Book contents
Part I - The Science of Language: Recent Change and Progress
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2017
Edited by
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky , pp. 27 - 152Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
Berwick, Robert and Weinberg, Amy. 1984. The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan W. 1970. “On Complementizers: Towards a Syntactic Theory of Complement Types.” Foundations of Language 6:297–321.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan W. 1971. “Sentence Stress and Syntactic Transformations.” Language 47:257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1955. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. Ms. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and MIT, Cambridge MA. [Revised 1956 version published in part by Plenum, New York, 1975; University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1985.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964a. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964b. “The Logical Basis of Linguistic Theory.” In Lunt, Horace, ed. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 914–978. Reprinted as “Current Issues in Linguistic Theory.” In Fodor and Katz, eds. Structure of Language. New York: Prentice-Hall. 1964.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. “Remarks on Nominalization.” In Jacobs, Roderick A. and Rosenbaum, Peter S., eds. Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham MA: Ginn and Co. 184–221. [Reprinted in Noam Chomsky, Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 1972, 11–61.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. “Conditions on Transformations.” In Anderson, Stephen and Kiparsky, Paul, eds. A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 232–286.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. “On wh-Movement.” In Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Thomas, and Akmajian, Adrian, eds. Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press. 71–132.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory.” In Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel J., eds. The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–52. [Reprinted in Noam Chomsky, The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1995), 167–217.]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David, and Uriagereka, Juan, eds. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by Phase.” In Kenstowicz, Michael, ed. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT. 1–52.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. “Beyond Explanatory Adequacy.” In Belletti, Adriana, ed. Structures and Beyond – The Cartography of Syntactic Structure Vol. 3. Oxford University Press. 104–131.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel D. 1999. “Un-Principled Syntax: The Derivation of Syntactic Relations.” In Epstein, Samuel D. and Hornstein, Norbert, eds. Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 317–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1969. Some Rules of Semantic Interpretation for English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 2005. “Grammar, Levels, and Biology.” In McGilvray, James, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, Mitchell. 1980. A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
May, Robert. 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1991. “Resumptive Pronouns, A’-Binding, and Levels of Representation in Irish.” In Hendrick, Randall, ed. Syntax and Semantics 23: The Syntax of the Modern Celtic Languages. New York: Academic Press. 199–248.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1980. “Violations of the wh-Island Constraint and the Subjacency Condition.” Journal of Italian Linguistics 5:157–195.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Published as Infinite Syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex (1986).Google Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 1984. “On Inversion in Spanish and Some of Its Effects.” Linguistic Inquiry 15:103–129.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. “Multiple Spell-Out.” In Epstein, Samuel David and Hornstein, Norbert, eds. Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 251–282Google Scholar
References
