Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T10:49:35.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Imperial Fathers and Their Sons

Licinius, Constantine, and the Council of Nicaea

from Part I - Contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2020

Young Richard Kim
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
Get access

Summary

During the formative period of disputation over the theology of Arius, the emperor Licinius ruled over the eastern Roman provinces. The emperor Constantine was directly involved in the doctrinal controversy only after his victory over Licinius in 324. But Constantine’s engagement in imperial politics had already shaped his thinking about theology. In imperial successions sons were sometimes promoted but also sometimes overlooked. Emperors introduced a new five-year cycle for calculating taxes and often held annual consulships. Emperors identified with deities such as Jupiter and Hercules. At the Council of Nicaea, Constantine was hence ready to debate with bishops over the theology of Father and Son, the annual date of Easter, and the simultaneous divinity and humanity of Jesus Christ. One bishop who attended the council was Eusebius of Caesarea, whose panegyric equated the emperor with the Son of God. Constantine himself strengthened the association by funding churches in honor of Jesus’s nativity and resurrection in the Holy Land and by publicizing a story about his own vision of a cross in the sky. The Council of Nicaea had been a crucible for the formation of both a theology of God and a political philosophy of a Christian emperor.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select References

Barnes, Timothy D. 1981. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Timothy D. 2011. Constantine: Dynasty, Religion and Power in the Later Roman Empire. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bowman, Alan K. 2005. “Diocletian and the First Tetrarchy, A.D. 284–305.” In The Cambridge Ancient History, Second Edition, Volume XII: The Crisis of Empire, A.D. 193–337, edited by Bowman, Alan K., Cameron, Averil, and Garnsey, Peter, 6789. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A., trans. 1976. In Praise of Constantine: A Historical Study and New Translation of Eusebius’ Tricennial Orations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Georgia. 2000. The Memory of the Eyes: Pilgrims to Living Saints in Christian Late Antiquity. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 30. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, Robert C., and Groh, Dennis. 1981. Early Arianism: A View of Salvation. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Gwynn, David M. 2007. The Eusebians: The Polemic of Athanasius of Alexandria and the Construction of the “Arian Controversy.” Oxford Theology and Religion Monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hekster, Olivier. 2015. Emperors and Ancestors: Roman Rulers and the Constraints of Tradition. Oxford Studies in Ancient Culture and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kolb, Frank. 2001. Herrscherideologie in der Spätantike. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Lenski, Noel, ed. 2006. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miles, Richard, ed. 2016. The Donatist Schism: Controversy and Contexts. TTH, Contexts 2. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Salzman, Michele Renee. 1990. On Roman Time: The Codex-Calendar of 354 and the Rhythms of Urban Life in Late Antiquity. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 17. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Dam, Raymond. 2007. The Roman Revolution of Constantine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dam, Raymond. 2010. Rome and Constantinople: Rewriting Roman History during Late Antiquity. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dam, Raymond. 2011. Remembering Constantine at the Milvian Bridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dam, Raymond. 2018. “Eastern Aristocracies and Imperial Courts: Constantine’s Half-Brother, Licinius’s Prefect, and Egyptian Grain.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 72:124.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×