi Turkman. In Postgate, John (ed.), Languages of Iraq, Ancient and Modern, pp. 159187. Cambridge: British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, 2006. Areal linguistics: A closer scrutiny. In Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April and Vincent, Nigel (eds), Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective, pp. 131. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Djelil, Ordixane and Djelil, Celile, 1978. Zargotina K’urda [The Oral Tradition of the Kurds]. Moscow: Nauk.Google Scholar
Dum-Tragut, Jasmine, 2009. Armenian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fox, Samuel Ethan, 2009. The Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Bohtan. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press.Google Scholar
Gemalmaz, Efrasiyap, 1995. Erzurum ili Ağızları: Inceleme, Metinler, Sözlük ve Dizinler [The Spoken Varieties (of Turkish) in Erzurum: Analysis, Texts, Lexicon, Glossaries]. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.Google Scholar
Gippert, Jost, 2007/2008. Zur dialektalen Stellung des Zazaki. Die Sprache 47 (1): 77107.Google Scholar
Göksel, Aslı and Kerslake, Celia, 2005. Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grawunder, Sven, Geumann, Anja, Haig, Geoffrey, Celebi, Cemile and Stilo, Donald, 2013. Stop contrasts in Kurmanji Kurdish: Testing the ejectives hypothesis. Paper held at the Fifth International Conference on Iranian Linguistics (ICIL5), University of Bamberg, August 2013.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey, 2001. Linguistic diffusion in present-day east Anatolia: From top to bottom. In Dixon, Robert and Aikhenvald, Alexandra (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics, pp. 195224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey, 2004. The invisibilization of Kurdish. The other side of language planning in Turkey. In Conermann, Stephan and Haig, Geoffrey (eds), Die Kurden: Studien zu ihrer Sprache, Geschichte und Kultur, pp. 121150. Hamburg: Schenefeld.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey, 2006. Turkish influence on Kurmanji: Evidence from the Tunceli dialect. In Johanson, Lars and Bulut, Christiane (eds), Turkic–Iranian Contact Areas: Historical and Linguistic Aspects, pp. 283299. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey, 2011. Linker, relativizer, nominalizer, tense-particle: On the Ezafe in West Iranian. In Yap, Foong Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen and Wrona, Janick (eds), Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives, vol. 1: Sino-Tibetan and Iranian Languages, pp. 363390. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey, 2014a. East Anatolia as a linguistic area? Conceptual and empirical issues. In Behzadi, Lale et al. (eds), Bamberger Orientstudien, pp. 1335. Bamberg: Bamberg University Press.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey, 2014b. Verb-goal (VG) word order in Kurdish and Neo-Aramaic: Typological and areal considerations. In Khan, Geoffrey and Napiorkowska, Lidia (eds), Neo-Aramaic and its Linguistic Context, pp. 407425. New York: Gorgias Press.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey and Öpengin, Ergin, 2014. Kurdish: A critical research overview. Kurdish Studies 2 (2): 99122.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey and Thiele, Hannah, 2014. Post-predicate goals in Northern Kurdish and neighbouring languages: A pilot study in quantitative areal linguistics. Paper held at the Second International Conference on Variation and Change in Kurdish, Mardin Artuklu University, 8–9 October 2014.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A., 2008. An asymmetry between VO and OV languages: The ordering of obliques. In Corbett, Greville and Noonan, Michael (eds), Case and Grammatical Relations: Essays in Honour of Bernard Comrie, pp. 167190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Herin, Bruno, 2012. The Domari language of Aleppo (Syria). Linguistic Discovery 10: 152.Google Scholar
Holes, Clive, 1992. Colloquial Arabic of the Gulf and Saudi Arabia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jastrow, Otto, 1980. Das mesopotamische Arabische. In Fischer, Wolfdietrich and Jastrow, Otto (eds), Handbuch der Arabischen Dialekte, pp. 140154. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Jastrow, Otto, 1988. Der Neuaramäische Dialekt von Hertevin (Provinz Siirt). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Jastrow, Otto, 1992. Lehrbuch der Ṭuroyo-Sprache. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kahn, Margaret, 1976. Borrowing and Regional Variation in a Phonological Description of Kurdish. Ann Arbor, MI: Phonetics Laboratory of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Kapeliuk, Olga, 2011. Language contact between Aramaic dialects and Iranian. In Weninger, Stefan (ed.), The Semitic Languages: An International Handbook, pp. 738747. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey, 2004. The Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Sulemaniyya and Ḥalabja. Brill: Leiden.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey, 2008a. Arabic Documents from Early Islamic Khurasan. London: Nour Foundation.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey, 2008b. The Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Urmi. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey, 2008c. The Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Barwar, vol. 1: Grammar. Brill: Leiden.Google Scholar
