Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:04:01.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Defending Trade Multilateralism

The BRICS Countries in the World Trade Organization's Dispute Settlement Mechanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2017

Rostam J. Neuwirth
Affiliation:
Universidade de Macau
Alexandr Svetlicinii
Affiliation:
Universidade de Macau
Denis De Castro Halis
Affiliation:
Universidade de Macau
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

VI. References

Alavi, Amin, ‘African countries and the WTO's Dispute Settlement Mechanism’ (2007) 25(1) Development Policy Review 2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azevêdo, Roberto, Brazil and Dispute Settlement in the WTO (Brasil e o contencioso no OMC. Sao Paulo: Ed. Saraiva, 2009.Google Scholar
Borght, Kim Van der, ‘Russian accession to the World Trade Organization: the slow road to trade & reform opportunities’ (2013) 2 Russian Law: Theory & Practice 7183.Google Scholar
Boulle, Laurence and Chella, Jessie, ‘Joining the BRICs: the case of South Africa’, in Io Lo, Vai and Hiscock, Mary (eds.), The Rise of the BRICS in Global Political Economy: Changing Paradigms? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014, pp. 99122.Google Scholar
BRICS Business Council, ‘Facing challenges, building confidence’, Second Annual Report 2014–2015.Google Scholar
BRICS Business Council, 2013/2014 Annual Report.Google Scholar
BRICS Research Group, ‘2010 BRIC Brasília Summit compliance assessment on world trade: fighting protectionism and disguised restrictions’, 29 September 2013; available at www.brics.utoronto.ca/compliance/2010-compliance-trade.pdf [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
BRICS Research Group, ‘2013 BRICS Durban Summit Compliance Report’, 27 March 2013 to 1 July 2014; available at www.brics.utoronto.ca/compliance/2013-durban.html [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
BRICS Research Group, ‘2014 BRICS Fortaleza Summit Compliance Report’, 15 July 2014 to 28 June 2015; available at www.brics.utoronto.ca/compliance/2014-fortaleza.html [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric, ‘Bargaining in the shadow of the law: early settlement in GATT/WTO disputes’ (2001) 24 Fordham International Law Journal 158172.Google Scholar
Davey, William J., ‘The WTO and rules-based dispute settlement: historical evolution, operational success, and future challenges’ (2014) 17(3) Journal of International Economic Law 679700.Google Scholar
Halverson, Karen, ‘China's WTO accession: economic, legal, and political implications’ (2004) 27(2) Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 319370.Google Scholar
Harpaz, Marcia Don, ‘Sense and sensibilities of China and WTO dispute settlement’ (2010) 44(6) Journal of World Trade 11551186.Google Scholar
Hodu, Yenkong Ngangjoh and Zhang, Qi, The Political Economy of WTO Implementation and China's Approach to Litigation in the WTO. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016.Google Scholar
Jatkar, Archana and McFarlene, Laura, ‘Brazil in the WTO dispute settlement understanding: a perspective’, (2013) 1 CUTS International Briefing Paper 16; available at www.cuts-citee.org/pdf/Briefing_Paper13-Brazil_in_the_WTO_Dispute_Settlement_Understanding-A_Perspective.pdf [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
Johns, Leslie and Pelc, Krzysztof J., ‘Fear of crowds in the World Trade Organization disputes: why don't more countries participate?’ (2015) 78(1) Journal of Politics 88104.Google Scholar
Li, Liao and Yu, Minyou, ‘Impact of the WTO on China's rule of law in trade: twentieth anniversary of the WTO’ (2015) 49(5) Journal of World Trade 837872.Google Scholar
Liu, Hongsong, ‘China's proposing behavior in global governance: the cases of the WTO Doha Round negotiation and G-20 process’ (2014) 57 Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 121137; available at www.scielo.br/pdf/rbpi/v57nspe/0034–7329-rbpi-57-spe-00121.pdf [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
Mathur, Sajal and Dasgupta, Meghna, ‘From BRIC to BRICS: an overview’, in Mathur, Sajal and Dasgupta, Meghna (eds.), BRICS: Trade Policies, Institutions and Deepening Cooperation. New Delhi: Centre for WTO Studies, 2013; available at wtocentre.iift.ac.in/FA/Brics.pdf [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
Michailova, Snejina, McCarthy, Daniel J. and Puffer, Sheila M., ‘Russia: as solid as a BRIC?’ (2013) 9(1–2) Critical Perspectives on International Business 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosoti, Victor, ‘Africa in the first decade of WTO dispute settlement’ (2006) 9(2) Journal of International Economic Law 427453.Google Scholar
Narlikar, Amrita, Daunton, Martin and Stern, Robert M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on The World Trade Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Neuwirth, Rostam J. and Svetlicinii, Alexandr, ‘International trade, intellectual property and competition rules: multiple cases for global “regulatory co-opetition”’, in Ramaswamy, Muruga Perumal and Ribeiro, Joao (eds.), Trade Development through Harmonization of Commercial Law. Wellington: UNCITRAL Regional Centre for Asia and the Pacific, 2015, pp. 393425.Google Scholar
