1993. Experiments on the difference between willingness to pay and willingness to accept. Land Economics. 69. 416–427., , and
1998. Sharing with the Kanis: a case study from India. Secretariat to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Fourth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the CBD, Bratislava, Slovakia.
2001. Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2002. Bioprospecting, benefit sharing, and biotechnological capacity building. World Development. 30 (8). 1355–1368.
2003. User Measures. Tokyo: United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies Report., and
2000. Is bioprospecting a viable strategy for conserving tropical ecosystems?Ecological Economics. 34. 293–300. and
1999. On biodiversity access, intellectual property rights and conservation. Ecological Economics. 29. 391–403.
2003. NGOs and the process of prior informed consent in bioprospecting research: the Maya ICBG project in Chiapas, Mexico. International Social Science. 55 (4). 629–638. and
2000. Indigenous medical knowledge: the law and politics of protection. Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre seminar. St Peter's College, Oxford. 25 January.
2003. Integrating conservation and development: a case of institutional misfit. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 1 (9). 479–487.
Brush, S. B. 1996. Is common heritage outmoded? In and (eds.). Valuing Local Knowledge: Indigenous People and Intellectual Property Rights. Washington, DC: Island Press.
1998. Bio-cooperation and the benefits of crop genetic resources: the case of Mexican maize. World Development. 26. 755–766.
2002. The Lighthouse and the Potato: Internalizing the Value of Crop Genetic Diversity. University of Massachussets at Amherst: Political Economy Research Institute Working Paper No. 37.
2001. The social value of biodiversity in new pharmaceutical product research. Environmental and Resource Economics. 18 (1). 1–17. and
Dedeurwaerdere, T. 2004. Bioprospecting, intellectual property law and evolutionary economics: the stake of a theory of reflexive governance. In , and (eds.). Innovative Roles of Biological Resources Centres. Tsukuba, Japan: World Federation for Culture Collections. 389–395.
2005. From bioprospecting to reflexive governance. Ecological Economics. 53 (4). 473–491.
2005. The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1988. Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature. 26 (3). 1120–1171.
2000. Traditional knowledge, intellectual property and biopiracy: is a global bio-collecting society the answer?European Intellectual Property Review. 6. 245–250.
2003. The Economic Dynamics of Environmental Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dutfield, G. 2002a. Literature survey on intellectual property rights and sustainable human development Geneva: UNCTAD www.iprsonline.org/unctadictsd/docs/bioblipr.pdf
Dutfield, G. 2002b. 'Protecting traditional knowledge and folklore: A review of progress in diplomacy and policy formulation. UNCTAD/ICTSD Capacity Building Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development.
Dyer, G. A., Taylor, J. E. and Yúnez, A. 2000. Who pays the cost of in situ conservation?. Paper presented at the Symposium ‘Scientific basis of participatory plant breeding and conservation of genetic resources’. Oaxtepec, Mexico.
2005. Imperfect Insitutions: Possibilities and Limits of Reform. Ann Harbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
1994. Biotic exploration fund- protecting biodiversity through chemical prospecting. BioScience. 44 (2). 95–98. and
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, E., Holling, C. S., Walker, B., Bengtsson, J., Berkes, F., Colding, J., Danell, K., Falkenmark, M., Gordon, L., Kasperson, R., Kautsky, N., Kinzig, A., Levin, S., Mäler, K-G., Moberg, F., Ohlsson, L., Olsson, P., Ostrom, E., Reid, W., Rockström, J., Savenije, H. and Svedin, U. 2002. Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations. Scientific Background Paper on Resilience for the process of The World Summit on Sustainable Development on behalf of The Environmental Advisory Council to the Swedish Government.
Goeschl, T. and Swanson, T. 2002. On the economic limits of technological potential: will industry resolve the resistance problem? In (ed.). The Economics of Managing Biotechnologies. Dordrecht/London/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 99–128.
Guerin-McManus, M., Nnadozie, K. C. and Laird, S. A. 2002. ‘Sharing financial benefits: trust funds for biodiversity prospecting’. In (ed.). Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge: Equitable Partnership in Practice. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd. 333–359.
2004. Overlapping public and private governance: can forest certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime?. Global Environmental Politics. 4 (2). 75–99.
Gupta, A. K. 2002. Value Addition to Local Kani Tribal Knowledge: Patenting, Licensing and Benefit-Sharing. IIMA Working Paper No. 2002–08–02. Ahmedabad: Indian Institute of Management.