Kıral, Filiz, 2001. Das gesprochene Aserbaidschanisch von Iran: Eine Studie zu den syntaktischen Einflüssen des Persischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria and Wälchli, Bernhard, 2001. The Circum-Baltic languages: An areal-typological approach. In Dahl, Östen and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (eds), Circum-Baltic Languages: Typology and Contact, pp. 615750. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lacroix, René, 2009. Description du Dialecte Laze d’Arhavi (Caucasique du Sud, Turquie): Grammaire et Textes. Unpublished PhD thesis, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Lewendî, Mahmûd, 1997. Kurdên Şêxbizinî [The Şêxbizinî Kurds]. Bîrnebûn 3: 7898.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, David, 1961. Kurdish Dialect Studies, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, David, 1962. Kurdish Dialect Studies, vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron, 2007. The borrowability of structural categories. In Matras, Yaron and Sakel, Jeanette (eds), Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, pp. 3173. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron, 2009. Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron, 2010. Contact, convergence, and typology. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Contact Linguistics, pp. 6685. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron, 2012. A Grammar of Domari. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Menz, Astrid, 2010. Klusile und Affikaten im Anlaut armenischer Globalkopien im Dialektmaterial von Erzurum. In Boeschoten, Hendrik and Rentzsch, Julian (eds), Turcology in Mainz, pp. 173190. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Noorlander, Paul, 2014. Diversity in convergence: Kurdish and Aramaic variation entangled. Journal of Kurdish Studies 2 (2): 201224.Google Scholar
Öpengin, Ergin, 2012. Sociolinguistic situation of Kurdish in Turkey: Sociopolitical factors and language use patterns. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 217: 151180.Google Scholar
Öpengin, Ergin, 2013. Clitic/Affix Interactions: A Corpus-Based Study of Person Marking in the Mukri Variety of Central Kurdish. Unpublished PhD thesis. Paris Sorbonne/University of Bamberg.Google Scholar
Öpengin, Ergin and Haig, Geoffrey, 2014. Variation in Kurmanji. A preliminary classification of dialects. Journal of Kurdish Studies 2 (2): 143176.Google Scholar
Paul, Ludwig, 1998. Zazaki: Grammatik und Versuch einer Dialektologie. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove and Bucak, Sertaç, 1995. Killing a mother tongue: How the Kurds are deprived of linguistic human rights. In Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove and Phillipson, Robert (eds), Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination, pp. 347370. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Stilo, Donald, 2005. Iranian as buffer zone between the universal typologies of Turkic and Semitic. In Csató, Éva Ágnes, Isaksson, Bo and Jahani, Carina (eds), Linguistic Convergence and Areal Diffusion: Case Studies from Iranian, Semitic and Turkic, pp. 3563. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stilo, Donald, 2012. Intersection zones, overlapping isoglosses, and ‘Fade- out/Fade-in’ phenomena in Central Iran. In Aghaei, Behrad and Ghanoonparvar, M. R. (eds), Iranian Languages and Culture: Essays in Honor of Gernot Ludwig Windfuhr, pp. 333. Costa Mesa: Mazda Publishers.Google Scholar
Talay, Shabo, 2006/2007. The influence of Turkish, Kurdish and other neighbouring languages on Anatolian Arabic. In Romano-Arabica VI-VII (2006–2007), pp. 179188. University of Bucharest, Center for Arab Studies.Google Scholar
Talay, Shabo, 2008. Die Neuaramäischen Dialekte der Khabur-Assyrer in Nordostsyrien: Einführung, Phonologie und Morphologie. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Talay, Shabo, 2011. Arabic dialects of Mesopotamia. In Weninger, Stefan (ed.), The Semitic Languages: An International Handbook, pp. 909920. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert, 2007. Homshetsma: The language of the Armenians of Hamshen. In Simonian, Hoann (ed.), The Hemshin, pp. 255278. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zeldes, Amir, 2013. Is Modern Hebrew Standard Average European? The view from European. Linguistic Typology 17 (3): 439470.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×