Borer, Hagit. 2005a. In Name Only: Structuring Sense. Vol. I. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005b. The Normal Course of Events: Structuring Sense. Vol. II. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2013. Taking Form: Structuring Sense. Vol. III. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Sean. 2005, Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo and the Making of the Animal Kingdom. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Martin, Robert, Michaels, David, and Uriagereka, Juan, eds. Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 89–155.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. “Beyond Explanatory Adequacy.” In Belletti, A., ed. Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. III. Oxford University Press. 104–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2005. “Three Factors in Language Design.” Linguistic Inquiry 36:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2007. “Approaching UG from Below.” In Sauerland, Uli and Gärtner, Hans-Martin, eds. Interfaces + Recursion = Language? New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–29.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. “On Phases.” In Freidin, Robert, Otero, Carlos, and Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa, eds. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 133–166.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2015a. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax: 50th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2015b. The Minimalist Program: 20th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2015c. “Problems of Projection: Extensions.” In Di Domenico, Elisa, Hamann, Cornelia and Matteini, Simona, eds. Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3–16.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and McGilvray, James. 2012. The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel and Hornstein, Norbert. 2005. “The Future of Language (Science).” Language 81:3–5.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel and Seely, T. Daniel, eds. 2002. Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel and Seely, T. Daniel, eds. 2006. Derivations in Minimalism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel and Seely, T. Daniel, eds. 2007. “The Anatomy of Chomsky’s Biolinguistic Minimalism: A Tutorial.” Video. Biolinguistics 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidin, Robert and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 2001. “Exquisite Connections: Some Remarks on the Evolution of Linguistic Theory.” Lingua 111:639–666.Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc, Chomsky, Noam, and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. “The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?” Science 298:1569–1579.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Donald. 1998. Visual Intelligence: How We Create What We See. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1994. Target α: A Unified Theory of Movement and Structure-Building. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1997. Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard and Saito, Mamoru. 1992. Move Alpha: Conditions on Its Application and Output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard. 1990. “The Evolution of Cognition: Questions We Will Never Answer.” In Osherson, Daniel and Smith, Edward, eds. Thinking: An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Vol. III. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 107–132.Google Scholar
Luria, Salvador. 1974. Transcript of remarks at “A Debate on Bio-Linguistics,” a conference organized by the Centre Royaumont pour une science de l’homme, Paris, held at Endicott House, Dedham, MA, 20–21 May 1974.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. “No Escape from Syntax: Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): Article 14.Google Scholar
McGilvray, James. 2014. Chomsky: Language, Mind, and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
References
Bobaljik, J. D. 1995. Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J. D. and Brown, S.. 1997. “Interarboreal Operations: Head Movement and the Extension Requirement.” Linguistic Inquiry 28(2):345–356.Google Scholar
Boskovic, Z. and Nunes, J.. 2007. “The Copy Theory of Movement: A view from PF.” In Corver, N. and Nunes, J., eds. The Copy Theory of Movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and McGilvray, J.. 2012. The Science of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1966. “How to Learn to Talk.” In Smith, F. and Miller, G. A., eds. The Genesis of Langauge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., and Grohmann, K.. 2005. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1998. “The Evolution of Cognition: Questions We Will Never Answer.” In Scarborough, D. and Sternberg, S., eds. An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Volume 4: Methods, Models and Conceptual Issues. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Matushansky, O. 2006. “Head Movement in Linguistic Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1): 69–109.Google Scholar
Nunes, J. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sidewards Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, J. 1998. Rhyme and Reason: An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
References
Amunts, Katrin and Ziles, Karl. 2012. “Architecture and Organizational Principles of Broca’s Region.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(8):418–426.Google Scholar
