Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: November 2010

Section I. - Basic Science and Animal Studies

References

1. Hughlings JacksonJ. Remarks on the relations of different divisions of the central nervous system to one another and to parts of the body. Br Med J. 1898;1:65–9.
2. FritzG, Hitzig, E. Über die elektrische Erregbarkeit des Grosshirns. Arch Anat Physiol wiss Med. 1870;37:300–32.
3. MontiB, BerteottiC, ContestabileA. Subchronic rolipram delivery activates hippocampal CREB and arc, enhances retention and slows down extinction of conditioned fear. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:278–86.
4. EscuderoJV, SanchoJ, BautistaD, et al. Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:1854–9.
5. BrouwerBJ, Schryburt-BrownK. Hand function and motor cortical output poststroke: are they related? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:627–34.
6. WittenbergGF, ChenR, IshiiK, et al. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: Magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:48–57.
7. KoskiL, MernarTJ, DobkinBH. Immediate and long-term changes in corticomotor output in response to rehabilitation: Correlation with functional improvements in chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18:230–49.
8. von MonakowC. Die Lokalisation im Grosshirn und der Abbau der Funktion durch kortikale Herde. Weisbaden: Bergmann; 1914.
9. CramerSC. Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery. Ann Neurol. 2008;63:272–87.
10. DuncanPW, GoldsteinLB, MatcharD, et al. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke. 1992;23:1084–9.
11. NudoRJ, MillikenGW. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:2144–9.
12. TalelliP, RothwellJ. Does brain stimulation after stroke have a future? Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;19:543–50.
13. KarniA, MeyerG, JezzardP, et al. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature. 1995;377:155–8.
14. FranziniA, FerroliP, DonesI, et al. Chronic motor cortex stimulation for movement disorders: A promising perspective. Neurol Res. 2003;25:123–6.
15. FrostSB, BarbayS, FrielKM, et al. Reorganization of remote cortical regions after ischemic brain injury: A potential substrate for stroke recovery. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:3205–14.
16. EnzingerC, Johansen-BergH, DawesH, et al. Functional MRI correlates of lower limb function in stroke victims with gait impairment. Stroke. 2008;39:1507–13.
17. ZemkeA, HeagertyP, LeeC, et al. Motor cortex organization after stroke is related to side of stroke and level of recovery. Stroke. 2003;34:E23–8.
18. JankowskaE, EdgleySA. How can corticospinal tract neurons contribute to ipsilateral movements? A question with implications for recovery of motor functions. Neuroscientist. 2006;12:67–79.
19. GerloffC, BraunC, StaudtM, et al. Coherent corticomuscular oscillations originate from primary motor cortex: Evidence from patients with early brain lesions. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006;27:789–98.
20. FeydyA, CarlierR, Roby-BramiA, et al. Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke. 2002;33:1610–7.
21. LotzeM, CohenLG. Volition and imagery in neurorehabilitation. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006;19:135–40.
22. WeillerC, CholletF, FristonKJ, et al. Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Ann Neurol. 1992;31:463–72.
23. FridmanEA, HanakawaT, ChungM, et al. Reorganization of the human ipsilesional premotor cortex after stroke. Brain. 2004;127:747–58.
24. BarbayS, PlautzEJ, FrielKM, et al. Behavioral and neurophysiological effects of delayed training following a small ischemic infarct in primary motor cortex of squirrel monkeys. Exp Brain Res. 2006;169:106–16.
25. ConnerJM, ChibaAA, TuszynskiMH. The basal forebrain cholinergic system is essential for cortical plasticity and functional recovery following brain injury. Neuron. 2005;46:173–9.
26. MonfilsMH, PlautzEJ, KleimJA. In search of the motor engram: Motor map plasticity as a mechanism for encoding motor experience. Neuroscientist. 2005;11:471–83.
27. MountcastleVB. The columnar organization of the neocortex. Brain. 1997;120:701–22.
28. GhoshS, PorterR. Morphology of pyramidal neurones in monkey motor cortex and the synaptic actions of their intracortical axon collaterals. J Physiol. 1988;400:593–615.
29. JankowskaE, PadelY, TanakaR. The mode of activation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical stimuli. J Physiol. 1975;249:617–36.
30. StoneySD, Jr., ThompsonWD, AsanumaH. Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: Effective extent of stimulating current. J Neurophysiol. 1968;31:659–69.
31. CheneyPD, FetzEE, PalmerSS. Patterns of facilitation and suppression of antagonist forelimb muscles from motor cortex sites in the awake monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1985;53:805–20.
32. MonfilsMH, TeskeyGC. Skilled-learning-induced potentiation in rat sensorimotor cortex: A transient form of behavioural long-term potentiation. Neuroscience. 2004;125:329–36.
33. TeskeyGC, MonfilsMH, VandenBergPM, et al. Motor map expansion following repeated cortical and limbic seizures is related to synaptic potentiation. Cereb Cortex. 2002;12:98–105.
34. Rioult-PedottiMS, FriedmanD, HessG, et al. Strengthening of horizontal cortical connections following skill learning. Nat Neurosci. 1998;1:230–4.
35. KleimJA, BarbayS, NudoRJ. Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:3321–5.
36. KleimJA, BarbayS, CooperNR, et al. Motor learning-dependent synaptogenesis is localized to functionally reorganized motor cortex. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2002;77:63–77.
37. KleimJA, HoggTM, VandenBergPM, et al. Cortical synaptogenesis and motor map reorganization occur during late, but not early, phase of motor skill learning. J Neurosci. 2004;24:628–33.
38. MacDonaldE, Van der LeeH, PocockD, et al. A novel phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor, HT-0712, enhances rehabilitation-dependent motor recovery and cortical reorganization after focal cortical ischemia. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:486–96.
39. PapadopoulosCM, TsaiSY, CheatwoodJL, et al. Dendritic plasticity in the adult rat following middle cerebral artery occlusion and Nogo-a neutralization. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16:529–36.
40. KartjeGL, SchulzMK, Lopez-YunezA, et al. Corticostriatal plasticity is restricted by myelin-associated neurite growth inhibitors in the adult rat. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:778–86.
41. WenkCA, ThallmairM, KartjeGL, et al. Increased corticofugal plasticity after unilateral cortical lesions combined with neutralization of the IN-1 antigen in adult rats. J Comp Neurol. 1999;410:143–57.
42. EmerickAJ, NeafseyEJ, SchwabME, et al. Functional reorganization of the motor cortex in adult rats after cortical lesion and treatment with monoclonal antibody IN-1. J Neurosci. 2003;23:4826–30.
43. FregniF, Pascual-LeoneA. Hand motor recovery after stroke: Tuning the orchestra to improve hand motor function. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006;19:21–33.
44. TsubokawaT, KatayamaY, YamamotoT, et al. Chronic motor cortex stimulation in patients with thalamic pain. J Neurosurg. 1993;78:393–401.
45. KatayamaY, OshimaH, FukayaC, et al. Control of post-stroke movement disorders using chronic motor cortex stimulation. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;79:89–92.
46. Garcia-LarreaL, PeyronR, MertensP, et al. Electrical stimulation of motor cortex for pain control: A combined PET-scan and electrophysiological study. Pain. 1999;83:259–73.
47. NguyenJP, PollinB, FeveA, et al. Improvement of action tremor by chronic cortical stimulation. Mov Disord. 1998;13:84–8.
48. KleimJA, BruneauR, VandenBergP, et al. Motor cortex stimulation enhances motor recovery and reduces peri-infarct dysfunction following ischemic insult. Neurol Res. 2003;25:789–93.
49. Adkins-MuirDL, JonesTA. Cortical electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitative training: enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats. Neurol Res. 2003;25:780–8.
50. PlautzEJ, BarbayS, FrostSB, et al. Post-infarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery using concurrent cortical stimulation and rehabilitative training: A feasibility study in primates. Neurol Res. 2003;25:801–10.
51. TeskeyGC, FlynnC, GoertzenCD, et al. Cortical stimulation improves skilled forelimb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat. Neurol Res. 2003;25:794–800.
52. YukimasaT, YoshimuraR, TamagawaA, et al. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves refractory depression by influencing catecholamine and brain-derived neurotrophic factors. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2006;39:52–9.
53. KleimJA, ChanS, PringleE, et al. BDNFval66met polymorphism is associated with modified experience-dependent plasticity of human motor cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:735–7.
54. CheeranB, TalelliP, MoriF, et al. A common polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) modulates human cortical plasticity and the response to rTMS. J Physiol. 2008;586(Pt 23):5717–25.
55. SiironenJ, JuvelaS, KanarekK, et al. The Met allele of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism predicts poor outcome among survivors of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2007;38:2858–60.

