Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:03:21.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Invasions by Mosquitoes: The Roles of Behaviour Across the Life Cycle

from Part III - Case Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

Judith S. Weis
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Daniel Sol
Affiliation:
National Spanish Research Council (CSIC)
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aliabadi, B.K. and Juliano, S.A. (2002). Escape from gregarine parasites affects the competitive impact of an invasive mosquito. Biological Invasions, 4, 283297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alto, B.E., Kesavaraju, B., Juliano, S.A. and Lounibos, L.P. (2009). Stage-dependent predation on competitors: consequences for the outcome of a mosquito invasion. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 928936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreadis, T.G. and Wolfe, R.J. (2010). Evidence for reduction of native mosquitoes with increased expansion of invasive Ochlerotatus japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the northeastern United States. Journal of Medical Entomology, 47, 4352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagny, L., Delatte, H., Quilici, S. and Fontenille, D. (2009). Progressive decrease in Aedes aegypti distribution in Reunion Island since the1900s. Journal of Medical Entomology, 46, 15411545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagny Beilhe, L., Delatte, H., Juliano, S.A., Fontenille, D. and Quilici, S. (2013). Ecological interactions in Aedes species from Reunion Island. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 27, 349459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bargielowski, I. and Lounibos, L.P. (2014). Rapid selection in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in response to satyrization by invasive Aedes albopictus. Evolutionary Ecology, 28, 193203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bargielowski, I., Lounibos, L.P. and Carrasquilla, M.C. (2013). Evolution of resistance to satyrization: evidence of reproductive character displacement in populations of invasive dengue vectors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 28882892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bargielowski, I.E., Lounibos, L.P., Shin, D., et al. (2015a). Widespread evidence for interspecific mating between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in nature. Infection, Genetics, and Evolution, 36, 456461.Google ScholarPubMed
Bargielowski, I., Blosser, E. and Lounibos, L.P. (2015b). The effects of interspecific courtship on the mating success of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus males. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 108, 513518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beketov, M.A. and Liess, M. (2007). Predation risk perception and food scarcity induce alterations of life-cycle traits of the mosquito Culex pipiens. Ecological Entomology, 32, 405410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, M.C., Levine, R.S., Hawley, W.A. and Lounibos, L.P. (2007). Spread of the tiger: global risk of invasion by Aedes albopictus. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 7, 7685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braks, M.A.H., Honório, N.A., Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R., Juliano, S.A. and Lounibos, L.P. (2003). Convergent habitat segregation of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in southeastern Brazil and Florida, USA. Journal of Medical Entomology, 40, 785794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braks, M.A.H., Honório, N.A., Lounibos, L.P., Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R. and Juliano, S.A. (2004). Interspecific competition between two invasive species of container mosquitoes, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), in Brazil. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 97, 130139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J.E., McBride, C.S., Johnson, P., et al. (2011). Worldwide patterns of genetic differentiation imply multiple ‘domestications’ of Aedes aegypti, a major vector of human diseases. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 24462454.Google Scholar
Brown, J.E., Evans, B.R., Zheng, W., et al. (2013). Human impacts have shaped historical and recent evolution in Aedes aegypti, the dengue and yellow fever mosquito. Evolution, 68, 514525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J.S. and Kotler, B.P. (2004). Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecology Letters, 7, 9991014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J.E. (2002). Physical habitat attribute mediates biotic resistance to non-indigenous species invasion. Oecologia, 130, 146156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrasquilla, M.C. and Lounibos, L.P. (2015). Satyrization without evidence of successful insemination from interspecific mating between invasive mosquitoes. Biology Letters, 11, 20150527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, R.G., Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R. and Braga, I.A. (2014). Updating the geographical distribution and frequency of Aedes albopictus in Brazil with remarks regarding its range in the Americas. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 109, 787796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chadee, D.D., Ward, R.A. and Novak, R.J. (1998). Natural habitats of Aedes aegypti in the Caribbean: a review. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 14, 511.Google ScholarPubMed