Gupta A. K. 2004. The role of intellectual property rights in the sharing of benefits arising from the use of biological resources and associated traditional knowledge. World Intellectual Property Organization publications No. 769 (E).
1991. Statistical efficiency of double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 73. 1255–1263., and
2002. Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge. Equitable Partnerships in Practice. People and Plants Handbook. London: Earthscan. (ed.).
2000. Bioprospecting: lessons from benefit-sharing experiences. International Journal of Biotechnology. 2(1/2/3). 132–144.
1997. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: some evidence of an endowment effect. Applied Economics. 29. 411–417.
1999. For whose benefit? Limits to the sharing in the bioprospecting regime. Environmental Politics. 8 (4). 35–65.
1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap. and
1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2000. Pathways for environmental evaluation: a walk in the (Hanging) Gardens of Babylon. Ecological Economics. 34. 175–193.
1984. The value of conserving genetic resources. Washington, DC: US Department of Interior. National Park Service.
Pearce, D. W. 2006. Do we really care about biodiversity? In , and (eds.). Frontiers in Biodiversity Economics. Chapter 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pearce, D. W. and Purushothaman, S. 1992. Preserving biological diversity: the economic value of pharmaceutical plants. Discussion Paper: 92–27. CSERGE, London.
2002. Equitability Sharing Benefits from the Utilization of Natural Genetic Resources: The Brazilian Interpretation of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Paper presented at the 6th conference of the parties of the Convention of Biological Diversity. The Hague, The Netherlands., and
1989. The Economic Value of Biodiversity among Medicinal Plants. Paris: OECD.
Pushpangadan, P. 2000. Pushpangadan model of benefit-sharing. Lucknow, India: National Botanical Research Institute. http://www.nbri-lko.org.
1988. Arogyappacha (Trichopus zeylanicus): The ginseng of Kani tribes of Agasthyar Hills (Kerala) for evergreen health and vitality. Ancient Sciences of Life. 7. 13–16., , , , , , and
RAFI 1996. Biopiracy Update: RAFI Communique. Ottawa: Rural Advancement Foundation International.
2001. Note and comment: market realities versus indigenous equities. Brooklyn Journal of International Law. 26. 1147–1175.
2000. Valuing research leads: bioprospecting and the conservation of genetic resources. Journal of Political Economy. 108 (1). 173–206. and
2000. Of green tulips and legal kudzu: repackaging rights in subpatentable innovation. Vanderbilt Law Review. 53. 1743.
1993. Biodiversity Prospecting: Using Genetic Resources for Sustainable Development. Washington, DC: World Resource Institute., , , , , and
Sahai, S. 2000. Commercialisation of Indigenous Knowledge and Benefit Sharing. UNCTAD Expert Meeting on Systems and National Experiences for Protecting Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices. Geneva.
Sheldon, J. W. and Balick, M. J. 1995. Ethnobotany and the search for balance between use and conservation. In (ed.). Intellectual Property Rights and Biodiversity Conservation: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Values of Medicinal Plants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1997. The Enclosure and Recovery of the Commons. New Delhi: Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology., , , and
1994. Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept. American Economic Review. 84. 255–270., , , and
1996. Tropical forest protection: an empirical analysis of the costs borne by local people. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 31. 129–144. and
2005. Biodiversity conservation, access and benefit sharing and traditional knowledge. Ecological Economics. 53 (4)., and
1996. Valuing biodiversity for use in pharmaceutical research. Journal of Political Economy. 104. 163–185., and
2000. Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland recreation. Ecological Economics. 34. 195–215.
2000. Responding to Bioprospecting: From Biodiversity in the South to Medicines in the North. Oslo: Spartacus Vorlag. and
1997. Global Action for Biodiversity. London: Earthscan.
2000. Property rights involving plant genetic resources: implications of ownership for economic efficiency. Ecological Economics. 23 (1). 75–92.
Swanson, T. and Goeschl, T. 1998. The management of genetic resources for agriculture: ecology and information, externalities and policies. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, CSERGE Working Paper, University College London.
1999. The Commercial Use of Biodiversity – Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-Sharing. London: Earthscan. and
2002. Biopiracy: distrust widens the rich-poor divide. Molecular Therapy. 5 (2). 95.
WGF 2003. Western Ghats Forum website: http://www.westernghatsforum.org/ Last accessed November 2005.