References

1. CarmichaelST, WeiL, RovainenCM, et al. New patterns of intra-cortical connections after focal stroke. Neurobiol Dis. 2001;8:910–22.
2. OvermanJJ, KwokA, WillisD, et al. Post-stroke blockade of ephrinA5 increases axonal sprouting in layer IV of the mouse somatosensory cortex. Soc Neurosci Abst. 2007;898.22.
3. DancauseN, BarbayS, FrostSB, et al. Extensive cortical rewiring after brain injury. J Neurosci. 2005;25:10 167–79.
4. Darian-SmithC, GilbertCD. Axonal sprouting accompanies functional reorganization in adult cat striate cortex. Nature. 1994;368:737–40.
5. PonsTP, GarraghtyPE, OmmayaAK, et al. Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques. Science. 1991;252:1857–60.
6. FlorenceSL, TaubHB, KaasJH. Large-scale sprouting of cortical connections after peripheral injury in adult macaque monkeys. Science. 1998;282:1117–21.
7. ItoU, KuroiwaT, NagasaoJ, et al. Temporal profiles of axon terminals, synapses and spines in the ischemic penumbra of the cerebral cortex: Ultrastructure of neuronal remodeling. Stroke. 2006;37:2134–9.
8. BrownCE, LiP, BoydJD, et al. Extensive turnover of dendritic spines and vascular remodeling in cortical tissues recovering from stroke. J Neurosci. 2007;27:4101–09.
9. WinshipIR, MurphyTH. In vivo calcium imaging reveals functional rewiring of single somatosensory neurons after stroke. J Neurosci. 2008;28:6592–606.
10. CarmichaelST. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: Making waves. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:735–72.
11. ChenP, GoldbergDE, KolbB, et al. Inosine induces axonal rewiring and improves behavioral outcome after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:9031–6.
12. PapadopoulosCM, TsaiSY, AlsbieiT, et al. Functional recovery and neuroanatomical plasticity following middle cerebral artery occlusion and IN-1 antibody treatment in the adult rat. Ann Neurol. 2002;51:433–41.
13. CarmichaelST, ChesseletM-F. Synchronous neuronal activity is a signal for axonal sprouting after cortical lesions in the adult. J Neurosci. 2002;22:6062–70.
14. RibanV, ChesseletMF. Region-specific sprouting of crossed corticofugal fibers after unilateral cortical lesions in adult mice. Exp Neurol. 2006;197:451–7.
15. AldskogiusH, LiuL, SvenssonM. Glial responses to synaptic damage and plasticity. J Neurosci Res. 1999;58:33–41.
16. WeiL, ErinjeriJP, RovainenCM, et al. Collateral growth and angiogenesis around cortical stroke. Stroke. 2000;32:2179–84.
17. CarmichaelST, ArchibequeI, LukeL, et al. Growth-associated gene expression after stroke: Evidence for a growth-promoting region in peri-infarct cortex. Exp Neurol. 2005;193:291–311.
18. DentEW, BarnesAM, TangF, et al. Netrin-1 and semaphorin 3A promote or inhibit cortical axon branching, respectively, by reorganization of the cytoskeleton. J Neurosci. 2004;24:3002–12.
19. OhabJJ, FlemingS, BleschA, et al. A neurovascular niche for neurogenesis after stroke. J Neurosci. 2006;26:13 007–16.
20. TsaiPT, OhabJJ, KerteszN, et al. A critical role of erythropoietin receptor in neurogenesis and post-stroke recovery. J Neurosci. 2006;26:1269–74.
21. YamashitaT, NinomiyaM, HernandezAcosta P, et al. Subventricular zone-derived neuroblasts migrate and differentiate into mature neurons in the post-stroke adult striatum. J Neurosci. 2006;26:6627–36.
22. ThoredP, WoodJ, ArvidssonA, et al. Long-term neuroblast migration along blood vessels in an area with transient angiogenesis and increased vascularization after stroke. Stroke. 2007;38:3032–9.
23. BovettiS, HsiehYC, BovolinP, et al. Blood vessels form a scaffold for neuroblast migration in the adult olfactory bulb. J Neurosci. 2007;27:5976–80.
24. TeramotoT, QiuJ, PlumierJC, et al. EGF amplifies the replacement of parvalbumin-expressing striatal interneurons after ischemia. J Clin Invest. 2004;111:1125–32.
25. RaoVL, BowenKL, DhoddaVK, et al. Gene expression analysis of spontaneously hypertensive rat cerebral cortex following transient focal cerebral ischemia. J Neurochem. 2002;83:1072–86.
26. LuA, TangY, RanR, et al. Genomics of the periinfarction cortex after focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:786–810.
27. KrügerC, CiraD, SommerC, et al. Long-term gene expression changes in the cortex following cortical ischemia revealed by transcriptional profiling. Exp Neurol. 2006;200:135–52.
28. BugaAM, DunoiuC, BălşeanuA, et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying neurorehabilitation after stroke in aged subjects. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2008;49:279–302.
29. YanYP, SailorKA, VemugantiR, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 is an endogenous mediator of focal ischemia-induced neural progenitor proliferation. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24:45–54.
30. SchölzkeMN, SchwaningerM. Transcriptional regulation of neurogenesis: Potential mechanisms in cerebral ischemia. J Mol Med. 2007;85:577–88.
31. ArlottaP, MolyneauxBJ, ChenJ, et al. Neuronal subtype-specific genes that control corticospinal motor neuron development in vivo. Neuron. 2005;45:207–21.
32. DeguchiK, TakaishiM, HayashiT, et al. Expression of neurocan after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in adult rat brain. Brain Res. 2005;1037:194–9.
33. EslamboliA, GrundyRI, IrvingEA. Time-dependent increase in Nogo-A expression after focal cerebral ischemia in marmoset monkeys. Neurosci Lett. 2006;408:89–93.
34. CheatwoodJL, EmerickAJ, SchwabME, et al. Nogo-A expression after focal ischemic stroke in the adult rat. Stroke. 2008;39:2091–8.
35. FujitaH, ZhangB, SatoK, et al. Expressions of neuropilin-1, neuropilin-2 and semaphorin 3A mRNA in the rat brain after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Brain Res. 2001;914:1–14.
36. KartjeGL, SchulzMK, Lopez-YunezA, et al. Corticostriatal plasticity is restricted by myelin-associated neurite growth inhibitors in the adult rat. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:778–86.
37. NapieralskiJA, ButlerAK, ChesseletMF. Anatomical and functional evidence for lesion-specific sprouting of corticostriatal input in the adult rat. J Comp Neurol. 1996;373:484–97.
38. GregersenR, ChristensenT, LehrmannE, et al. Focal cerebral ischemia induces increased myelin basic protein and growth-associated protein-43 gene transcription in peri-infarct areas in the rat brain. Exp Brain Res. 2001;138:384–92.
39. MiyakeK, YamamotoW, TadokoroM, et al. Alterations in hippocampal GAP-43, BDNF, and L1 following sustained cerebral ischemia. Brain Res. 2002;935:24–31.
40. BomzeHM, BulsaraKR, IskandarBJ, et al. Spinal axon regeneration evoked by replacing two growth cone proteins in adult neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:38–43.
41. BonillaIE, TanabeK, StrittmatterSM. Small proline-rich repeat protein 1A is expressed by axotomized neurons and promotes axonal outgrowth. J Neurosci. 2002;22:1303–15.
42. RaivichG, BohatschekM, Da CostaC, et al. The AP-1 transcription factor c-Jun is required for efficient axonal regeneration. Neuron. 2004;43:57–67.
43. StoweAM, PlautzEJ, Eisner-JanowiczI, et al. VEGF protein associates to neurons in remote regions following cortical infarct. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:76–85.
44. StoweAM, PlautzEJ, NguyenP, et al. Neuronal HIF-1 alpha protein and VEGFR-2 immunoreactivity in functionally related motor areas following a focal M1 infarct. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28:612–20.
45. OhabJJ, CarmichaelST. Poststroke neurogenesis: Emerging principles of migration and localization of immature neurons. Neuroscientist. 2008;14:369–80.
46. MillerFD, GeddesJW. Increased expression of the major embryonic alpha-tubulin mRNA, T alpha 1, during neuronal regeneration, sprouting, and in Alzheimer’s disease. Prog Brain Res. 1990;86:321–30.
47. TanakaH, YamashitaT, AsadaM, et al. Cytoplasmic p21(Cip1/WAF1) regulates neurite remodeling by inhibiting Rho-kinase activity. J Cell Biol. 2002;58:321–9.
48. GreijerAE, van der GroepP, KemmingD, et al. Up-regulation of gene expression by hypoxia is mediated predominantly by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1). J Pathol. 2005;206:291–304.
49. LauxT, FukamiK, ThelenM, et al. GAP43, MARCKS, and CAP23 modulate PI(4,5)P(2) at plasmalemmal rafts, and regulate cell cortex actin dynamics through a common mechanism. J Cell Biol. 2000;149:1455–72.