Costanzo, K.S., Kesavaraju, B. and Juliano, S.A. (2005). Condition-specific competition in container mosquitoes: the role of non-competing life-history stages. Ecology, 86, 32893295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M.A. (2006). Invasion biology 1958–2004: the pursuit of science and conservation. In Conceptual Ecology and Invasion Biology: Reciprocal Approaches to Nature, ed. Cadotte, M.W., McMahon, S.M. and Fukami, T. London: Kluwer Publishers, pp. 3566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekker, T., Steib, B., Carde, R.T. and Geier, M. (2002). L-lactic acid: a human-signifying host cue for the anthropophilic mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 16, 9198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeRivera, C.E., Ruiz, G.M., Hines, A.H. and Jivo, V.P. (2005). Biotic resistance to invasion: native predator limits abundance and distribution of an introduced crab. Ecology, 86, 33643376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, D.M., Keyghobadi, N., Malcolm, C.A., et al. (2004). Emerging vectors in the Culex pipiens complex. Science 303, 15351538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritz, M.L., Walker, E.D., Miller, J.R., Severson, D.W. and Dworkin, I.D. (2015). Divergent host preferences of above- and below-ground Culex pipiens mosquitoes and their hybrid offspring. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 29, 115123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillies, M.T. (1964). Selection for host preference in Anopheles gambiae. Nature, 203, 852854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gouck, H.K. (1972). Host preferences of various strains of Aedes aegypti and A. simpsoni as determined by an olfactometer. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 47, 680683.Google Scholar
Grill, C.P. and Juliano, S.A. (1996). Predicting species interactions based on behaviour: predation and competition in container-dwelling mosquitoes. Journal of Animal Ecology, 65, 6376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, M.W. and Lounibos, L.P. (2005). Does differential predation permit invasive and native mosquito larvae to coexist in Florida? Ecological Entomology, 30, 122127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gröning, J. and Hochkirch, A. (2008). Reproductive interference between animal species. Quarterly Review of Biology, 83, 257282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gubler, D.J. and Bhattachaya, N.C. (1972). Swarming and mating of Aedes (S.) albopictus in nature. Mosquito News, 32, 219223.Google Scholar
Guillaumot, L., Ofanoa, R., Swillen, L., Singh, N., Bossin, H.C. and Schaffner, F. (2012). Distribution of Aedes albopictus in southwestern Pacific countries, with a first report from the Kingdom of Tonga. Parasites and Vectors, 5, 247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, J.P. and Paulson, S.L. (1994). Reproductive isolation between Florida strains of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 10, 8892.Google ScholarPubMed
Harrington, L.C., Ponlawat, A., Edman, J.D., Scott, T.W. and Vermeylen, F. (2008). Influence of container size, location, and time of day on oviposition patterns of the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti, in Thailand. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 8, 415423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, B.A., Boonyakanist, P. and Mongkolpanya, K. (1972). Biological observations on Aedes setoi Huang in Thailand with notes on rural Aedes aegypti (L.) and other Stegomyia populations. Journal of Medical Entomology, 9, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartberg, W.K. (1971). Observations on the mating behaviour of Aedes aegypti in nature. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 45, 847850.Google ScholarPubMed
Hawley, W.A. (1988). The biology of Aedes albopictus. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 4 (Suppl.), 140.Google Scholar
Huang, Y-M. and Hitchcock, J.C. (1980). Medical entomology studies XII. A revision of the Aedes scutellaris Group of Tonga (Diptera: Culicidae). Contributions of the American Entomological Institute, 17(3), 1107.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, R.A., Facon, B., Ravigné, V., et al. (2012). Anthropogenically induced adaptation to invade (AIAI). Evolutionary Applications, 5, 89101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeschke, J.M. and Strayer, D.L. (2006). Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America. Global Change Biology, 12, 16081619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juliano, S.A. (1998). Species introduction and replacement among mosquitoes: interspecific resource competition or apparent competition? Ecology, 79, 255268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juliano, S.A. (2009). Species interactions among larval mosquitoes: context dependence across habitat gradients. Annual Review of Entomology, 54, 3756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juliano, S.A. (2010). Coexistence, exclusion, or neutrality? A meta-analysis of competition between Aedes albopictus and resident mosquitoes. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution, 56, 325351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juliano, S.A. and Gravel, M.E. (2002). Predation and the evolution of prey behavior: an experiment with tree hole mosquitoes. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 301311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juliano, S.A. and Lounibos, L.P. (2005). Ecology of invasive mosquitoes: effects on resident species and on human health. Ecology Letters, 8, 558574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juliano, S.A. and Reminger, L. (1992). The relationship between vulnerability to predation and behavior: geographic and ontogenetic differences in larval treehole mosquitoes. Oikos, 63, 465476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juliano, S.A., Hechtel, L.J. and Waters, J. (1993). Behavior and risk of predation in larval tree hole mosquitoes: effects of hunger and population history of predation. Oikos, 68, 229241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juliano, S. A., O'Meara, G.F., Morrill, J.R. and Cutwa, M.M. (2002). Desiccation and thermal tolerance of eggs and the coexistence of competing mosquitoes. Oecologia, 130, 458469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juliano, S.A., Lounibos, L.P. and O'Meara, G.F. (2004). A field test for competitive effects of Aedes albopictus on Aedes aegypti in South Florida: differences between sites of coexistence and exclusion? Oecologia, 139, 583593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juliano, S.A., Lounibos, L.P., Nishimura, N. and Greene, K. (2010). Your worst enemy could be your best friend: predator contributions to invasion resistance and persistence of natives. Oecologia, 162, 709718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, L., Kendell, D., Robertson, D., Livdahl, T. and Khatchikian, C. (2010). Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Bermuda: extinction, invasion, invasion and extinction. Biological Invasions, 12, 32773288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, M.G. and Fonseca, D.M. (2014). Invasion biology of Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae). Annual Review of Entomology, 59, 3149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kesavaraju, B. and Juliano, S.A. (2004). Differential behavioral responses to water-borne cues to predation in two container dwelling mosquitoes. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 97, 194201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kesavaraju, B. and Juliano, S.A. (2008). Behavioral responses of Aedes albopictus to a predator are correlated with size-dependent risk of predation. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101, 11501153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kesavaraju, B. and Juliano, S.A. (2009). No evolutionary response to four generations of laboratory selection on antipredator behavior of Aedes albopictus: potential implications for biotic resistance to invasion. Journal of Medical Entomology, 46, 772781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kesavaraju, B., Alto, B.W., Lounibos, L.P. and Juliano, S.A. (2007). Behavioural responses of larval container mosquitoes to a size-selective predator. Ecological Entomology, 32, 262272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kesavaraju, B., Damal, K. and Juliano, S.A. (2008). Do natural container habitats impede invader dominance? Predator-mediated coexistence of invasive and native container-dwelling mosquitoes. Oecologia, 155, 631639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kesavaraju, B, Kahn, D.F. and Gaugler, R. (2011). Behavioral differences of invasive container-dwelling mosquitoes to a native predator. Journal of Medical Entomology, 48, 526532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kishi, S. and Nakazawa, T. (2013). Analysis of species coexistence co-mediated by resource competition and reproductive interference. Population Ecology, 55, 305313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPointe, D.A., Atkinson, C.T. and Samuel, M.D. (2012). Ecology and conservation biology of avian malaria. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249, 211226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leahy, M.G. and Craig, G.B. (1967). Barriers to hybridization between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). Evolution, 21, 4158.Google ScholarPubMed
Leahy, M.G., VandeHey, R.C. and Booth, K.S. (1978). Differential response to oviposition site by feral and domestic populations of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 68, 455463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leisnham, P.T. and Juliano, S.A. (2010). Interpopulation differences in competitive effect and response of the mosquito Aedes aegypti and resistance to invasion of a superior competitor. Oecologia, 164, 221230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leisnham, P.T., Lounibos, L.P., O'Meara, G.F. and Juliano, S.A. (2009). Interpopulation divergence in competitive interactions of the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Ecology, 90, 24052413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livdahl, T. and Willey, M.S. (1991). Prospects for an invasion: competition between Aedes albopictus and native Aedes triseriatus. Science, 253, 189191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockwood, J.L., Hoopes, M.F. and Marchetti, M.P. (2007). Invasion Ecology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Lorimer, N., Lounibos, L.P. and Petersen, J.L. (1976). Field trials with a translocation homozygote in Aedes aegypti for population replacement. Journal of Economic Entomology, 69, 405409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lounibos, L.P. (1981). Habitat segregation among African treehole mosquitoes. Ecological Entomology, 6, 129154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounibos, L.P. (2002). Invasions by insect vectors of human disease. Annual Review of Entomology, 47, 233266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lounibos, L.P., Escher, R.L., Nishimura, N. and Juliano, S.A. (1997). Long term dynamics of a predator used for biological control and decoupling from mosquito prey in a subtropical treehole ecosystem. Oecologia, 111, 189200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounibos, L.P., O'Meara, G.F., Escher, R.L., et al. (2001). Testing predicted competitive displacement of native Aedes by the invasive Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus in Florida, USA. Biological Invasions, 3, 151166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, S., Browne, M., Boudjelas, S. and De Poorter, M. (2000). 100 of the World's Worst Invasive Alien Species: A selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG), a specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN), Auckland.Google Scholar
