Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: November 2010

11 - Human brain mapping of the motor system after stroke

from Section II. - Spontaneous Stroke Recovery in Humans

Related content

Powered by UNSILO


1. Nichols-LarsenDS, ClarkPC, ZeringueA, et al. Factors influencing stroke survivors’ quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke. 2005;36:1480–4.
2. WyllerTB, SveenU, SodringKM, et al. Subjective well-being one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1997;11:139–45.
3. CramerSC, ChoppM. Recovery recapitulates ontogeny. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:265–71.
4. BuxtonRB. An introduction to functional magnetic resonance imaging: principles and techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
5. MagistrettiPJ, PellerinL. Cellular mechanisms of brain energy metabolism and their relevance to functional brain imaging. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;354:1155–63.
6. AttwellD, IadecolaC. The neural basis of functional brain imaging signals. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:621–5.
7. FristonKJ, JosephsO, ReesG, et al. Nonlinear event-related responses in fMRI. Magn Reson Med. 1998;39:41–52.
8. NewtonJ, SunderlandA, ButterworthSE, et al. A pilot study of event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging of monitored wrist movements in patients with partial recovery. Stroke. 2002;33:2881–7.
9. PineiroR, PendleburyS, Johansen-BergH, et al. Functional MRI detects posterior shifts in primary sensorimotor cortex activation after stroke: Evidence of local adaptive reorganization?Stroke. 2001;32:1134–9.
10. CarusoneLM, SrinivasanJ, GitelmanDR, et al. Hemodynamic response changes in cerebrovascular disease: Implications for functional MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1222–8.
11. HamzeiF, KnabR, WeillerC, et al. The influence of extra- and intracranial artery disease on the BOLD signal in fMRI. Neuroimage. 2003;20:1393–9.
12. RossiniPM, AltamuraC, FerrettiA, et al. Does cerebrovascular disease affect the coupling between neuronal activity and local haemodynamics?Brain. 2004;127:99–110.
13. RötherJ, KnabR, HamzeiF, et al. Negative dip in BOLD fMRI is caused by blood flow–oxygen consumption uncoupling in humans. Neuroimage. 2002;15:98–102.
14. KrainikA, Hund-GeorgiadisM, ZyssetS, et al. Regional impairment of cerebrovascular reactivity and BOLD signal in adults after stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:1146–52.
15. MurataY, SakataniK, HoshinoT, et al. Effects of cerebral ischemia on evoked cerebral blood oxygenation responses and BOLD contrast functional MRI in stroke patients. Stroke. 2006;37:2514–20.
16. WardNS, BrownMM, ThompsonAJ, et al. Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: A cross-sectional fMRI study. Brain. 2003;126:1430–48.
17. WardNS, NewtonJM, SwayneOB, et al. Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. Brain. 2006;129:809–19.
18. WardNS, NewtonJM, SwayneOB, et al. The relationship between brain activity and peak grip force is modulated by corticospinal system integrity after subcortical stroke. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:1865–73.
19. D’EspositoM, ZarahnE, AguirreGK, et al. The effect of normal aging on the coupling of neural activity to the bold hemodynamic response. Neuroimage. 1999;10:6–14.
20. WardNS, SwayneOB, NewtonJM. Age-dependent changes in the neural correlates of force modulation: An fMRI study. Neurobiol Aging. 2008;29:1434–46.
21. CalauttiC, LeroyF, GuincestreJY, et al. Dynamics of motor network overactivation after striatocapsular stroke: A longitudinal PET study using a fixed-performance paradigm. Stroke. 2001;32:2534–42.
22. CholletF, DiPieroV, WiseRJ, et al. The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: A study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 1991;29:63–71.
23. SeitzRJ, HoflichP, BinkofskiF, et al. Role of the premotor cortex in recovery from middle cerebral artery infarction. Arch Neurol. 1998;55:1081–8.
24. WeillerC, CholletF, FristonKJ, et al. Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Ann Neurol. 1992;31:463–72.
25. WeillerC, RamsaySC, WiseRJ, et al. Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Ann Neurol. 1993;33:181–9.
26. CaoY, D’OlhaberriagueL, VikingstadEM, et al. Pilot study of functional MRI to assess cerebral activation of motor function after poststroke hemiparesis. Stroke. 1998;29:112–22.
27. CramerSC, NellesG, BensonRR, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:2518–27.
28. CramerSC, MooreCI, FinklesteinSP, et al. A pilot study of somatotopic mapping after cortical infarct. Stroke. 2000;31:668–71.