50. StroemerRP, KentTA, HulseboschCE. Neocortical neural sprouting, synaptogenesis, and behavioral recovery after neocortical infarction in rats. Stroke. 1995;26:2135–44.
51. MoriN, MoriiH. SCG10-related neuronal growth-associated proteins in neural development, plasticity, degeneration, and aging. J Neurosci Res. 2002;70:264–73.
52. CostiganM, BefortK, KarchewskiL, et al. Replicate high-density rat genome oligonucleotide microarrays reveal hundreds of regulated genes in the dorsal root ganglion after peripheral nerve injury. BMC Neurosci. 2002;3:16.
53. MasonMR, LiebermanAR, GrenninglohG, et al. Transcriptional upregulation of SCG10 and CAP-23 is correlated with regeneration of the axons of peripheral and central neurons in vivo. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2002;20:595–615.
54. SeijffersR, MillsCD, WoolfCJ. ATF3 increases the intrinsic growth state of DRG neurons to enhance peripheral nerve regeneration. J Neurosci. 2007;27:7911–20.
55. QiuJ, CaffertyWB, McMahonSB, et al. Conditioning injury-induced spinal axon regeneration requires signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation. J Neurosci. 2005;25:1645–53.
56. LeclerePG, NormanE, GroutsiF, et al. Impaired axonal regeneration by isolectin B4-binding dorsal root ganglion neurons in vitro. J Neurosci. 2007;27:1190–9.
57. FischerD, PetkovaV, ThanosS, et al. Switching mature retinal ganglion cells to a robust growth state in vivo: Gene expression and synergy with RhoA inactivation. J Neurosci. 2004;24:8726–40.
58. WangJT, KunzevitzkyNJ, DugasJC, et al. Disease gene candidates revealed by expression profiling of retinal ganglion cell development. J Neurosci. 2007;27:8593–603.
59. ZhouFQ, WalzerM, WuYH, et al. Neurotrophins support regenerative axon assembly over CSPGs by an ECM-integrin-independent mechanism. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:2787–96.
60. LiuBP, CaffertyWB, BudelSO, et al. Extracellular regulators of axonal growth in the adult central nervous system. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006;361:1593–610.
61. BuschSA, SilverJ. The role of extracellular matrix in CNS regeneration. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007;17:120–7.
62. LiS, CarmichaelST. Growth-associated gene and protein expression in the region of axonal sprouting in the aged brain after stroke. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;23:362–73.
63. Popa-WagnerA, CarmichaelST, KokaiaZ, et al. The response of the aged brain to stroke: Too much, too soon? Curr Neurovasc Res. 2007;4:216–27.
64. LongH, SabatierC, MaL, et al. Conserved roles for Slit and Robo proteins in midline commissural axon guidance. Neuron. 2004;42:213–23.
65. SuhLH, OsterSF, SoehrmanSS, et al. L1/Laminin modulation of growth cone response to EphB triggers growth pauses and regulates the microtubule destabilizing protein SCG10. J Neurosci. 2004;24:1976–86.
66. RichterMW, FletcherPA, LiuJ, et al. Lamina propria and olfactory bulb ensheathing cells exhibit differential integration and migration and promote differential axon sprouting in the lesioned spinal cord. J Neurosci. 2005;25:10 700–11.
67. CarmelietP, Tessier-LavigneM. Common mechanisms of nerve and blood vessel wiring. Nature. 2005;436:193–200.
68. TomVJ, SteinmetzMP, MillerJH, et al. Studies on the development and behavior of the dystrophic growth cone, the hallmark of regeneration failure, in an in vitro model of the glial scar and after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2004;24:6531–9.
69. HooksBM, ChenC. Critical periods in the visual system: Changing views for a model of experience-dependent plasticity. Neuron. 2007;56:312–26.
70. MatagaN, MizuguchiY, HenschTK. Experience-dependent pruning of dendritic spines in visual cortex by tissue plasminogen activator. Neuron. 2004;44:1031–41.
71. KleinschmidtA, BearMF, SingerW. Blockade of “NMDA” receptors disrupts experience-dependent plasticity of kitten striate cortex. Science. 1987;238:355–8.
72. PizzorussoT, MediniP, BerardiN, et al. Reactivation of ocular dominance plasticity in the adult visual cortex. Science. 2002;298:1248–51.
73. McGeeAW, YangY, FischerQS, et al. Experience-driven plasticity of visual cortex limited by myelin and Nogo receptor. Science. 2005;309:2222–6.
74. LeeWC, NediviE. Extended plasticity of visual cortex in dark-reared animals may result from prolonged expression of cpg15-like genes. J Neurosci. 2002;22:1807–15.
75. TropeaD, KreimanG, LyckmanA, et al. Gene expression changes and molecular pathways mediating activity-dependent plasticity in visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:660–8.
76. AlpárA, GärtnerU, HärtigW, et al. Distribution of pyramidal cells associated with perineuronal nets in the neocortex of rat. Brain Res. 2006;1120:13–22.
77. BiernaskieJ, ChernenkoG, CorbettD. Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci. 2004;24:1245–54.
78. RamanathanD, ConnerJM, TuszynskiMH. A form of motor cortical plasticity that correlates with recovery of function after brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:11 370–5.
79. PlanasAM, SoleS, JusticiaC. Expression and activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in rat brain after transient focal cerebral ischemia. Neurobiol Dis. 2001;8:834–46.
80. CrossAK, HaddockG, StockCJ, et al. ADAMTS-1 and -4 are up-regulated following transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat and their expression is modulated by TNF in cultured astrocytes. Brain Res. 2006;1088:19–30.
81. HobohmC, GüntherA, GroscheJ, et al. Decomposition and long-lasting downregulation of extracellular matrix in perineuronal nets induced by focal cerebral ischemia in rats. J Neurosci Res. 2005;80:539–48.
82. CarmichaelST. Plasticity of cortical projections after stroke. Neuroscientist. 2003;9:64–75.
83. RickhagM, TeilumM, WielochT. Rapid and long-term induction of effector immediate early genes (BDNF, Neuritin and Arc) in peri-infarct cortex and dentate gyrus after ischemic injury in rat brain. Brain Res. 2007;1151:203–10.
84. HenschTK. Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:877–88.
85. SatoM, StrykerMP. Distinctive features of adult ocular dominance plasticity. J Neurosci. 2008;28:10 278–86.
86. GreenbergDA, JinK. Growth factors and stroke. NeuroRx. 2006;3:458–65.
87. LiuXS, ZhangZG, ZhangRL, et al. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro gene expression profiles in subventricular zone neural progenitor cells from the adult mouse after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Neuroscience. 2007;146:1053–61.
88. LiuXS, ZhangZG, ZhangRL, et al. Chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) induces migration and differentiation of subventricular zone cells after stroke. J Neurosci Res. 2007;85:2120–5.
89. YanYP, SailorKA, LangBT, et al. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 plays a critical role in neuroblast migration after focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1213–24.
90. WellsTN, ProudfootAE, PowerCA. Chemokine receptors and their role in leukocyte activation. Immunol Lett. 1999;65:35–40.
91. López-BenditoG, Sánchez-AlcañizJA, PlaR, et al. Chemokine signaling controls intracortical migration and final distribution of GABAergic interneurons. J Neurosci. 2008;28:1613–24.
92. MonjeML, TodaH, PalmerTD. Inflammatory blockade restores adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Science. 2003;302:1760–65.
93. HoehnBD, PalmerTD, SteinbergGK. Neurogenesis in rats after focal cerebral ischemia is enhanced by indomethacin. Stroke. 2005;36:2718–24.
94. IosifRE, AhleniusH, EkdahlCT, et al. Suppression of stroke-induced progenitor proliferation in adult subventricular zone by tumor necrosis factor receptor 1. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28:1574–87.
95. WangL, ZhangZG, ZhangRL, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and MMP9 secreted by erythropoietin-activated endothelial cells promote neural progenitor cell migration. J Neurosci. 2006;26:5996–6003.
96. LeeSR, KimHY, RogowskaJ, et al. Involvement of matrix metalloproteinase in neuroblast cell migration from the subventricular zone after stroke. J Neurosci. 2006;26:3491–5.
97. KrupinskiJ, KaluzaJ, KumarP, et al. Role of angiogenesis in patients with cerebral ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1794–8.

