Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:54:53.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Response of the soil bacterial community to perturbation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2009

Alan J. McCarthy
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Neil D. Gray
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Thomas P. Curtis
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Ian M. Head
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Richard Bardgett
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Michael Usher
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
David Hopkins
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Get access

Summary

SUMMARY

  1. Molecular biological methods have provided new insights into the true extent of bacterial diversity in soil, and here we focus on their application in tandem with soil process measurements.

  2. Data from a field experiment are used to illustrate the impact of perturbation on the total bacterial community as well as those functional groups responsible for nitrification, denitrification, methanogenesis and methane oxidation. Increasing the organic matter by about 20% by sewage sludge addition had no statistically significant effect on soil respiration rates, and although methanogenesis and methane oxidation were both stimulated, the effect was short lived and variable. We argue that the methane transformations are particularly dependent on unevenly distributed microsite activity, unlike nitrification/denitrification rates, which were stimulated by liming and organic matter addition in a manner that was both reproducible and persistent. The genetic diversity of the ammonia-oxidising bacteria concomitantly decreased, implying classical selection or enrichment of competitive species upon perturbation.

  3. Effects on the diversity of the soil bacterial flora quickly disappeared with time, and we argue that seasonal variation, and particularly its effect on plant growth, has a greater impact on the dynamics of bacterial populations in soil than single time-point perturbations aimed at stimulating general biological activity. However, time course experiments revealed that the bacterial diversity in untreated soils was more stable, as the 16S rRNA gene profiles were more stable than those that developed in disturbed soils.

