Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:42:52.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Assessing the Potential Benefits and Risks of Introducing Natural and Genetically Manipulated Bacteria for the Control of Soil-borne Root Diseases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

Heikki M. T. Hokkanen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
James M. Lynch
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The application of biological control agents is an established if under-exploited method for the control of agricultural pests and diseases. There are considerable benefits to be gained from this approach, however caution is necessary in the introduction of biocontrol agents because of possible effects on non-target organisms. In some situations the biocontrol organism itself may become a pest.

There are numerous examples of experimental biocontrol treatments for fungal and bacterial plant root diseases, though on a practical level there are less examples than for control of insect pests. Plant root diseases can often be controlled by management practices such as rotation with a non-host crop or by several years of crop monoculture, a practice which can lead to the build-up of a disease-suppressive soil (Hornby, 1983). Microbially mediated disease suppression can also occur in soil-less potting mixes (Hoitink and Fahy, 1986). Fungicides (e.g. Baytan for control of take-all) are used for control of disease, but success has been limited especially when applied to field crops. Biological control agents used to control soil-borne root diseases are most commonly soil bacteria or fungi.

On the whole, there are relatively few publications dealing with risk assessment in the literature on biocontrol. Recent papers include that by de Jong et al (1990). The need for risk assessment is now much greater, particularly as genetic manipulation is beginning to be used more often in biological control (Jones and Kerr, 1989; Ryder and Jones, 1991). The use of recombinant DNA technology brings its own risks and benefits. Given that there are both risks and benefits for pest control methods, procedures for their estimation are desirable.

Type
Chapter
Information
Biological Control
Benefits and Risks
, pp. 209 - 216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×