Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T16:32:19.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Buddhism and Law in Tibet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Rebecca Redwood French
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Mark A. Nathan
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Get access

Summary

The Tibetan plateau is an immense high-altitude desert that, except for a few larger towns, was very sparsely populated with agriculturalists, nomadic herders, and merchant traders prior to 1960. The small population and minimal urbanization are the most important distinguishing features of this Buddhist country because concentrated populations are commonly connected to the development of government administration, law, and intellectual production. Despite this, Tibetan culture is known for its long history of enormous production of literary, scholarly, and religious works. Books on Buddhism and other topics from the five traditional classifications of knowledge in Tibet – arts and crafts, medicine, language, logic and Buddhism – were written and printed throughout much of Tibetan history.

When discussing the relationship between law and Buddhism in Tibet, the number of topics and the many historical twists and turns are daunting given the long history, the growth in Tibetan scholarship, and the rich textual resources available. As it is not possible to cover all of Tibetan legal history, this essay will concentrate on four distinct periods, providing a brief political history followed by a discussion of law during each period: (1) the Empire period (c. 600–850), which is the origin of many of the original customary law practices that were codified over the centuries; (2) the First Patron-Priest period (c. 1264–1350) in which a particular political formation, “the patron-priest,” resulted in the interweaving of Buddhist principles with legal and political institutions into a “Buddhist government”; (3) the Law Code Drafting period (c. 1618–1705) in which the law codes were developed and took on a very specific form and shape that included Buddhist elements in the prologue, factoring, and forms of reasoning; and (4) the 1940s in Tibet, the period before the Chinese takeover, in which we can look at the daily practice of law as it blends ordinary bureaucratic decision-making with a continuous thread of customary practices from early times and embedded Buddhist concepts.

Type
Chapter
Information
Buddhism and Law
An Introduction
, pp. 305 - 318
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The landmass of the Tibetan plateau is similar to four times that of France or the seven combined U.S. states of California, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Arizona, Oklahoma and Texas. Charles Bell, a British diplomat in Tibet in the early part of the twentieth century, estimated the entire population of this area as only 2 million and the largest town at 40,000. Charles Alfred Bell, The People of Tibet (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928)
Schaffer, Kurt, The Culture of the Book in Tibet, (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Dotson, Brandon, The Old Tibetan Annals: An Annotated Translation of Tibet’s First History, (Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2009), 43Google Scholar
Bacot, and Toussaint, , Documents de Touen-houang relatifs a l’histoire de Tibet, (Paris: Libraire orientaliste Paul Geunther, 1940–46)Google Scholar
Walters, Michael has argued in Buddhism and Empire: The Political and Religious Culture of Early Tibet, (Leiden: Brill, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapstein, Mathew T., The Tibetans (Cambridge: Blackwell, 2006), 71–72Google Scholar
van Schaik, Sam and Doney, Lewis, “The Prayer, the Priest and the Tsenpo: An Early Buddhist Narrative from Dunhuang,” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 30 (2007), 175–217Google Scholar
Takeguchi, Tsuguhito, A Study of Old Tibetan Contracts (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Uray, Geza, “The Narrative of the Legislation and Organization of the Mkhas pa’i dga ston,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae (1972) 26, 11–68Google Scholar
Richardson, Hugh, “Early Tibetan Law Concerning Dog-Bite,” Bulletin of Tibetology (1989), 3, 5–10Google Scholar
Dotson, , The Old Tibetan Annals
French, Rebecca Redwood, Golden Yoke: The Legal Cosmology of Buddhist Tibet (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995), 81–82Google Scholar
Drege, J.P. (ed.), Études de Dunhuang et Turfan. (Genève: Librairie Droz, 2007), 257–326
Kapstein, Matthew T. and Dotson, Brandon (eds.), Contributions to the Cultural History of Early Tibet, (Leiden: Brill, 2007), 17
Bernstein, Anya, “More Alive than all the Living: Bodies and Cosmic Politics in Buddhist Siberia,” Cultural Anthropology 27 (2012), 261–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihama, Yumiko, “The Notion of ‘Buddhist Government’ (chos srid) shared by Tibet, Mongol and Manchu in the Early Seventeenth Century,” in Cüppers, Christoph (ed.), The Relationship between Religion and State (chos srid zung ‘brel) in Traditional Tibet, (Lumbini: Lumbini International Research Institute, 2004), 15–31Google Scholar
van der Kuijp, Leonard, “On the Life and Political Career of Ta’i -si-tu Byangchub rgyal-mtshan (1302?–1364)” in Steinkellner, Ernst (ed.), Tibetan History and Language (Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien, 1991)Google Scholar
Tibetan Legal Materials, reprint of the Library of Tibetan Works and Archives (Delhi: Dorjee Tsering, M.M. Offset Press,1985)
Meisezahl, R.O., “Die Handschriften in den city of Liverpool Museum,” Zentralasiastische Studien des Seminars für Sprach und Kulturwissenschaft Zentralasiens (Weisbaden 1973)Google Scholar
Tucci, Guiseppe, Tibetan Painted Scrolls (Rome: Libreria dello Stato, 1949), 697Google Scholar
Tucci, G. stated that the Ganden Podrang Law Code was copied from the Neudong code and was just a revision. However, a close look at the documents shows the Tsangpa to be the real template. G. Tucci, Tibetan Painted Scrolls (Roma: Libreria dello Stato, 1949), 37Google Scholar
Schuh, Dieter, Grundlagen tibetischer Siegelkunde: Eine Untersuchung uber tibetische Siegelaufschriften in Phags-pa-Schrift (Monumenta Tibetica historica) (St. Augustin: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag, 1981)Google Scholar
Schuh, Dieter, Urkunden und Sendschreiben aus Zentraltibet, Ladakh und Zanskar (St. Augustin: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag, 1976)Google Scholar
Schneider, Hanna, Tibetische Handschriften und Blockdrucke: Teil 16: Tibetischsprachige Urkunden aus Sudwesttibet (Spo-Rong, Ding-Ri und Shel-Dkar) (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2012)Google Scholar
Cüppers, Christoph, “Some Aspects of Tibetan Administration Under the dGa’-ldan pho-brang Government” in Krasser, H. et al. (eds.), Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 7th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, vol. 1 (Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1997) 189–93Google Scholar
Cüppers, C., “Registers and Account Books of the dGa’ ldan pho brang Government” in Prats, R.. (ed.), The Pandita and the Siddha: Tibetan Studies in Honour of E. Gene Smith, (Dharamsala: Amnye Machen Institute, 2007) 12–15Google Scholar
Gzhung sa dga’ ldan pho brang gi chos srid lar rgya dang ’brel ba’i khrims srol rtsa ’dzin dang bca’ yig chings dan sogs phyogs gcig tu bsgrigs pa nor bu’i me long zhes bya ba bzhugs so (Beijing: Mi rigs dpe skrun khang, 2008)
Alice Travers, “The Careers of the Noble Officials of the Ganden Phodrang (1895–1959): Organisation and Hereditary Divisions within the Service of the State” in Kelsang Norbu Gurung, Tim Myatt, Nicola Schneider, and Alice Travers (eds.), Revisiting Tibetan Culture and History, Proceedings of the Second International Seminar of Young Tibetologists Vol 1. (Paris: Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines, 2011) 155–74

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×