Bates, Timothy C., Luciano, Michelle, Medland, Sarah, Montgomery, Grant W., Wright, Margaret, and Nicholas, Martin G.. 2011. “Genetic Variance in a Component of the Language Acquisition Device: ROBO1 Polymorphisms Associated with Phonological Buffer Deficits. Behavior Genetics, 41:50–57.Google Scholar
Berwick, Robert C. 1982. Locality Principles and the Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Berwick, Robert C. 1985. The Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Berwick, Robert C., Beckers, Gabriel, Okanoya, Kazuo, and Bolhuis, Johan. 2011. “Songs to Syntax.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(3):112–121.Google Scholar
Blevins, Judith. 2006. “A Theoretical Synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology.” Theoretical Linguistics, 32(2):117–166.Google Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, Schlesewsky, Matthias, Small, Steven L., and Rauschecke, Josef P.. 2015. “Neurobiological Roots of Language in Primate Audition: Common Computational Properties.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19:142–150.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Westport, CT: Prager Publishers.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. “Notes on Denotation and Denoting.” In Caponigro, I. and Cecchetto, C., eds. From Grammar to Meaning: The Spontaneous Logicality of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2016. “The Language Capacity: Architecture and Evolution.” In Fitch, William Tecumseh, ed. Psychological Bulletin and Review. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1078-6Google Scholar
Dediu, Daniel. 2011. “Are Languages Really Independent from Genes? If Not, What Would a Genetic Bias Affecting Language Diversity Look Like?” Human Biology 83(2):279–296.Google Scholar
Dediu, Daniel and Levinson, Steven. 2013. “On the Antiquity of Language: The Reinterpretation of Neandertal Linguistic Capacity and Its Consequences.” Frontiers in Psychology. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00397Google Scholar
Enard, Wolfgang, Przeworski, Molly, Fisher, Simon E., Lai, Cecilia, Wiebe, Victor, Kitano, Takashi, Monaco, Anthony P., and Paääbo, Svante. 2002. “Molecular Evolution of FOXP2, a Gene Involved in Speech and Language.” Nature 418:869–872.Google Scholar
Everaert, Martin, Huijbregts, Riny, Chomsky, Noam, Berwick, Robert C., and Bolhuis, Johan J.. 2015. “Structure Not Strings: Linguistics as Part of the Cognitive Sciences.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(12):729–743.Google Scholar
Fisher, Simon E. 2016. “A Molecular Genetic Perspective on Speech and Language.” In Hickock, Gregory and Small, Steven, eds. Neurobiology of Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier 13–24.Google Scholar
Fisher, Simon E. and Ridley, Matthew. 2013. “Evolution, Culture, Genes, and the Human Revolution.” Science 340(6135):929–930.Google Scholar
Fisher, Simon E. and Vernes, Sonja. 2015. “Genetics and the Language Sciences.” Annual Review of Linguistics 1:289–310.Google Scholar
Fitch, William Tecumseh. 2013. “Noam Chomsky and the Biology of Language.” In Harmand, Oren and Dietrich, Michel R., eds. Outsider Scientists: Routes to Innovation in Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 201–222.Google Scholar
Fitch, William Tecumseh. 2014. “Toward a Computational Framework for Cognitive Biology: Unifying Approaches from Cognitive Neuroscience and Comparative Cognition.” Physics of Life Reviews 11(3):329–364.Google Scholar
Friederici, Angela D. 2004. “Processing Local Transitions Versus Long-distance Syntactic Hierarchies.” Trends in Cognitive Science 8:245–247.Google Scholar
Friederici, Angela D., Moro, Andrea, Chomsky, Noam, Berwick, Robert C., and Bolhuis, Johan. 2016. “Language in the Brain.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, in press.Google Scholar
Graham, Sarah and Fisher, Simon E.. 2015. “Understanding Language from a Genomic Perspective.” Annual Reviews of Genetics 49:131–160.Google Scholar
Graham, Sarah, Deriziotis, Pelagia, and Fisher, Simon E.. 2015. “Insights into the Genetic Foundations of Human Communication.” Neuropsychological Review 25:3–26.Google Scholar
Gronau, Ilan, Hubisz, Melissa J., Gulko, Brad, Danko, Charles G., and Siepel, Adam. 2011. “Bayesian Inference of Ancient Human Demography from Individual Genome Sequences.” Nature Genetics 43:1031–1034.Google Scholar
Hoogman, Martine, Guadalupe, Tulio, Zwiers, Marcel P., Klarenbeek, Patricia, Francks, Clyde, and Fisher, Simon E.. 2014. “Assessing the Effects of Common Variation in the FOXP2 Gene on Human Brain Structure.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:1. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00473.Google Scholar