References

1. GrossmanAW, ChurchillJD, BatesKE, et al. A brain adaptation view of plasticity: Is synaptic plasticity an overly limited concept? Prog Brain Res. 2002;138:91–108.
2. KleimJA, JonesTA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:S225–39.
3. DoyleKP, SimonRP, Stenzel-PooreMP. Mechanisms of ischemic brain damage. Neuropharmacology. 2008;55:310–8.
4. JonesTA, SchallertT. Use-dependent growth of pyramidal neurons after neocortical damage. J Neurosci. 1994;14:2140–52.
5. AdkinsDL, BurySD, JonesTA. Laminar-dependent dendritic spine alterations in the motor cortex of adult rats following callosal transection and forced forelimb use. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2002;78:35–52.
6. BurySD, EichhornAC, KotzerCM, et al. Reactive astrocytic responses to denervation in the motor cortex of adult rats are sensitive to manipulations of behavioral experience. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:743–55.
7. JonesTA, ChuCJ, GrandeLA, et al. Motor skills training enhances lesion-induced structural plasticity in the motor cortex of adult rats. J Neurosci. 1999;19:10 153–63.
8. BurySD, JonesTA. Unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions in adult rats facilitate motor skill learning with the “unaffected” forelimb and training-induced dendritic structural plasticity in the motor cortex. J Neurosci. 2002;22:8597–606.
9. AllredRP, JonesTA. Maladaptive effects of learning with the less-affected forelimb after focal cortical infarcts in rats. Exp Neurol. 2008;210:172–81.
10. CarmichaelST. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: Making waves. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:735–42.
11. WielochT, NikolichK. Mechanisms of neural plasticity following brain injury. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16:258–64.
12. BrownCE, MurphyTH. Livin’ on the edge: Imaging dendritic spine turnover in the peri-infarct zone during ischemic stroke and recovery. Neuroscientist. 2008;14:139–46.
13. CheatwoodJL, EmerickAJ, KartjeGL. Neuronal plasticity and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15:42–50.
14. KozlowskiDA, JamesDC, SchallertT. Use-dependent exaggeration of neuronal injury after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions. J Neurosci. 1996;16:4776–86.
15. DeBowSB, McKennaJE, KolbB, et al. Immediate constraint-induced movement therapy causes local hyperthermia that exacerbates cerebral cortical injury in rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004;82:231–7.
16. KirklandSW, ComaAK, ColwellKL, et al. Delayed recovery and exaggerated infarct size by post-lesion stress in a rat model of focal cerebral stroke. Brain Res. 2008;1201:151–60.
17. DeBowSB, DaviesML, ClarkeHL, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy and rehabilitation exercises lessen motor deficits and volume of brain injury after striatal hemorrhagic stroke in rats. Stroke. 2003;34:1021–6.
18. FarrellR, EvansS, CorbettD. Environmental enrichment enhances recovery of function but exacerbates ischemic cell death. Neuroscience. 2001;107:585–92.
19. TillersonJL, CohenAD, PhilhowerJ, et al. Forced limb-use effects on the behavioral and neurochemical effects of 6-hydroxydopamine. J Neurosci. 2001;21:4427–35.
20. DhanushkodiA, BinduB, RajuTR, et al. Exposure to enriched environment improves spatial learning performances and enhances cell density but not choline acetyltransferase activity in the hippocampus of ventral subicular-lesioned rats. Behav Neurosci. 2007;121:491–500.
21. GriesbachGS, Gomez-PinillaF, HovdaDA. The upregulation of plasticity-related proteins following TBI is disrupted with acute voluntary exercise. Brain Res. 2004;1016:154–62.
22. GriesbachGS, Gomez-PinillaF, HovdaDA. Time window for voluntary exercise-induced increases in hippocampal neuroplasticity molecules after traumatic brain injury is severity dependent. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1161–71.
23. BrionesTL, WoodsJ, WadowskaM, et al. Astrocytic changes in the hippocampus and functional recovery after cerebral ischemia are facilitated by rehabilitation training. Behav Brain Res. 2006;171:17–25.
24. CaleoM, TropeaD, RossiC, et al. Environmental enrichment promotes fiber sprouting after deafferentation of the superior colliculus in the adult rat brain. Exp Neurol. 2009;21:515–9.
25. MorganS, HustonJP, PritzelM. Effects of reducing sensory-motor feedback on the appearance of crossed nigro-thalamic projections and recovery from turning induced by unilateral substantia nigra lesions. Brain Res Bull. 1983;11:721–7.
26. BrionesTL, SuhE, JozsaL, et al. Behaviorally induced synaptogenesis and dendritic growth in the hippocampal region following transient global cerebral ischemia are accompanied by improvement in spatial learning. Exp Neurol. 2006;198:530–8.
27. KomitovaM, ZhaoLR, GidoG, et al. Postischemic exercise attenuates whereas enriched environment has certain enhancing effects on lesion-induced subventricular zone activation in the adult rat. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:2397–405.
28. WurmF, KeinerS, KunzeA, et al. Effects of skilled forelimb training on hippocampal neurogenesis and spatial learning after focal cortical infarcts in the adult rat brain. Stroke. 2007;38:2833–40.
29. NudoRJ, WiseBM, SiFuentesF, et al. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–4.
30. ConnerJM, ChibaAA, TuszynskiMH. The basal forebrain cholinergic system is essential for cortical plasticity and functional recovery following brain injury. Neuron. 2005;46:173–9.
31. JonesTA. Multiple synapse formation in the motor cortex opposite unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions in adult rats. J Comp Neurol. 1999;414:57–66.
32. MeshulCK, CogenJP, ChengH-W, et al. Alterations in rat striatal glutamate synapses following a lesion of the cortico- and/or nigrostriatal pathway. Exp Neurol. 2000;165:191–206.
33. GaneshinaO, BerryRW, PetraliaRS, et al. Synapses with a segmented, completely partitioned postsynaptic density express more AMPA receptors than other axospinous synaptic junctions. Neuroscience. 2004;125:615–23.
34. McNeillTH, BrownSA, HoggE, et al. Synapse replacement in the striatum of the adult rat following unilateral cortex ablation. J Comp Neurol. 2003;467:32–43.
35. RaismanG, FieldPM. Synapse formation in the adult brain after lesions and after transplantation of embryonic tissue. J Exp Biol. 1990;153:277–87.
36. PetcuEB, SfredelV, PlattD, et al. Cellular and molecular events underlying the dysregulated response of the aged brain to stroke: A mini-review. Gerontology. 2008;54:6–17.
37. CarmichaelST, ChesseletMF. Synchronous neuronal activity is a signal for axonal sprouting after cortical lesions in the adult. J Neurosci. 2002;22:6062–70.
38. DancauseN, BarbayS, FrostSB, et al. Effects of small ischemic lesions in the primary motor cortex on neurophysiological organization in ventral premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2006;96:3506–11.
39. NudoRJ. Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery. Stroke. 2007;38:840–5.
40. Brus-RamerM, CarmelJB, ChakrabartyS, et al. Electrical stimulation of spared corticospinal axons augments connections with ipsilateral spinal motor circuits after injury. J Neurosci. 2007;27:13 793–801.
41. LichtenwalnerRJ, ParentJM. Adult neurogenesis and the ischemic forebrain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:1–20.
42. OhabJJ, FlemingS, BleschA, et al. A neurovascular niche for neurogenesis after stroke. J Neurosci. 2006;26:13 007–16.
43. GottsJE, ChesseletMF. Migration and fate of newly born cells after focal cortical ischemia in adult rats. J Neurosci Res. 2005;80:160–71.
44. AdkinsDL, VoorhiesAC, JonesTA. Behavioral and neuroplastic effects of focal endothelin-1 induced sensorimotor cortex lesions. Neuroscience. 2004;128:473–86.
45. AllredRP, Jones, TA. Experience – a double edged sword for restorative neural plasticity after brain damage. Future Neurol. 2008;3:189–98.
46. TaubE, UswatteG, MarkVW, et al. The learned nonuse phenomenon: Implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys. 2006;42:241–56.
47. WhishawIQ. Loss of the innate cortical engram for action patterns used in skilled reaching and the development of behavioral compensation following motor cortex lesions in the rat. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:788–805.
48. HsuJE, JonesTA. Contralesional neural plasticity and functional changes in the less-affected forelimb after large and small cortical infarcts in rats. Exp Neurol. 2006;201:479–94.
49. AllredRP, MaldonadoMA, Hsu AndJE, et al. Training the “less-affected” forelimb after unilateral cortical infarcts interferes with functional recovery of the impaired forelimb in rats. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2005;23:297–302.
50. JablonkaJA, WitteOW, KossutM. Photothrombotic infarct impairs experience-dependent plasticity in neighboring cortex. Neuroreport. 2007;18:165–9.
51. WardNS, CohenLG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:1844–8.
52. RoseFD, DaveyMJ, AttreeEA. How does environmental enrichment aid performance following cortical injury in the rat? Neuroreport. 1993;4:163–6.
53. GreenoughWT, FassB, DeVoogdTJ. The influence of experience on recovery following brain damage in rodents: Hypotheses based on development research. In: WalshRN, GreenoughWT, editors. Environments as therapy for brain dysfunction. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1976: pp. 10–50.
54. VaynmanS, Gomez-PinillaF. License to run: Exercise impacts functional plasticity in the intact and injured central nervous system by using neurotrophins. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:283–95.
55. SilasiG, HamiltonDA, KolbB. Social instability blocks functional restitution following motor cortex stroke in rats. Behav Brain Res. 2008;188:219–26.
56. SalterK, HellingsC, FoleyN, et al. The experience of living with stroke: A qualitative meta-synthesis. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:595–602.
57. ChuCJ, JonesTA. Experience-dependent structural plasticity in cortex heterotopic to focal sensorimotor cortical damage. Exp Neurol. 2000;166:403–14.
58. MaldonadoMA, AllredRP, FelthauserEL, et al. Motor skill training, but not voluntary exercise, improves skilled reaching after unilateral ischemic lesions of the sensorimotor cortex in rats. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:250–61.
59. AlaverdashviliM, ForoudA, LimDH, et al. “Learned baduse” limits recovery of skilled reaching for food after forelimb motor cortex stroke in rats: A new analysis of the effect of gestures on success. Behav Brain Res. 2008;188:281–90.
60. BarbayS, PlautzEJ, FrielKM, et al. Behavioral and neurophysiological effects of delayed training following a small ischemic infarct in primary motor cortex of squirrel monkeys. Exp Brain Res. 2005;5:1–11.
61. BiernaskieJ, ChernenkoG, CorbettD. Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci. 2004;24:1245–54.
62. GoldsteinLB. Neurotransmitters and motor activity: Effects on functional recovery after brain injury. NeuroRx. 2006;3:451–7.
63. PlowEB, CareyJR, NudoRJ, et al. Cortical stimulation to promote recovery of function after stroke: A critical appraisal. Stroke. 2009;40:1926–31.
64. EdwardsD, FregniF. Modulating the healthy and affected motor cortex with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke: Development of new strategies for neurorehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23:3–14.
65. Adkins-MuirDL, JonesTA. Cortical electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitative training: Enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats. Neurol Res. 2003;25:780–8.
66. AdkinsDL, HsuJE, JonesTA. Motor cortical stimulation promotes synaptic plasticity and behavioral improvements following sensorimotor cortex lesions. Exp Neurol. 2008;212:14–28.
67. KleimJA, BruneauR, VandenBergP, et al. Motor cortex stimulation enhances motor recovery and reduces peri-infarct dysfunction following ischemic insult. Neurol Res. 2003;25:789–93.
68. TeskeyGC, FlynnC, GoertzenCD, et al. Cortical stimulation improves skilled forelimb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat. Neurol Res. 2003;25:794–800.
69. SchallertT, LeasureJL, KolbB. Experience-associated structural events, subependymal cellular proliferative activity, and functional recovery after injury to the central nervous system. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20:1513–28.
70. WoodleeMT, SchallertT.The impact of motor activity and inactivity on the brain. Curr Directions Psychol Sci. 2006;15:203–06.