  4. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avrahami, S., Conrad, R. & Braker, G. (2002). Effect of soil ammonium concentration on N2O release and on the community structure of ammonia oxidizers and denitrifiers. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 5685–5692CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avrahami, S., Liesack, W. & Conrad, R. (2003). Effects of temperature and fertilizer on activity and community structure of soil ammonia oxidizers. Environmental Microbiology, 5, 691–705CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaulieu, M., Becaert, V., Deschenes, L. & Villemur, R. (2000). Evolution of bacterial diversity during enrichment of PCP-degrading activated soils. Microbial Ecology, 40, 345–355Google ScholarPubMed
Bodelier, P. L. E., Roslev, P., Henckel, T. & Frenzel, P. (2000). Stimulation by ammonium-based fertilizers of methane oxidation in soil around rice roots. Nature, 403, 421–424CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briones, A. M., Okabe, S., Umemiya, Y., et al. (2002). Influence of different cultivars on populations of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in the root environment of rice. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 3067–3075CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, T. P., Sloan, W. & Scannell, J. W. (2002). Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 10 494–10 499CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dancer, W. S., Peterson, L. A. & Chesters, G. (1973). Ammonification and nitrification of N as influenced by soil pH and previous N treatments. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 37, 67–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Dunbar J., , Barns S. M., , Ticknor L. O. & , Kuske C. R. (2002). Empirical and theoretical bacterial diversity in four Arizona soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 3035–3045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dykhuizen, D. E. (1998). Santa Rosalia revisited: why are there so many species of bacteria?Antonie van Leeuwenhoek International Journal of General and Molecular Microbiology, 73, 25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Eilers H., , Pernthaler J., , Glöckner F. O. & , Amann R. (2000). Culturability and in situ abundance of pelagic bacteria from the North Sea. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 3044–3051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, F. F., Seldin, L., Sebastian, G. V., et al. (2004). Influence of petroleum contamination and biostimulation treatment on the diversity of Pseudomonas spp. in soil microcosms as evaluated by 16S rRNA based PCR and DGGE. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 38, 93–98CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, G. W. & Curtis, T. P. (2003). Ecological theory and bioremediation. Bioremediation: a Critical Review (Ed. by , I. M. Head, , I. Singleton & , M. G. Milner), pp. 61–92. Norwich: Horizon Scientific PressGoogle Scholar
Gray, N. D., Hastings, R. C., Sheppard, S. K., et al. (2003). Effects of soil improvement treatments on bacterial community structure and soil processes in an upland grassland soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 46, 11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, R. I., Whiteley, A. S., O'Donnell, A. G. & Bailey, M. J. (2003). Physiological and community responses of established grassland bacterial populations to water stress. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 6961–6968CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grime, J. P. (1997). Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the debate deepens. Science, 277, 1260–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, R. C., Butler, C., Singleton, I., Saunders, J. R. & McCarthy, A. J. (2000). Analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria populations in acid forest soil during conditions of moisture limitation. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 30, 14–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hastings, R. C., Ceccherini, M. T., Miclaus, N., et al. (1997). Direct molecular biological analysis of ammonia oxidising bacteria populations in cultivated soil plots treated with swine manure. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 23, 45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, I. M., Hiorns, W. D., Embley, T. M., McCarthy, A. J. & Saunders, J. R. (1993). The phylogeny of autotrophic ammonia-oxidising bacteria as determined by analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Journal of General Microbiology, 139, 1147–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, M. A., Matthies, C., Kusel, K., Schramm, A. & Drake, H. L. (2003). Hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis by moderately acid-tolerant methanogens of a methane-emitting acidic peat. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 74–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowalchuk, G. A. & Stephen, J. R. (2001). Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria: a model for molecular microbial ecology. Annual Review of Microbiology, 55, 485–529CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, R. H. (1960). On the relative abundance of species. American Naturalist, 94, 25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNaughton, S. J., Stephen, J. R., Venosa, A. D., et al. (1999). Microbial population changes during bioremediation of an experimental oil spill. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 3566–3574Google ScholarPubMed
Manefield, M., Whiteley, A. S., Griffiths, R. I. & Bailey, M. J. (2002). RNA stable isotope probing, a novel means of linking microbial community function to phylogeny. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 5367–5373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M. (1975). Patterns of species abundance and diversity. Ecology of Species and Communities (Ed. by , M. Cody & , J. M. Diamond), pp. 81–120. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
McCaig, A. E., Glover, L. A. & Prosser, J. I. (1999). Molecular analysis of bacterial community structure and diversity in unimproved and improved upland grass pastures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 1721–1730Google ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, A. J. & Williams, S. T. (1992). Actinomycetes as agents of biodegradation in the environment: a review. Gene, 115, 189–192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nedwell, D. B., Murrell, J. C., Ineson, P., et al. (2003). Microbiological basis of land use impact on the soil methane sink: molecular and functional analysis. Genes in the Environment (Ed. by , R. S. Hails, , J. E. Beringer & , H. C. J. Godfray), pp. 150–166. Oxford: Blackwell ScienceGoogle Scholar