Idsardi, William James. 2015. “What’s Different About Phonology? No Recursion.” Ms. University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Jerison, Harry J. 1973. Evolution of the Brain and Human Intelligence. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, Simon. 2000. “Syntax Without Natural Selection: How Compositionality Emerges from Vocabulary in a Population of Learners.” In Knight, Christopher, ed. The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 303–323.Google Scholar
Krause, Johannes, Lalueza-Fox, Carles, Orlando, Ludovic, Enard, Wolfgang, Green, Richard, Burbano, Herman A., Hublin, Jean-Jacques, Hänni, Catherine, Fortea, Javier, de la Rasilla, Marco, Bertranpetit, Jean, Rosas, Jonas, and Pääbo, Svante. 2007. “The Derived FOXP2 Variant of Modern Humans Was Shared with Neandertals.” Current Biology 17:1–5.Google Scholar
Kuhlwilm, Martin, Gronau, Ilan, Hubisz, Melissa J., de Filippo, Cesare, Prado-Martinez, Javier Kircher, Martin, Fu, Qiaomei, Burbano, Hernán A., Lalueza-Fox, Carles, de la Rasilla, Marco, Rosas, Antonio, Rudan, Pavao, Brajkovic, Dejana, Kucan, Željko, Gušic, Ivan, Marques-Bonet, Tomas, Andrés, Aida M., Viola, Bence, Pääbo, Svante, Meyer, Matthias, Siepel, Adam, and Castellano, Sergi. 2016. “Ancient Gene Flow from Early Modern Humans into Eastern Neanderthals.” Nature 530:429–433.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric. 1964. New Directions in the Study of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Meyer, Matthias, Arsuaga, Juan-Luis, de Filippo, Cesare, Nagel, Sarah, Aximu-Petri, Ayinuer, Nickel, Birgit, Martínez, Ignacio, Gracia, Ana, de Castro, José María Bermúdez, Carbonell, Eudald, Viola, Bence, Kelso, Janet, Prüfer, Kay, and Pääbo, Svante. 2016. “Nuclear DNA Sequences from the Middle Pleistocene Sima de los Huesos Hominins.” Nature 531:504–507.Google Scholar
Niyogi, Partha, and Berwick, Robert C.. 1995. “The Logical Problem of Language Change.” AI Memo 1516, MIT. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Niyogi, Partha, and Berwick, Robert C.. 2009. “The Proper Treatment of Language Change in a Population Setting.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:10124–10129.Google Scholar
Niyogi, Partha. 2006. The Computational Nature of Language Learning and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pagel, Mark, Atkinson, Quentin D., and Meade, Andrew. 2007. “Frequency of Word-Use Predicts Rates of Lexical Evolution Throughout Indo-European History.” Nature 449:717–720.Google Scholar
Petitto, Laura Anne. 2005. “How the Brain Begets Language.” In McGilvray, J., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85–101.Google Scholar
Pfenning, Andreas R., Hara, Erina, Whitney, Osceola, Rivas, Miriam V., Wang, Rui, Roulhac, Petra L., Howard, Jason T., Wirthlin, Morgan, Lovell, Peter V., Ganapathy, Ganeshkumar, Mountcastle, Jacquelyn, Moseley, M. Arthur, Will Thompson, J., Soderblom, Erik J., Iriki, Atsushi, Kato, Masaki, Thomas, M., Gilbert, P., Zhang, Guojie, Bakken, Trygve, Bongaarts, Angie, Bernard, Amy, Lein, Ed, Mello, Claudio V., Hartemink, Alexander J., and Jarvis, Erich D.. 2014. Convergent transcriptional specializations in the brains of humans and song-learning birds. Science 346 (6215):1256846 (1–13).Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven and Bloom, Paul. 1989. “Natural Language and Natural Selection.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13(4):707–784.Google Scholar
Rilling, James K. 2014. “Comparative Primate Neurobiology and the Evolution of Brain Language Systems.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 28:C:10–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saffran, Jenny, Aslin, William, and Newport, Elissa. 1996. “Statistical Learning by 8-month Old Infants.” Science 274:1926–1928.Google Scholar
Somel, Mehmet, Liu, Xiling, and Khaitovich, Philipp. 2013. “Human Brain Evolution: Transcripts, Metabolites and Their Regulators.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 14:112–127.Google Scholar
Sonderreger, Morgan and Niyogi, Partha. 2010. “Combining Data and Mathematical Models of Language Change.” Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1019–1029.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, Andrew, Bishop, Dorothy. V. M., Ang, Qi W., Pennell, Craig E., and Fisher, Simon E.. 2011. “CNTNAP2 Variants Affect Early Language Development in the General Population.” Genes, Brain and Behavior 10:451–456.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles D. 2000. “Internal and External Forces in Language Change.” Language Variation and Change 12:231–250.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles D. 2004. “Universal Grammar, Statistics, or Both?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(10):451–456.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles D. 2013. “Ontogeny and Phylogeny of Language.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(16):6324–6327.Google Scholar