Mack, R.N. (2000). Cultivation fosters plant naturalization by reducing environmental stochasticity. Biological Invasions, 2, 111122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, P.F. (1957). Genetical aspects of the Aedes aegypti problem I. Taxonomy and bionomics. American Journal Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 51, 392408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, C.S., Baier, F., Omondi, A.B., et al. (2014). Evolution of mosquito preference for humans linked to an odorant receptor. Nature, 515, 222227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClain, D.K. and Rai, K.S. (1985). Ethological divergence in allopatry and asymmetrical isolation in the South Pacific Aedes scutellaris subgroup. Evolution, 39, 9981008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medley, K.A. (2010). Niche shifts during the global invasion of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus Skuse (Culicidae), revealed by reciprocal distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19, 122133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyle, P.B. and Light, T. (1996). Biological invasions of freshwater: empirical rules and assembly theory. Biological Conservation, 78, 149162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukwaya, L.G. (1977). Genetic control of feeding preferences in the mosquitoes Aedes (Stegomyia) simpsoni and aegypti. Physiological Entomology, 2, 133145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasci, R.S., Hare, S.G. and Willis, F.S. (1989). Interspecific mating between Louisiana strains of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti in the field and in laboratory. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 5, 416421.Google Scholar
O'Meara, G.F., EvansJr., L.F., Gettman, A.D. and Cuda, J.P. (1995). Spread of Aedes albopictus and decline of A. aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Florida. Journal of Medical Entomology, 32, 554562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, J.L. (1977). Behavioral differences in two subspecies of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) in East Africa. PhD dissertation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Powell, J.R. and Tabachnick, W.J. (2013). History of domestication and spread of Aedes aegypti: a review. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, 108(Suppl. I), 1117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribeiro, J.M. (1988). Can satyrs control pests and vectors? Journal of Medical Entomology, 25, 431440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribeiro, J.M. and Spielman, A. (1986). The satyr effect: a model predicting parapatry and species extinction. American Naturalist, 128, 513528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, S.A., Moore, P., Carruthers, M., et al. (2006). Discovery of a widespread infestation of Aedes albopictus in the Torres Strait, Australia. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 22, 358365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sih, A. (1986). Antipredator responses and the perception of danger by mosquito larvae. Ecology, 67, 434441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simard, F., Nchoutpouen, E., Toto, J.C. and Fontenille, D. (2005). Geographic distribution and breeding site preference of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Cameroon, Central Africa. Journal of Medical Entomology, 42, 726731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skelly, D. (1994). Activity level and the susceptibility of anuran larvae to predation. Animal Behaviour, 47, 465468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soper, D.L. and Wilson, D.B. (1943). Anopheles gambiae in Brazil 1930 to 1940. New York, NY: Rockefeller Foundation.Google Scholar
Sylla, M., Bosio, C., Urdaneta-Marquez, L., Ndiaye, M. and Black, W.C. (2009). Gene flow, subspecies composition, and dengue virus-2 susceptibility among Aedes aegypti collections in Senegal. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 3, e408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sylla, M., Ndiaye, M. and Black, W.C. (2013). Aedes species in treeholes and fruit husks between dry and wet seasons in southeastern Senegal. Journal of Vector Ecology, 38, 237244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takken, W. and Verhulst, N.O. (2013). Host preferences of blood-feeding mosquitoes. Annual Review of Entomology, 58, 433453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tripet, F., Lounibos, L.P., Robbins, D., Moran, J., Nishimura, N. and Blosser, E.M. (2011). Competitive reduction by satyrization? Evidence for interspecific mating in nature and asymmetric reproductive competition between invasive mosquito vectors. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 85, 265270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trpis, M. and Haüsermann, W. (1975). Demonstration of differential domesticity of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera, Culicidae) in Africa by mark–release–recapture. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 65, 199208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trpis, M. and Haüsermann, W. (1978). Genetics of house-entering behaviour in East African populations of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera, Culicidae) and its relevance to speciation. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 68, 521532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Riper, C., Van Riper, S.G., Goff, M.L. and Laird, M. (1986). The epizootiology and ecological significance of malaria in Hawaiian land birds. Ecological Monographs, 56, 327344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, G.P. and Tabachnick, W.J. (1990). Genetic analysis of rock hole and domestic Aedes aegypti on the Caribbean island of Anguilla. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 6, 625630.Google ScholarPubMed
Ward, R.A. (1984). Mosquito fauna of Guam: case history of an introduced fauna. In Commerce and the Spread of Pests and Disease Vectors, ed. Laird, M. New York: Praeger, pp. 143162.Google Scholar
Wellborn, G.A. (2002). Trade off between competitive ability and antipredator adaptation in a freshwater amphipod species complex. Ecology, 83, 129136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×