References

1. GladstoneDJ, BlackSE, HakimAM. Toward wisdom from failure: Lessons from neuroprotective stroke trials and new therapeutic directions. Stroke. 2002;33:2123–36.
2. ColbourneF, SutherlandG, CorbettD. Postischemic hypothermia. A critical appraisal with implications for clinical treatment. Mol Neurobiol. 1997;14:171–201.
3. KozlowskiDA, JamesDC, SchallertT. Use-dependent exaggeration of neuronal injury after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions. J Neurosci. 1996;16:4776–86.
4. KolbB. Brain plasticity and behavior. Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1995.
5. WhishawIQ, KolbB. Sparing of skilled forelimb reaching and corticospinal projections after neonatal motor cortex removal or hemidecortication in the rat: Support for the Kennard doctrine. Brain Res. 1988;451:97–114.
6. LomberS, EggermontJJ. Reprogramming the cerebral cortex. London: Oxford University Press; 2006.
7. TeuberHL. Recovery of function after brain injury in man. Ciba Found Symp. 1975;34:159–90.
8. BarnesCA. Long-term potentiation and the ageing brain. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003;358:765–72.
9. KolbB, WhishawIQ. Fundamentals of human neuropsychology. 5th ed. New York: Worth; 2003.
10. McGillJK, GallagherL, CarswellHV, et al. Impaired functional recovery after stroke in the stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat. Stroke 2005;36:135–41.
11. WindleV, CorbettD. Fluoxetine and recovery of motor function after focal ischemia in rats. Brain Res. 2005;1044:25–32.
12. ZhaoC, PuurunenK, SchallertT, et al. Behavioral and histological effects of chronic antipsychotic and antidepressant drug treatment in aged rats with focal ischemic brain injury. Behav Brain Res. 2005;158:211–20.
13. TeskeyGC, MonfilsM-H, VandenBergP, et al. Motor map expansion following repeated cortical and limbic seizures is related to synaptic potentiation. Cereb Cortex. 2002;12:98–105.
14. ValentinePA, TeskeyGC, EggermontJJ. Kindling limits the inter-ictal neuronal temporal response properties in cat primary auditory cortex. Epilepsia. 2005;46:171–8.
15. HernandezTD. Preventing post-traumatic epilepsy after brain injury: Weighing the costs and benefits of anticonvulsant prophylaxis. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1997;18:59–62.
16. KolbB, GibbR, GornyG. Experience-dependent changes in dendritic arbor and spine density in neocortex vary qualitatively with age and sex. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2003;79:1–10.
17. KolbB, StewartJ. Sex-related differences in dendritic branching of cells in the prefrontal cortex of rats. J Neuroendocrinol. 1991;3:95–9.
18. WhishawIQ, PellisSM, GornyBP, et al. The impairments in reaching and the movements of compensation in rats with motor cortex lesions: an endpoint, videorecording, and movement notation analysis. Behav Brain Res. 1991;42:77–91.
19. WhishawIQ, KolbB. The behaviour of the laboratory rat. London: Oxford University Press; 2004.
20. BiernaskieJ, CorbettD. Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury. J Neurosci. 2001;21:5272–80.
21. KleimJA, JonesTA, SchallertT. Motor enrichment and the induction of plasticity before or after brain injury. Neurochem Res. 2003;28:1757–69.
22. NudoRJ, WiseBM, SiFuentesF, et al. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–4.
23. GonzalezCLR, GharbawieOA, KolbB. Chronic low-dose administration of nicotine facilitates recovery and synaptic change after focal ischemia in rats. Neuropharmacology. 2006;50:777–87.
24. KolbB, GornyG, LiY, et al. Amphetamine or cocaine limits the ability of later experience to promote structural plasticity in the neocortex and nucleus accumbens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:10 523–8.
25. RobinsonTE, KolbB. Structural plasticity associated with drugs of abuse. Neuropharmacology. 2004;47Suppl 1: 33–46.
26. KolbB, CoteS, Ribeiro-da-SilvaA, et al. Nerve growth factor treatment prevents dendritic atrophy and promotes recovery of function after cortical injury. Neuroscience. 1997;76:1139–51.
27. KolbB, MorsheadC, GonzalezC, et al. Growth factor-stimulated generation of new cortical tissue and functional recovery after stroke damage to the motor cortex of rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:983–97.
28. FloresC, StewartJ. Changes in astrocytic basic fibroblast growth factor expression during and after prolonged exposure to escalating doses of amphetamine. Neuroscience. 2000;98:287–93.
29. KawamataT, SpeliotesEK, FinklesteinSP. The role of polypeptide growth factors in recovery from stroke. Adv Neurol. 1997;73:377–82.
30. KolbB, ForgieM, GibbR, et al. Age, experience, and the changing brain. Neurosci Biobehav Revs. 1998;22:143–59.
31. CotmanCW, BerchtoldNC. Exercise: A behavioral intervention to enhance brain health and plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:295–301.
32. KolbB. Animal models for human PFC-related disorders. Prog Brain Res. 1990;85:501–19.
33. KolbB, PetrieB, CioeJ. Recovery from early cortical damage in rats: VII. Comparison of the behavioural and anatomical effects of medial prefrontal lesions at different ages of neural maturation. Behav Brain Res. 1996;79:1–14.
34. MonfilsMH, DriscollI, VandenbergPM, et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor stimulates functional recovery after neonatal lesions of motor cortex in rats. Neuroscience 2005;134:1–8.
35. MonfilsMH, DriscollI, KamitakaharaH, et al. FGF-2-induced cell proliferation stimulates anatomical, neurophysiological and functional recovery from neonatal motor cortex injury. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24:739–49.
36. ArvidssonA, CollinT, KirikD, et al. Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke. Nat Med. 2002;8:963–70.
37. ScharfmanHE, HenR. Is more neurogenesis always better? Science. 2007;315:336–8.
38. HayashiT, NoshitaN, SugawaraT, et al. Temporal profile of angiogenesis and expression of related genes in the brain after ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:166–80.
39. PalmerTD, WillhoiteAR, GageFH. Vascular niche for adult hippocampal neurogenesis. J Comp Neurol. 2000;425:479–94.
40. ShenQ, GoderieSK, JinL, et al. Endothelial cells stimulate self-renewal and expand neurogenesis of neural stem cells. Science. 2004;304:1338–40.
41. AdkinsDL, CamposP, QuachD, et al. Epidural cortical stimulation enhances motor function after sensorimotor cortical infarcts in rats. Exp Neurol. 2006;200:356–70.
42. Adkins-MuirDL, JonesTA. Cortical electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitative training: Enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats. Neurol Res. 2003;25:780–8.
43. AdkinsDL, HsuJE, JonesTA. Motor cortical stimulation promotes synaptic plasticity and behavioral improvements following sensorimotor cortex lesions. Exp Neurol. 2008;212:14–28.
44. KleimJA, BruneauR, VandenBergP, et al. Motor cortex stimulation enhances motor recovery and reduces peri-infarct dysfunction following ischemic insult. Neurol Res. 2003;25:789–93.
45. PlautzEJ, BarbayS, FrostSB, et al. Post-infarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery using concurrent cortical stimulation and rehabilitative training: A feasibility study in primates. Neurol Res. 2003;25:801–10.
46. TeskeyGC, FlynnC, GoertzenCD, et al. Cortical stimulation improves skilled forelimb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat. Neurol Res. 2003;25:794–800.
47. BrownJA, LutsepH, CramerSC, et al. Motor cortex stimulation for enhancement of recovery after stroke: Case report. Neurol Res. 2003;25:815–8.
48. CramerSC, BastingsEP. Mapping clinically relevant plasticity after stroke. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:842–51.

References

1. Pascual-LeoneA, AmediA, FregniF, et al. The plastic human brain cortex. Ann Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:377–401.
2. JohanssonBB. Brain plasticity in health and disease. Keio J Med. 2004;53:231–46.
3. HebbDO. The effect of early experience on problem solving at maturity. Am Psychol. 1947;2:737–45.
4. BennetEL, DiamondMC, KrechD, et al. Chemical and anatomical plasticity of brain. Science. 1964:146:610–19.
5. MohammedAH, ZhuSW, DarmopilS, et al. Environmental enrichment and the brain. Prog Brain Res. 2002;138:109–33.
6. WillB, GalaniR, KelcheC, et al. Recovery from brain injury in animals: Relative efficacy of environmental enrichment, physical exercise or formal training (1990–2002). Prog Neurobiol. 2004;72:167–82.
7. JohanssonBB. Functional and cellular effects of environmental enrichment after experimental brain infarcts. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22:163–74.
8. NilssonM, PeknyM. Enriched environment and astrocytes in central nervous system regeneration. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:345–52.
9. NithianantharajahJ, HannanAJ. Enriched environment, experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:697–709.
10. JohanssonBB. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation. The Willis lecture. Stroke. 2000;31:223–30.
11. OhlssonA-L, JohanssonBB. Environment influences functional outcome of cerebral infarction in rats. Stroke. 1995;26:644–9.
12. DahlqvistP, RönnbäckA, BergströmS-A, et al. Environmental enrichment reverses learning impairment in the Morris water maze after focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19:2288–98.
13. GlobusA, RosenzweigMR, BennettEL, et al. Effect of differential experience on dendritic spine counts in rat cerebral cortex. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1973;82:175–81.
14. GreenoughWT, VolkmarFR, JuraskaJM. Effects of rearing complexity on dendritic branching in frontolateral and temporal cortex of the rat. Exp Neurol. 1973;41:371–8.
15. JohanssonBB, BelichenkoPV. Neuronal plasticity and dendritic spines: Effect of environmental enrichment on intact and postischemic rat brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22:89–96.
16. Rioult-PedottiMS, FriedmanD, HessG, et al. Strengthening of horizontal cortical connections following skill learning. Nat Neurosci. 1998;1:230–4.
17. CoqJO, XerriC. Environmental enrichment alters organizational features of the forepaw representation in the primary somatocortex of adult rats. Exp Brain Res. 1998;121:191–204.
18. CoqJO, XerriC. Sensorimotor experience modulates age-dependent alterations of the forepaw representation in the rat primary somatosensory cortex. Neuroscience. 2001;104:705–15.
19. NudoRJ, WiseBM, SiFuentesF, et al. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–4.
20. HoltmaatA, SvobodaK. Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:647–58.
21. BrownCE, LiP, BoydJD, et al. Extensive turnover of dendritic spines and vascular remodeling in cortical tissues recovering from stroke. J Neurosci. 2007;27:4101–09.
22. TakatsuruY, FukumotoD, YoshitomoM, et al. Neuronal circuit remodeling in the contralateral cortical hemisphere during functional recovery from cerebral infarction. J Neurosci. 2009;29;10 061–6.
23. JohanssonBB, OhlssonA-L. Environment, social interaction, and physical activity as determinants of functional outcome after cerebral infarction in the rat. Exp Neurol. 2006;139:322–7.
24. DahlqvistP, RönnbäckA, RisedalA, et al. Effects of postischemic environment on transcription factor and serotonin receptor expression after permanent focal cortical ischemia in the rat. Neuroscience. 2003;119:643–52.
25. NygrenJ, KokaiaM, WielochT. Decreased expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in BDNF(+/–) mice is associated with enhanced recovery of motor performance and increased neuroblast number following experimental stroke. J Neurosci Res. 2006;84:626–31.
26. KleimJA, ChanS, PringleE, et al. BDNF val66met polymorphism is associated with modified experience-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:735–7.
27. KeyvaniK, SachserN, WitteOW, et al. Gene expression profiling in the intact and injured brain following environmental enrichment. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2004;63:598–609.
28. RönnbäckA, DahlqvistP, SvenssonP-A, et al. Gene expression profiling of the rat hippocampus one month after focal ischemia followed by enriched environment. Neurosci Lett. 2005;385:173–8.
29. RönnbäckA, DahlqvistP, BergströmSA, et al. Diurnal effects of enriched environment on immediately early gene expression in the rat brain. Brain Res. 2005;1046:127–44.
30. JohanssonBB. Regeneration and plasticity in the brain and spinal cord. J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1417–30.
31. KomitovaM, PerfilievaE, MattssonB, et al. Effects of cortical ischemia and postischemic environmental enrichment on hippocampal cell genesis and differentiation in the adult rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22:852–60.
32. KomitovaM, MattssonB, JohanssonBB, et al. Enriched environment increases neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the subventricular zone of stroke-lesioned adult rats. Stroke. 2005;36:1278–82.
33. KomitovaM, PerfilievaE, MattssonB, et al. Enriched environmental after focal cortical ischemia enhances the generation of astroglia and NG2 positive polydendrocytes in adult rat neocortex. Exp Neurol. 2006;199:113–21.
34. NishiyamaA. Polydendrocytes: NG2 cells with many roles in development and repair of the CNS. Neuroscientist. 2007;13:62–76.
35. KeinerS, WurmF, KunzeA, et al. Rehabilitative therapies differentially alter proliferation and survival of glial cell populations in the perilesional zone of cortical infarcts. Glia. 2008;56:516–27.
36. KomitovaM, ZhaoLR, GidoG, et al. Postischemic exercise attenuates whereas enriched environment has certain enhancing effects on lesion-induced subventricular zone activation in the adult rat. Eur J Neurol. 2005;21:2397–405.
37. YagitaY, KitagawaK, SasakiT, et al. Postischemic exercise decreases neurogenesis in the adult rat dentate gyrus. Neurosci Lett. 2006;409:24–9.
38. Biernaskie, Corbett D. Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury. J Neurosci. 2001;21:5272–80.
39. MattssonB, SorensenJC, ZimmerJ, et al. Neural grafting to experimental neocortical infarcts improves behavioral outcome and reduces thalamic atrophy in rats housed in an enriched but not in standard environments. Stroke. 1997;28:1225–32.
40. ZengJ, MattssonB, SchultzMK. Expression of zinc-positive cells and terminals in fetal neocortical homografts to adult rat depends on lesion type and rearing conditions. Exp Neurol. 2000;164:176–83.
41. DöbrössyMD, DunnettSB. Optimizing plasticity: Environmental and training-associated brain repair. Rev Neurosci. 2005;16:1–21.
42. MatsumoriY, HongSM, FanY, et al. Enriched environment and spatial learning enhance hippocampal neurogenesis and salvages ischemic penumbra after focal cerebral ischemia. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;22:187–98.
43. FischerA, SananbenesiF, WangX, et al. Recovery of learning and memory is associated with chromatin remodeling. Nature. 2007;447:178–82.
44. SpolidoroM, SaleA, BerardiM, et al. Plasticity of the adult brain: Lesions from the visual system. Exp Brain Res. 2009;192:335–41.
45. SaleA, Maya VetencourtJF, MediniP, et al. Environmental enrichment in adulthood promotes amblyopia recovery through a reduction of intracortical inhibition. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:679–81.
46. MuellbacherW, RichardsU, ZiemannU, et al. Improving hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Neurol. 2002;59:1278–82.
47. JinYP, De LeggeS, OstbyeT, et al. The reciprocal risk of stroke and cognitive impairment in an elderly population. Alzheim Dementia 2006;2:171–8.
48. Boden-AlbalaB, LitwakE, ElkindMS, et al. Social isolation and outcomes post stroke. Neurology. 2005;64:1888–92.
49. Leal-GaliciaP, Castaneda-BuenoM, Quiroz-BaezR, et al. Long-term exposure to environmental enrichment since youth prevents recognition memory decline and increases synaptic plasticity markers in aging. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2008;90:511–8.
50. CarmichaelST. Themes and strategies for studying the biology of stroke recovery in the poststroke epoch. Stroke. 2008;39:1380–5.
51. RabadiMH, RabadiFM, EdelsteinL, et al. Cognitively impaired stroke patients do benefit from admission to an acute rehabilitation unit. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:441–8.
52. EdwardsDF, HahnM, BaumC, et al. The impact of mild stroke on meaningful activity and life satisfaction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;14:151–7.