29. RossiniPM, CaltagironeC, Castriota-ScanderbegA, et al. Hand motor cortical area reorganization in stroke: A study with fMRI, MEG and TCS maps. Neuroreport. 1998;9:2141–6.
30. SanesJN, DonoghueJP. Plasticity and primary motor cortex. Ann Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:393–415.
31. CaoY, VikingstadEM, HuttenlocherPR, et al. Functional magnetic resonance studies of the reorganization of the human hand sensorimotor area after unilateral brain injury in the perinatal period. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:9612–6.
32. PorterR, LemonRN. Corticospinal function and voluntary movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.
33. TomassiniV, JbabdiS, KleinJC, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging tractography-based parcellation of the human lateral premotor cortex identifies dorsal and ventral subregions with anatomical and functional specializations. J Neurosci. 2007;27:10 259–69.
34. Johansen-BergH, MatthewsPM. Attention to movement modulates activity in sensori-motor areas, including primary motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2002;142:13–24.
35. DumRP, StrickPL. The origin of corticospinal projections from the premotor areas in the frontal lobe. J Neurosci. 1991;11:667–89.
36. HeSQ, DumRP, StrickPL. Topographic organization of corticospinal projections from the frontal lobe: Motor areas on the lateral surface of the hemisphere. J Neurosci. 1993;13:952–80.
37. HeSQ, DumRP, StrickPL. Topographic organization of corticospinal projections from the frontal lobe: Motor areas on the medial surface of the hemisphere. J Neurosci. 1995;15:3284–306.
38. StrickPL. Anatomical organization of multiple motor areas in the frontal lobe: Implications for recovery of function. Adv Neurol. 1988;47:293–312.
39. BoudriasMH, Belhaj-SaifA, ParkMC, et al. Contrasting properties of motor output from the supplementary motor area and primary motor cortex in rhesus macaques. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16:632–8.
40. MaierMA, ArmandJ, KirkwoodPA, et al. Differences in the corticospinal projection from primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area to macaque upper limb motoneurons: An anatomical and electrophysiological study. Cereb Cortex. 2002;12:281–96.
41. MazevetD, MeunierS, Pradat-DiehlP, et al. Changes in propriospinally mediated excitation of upper limb motoneurons in stroke patients. Brain. 2003;126:988–1000.
42. StinearJW, ByblowWD. The contribution of cervical propriospinal premotoneurons in recovering hemiparetic stroke patients. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;21:426–34.
43. MazevetD, Pierrot-DeseillignyE. Pattern of descending excitation of presumed propriospinal neurones at the onset of voluntary movement in humans. Acta Physiol Scand. 1994;150:27–38.
44. Pierrot-DeseillignyE. Transmission of the cortical command for human voluntary movement through cervical propriospinal premotoneurons. Prog Neurobiol. 1996;48:489–517.
45. DancauseN, BarbayS, FrostSB, et al. Ipsilateral connections of the ventral premotor cortex in a new world primate. J Comp Neurol. 2006;495:374–90.
46. DancauseN, BarbayS, FrostSB, et al. Interhemispheric connections of the ventral premotor cortex in a new world primate. J Comp Neurol. 2007;505:701–15.
47. DumRP, StrickPL. Spinal cord terminations of the medial wall motor areas in macaque monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996;16:6513–25.
48. RouillerEM, MoretV, TanneJ, et al. Evidence for direct connections between the hand region of the supplementary motor area and cervical motoneurons in the macaque monkey. Eur J Neurosci. 1996;8:1055–9.
49. WardNS, BrownMM, ThompsonAJ, et al. The influence of time after stroke on brain activations during a motor task. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:829–34.
50. FeydyA, CarlierR, Roby-BramiA, et al. Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: Recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke. 2002;33:1610–7.
51. MarshallRS, PereraGM, LazarRM, et al. Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke. 2000;31:656–61.
52. SmallSL, HlustikP, NollDC, et al. Cerebellar hemispheric activation ipsilateral to the paretic hand correlates with functional recovery after stroke. Brain. 2002;125:1544–57.
53. WardNS, BrownMM, ThompsonAJ, et al. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: A longitudinal fMRI study. Brain. 2003;126:2476–96.
54. LuftAR, WallerS, ForresterL, et al. Lesion location alters brain activation in chronically impaired stroke survivors. Neuroimage. 2004;21:924–35.
