Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T00:54:06.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The path to the Veneziano model

from Part II - The prehistory: the analytic S-matrix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2012

Hector R. Rubinstein
Affiliation:
AlbaNova University Center
Andrea Cappelli
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Florence
Elena Castellani
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Filippo Colomo
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Florence
Paolo Di Vecchia
Affiliation:
Niels Bohr Institutet, Copenhagen and Nordita, Stockholm
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Marco Ademollo, in his contribution to this Volume, has given a review of early work that led to string theory. I will complement this view of that period and its origin. My main purpose is to go further back in time and put the appearance of string theory work in the context of the evolution of the theory of elementary particles.

Introduction

Just after the end of the second world war, the resounding confirmation of relativistic field theory (more precisely, quantum electrodynamics) took place with Lamb's measurement of the level shifts in hydrogen and Schwinger's calculation of the electron magnetic moment, which differed from the value predicted from Dirac's equation. Renormalization theory with American, European, and Japanese contributions gave remarkable results with accuracies beyond one part in one hundred million.

All of these results were obtained using perturbation theory and though the agreement was remarkable, questions of principle on whether the series are convergent and divergences exist, requiring a modification of the theory, loomed in the discussions.

Soon after, with the discovery of mesons, and later other baryons, besides the proton and neutron, attention concentrated on the strong interactions. Pauli, Wentzel, Tamm, Dancoff, Dyson and others worked on the problem (for a short review, see Salpeter [Sal08]).

The natural thing to do was to write a Lagrangian for mesons and nucleons, and try all possible couplings in perturbation theory. It soon became clear that these calculations did not describe the experimental data.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×