Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T21:12:07.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Divided against itself

Aspiration and reality of international law

from Part IV - Projects of international law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

Thomas Pogge
Affiliation:
University of Oslo
James Crawford
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martti Koskenniemi
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Various human rights are widely recognised in codified and customary international law. These human rights promise all human beings protection against specific severe harms that might be inflicted on them domestically or by foreigners. Yet, international law also establishes and maintains institutional structures that greatly contribute to violations of these same human rights: central components of international law systematically obstruct the aspirations of poor populations for democratic self-government, civil rights, and minimal economic sufficiency. And central international organisations, like the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, are designed in ways that systematically contribute to the persistence of severe poverty.

We know, or certainly should know, that even today about a third of all human deaths – some 18 million annually – are due to poverty-related causes such as malnutrition, perinatal and maternal conditions, measles, diarrhoea, pneumonia, tuberculosis, or malaria (WHO 2008, 54–59, Table A1). Most of this annual death toll and the much larger poverty problem it epitomises are avoidable through minor modifications in supranational institutional arrangements that would entail only slight reductions in the incomes of the affluent. Such reforms have been blocked by the governments of the affluent countries that, advancing their own interests and those of their corporations and citizens, are designing and imposing a global institutional order that, continually and foreseeably, produces vast excesses of severe poverty and premature poverty-related deaths.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benvenisti, E. and Downs, G., 2007. ‘The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law’, Stanford Law Review, 60, 595–632Google Scholar
Charney, J., 1996. ‘The Implications of Expanding International Dispute Settlement Systems: The 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea’, American Journal of International Law, 90, 69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S. and Ravallion, M., 2008. ‘The Developing World is Poorer than We Thought, but No Less Successful in the Fight against Poverty’, World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, WPS 4703
Chimni, B., 2005. ‘Global Administrative Law: Winners and Losers’, NYU Global Administrative Law Conference, 22–23 April
Cohen, G., 1989. History, Labour, and Freedom, Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. B., Sandstrom, S., Shorrocks, A. and Wolff, E. N., 2006. The World Distribution of Household Wealth, 5 December
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2009. ‘1.02 Billion People Hungry’, News Release, 19 JuneGoogle Scholar
Kar, D. and Cartwright-Smith, D., 2008. Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries 2002–2006, Washington, DC: Global Financial IntegrityGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., 2007. ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’, The Modern Law Review, 70, 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, R. and Wantchekon, L., 1999. ‘Dictatorships as a Political Dutch Disease’, Yale University Economic Growth Center Working Papers, No. 795
Milanovic, B., 2005. Worlds Apart: Measuring International and Global Inequality, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2010. ‘Development Cooperation Directorate, Development Aid Rose in 2009 and Most Donors Will Meet 2010 Aid Targets’, Aid Statistics, 14 AprilGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T., 2005. ‘Severe Poverty as a Violation of Negative Duties’, Ethics and International Affairs, 19, 55–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T., 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights, Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms, 2nd edn., Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T., 2009. ‘The Health Impact Fund and its Justification by Appeal to Human Rights’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 40, 542–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T., 2010a. Politics as Usual: What Lies behind the Pro-poor Rhetoric, Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T., 2010b. ‘Responses to the Critics’, in Jaggar, A. (ed.), Thomas Pogge and His Critics, Cambridge: Polity Press, 175–250Google Scholar
Rawls, J., 1993. ‘The Law of Peoples’, in Shute, S. and Hurley, S. (eds.), On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1993, New York: Basic Books, 41–82Google Scholar
Rawls, J., 1999. The Law of Peoples, With ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Schauer, F., 1991. Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-based Decision-making in Law and in Life, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute), 2010. Press Release on the Launch of its Yearbook for 2010
Stern, N., 2002. ‘Making Trade Work for Poor People’, speech delivered at National Council for Applied Economic Research, New Delhi, 28 November
The Economist, 2010. ‘Ploughing on’, 1 July
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 1998. Human Development Report 1998
UNDP, 2002, Human Development Report 2002
UNDP, 2003, Human Development Report 2003
Wenar, L., 2008. ‘Property Rights and the Resource Curse’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36, 2–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (World Health Organisation), 2008. The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update
World Bank, 2003. Global Economic Prospects 2004
World Bank, 2010. World Development Report 2010

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×