Zaccarella, E. and Friederici, Angela D.. 2015. “Reflections of Word Processing in the Insular Cortex: A Sub-Regional Parcellation Based Functional Assessment.” Brain and Language 142:1–7.Google Scholar
References
Alexiadou, Artemis, Borer, Hagit, and Schäfer, Florian, eds. 2015. The Roots of Syntax, the Syntax of Roots. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1985. “The Mirror Principle and Morphosyntactic Explanation.” Linguistic Inquiry 16:373–416.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2013. Taking Form, Structuring Sense. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. “Remarks on Nominalization.” In Jacobs, R. A. and Rosenbaum, P. S., eds. Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn. 184–221.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Martin, R., Michaels, D., and Uriagereka, J., eds. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by Phase.” In Kenstowitz, M., ed. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2015. “Problems of Projection: Extensions.” In Di Domenico, E., Hamann, C., and Matteini, S., eds. Structures, Strategies and Beyond, Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve and Clark, Herbert. 1979. “When Nouns Surface as Verbs.” Language 55:767–811.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1967. “The Logical Form of Action Sentences.” In Rescher, N., ed. The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 81–95.Google Scholar
DiSciullo, Anna Maria and Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul, and O’Connor, Mary Catherine. 1988. “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone.” Language 64:501–538.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1994. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. “Complement Selection and the Lexicon.” Linguistic Inquiry 10:279–326.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, S. Jay. 1993. “On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations.” In Hale, Kenneth and Jay Keyser, S., eds. The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 53–110.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1973. “Prolegomena to a Theory of Word Formation.” Linguistic Inquiry 4:3–16.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1975. “Morphological and Semantic Regularities in the Lexicon.” Language 51:639–71.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. “Severing the External Argument from the Verb.” In Rooryck, Johan and Zaring, Laurie, eds. Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 109–137.Google Scholar
Lapointe, Steven. 1980. A Theory of Grammatical Agreement. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 2011. “The Lexicon Project and Its Legacy.” PowerPoint presentation, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English. A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1983. Studies in Relational Grammar 1. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Roeper, Thomas and van Hout., Angeliek 2009. “The Representation of Movement in –ability Nominalizations: Evidence for Covert Category Movement, Edge Phenomena, and Local LF.” In Giannakidou, A. and Rathert, M., eds. Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 344–364.Google Scholar
Wasow, Tom. 1977. “Transformations and the Lexicon.” In Culicover, P. W., Wasow, T., and Akmajian, A., eds. Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1981. “Argument Structure and Morphology.” The Linguistic Review 1:81–114.Google Scholar
References
Alfinito, E., Viglione, R. G., and Vitiello, G. 2001. “The Decoherence Criterion.” Modern Physics Letters B 15:127–135.Google Scholar
Beige, A., Knight, P. L., and Vitiello, G.. 2005. “Cooling Many Particles at Once.” New Journal of Physics. 7(9):96–105.Google Scholar
Blasone, M., Jizba, P., and Vitiello, G.. 2011. Quantum Field Theory and Its Macroscopic Manifestations. London: Imperial College Press/World Scientific.Google Scholar
Boeckx, C., Hornstein, N., and Nunes, J.. 2007. “Overt Copies in Reflexive and Control Structures: A Movement Analysis.” In Conroy, A., Jing, C., Nakao, C., and Takahashi, E., eds. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 15:1–46.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. 2006. “Formal Semantics.” In Brown, E. K., Asher, R. E., and Simpson, J. M. Y., eds. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 564–579.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G., and McConnell-Ginet, S.. 1990. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding (The Pisa Lectures). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger Scientific.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2013b. “Notes on Denotation and Denoting.” In Caponigro, I. and Cecchetto, C., eds. From Grammar to Meaning: The Spontaneous Logicality of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 38–45.