References

1. BaronJC. Mapping the ischaemic penumbra with PET: Implications for acute stroke treatment. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999;9:193–201.
2. CholletF, WeillerC. Imaging recovery of function following brain injury. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994;4:226–30.
3. BairdAE, WarachS. Magnetic resonance imaging of acute stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998;18:583–609.
4. DijkhuizenRM, NicolayK. Magnetic resonance imaging in experimental models of brain disorders. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:1383–402.
5. Neumann-HaefelinT, SteinmetzH. Time is brain: Is MRI the clock? Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20:410–6.
6. NudoRJ. Recovery after damage to motor cortical areas. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9:740–7.
7. MandevilleJB, RosenBR. Functional MRI. In: TogaAW, MazziottaJC, editors. Brain mapping: the methods. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2002:315–49.
8. HarelN, UgurbilK, UludagK, et al. Frontiers of brain mapping using MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23:945–57.
9. CramerSC, BastingsEP. Mapping clinically relevant plasticity after stroke. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:842–51.
10. CramerSC, NellesG, BensonRR, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:2518–27.
11. CaoY, D’OlhaberriagueL, VikingstadEM, et al. Pilot study of functional MRI to assess cerebral activation of motor function after poststroke hemiparesis. Stroke. 1998;29:112–22.
12. RijntjesM, WeillerC. Recovery of motor and language abilities after stroke: The contribution of functional imaging. Prog Neurobiol. 2002;66:109–22.
13. CalauttiC, BaronJC. Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: A review. Stroke. 2003;34:1553–66.
14. Van der LindenA, Van CampN, Ramos-CabrerP, et al. Current status of functional MRI on small animals: Application to physiology, pathophysiology and cognition. NMR Biomed. 2007;20:522–45.
15. ReeseT, PorszaszR, BaumannD, et al. Cytoprotection does not preserve brain functionality in rats during the acute post-stroke phase despite evidence of non-infarction provided by MRI. NMR Biomed. 2000;13:361–70.
16. AboM, ChenZ, LaiLJ, et al. Functional recovery after brain lesion–contralateral neuromodulation: An fMRI study. Neuroreport. 2001;12:1543–7.
17. DijkhuizenRM, RenJ, MandevilleJB, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reorganization in rat brain after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:12 766–71.
18. SauterA, ReeseT, PorszaszR, et al. Recovery of function in cytoprotected cerebral cortex in rat stroke model assessed by functional MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:759–65.
19. DijkhuizenRM, SinghalAB, MandevilleJB, et al. Correlation between brain reorganization, ischemic damage, and neurologic status after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci. 2003;23:510–7.
20. KimYR, Van MeerMP, MandevilleJB, et al. fMRI of delayed albumin treatment during stroke recovery in rats: Implication for fast neuronal habituation in recovering brains. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:142–53.
21. KimYR, Van MeerMP, TejimaE, et al. Functional MRI of delayed chronic lithium treatment in rat focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2008;39:439–47.
22. WeberR, Ramos-CabrerP, JusticiaC, et al. Early prediction of functional recovery after experimental stroke: Functional magnetic resonance imaging, electrophysiology, and behavioral testing in rats. J Neurosci. 2008;28:1022–9.
23. ParienteJ, LoubinouxI, CarelC, et al. Fluoxetine modulates motor performance and cerebral activation of patients recovering from stroke. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:718–29.
24. ChenYC, GalpernWR, BrownellAL, et al. Detection of dopaminergic neurotransmitter activity using pharmacologic MRI: Correlation with PET, microdialysis, and behavioral data. Magn Reson Med. 1997;38:389–98.
25. ReeseT, BochelenD, BaumannD, et al. Impaired functionality of reperfused brain tissue following short transient focal ischemia in rats. Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;20:447–54.
26. BiswalB, YetkinFZ, HaughtonVM, et al. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34:537–41.
27. HeBJ, SnyderAZ, VincentJL, et al. Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron. 2007;53:905–18.
28. XiongJ, FoxPT, GaoJH. Directly mapping magnetic field effects of neuronal activity by magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2003;20:41–9.
29. LinYJ, KoretskyAP. Manganese ion enhances T1-weighted MRI during brain activation: An approach to direct imaging of brain function. Magn Reson Med. 1997;38:378–88.
30. BasserPJ, MattielloJ, LeBihanD. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J. 1994;66:259–67.
31. BasserPJ, JonesDK. Diffusion-tensor MRI: Theory, experimental design and data analysis – A technical review. NMR Biomed. 2002;15:456–67.
32. MoriS, ZhangJ. Principles of diffusion tensor imaging and its applications to basic neuroscience research. Neuron. 2006;51:527–39.
33. SotakCH. The role of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of ischemic brain injury – A review. NMR Biomed. 2002;15:561–9.
34. LiuY, D’ArceuilHE, WestmorelandS, et al. Serial diffusion tensor MRI after transient and permanent cerebral ischemia in nonhuman primates. Stroke. 2007;38:138–45.
35. WangC, StebbinsGT, NyenhuisDL, et al. Longitudinal changes in white matter following ischemic stroke: A three-year follow-up study. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27:1827–33.
36. JiangQ, ZhangZG, DingGL, et al. MRI detects white matter reorganization after neural progenitor cell treatment of stroke. Neuroimage. 2006;32:1080–9.
37. Van der ZijdenJP, Van der ToornA, Van der MarelK, et al. Longitudinal in vivo MRI of alterations in perilesional tissue after transient ischemic stroke in rats. Exp Neurol. 2008;212:207–12.
38. DingG, JiangQ, LiL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging investigation of axonal remodeling and angiogenesis after embolic stroke in sildenafil-treated rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28:1440–8.
39. SilvaAC, LeeJH, AokiI, et al. Manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MEMRI): Methodological and practical considerations. NMR Biomed. 2004;17:532–43.
40. PautlerRG. In vivo, trans-synaptic tract-tracing utilizing manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MEMRI). NMR Biomed. 2004;17:595–601.
41. PautlerRG, SilvaAC, KoretskyAP. In vivo neuronal tract tracing using manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1998;40:740–8.
42. AllegriniPR, WiessnerC. Three-dimensional MRI of cerebral projections in rat brain in vivo after intracortical injection of MnCl2. NMR Biomed. 2003;16:252–6.
43. Van der ZijdenJP, WuO, Van der ToornA, et al. Changes in neuronal connectivity after stroke in rats as studied by serial manganese-enhanced MRI. Neuroimage. 2007;34:1650–7.
44. Van der ZijdenJP, BoutsMJ, WuO, et al. Manganese-enhanced MRI of brain plasticity in relation to functional recovery after experimental stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28:832–40.
45. CarmichaelST. Plasticity of cortical projections after stroke. Neuroscientist. 2003;9:64–75.
46. WatanabeT, FrahmJ, MichaelisT. Functional mapping of neural pathways in rodent brain in vivo using manganese-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed. 2004;17:554–68.
47. CanalsS, BeyerleinM, KellerAL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of cortical connectivity in vivo. Neuroimage. 2008;40:458–72.
48. DingG, JiangQ, LiL, et al. Angiogenesis detected after embolic stroke in rat brain using magnetic resonance T2*WI. Stroke. 2008;39:1563–8.
49. LinCY, ChangC, CheungWM, et al. Dynamic changes in vascular permeability, cerebral blood volume, vascular density, and size after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats: Evaluation with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28:1491–501.
50. Van der ZijdenJP, Van EijsdenP, De GraafRA, et al. 1H/13C MR spectroscopic imaging of regionally specific metabolic alterations after experimental stroke. Brain. 2008;131:2209–19.