Nicol, G. W., Glover, L. A. & Prosser, J. I. (2003). The impact of grassland management on archaeal community structure in upland pasture rhizosphere soil. Environmental Microbiology, 5, 152–162CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyborg, M. & Hoyt, P. B. (1978). Effects of soil acidity and liming on mineralization of soil nitrogen. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 58, 331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okano, Y., Hristova, K. R., Leutenegger, C. M., et al. (2004). Application of real-time PCR to study effects of ammonium on population size of ammonia-oxidising bacteria in soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70, 1008–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, O. & Alcaniz, J. M. (1993). Respiration potential of microbial biomass in a calcareous soil treated with sewage sludge. Geomicrobiology Journal, 11, 333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oved, T., Shaviv, A., Goldrath, T., Mandelbaum, R. T. & Minz, D. (2001). Influence of effluent irrigation on community composition and function of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 3426–3433CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paerl, H. W. & Steppe, T. F. (2003). Scaling up: the next challenge in environmental microbiology. Environmental Microbiology, 5, 1025–1038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, E. A. & Clark, F. E. (1996). Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry, 2nd edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Persson, T., Wiren, A. & Andersson, S. (1990). Effects of liming on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in coniferous forests. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 54, 351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C. J., Harris, D., Dollhopf, S. L., et al. (2000). Effects of agronomic treatments on structure and function of ammonia-oxidizing communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 5410–5418CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prosser, J. I. & Embley, T. M. (2002). Cultivation-based and molecular approaches to characterisation of terrestrial and aquatic nitrifiers. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek International Journal of General and Molecular Microbiology, 81, 165–179CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purkhold, U., Pommerening-Roser, A., Juretschko, S., et al. (2000). Phylogeny of all recognised species of ammonia oxidizer based on comparative 16S rRNA and amoA sequence analysis: implications for molecular surveys. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 5368–5382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, S. L. & McClure, N. (2003). The role of microbiological studies in bioremediation process optimisation. Bioremediation: A Critical Review (Ed. by , I. M. Head, , I. Singleton & , M. G. Milner), pp. 27–59. Norwich: Horizon Scientific PressGoogle Scholar
Schimel, J. (2000). Rice, microbes and methane. Nature, 403, 375–377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schimel, J. P., Firestone, M. K. & Killham, K. S. (1984). Identification of heterotrophic nitrification in a Sierran acid forest soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 48, 802–806Google Scholar
Shah, Z., Adams, W. A. & Haven, C. D. V. (1989). Composition and activity of the microbial population in an acidic upland soil and effects of liming. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 22, 257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, S. K. & Lloyd, D. (2002). Direct mass spectrometric measurement of gases in soil monoliths. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 50, 175–188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stamatiadis, S., Doran, J. W. & Kettler, T. (1999). Field and laboratory evaluation of soil quality changes resulting from injection of liquid sewage sludge. Applied Soil Ecology, 12, 263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, J. R., McCaig, A. E., Smith, Z., Prosser, J. I. & Embley, T. M. (1996). Molecular diversity of soil and marine 16s rRNA gene sequences related to β-subgroup ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 62, 4147–4154Google ScholarPubMed
Stults, J. R., Snoeyenbos-West, O., Methe, B., Lovley, D. R. & Chandler, D. P. (2001). Application of the 5′ fluorogenic exonuclease assay (TaqMan) for quantitative ribosomal DNA and rRNA analysis in sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 2781–2789CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Tilman D., Wedin, D. & Knops, J. (1996). Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature, 379, 718–720Google Scholar
Torsvik, V., Ovreas, L. & Thingstad, T. F. (2002). Prokaryotic diversity: magnitude, dynamics, and controlling factors. Science, 296, 1064–1066CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torsvik, V., Goksøyr, J. & Daae, F. L. (1990). High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 56, 782–787Google ScholarPubMed
Voget, S., Leggewie, C., Uesbeck, A., et al. (2003). Prospecting for novel biocatalysts in a soil metagenome. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 6235–6242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, D. A. (1999). Biodiversity, ecosystems and interactions that transcend the interface. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 125–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, G., Embley, T. M. & Prosser, J. I. (2002). Grassland management regimens reduce small-scale heterogeneity and species diversity of beta-protobacterial ammonia oxidizer populations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 4058–4067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitby, C. B., Meade, R. A., Hall, G., et al. (2003). Molecular genetic analysis of the ammonia-oxidising bacterial community in a defined hypereutrophic freshwater lake. Genes in the Environment (Ed. by , R. S. Hails, , J. E. Beringer & , H. C. J. Godfray), pp. 167–186. Oxford: Blackwell ScienceGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. (1972). Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21, 213–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S. T. (1985). Oligotrophy in soil: fact or fiction? Bacteria in their Natural Environments (Ed. by , M. M. Fletcher & , G. D. Floodgate), pp. 81–110. Orlando, FL: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1994). The Diversity of Life. New York: Penguin
Winogradsky, S. (1924). Sur la microflora autochthone de la terre arable. Compte Rendu Academie Science, Paris, 178, 1236–1239Google Scholar
Zarda, B., Hahn, D., Chatzinotas, A., et al. (1997). Analysis of bacterial community structure in bulk soil by in situ hybridization. Archives of Microbiology, 168, 185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucchi, M., Angiolini, L., Borin, S., et al. (2003). Response of a bacterial community during bioremediation of an oil-polluted soil. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 94, 248–257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×