Neuwirth, Rostam J. and Svetlicinii, Alexandr, ‘The current EU/US–Russia conflict over Ukraine and the WTO: a preliminary note on (trade) restrictive measures’ (2016) 32(3) Post-Soviet Affairs 237–71.Google Scholar
Pereira, Carlos and Neves, João Augusto de Castro, ‘Brazil and China: South–South partnership or North–South competition?’ (2011) 26 Brookings Foreign Policy Paper.Google Scholar
Puccio, Lara, ‘Granting market economy status to China: an analysis of WTO law and of selected WTO members’ policy’, European Parliamentary Research Service, November 2015.Google Scholar
Purugganan, Joseph, Jafri, Afsar and Solon, Pablo, ‘BRICS: a global trade power in a multi-polar world’ (September 2014) Focus on the Global South; available at www.tni.org/files/download/shifting_power-trade.pdf [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
Ramaswamy, Muruga Perumal, ‘Sino-Brazilian trade and anti-dumping concerns’, in Lo, Vai Io and Hiscock, Mary (eds.), The Rise of the BRICS in Global Political Economy: Changing Paradigms? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014, pp. 8498.Google Scholar
Ruggiero, Renato, ‘The future path of the multilateral trading system’, 17 April 1997; available at www.wto.org/english/news_e/sprr_e/seoul_e.htm [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
Ruggiero, Renato, ‘Reflections after Seattle’ (2000) 24(15) Fordham International Law Journal 3061.Google Scholar
Rumbaugh, Thomas and Blancher, Nicolas, ‘China: international trade and WTO accession’, IMF Working Paper No. 04/36, March 2004; available at www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2004/wp0436.pdf [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
Sanson, Michelle, ‘Facilitating access to dispute settlement for African members of the World Trade Organization’ (2009) 2 Indian Journal of International Economic Law 151.Google Scholar
Sekine, Eiichi, ‘The impact of the third BRICS Summit’ (2011) 3(1) Nomura Journal of Capital Markets 16; available at www.nicmr.com/nicmr/english/report/repo/2011/2011sum04.pdf [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, ‘The challenges of WTO law: strategies for developing country adaptation’ (2006) 5(2) World Trade Review 177198.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C., Badin, Michelle Ratton Sanchez and Rosenberg, Barbara, ‘Winning at the WTO: the development of a trade policy community within Brazil’, in Shaffer, Gregory C. and Melendez-Ortiz, Ricardo (eds.), Dispute Settlement at the WTO: The Developing Country Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 21104.Google Scholar
Stuenkel, Oliver, ‘Emerging powers and status: the case of the first BRICs summit’ (2014) 38(1) Asian Perspective 89109.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Peter, ‘Concluding the Uruguay Round – creating the new architecture of trade for the global economy’ (2000) 24(15) Fordham International Law Journal 1529.Google Scholar
Thomas, Kristie, ‘China and the WTO dispute settlement system: from passive observer to active participant?’ (2011) 6(10) Global Trade and Customs Journal 481490.Google Scholar
Thorstensen, Vera and Oliveira, Ivan Tiago Machado (eds.), BRICS in the World Trade Organization: Comparative Trade Policies. Brasília: Institute for Applied Economic Research, 2014.Google Scholar
Toohey, Lisa, ‘Barriers to universal membership of the World Trade Organization’ (2012) 19 Australian International Law Journal 97115.Google Scholar
Torres, Raul A., ‘Use of the WTO Trade Dispute Settlement Mechanism by the Latin American countries – dispelling myths and breaking down barriers’, WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2012–03, February 2012; available at www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201203_e.pdf [accessed on 26 October 2016].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urdinez, Francisco and Masiero, Gilmar, ‘China and the WTO: will the market economy status make any difference after 2016?’ (2015) 48(2) Chinese Economy 155172.Google Scholar
Wilson, Dominic and Purushothaman, Roopa, ‘Dreaming with BRICs: the path to 2050’, Global Economics Paper no. 99, (2003) available at www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/archive/archive-pdfs/brics-dream.pdf [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, ‘Azevêdo launches “rolling set of meetings” aimed at delivering success in Bali’ (9 September 2013); available at www.wto.org/english/news_e/news13_e/gc_09sep13_e.htm [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, ‘International Trade Statistics 2014’; available at www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2014_e/its14_highlights1_e.pdf [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, ‘Trade Monitoring Database’; available at tmdb.wto.org/ [accessed on 26 October 2016].Google Scholar
Zunckel, Hilton E. and Botha, Lambert, ‘The BRICS, South Africa and dispute settlement in the WTO’, SAFPI Policy Brief No. 9 (September 2012).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×