References

1. GleesP, ColeJ. Recovery of skilled motor functions after small repeated lesions in motor cortex in macaque. J Neurophysiol. 1950;13:137–48.
2. MurphyWJ, EizirikE, O’BrienSJ, et al. Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics. Science. 2001;294(5550):2348–51.
3. MartinRD. Colugos: Obscure mammals glide into the evolutionary limelight. J Biol. 2008;7(4):13.
4. JaneckaJE, MillerW, PringleTH, et al. Molecular and genomic data identify the closest living relative of primates. Science. 2007;318(5851):792–4.
5. SteiperME, YoungNM. Primate molecular divergence dates. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006;41:384–94.
6. FrostSB, BarbayS, MumertML, et al. An animal model of capsular infarct: Endothelin-1 injections in the rat. Behav Brain Res. 2006;169:206–11.
7. NudoRJ, SutherlandDP, MastertonRB, et al. Variation and evolution of mammalian corticospinal somata with special reference to primates. J Comp Neurol. 1995;358:181–205.
8. LemonRN, GriffithsJ. Comparing the function of the corticospinal system in different species: Organizational differences for motor specialization? Muscle Nerve. 2005;32:261–79.
9. WalkerAE, FultonJF. Hemidecortication in chimpanzee, baboon, macaque, potto, cat and coati: A study in encephalization. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1938;87:677–700.
10. KapoorK, KakVK, SinghB, et al. Morphology and comparative anatomy of circulus arteriosus cerebri in mammals. Anat Histol Embryol. 2003;32:347–55.
11. FukudaS, del ZoppoGJ. Models of focal cerebral ischemia in the nonhuman primate. ILAR J. 2003;44:96–104.
12. FuruichiY, MaedaM, MoriguchiA, et al. Tacrolimus, a potential neuroprotective agent, ameliorates ischemic brain damage and neurologic deficits after focal cerebral ischemia in nonhuman primates. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:1183–94.
13. D’ArceuilHE, DugganM, HeJ, et al. Middle cerebral artery occlusion in Macaca fascicularis: Acute and chronic stroke evolution. J Med Primatol. 2006;35:78–86.
14. MolinariGF, MoseleyJI, LaurentJP, et al. Segmental middle cerebral artery occlusion in primates: An experimental method requiring minimal surgery and anesthesia. Stroke. 1974;5:334–9.
15. WatanabeO, BremerAM, WestCR, et al. Experimental regional cerebral ischemia in the middle cerebral artery territory in primates. Part 1: Angio-anatomy and description of an experimental model with selective embolization of the internal carotid artery bifurcation. Stroke. 1977;8:61–70.
16. KitoG, NishimuraA, SusumuT, et al. Experimental thromboembolic stroke in cynomolgus monkey. J Neurosci Methods. 2001;105:45–53.
17. Eisner-JanowiczI, BarbayS, HooverE, et al. Early and late changes in the distal forelimb representation of the supplementary motor area after injury to frontal motor areas in the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:1498–512.
18. NudoRJ, MastertonRB. Descending pathways to the spinal cord, III: Sites of origin of the corticospinal tract. J Comp Neurol. 1990;296:559–83.
19. NudoRJ, MillikenGW. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:2144–9.
20. NudoRJ, WiseBM, SiFuentesF, et al. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272(5269):1791–4.
21. NudoRJ, MillikenGW, JenkinsWM, et al. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996;16:785–807.
22. FrielKM, BarbayS, FrostSB, et al. Effects of a rostral motor cortex lesion on primary motor cortex hand representation topography in primates. Neurorehabil Neural Rep. 2007;21:51–61.
23. StoweAM, PlautzEJ, NguyenP, et al. Neuronal HIF-1 alpha protein and VEGFR-2 immunoreactivity in functionally related motor areas following a focal M1 infarct. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28:612–20.
24. FrostSB, BarbayS, FrielKM, et al. Reorganization of remote cortical regions after ischemic brain injury: A potential substrate for stroke recovery. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:3205–14.
25. DancauseN, BarbayS, FrostSB, et al. Effects of small ischemic lesions in the primary motor cortex on neurophysiological organization in ventral premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2006; 96: 3506–11.
26. McNealDW, DarlingWG, PizzimentiM, et al. Long-term reorganization of the corticospinal projection from the supplementary motor cortex following brain injury is accompanied by motor recovery and prolonged microgliosis in the rhesus monkey. Program No. 77.4. 2007 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. San Diego, CA: Society for Neuroscience, 2007. Online.
27. DumRP, StrickPL. Spinal cord terminations of the medial wall motor areas in macaque monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996;16:13–25.
28. BoudriasMH, Belhaj-SaifA, ParkMC, et al. Contrasting properties of motor output from the supplementary motor area and primary motor cortex in rhesus macaques. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16:632–8.
29. DancauseN, BarbayS, FrostSB, et al. Extensive cortical rewiring after brain injury. J Neurosci. 2005;25:10 167–79.
30. Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR). Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development. Stroke. 1999;30: 2752–8.
31. MarshallJW, CummingsRM, BowesLJ, et al. Functional and histological evidence for the protective effect of NXY-059 in a primate model of stroke when given 4 hours after occlusion. Stroke. 2003;34:2228–33.
32. DienerHC, LeesKR, LydonP, et al. NXY-059 for the treatment of acute stroke: Pooled analysis of the SAINT I and II Trials. Stroke. 2008;39:1751–8.
33. SchillerF. Paul Broca, explorer of the brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1992.