55. HodicsT, CohenLG, CramerSC. Functional imaging of intervention effects in stroke motor rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(12 Suppl 2):S36–42.
56. LuftAR, McCombe-WallerS, WhitallJ, et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;292:1853–61.
57. SchaechterJD, KraftE, HilliardTS, et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: A preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16:326–38.
58. WardNS, CohenLG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:1844–8.
59. MuraseN, DuqueJ, MazzocchioR, et al. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:400–09.
60. GrefkesC, NowakDA, EickhoffSB, et al. Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2008;63:236–46.
61. MansurCG, FregniF, BoggioPS, et al. A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology. 2005;64:1802–04.
62. LiepertJ, ZittelS, WeillerC. Improvement of dexterity by single session low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in acute stroke: A double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25:461–5.
63. TakeuchiN, ChumaT, MatsuoY, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:2681–6.
64. NowakDA, GrefkesC, DafotakisM, et al. Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:741–7.
65. FregniF, BoggioPS, MansurCG, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport. 2005;16:1551–5.
66. FregniF, BoggioPS, ValleAC, et al. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke. 2006;37:2115–22.
67. TalelliP, RothwellJ. Does brain stimulation after stroke have a future?Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;19:543–50.
68. VerlegerR, AdamS, RoseM, et al. Control of hand movements after striatocapsular stroke: High-resolution temporal analysis of the function of ipsilateral activation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:1468–76.
69. Johansen-BergH, RushworthMF, BogdanovicMD, et al. The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:14 518–23.
70. WerhahnKJ, ConfortoAB, KadomN, et al. Contribution of the ipsilateral motor cortex to recovery after chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2003;54:464–72.
71. LotzeM, MarkertJ, SausengP, et al. The role of multiple contralesional motor areas for complex hand movements after internal capsular lesion. J Neurosci. 2006;26:6096–102.
72. SerrienDJ, StrensLH, CassidyMJ, et al. Functional significance of the ipsilateral hemisphere during movement of the affected hand after stroke. Exp Neurol. 2004;190:425–32.
73. FridmanEA, HanakawaT, ChungM, et al. Reorganization of the human ipsilesional premotor cortex after stroke. Brain. 2004;127:747–58.
74. DettmersC, FinkGR, LemonRN, et al. Relation between cerebral activity and force in the motor areas of the human brain. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74:802–15.
75. ThickbroomGW, PhillipsBA, MorrisI, et al. Differences in functional magnetic resonance imaging of sensorimotor cortex during static and dynamic finger flexion. Exp Brain Res. 1999;126:431–8.
76. WardNS, FrackowiakRS. Age-related changes in the neural correlates of motor performance. Brain. 2003;126:873–88.
77. StinearCM, BarberPA, SmalePR, et al. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain. 2007;130:170–80.
78. HealdA, BatesD, CartlidgeNE, et al. Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 2. Central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. Brain. 1993;116:1371–85.
79. CramerSC, ParrishTB, LevyRM, et al. Predicting functional gains in a stroke trial. Stroke. 2007;38:2108–14.
80. MarshallRS, ZarahnE, AlonL, et al. Early imaging correlates of subsequent motor recovery after stroke. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:596–602.
81. SwayneOB, RothwellJC, WardNS, et al. Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18:1909–22.
82. NewtonJM, WardNS, ParkerGJ, et al. Non-invasive mapping of corticofugal fibres from multiple motor areas – Relevance to stroke recovery. Brain. 2006;129:1844–58.
83. ZemkeAC, HeagertyPJ, LeeC, et al. Motor cortex organization after stroke is related to side of stroke and level of recovery. Stroke. 2003;34:e23–8.
84. CraftonKR, MarkAN, CramerSC. Improved understanding of cortical injury by incorporating measures of functional anatomy. Brain. 2003;126:1650–9.
85. GoldsteinLB. Pharmacology of recovery after stroke. Stroke. 1990;21(Suppl):III139–42.
86. KleimJA, ChanS, PringleE, et al. BDNF val66met polymorphism is associated with modified experience-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:735–7.
87. WardNS. Getting lost in translation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2008;21:625–7.