Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T14:37:09.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Methodological Nuances in Undertaking and Interpreting Efficacy Studies of Medications for Bipolar II Disorder

from Section 1 - Domain Chapters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2018

Gordon Parker
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Bipolar II Disorder
Modelling, Measuring and Managing
, pp. 108 - 112
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Grunze, H., Vieta, E., Goodwin, G. M., et al. (2010). The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the biological treatment of bipolar disorders: update 2010 on the treatment of acute bipolar depression. World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 11, 81109.Google Scholar
Grunze, H., Vieta, E., Goodwin, G. M., et al. (2013). The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the biological treatment of bipolar disorders: update 2012 on the long-term treatment of bipolar depression. World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 14, 154219.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 23, 5662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, S. A. and Asberg, M., (1979). A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 382–9.Google Scholar
Parker, G. (2016). The clinical diagnosis of bipolar depression. In Bipolar Depression: Molecular Neurobiology, Clinical Diagnosis, and Pharmacotherapy, 2nd ed., ed. Zarate, C.A. Jr. and Manji, H.K.. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Parker, G. and McCraw, S. (2015). The ‘disconnect’ between initial judgments of lamotrigine vs. its real-world effectiveness in managing bipolar disorder: a tale with wider ramifications. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 132, 345–54.Google Scholar
Parker, G. and Tavella, G. (2018). Design limitations to bipolar II treatment efficacy studies: a challenge and a revisionist strategy. Journal of Affective Disorders, 229, 334–41.Google Scholar
Young, R. C., Biggs, J. T., Ziegler, V. E., et al. (1978). A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. British Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 429–35.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×