References

1. RautioA, EliassonM, StegmayrB. Favorable trends in the incidence and outcome in stroke in nondiabetic and diabetic subjects. Findings from the Northern Sweden MONICA stroke registry in 1985 to 2003. Stroke. 2008;39:3137–44.
2. LindnerMD. Clinical attrition due to biased preclinical assessments of potential efficacy. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;115:148–75.
3. SchallertT, FlemingSM, LeasureJL, et al. CNS plasticity and assessment of forelimb sensorimotor outcome in unilateral rat models of stroke, cortical ablation, parkinsonism and spinal cord injury. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:777–87.
4. SchallertT, JonesTA. “Exuberant” neuronal growth after brain damage in adult rats: The essential role of behavioral experience. J Neural Transplant Plast. 1993;4:193–8.
5. JonesTA, SchallertT. Overgrowth and pruning of dendrites in adult rats recovering from neocortical damage. Brain Res. 1992;581:156–60.
6. JonesTA, SchallertT. Use-dependent growth of pyramidal neurons after neocortical damage. J Neurosci. 1994;14:2140–52.
7. NudoRJ, WiseBM, SiFuentesF, et al. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272(5269):1791–4.
8. PruskyG, WhishawIQ. Morphology of identified corticospinal cells in the rat following motor cortex injury: Absence of use-dependent change. Brain Res. 1996;714:1–8.
9. NapieralskiJA, ButlerAK, ChesseletMF. Anatomical and functional evidence for lesion-specific sprouting of corticostriatal input in the adult rat. J Comp Neurol. 1996;373:484–97.
10. BurySD, EichhornAC, KotzerCM, et al. Reactive astrocytic responses to denervation in the motor cortex of adult rats are sensitive to manipulations of behavioral experience. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:743–55.
11. HsuJE, JonesTA. Time-sensitive enhancement of motor learning with the less-affected forelimb after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions in rats. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:2069–80.
12. TaubE, UswattG. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Answers and questions after two decades of research. NeuroRehabilitation. 2006;21:93–5.
13. SchallertT, HummJL, BlandST, et al. Activity-associated growth factor expression and related neural events in recovery of function after brain injury. In: ChoiD, DaceyRG, HsuCY, PowersWJ, editors. Cerebrovascular disease: Momentum at the end of the second millennium. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Comany, Inc.; 2002:401–26.
14. SchallertT, LeasureJL, KolbB. Experience-associated structural events, subependymal cellular proliferative activity, and functional recovery after injury to the central nervous system. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20:1513–28.
15. Kleim, JA, JonesTA, SchallertT. Motor enrichment and the induction of plasticity before and after brain injury. Neurochem Res. 2003;28:1757–69.
16. Schubring-GieseM, Molina-LunaK, HertlerB, et al. Speed of motor re-learning after experimental stroke depends on prior skill. Exp Brain Res. 2007;181:359–65.
17. TaubE, CragoJE, BurgioLD, et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: Overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994;61:281–93.
18. KozlowskiDA, JamesDC, SchallertT. Use-dependent exaggeration of neuronal injury after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions. J Neurosci. 1996;16:4776–86.
19. HummJL, KozlowskiDA, JamesDC, et al. Use-dependent exacerbation of brain damage occurs during an early post-lesion vulnerable period. Brain Res. 1998;783:286–92.
20. GriesbachGS, HovdaDA, MolteniR, et al. Voluntary exercise following traumatic brain injury: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor upregulation and recovery of function. Neuroscience. 2004;125:129–39.
21. HummJL, KozlowskiDA, BlandST, et al. Use-dependent exaggeration of brain injury: Is glutamate involved? Exp Neurol. 1999;157:349–58.
22. DeBowSB, McKennaJE, KolbB, et al. Immediate constraint-induced movement therapy causes local hyperthermia and exacerbates cerebral cortical injury in rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004;82:231–7.
23. GriesbachGS, Gomez-PinillaF, HovdaDA. The upregulation of plasticity-related proteins following TBI is disrupted with acute voluntary exercise. Brain Res. 2004;1016:154–62.
24. LeasureJL, SchallertT. Consequences of forced disuse of the impaired forelimb after unilateral cortical injury. Behav Brain Res. 2004;150:83–91.
25. CarmichaelST.Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: Making waves. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:735–42.
26. MaldonadoMA, AllredRP, FelthauserEL, et al. Motor skill training, but not voluntary exercise, improves skilled reaching after unilateral ischemic lesions of the sensorimotor cortex in rats. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:250–61.
27. RoT, NoserE, BoakeC, et al. Functional reorganization and recovery after constraint-induced movement therapy in subacute stroke: Case reports. Neurocase. 2006;12:50–60.
28. LuftAR, MackoRF, ForresterLW, et al. Treadmill exercise activates subcortical neural networks and improves walking after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2008;39:3341–50.
29. MackoRF, IveyFM, ForresterLW, et al. Treadmill exercise rehabilitation improves ambulatory function and cardiovascular fitness in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. 2005;36:2206–11.
30. LeasureJL, JonesM. Forced and voluntary exercise differentially affect brain and behavior. Neuroscience. 2008;156:456–65.
31. HayesK, SpragueS, GuoM, et al. Forced, not voluntary, exercise effectively induces neuroprotection in stroke. Acta Neuropathol. 2008;115:289–96.
32. StummerW, WeberK, TranmerB, et al. Reduced mortality and brain damage after locomotor activity in gerbil forebrain ischemia. Stroke 1994;25:1862–9.
33. ZhaoX, AronowskiJ, LiuSJ, et al. Wheel-running modestly promotes functional recovery after a unilateral cortical lesion in rats. Behav Neurol. 2005;16:41–9.
34. BoakeC, NoserEA, RoT, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy during early stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:14–24.
35. DromerickAW, LangCE, PowersWJ, et al. Very early constraint-induced movement therapy (VECTORS): Phase II trial results. Stroke. 2007;38:465.
36. BylNN, PitschEA, AbramsGM. Functional outcomes can vary by dose: Learning-based sensorimotor training for patients stable poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:494–504.
37. SzeleFG, AlexanderC, ChesseletMF. Expression of molecules associated with neuronal plasticity in the striatum after aspiration and thermocoagulatory lesions of the cerebral cortex in adult rats. J Neurosci. 1995;15:4429–48.
38. AuriatAM, GramsJD, YanRH, et al. Forced exercise does not improve recovery after hemorrhagic stroke in rats. Brain Res. 2006;1109:183–91.
39. WuJ, HuaY, KeepRF, et al. Oxidative brain injury from extravasated erythrocytes after intracerebral hemorrhage. Brain Res. 2002;953:45–52.
40. NakamuraT, KeepRF, HuaY, et al. Deferoxamine-induced attenuation of brain edema and neurological deficits in a rat model of intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2004;100:672–8.
41. NakamuraT, XiG, HuaY, et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage in mice: Model characterization and application for genetically modified mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004;24:487–94.
42. HuaY, NakamuraT, KeepRF, et al. Long-term effects of experimental intracerebral hemorrhage: The role of iron. J Neurosurg. 2006;104:305–12.
43. ShaoJ, XiG, HuaY, et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage in the iron deficient rat. Stroke. 2005;36:660–4.
44. NapieralskiJA, BanksRJ, ChesseletMF. Motor and somatosensory deficits following uni- and bilateral lesions of the cortex induced by aspiration or thermocoagulation in the adult rat. Exp Neurol. 1998;154:80–8.
45. ThoredP, ArvidssonA, CacciE, et al. Persistent production of neurons from adult brain stem cells during recovery after stroke. Stem Cells. 2006;24:739–47.
46. SchallertT. Behavioral tests for preclinical intervention assessment. NeuroRx. 2006;3:497–504.
47. HuaY, SchallertT, KeepRF, et al. Behavioral tests after intracerebral hemorrhage in the rat. Stroke. 2002;33:2478–84.
48. VallaJ, HummJL, SchallertT, et al. Metabolic activity increases in the subependymal zone following cortical injury. NeuroReport. 1999;10:2731–4.
49. GottsJE, ChesseletMF. Migration and fate of newly born cells after focal cortical ischemia in adult rats. J Neurosci Res. 2005;80:160–71.
50. KluskaMM, WitteOW, BolzJ, et al. Neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus after cortical infarcts: effects of infarct location, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor blockade and anti-inflammatory treatment. Neuroscience. 2005;135:723–35.
51. KolbB, MorsheadC, GonzalezC, et al. Growth factor-stimulated generation of new cortical tissue and functional recovery after stroke damage to the motor cortex of rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:983–97.
52. AdkinsDL, SchallertT, GoldsteinLB. Issues in pre-clinical and clinical research: Lost in translation. Stroke. 2008;40:8–9.
53. SilasiG, HamiltonDA, KolbB. Social instability blocks functional restitution following motor cortex stroke in rats. Behav Brain Res. 2008;188:219–26.
54. WoodleeMT, SchallertT. The impact of motor activity and inactivity on the brain: implications for the prevention and treatment of nervous system disorders. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2006;15:203–06.
55. CraftTKS, GlasperER, McCulloughL, et al. Social interaction improves experimental stroke outcome. Stroke. 2006;36:2006–11.
56. MariniC, TriggianiL, CiminiN, et al. Proportion of older people in the community as a predictor of increasing stroke incidence. Neuroepidemiology. 2001;20:91–5.
57. Ramirez-LassepasM. Stroke and the aging of the brain and the arteries. Geriatrics. 1998;53(Suppl 1):44–8.
58. WyllerTB. Prevalence of stroke and stroke-related disability. Stroke. 1998;29:866–7.
59. LindnerMD, GribkoffVK, DonlanNA, et al. Long-lasting functional disabilities in middle-aged rats with small cerebral infarcts. J Neurosci. 2003;23:10 913–22.
60. GladstoneDJ, BlackSE, HakimAM. Toward wisdom from failure: Lessons from neuroprotective stroke trials and new therapeutic directions. Stroke. 2002;33:2123–36.
61. WangRY, WangPS, YangYR. Effect of age in rats following middle cerebral artery occlusion. Gerontology. 2003;49:27–32.
62. JinK, MinamiM, XieL, et al. Ischemia-induced neurogenesis is preserved but reduced in the aged rodent brain. Aging Cell. 2004;3:373–7.
63. FutrellN, GarciaJH, PetersonE, et al. Embolic stroke in aged rats. Stroke. 1991;22:1582–91.
64. WestlingB, NorrvingB, ThorngrenM. Survival following stroke. A prospective population-based study of 438 hospitalized cases with prediction according to subtype, severity and age. Acta Neurol Scand. 1990;81:457–63.
65. KramerAF, BhererL, ColcombeSJ, et al. Environmental influences on cognitive and brain plasticity during aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:M940–57.
66. LuftAR, McCombe-WallerS, WhitallJ, et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;292:1853–61.
67. LiepertJ, BauderH, MiltnerWH, et al. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31:1210–6.
68. LuftAR, MackoRF, ForresterLW, et al. Treadmill exercise activates subcortical neural networks and improves walking after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2008;39:3341–50.
69. ZhaoCS, HartikainenS, SchallertT, et al. CNS-active drugs in aging population at high risk of cerebrovascular events: Evidence from preclinical and clinical studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32:56–71.
70. SchallertT, HernandezTD, BarthTM. Recovery of function after brain damage: Severe and chronic disruption by diazepam. Brain Res. 1986;379:104–11.
71. LuD, MahmoodA, GoussevA, et al. Atorvastatin reduces intravascular thrombosis, increases cerebral microvascular patency and integrity, and enhances spatial learning in rats subjected to traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2004;101:813–21.
72. LuD, QuC, GoussevA, et al. Statins increase neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus, reduce delayed neuronal death in the hippocampal CA3 region, and improve spatial learning in rat after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1132–46.
73. QuCS, LuD, GoussevA, et al. Effect of atorvastatin on spatial memory, neuronal survival, and vascular density in female rats after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:695–701.
74. ColeMG, ElieLM, McCuskerJ, et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of treatments for post-stroke depression in elderly inpatients: Systematic review. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2001;14:37–41.
75. HamaS, YamashitaH, KatoT, et al. “Insistence on recovery” as a positive prognostic factor in Japanese stroke patients. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008;62:386–95.
76. ChenY, GuoJJ, LiH, et al. Risk of cerebrovascular events associated with antidepressant use in patients with depression: A population-based, nested case-control study. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42:177–84.
77. Cumberland Consensus Working Group: CheeranB, CohenL, DobkinB, FordG, GreenwoodR, HowardD, HusainM, MacleodM, NudoR, RothwellJ, RuddA, TeoJ, WardN, WolfS. The future of restorative neurosciences in stroke: Driving the translational research pipeline from basic science to rehabilitation of people after stroke. Neurorehab Neural Repair. 2009;23:97–107.
78. GinsbergMD. Neuroprotection for ischemic stroke: Past, present and future. Neuropharmacology. 2008;55:363–89.
79. KeyvaniK, SchallertT. Plasticity associated molecular and structural events in postlesional brain. J Neuropathol Exper Neurol. 2002;61:831–40.
80. HicksA, SchallertT, JolkkonenJ. Cell-based therapies and functional outcome in experimental stroke. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;7:139–40.