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2013c. “What Is Language” (First lecture of Dewey Lectures 2013: “What Kind of Creatures Are We?” The Journal of Philosophy 110(12): 645–662.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2015. “Problems of Projection: Extensions.” In Di Domenico, E., Hamann, C. and Matteini, S., eds. Structures, Strategies and Beyond. Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2017. “Puzzles about Phases.” In Franco, L. and Bellucci, G., eds., Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation – A Festschrift in Honour of M. Rita Manzini. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., and McGilvray, J., 2012. The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Close, F. 2011. The Infinity Puzzle: Quantum Field Theory and the Hunt for an Orderly Universe. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Epstein, S., Kitahara, H., and Seely, D.. 2012. “Structure Building That Can’t Be.” In Uribe-Etxebarria, M. and Valmala, V., eds. Ways of Structure Building. Oxford University Press. 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feynman, R. P. and Hibbs, A. R.. 1965. Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. New York: McGraw-Hill Co.Google Scholar
Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., and Sands, M.. 1963. The Feynman Lectures on Physics (Vol. 1). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. D. 1980. Semantics: Theories of Meaning in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. and Pylyshyn, Z.. 2015. Minds without Meanings: An Essay on the Content of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, W. J., and Vitiello, G.. 2006. “Nonlinear Brain Dynamics as Macroscopic Manifestation of Underlying Many-Body Dynamics.” Physics of Life Reviews 3:93–118.Google Scholar
Freeman, W. J., and Vitiello, G.. 2008. “Brain Dynamics, Dissipation, and Spontaneous Breakdown of Symmetry.” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41 (30): 30–42.Google Scholar
Gilmore, R. 1994. Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and Some of Their Applications. Malabar FL: Krieger.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., and Grohmann, K. K.. 2005. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Idsardi, W. J., and Uriagereka, J.. 2009. “Metrical Combinatorics and the Real Half of the Fibonacci Sequence.” Biolinguistics 3(4):404–406.Google Scholar
McGilvray, J. 1998. “Meanings Are Syntactically Individuated and Found in the Head.” Mind and Language 13:225–280.Google Scholar
McGilvray, J. 1999/2014. Chomsky: Language, Mind and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Second extensively revised edition (2014).Google Scholar
Medeiros, D. P. 2008. “Optimal Growth in Phrase Structure.” Biolinguistics 2(3):152–195.Google Scholar
Medeiros, D. P. 2012. Economy of Command. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Medeiros, D. P., and Piattelli-Palmarini, M. 2016. “The Golden Phrase: Steps to the Physics of Language.” In Gallego, A. and Martin, R., eds. Language, Syntax, and the Natural Sciences. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moro, A. 2013. “Rethinking Symmetry: A Note on Labeling and the EPP.” The Equilibrium of Human Syntax. Symmetries in the Brain. New York: Routledge. 200–203.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M., and Uriagereka, J.. 2008. “Still a Bridge Too Far? Biolinguistic Questions for Grounding Language on Brains.” Physics of Life Reviews 5(4):207–224.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M., and Vitiello, G.. 2015. “Linguistics and Some Aspects of its Underlying Dynamics.” Biolinguistics 9: 96–115. See also arXiv:1506.08663 at http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.08663Google Scholar
Pietroski, P. M. 2005. “Meaning Before Truth.” In Preyer, G. and Peters, G., eds. Contextualism in Philosophy. Oxford University Press. 225–300.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. 1955. Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I., and Glandsorff, P.. 1971. Thermodynamic Theory of Structure, Stability and Fluctuations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. 2006. “Lexical Semantics: Overview.” In Keith, B., ed. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier. 98–106.Google Scholar
Shah, M. N., Umezawa, H., and Vitiello, G.. 1974. “Relation Among Spin Operators and Magnons.” Physical Review B 10:4724–4736.Google Scholar
Umezawa, H. 1993. Advanced Field Theory: Micro, Macro and Thermal Concepts. New York: American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Vitiello, G. 1974. “Dynamical Rearrangement of Symmetry,” Dissertation Abstract International 36–02, Section B:0769.Google Scholar
von Fintel, K., and Matthewson, L.. 2008. “Universals in Semantics.” The Linguistic Review 25:139–201.Google Scholar
Zee, A. 2010. Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell (2nd ed.). Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar