Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T14:54:10.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Treatment of One's Slaves, Servants, Animals, and Relatives: Legal Boundaries and the Problem of Social Cost

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2009

Jenny Bourne Wahl
Affiliation:
St Olaf College, Minnesota
Get access

Summary

I'll conquer ye, or kill ye! – one or t'other. I'll count every drop of blood there is in you, and take 'em, one by one, till ye give up!

– Simon Legree

Uncle Tom's Cabin paints for many people the quintessential picture of relationships between masters and slaves: Harriet Beecher Stowe portrayed in fiction what scholars have since documented in fact. According to court records, antebellum Southern judges helped frame these relationships. They granted masters generous leeway in their discipline of slaves, tolerating even the viciousness of real Simon Legrees as long as the abusive behavior did not affect the community. This practice had economic as well as political and social roots: Privately administered “plantation law” cost less to carry out than public law, at least to those other than slaves. But court proceedings show that many slaveowners also treated their human property compassionately – caring for slaves in old age, granting slaves small favors, keeping slave families together, and protecting illegitimate slave children from wrathful wives. To a degree, Southern judges supported benevolence toward slaves, even when such kindness apparently contradicted statutes. Why? Certainly some judges must have been motivated by humanitarian instincts or a desire to protect the powerless. But judges' opinions also indicate their beliefs that good treatment of slaves could enhance labor productivity, increase plantation profits, and reinforce the sentimental ties between master and slave. Courts also accepted masters' use of slaves as agents when doing so lowered overall costs of production and distribution.

When the treatment of one's slaves might have inflicted costs on other parties with legal standing, however, judges stepped in to regulate the master's behavior.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Bondsman's Burden
An Economic Analysis of the Common Law of Southern Slavery
, pp. 142 - 173
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×