Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2018
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Believing in ShakespeareStudies in Longing, pp. 299 - 319Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Primary Sources
A myraculous, and monstrous, but yet most true, and certayne discourse, of a woman (now to be seene in London) of the age of threescore yeares, or there abouts, in the midst of whose fore-head (by the wonderfull worke of God) there groweth out a crooked horne, of foure ynches long. (London: Thomas Orwin, 1588).Google Scholar
A Tragedie called Oedipus, available at www.yale.edu/elizabethanclub/oedipus.html.Google Scholar
Ahl, Frederick M., trans. and ed., The Two Faces of Oedipus: Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus and Seneca’s Oedipus (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Ambrose, Isaac, Media: The Middle Things, in Reference to the First and Last Things (London, 1652).Google Scholar
Andrews, Lancelot, The Copie of a Sermon Preached on Good Friday Last before His Majesty (London, 1604).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Poetics, in Barnes, Jonathan, ed., The Complete Works of Aristotle, Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vols. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Augustine, , The Confessions, trans. and ed. Burton, Philip (New York, NY: Knopf, 2001).Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis, The Advancement of Learning, ed. Gould, Stephen Jay (New York, NY: Modern Library, 2001).Google Scholar
Battles, Ford Lewis, and Hugo, Andre Malan (eds.), Calvin’s Commentary on Seneca’s De Clementia (Leiden: Brill, 1969).Google Scholar
Beard, Thomas, The Theatre of God’s Judgments: or, a Collection of Histories, trans. Out of the French, and Augmented by T. Beard (London, 1597).Google Scholar
Benson, George. A Sermon Preached at Paules Crosse the Seaventh of May, 1609 (London, 1609).Google Scholar
Calvin, John, Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, and Luke (Edinburgh: General Books, 2009), 3 vols.Google Scholar
Calvin, John, Commentary on the Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, trans. Pringle, John (San Bernadino, CA: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform, 2015).Google Scholar
Calvin, John, Institutes of the Christian Religion … seen and allowed according to the order of the Queen Majesty’s instructions, trans. Norton, T. (London, 1561).Google Scholar
Calvin, John, Concerning the Eternal Predestination of God (Westminster: John Knox Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Calvin, John, Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, and Luke (Edinburgh: General Books, 2009), 3 vols.,Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret, in Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage, 1623–1692, ed. Vickers, Brian (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974), six vols., vol. 1.Google Scholar
Deacon, John, A very godly and most necessary sermon, full of Singular comfort for so many as see their sundry sins, and are inwardly afflicted with a conscience and a feeling thereof (London, 1586).Google Scholar
Dering, Edmund, M. Derings Workes, more at large then ever hath here-to-fore been printed in any one Volume (London, 1597).Google Scholar
Dialogue Concerning Heresies, ed. Gottschalk, Mary (New York, NY: Scepter Publishers, 2006).Google Scholar
Documents of the English Reformation, ed. Bray, Gerald (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Dryden, John. “An Essay of Dramatic Poesie,” in The Great Critics: An Anthology of Literary Criticism, ed. Smith, James Harry et al. (New York: W. W. Norton, 1932), pp. 255–310.Google Scholar
Sir. Elyot, Thomas, The Boke Named the Governour, vol. 1, ed. Croft, Henry Herbert Stephen (London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Co., 1883).Google Scholar
Featly, Daniel, Cygnea Cantio: or, learned decisions,… delivered by King James,… a few weeks before his death (London, 1629).Google Scholar
Freeman, John, The Comforter: or a comfortable Treatise, wherein are contained many reasons…to assure the forgiveness of sins (London, 1600).Google Scholar
Fulke, William, Comfortable Sermon of Faith in Temptations and Afflictions (London, 1586).Google Scholar
Gleanings of a Few Scattered Ears, During the Period of the Reformation, ed. Gorham, George Cornelius (London, 1857).Google Scholar
Golding, Arthur, trans., The XV Bookes of P. Ouidius Naso, Entytled Metamorphosis, Translated oute of Latin into English Meeter (London, 1567).Google Scholar
Heinsius, Daniel, On Plot in Tragedy (1611), trans. Sellin, Paul and McManmon, John J. (Northridge, CA: San Fernando Valley State College, 1971).Google Scholar
Hooker, Richard, A Learned and Comfortable Sermon of the Certaintie and Perpetuitie of Faith in the Elect (Oxford, 1612), in The Folger Library Edition of the Works of Richard Hooker, gen. ed. W. Speed Hill (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990), 5 vols., vol. v, ed. Laetitia Yeandle and Egil Grislis.Google Scholar
Hooker, Richard, The Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, in The Folger Library Edition of the Works of Richard, gen. ed. Speed Hill, W. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990), 5 vols., vol. i.Google Scholar
Houlbrooke, Ralph, Death, religion, and the family in England, 1480–1750, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
James, Henry, “The Art of Fiction,” http://public.wsu.edu/~campbelld/amlit/artfiction.html.Google Scholar
Jewel, John, An Apology for the Church of England, ed. Booty, John, Folger, Shakespeare Library (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben, Cynthia’s Revels, in Ben Jonson, ed. Hereford, C. H. and Simpson, Percy, 11 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1932).Google Scholar
Martin, Gregory, The Holie Bible Faithfully Translated into English out of the Authentical Latin … By the English College of Douay (Doway, 1609–10).Google Scholar
Melanchthon, Philip, Loci Communes, in Melanchthon and Bucer, ed. Pauck, Wilhelm (London: Westminster Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas F. (ed.), “A Discourse of Conscience,” in William Perkins, 1558–1602, English Puritanist, His Pioneer Works on Casuisity: “A Discourse of Conscience” and “The Whole Treatise of Cases of Conscience (The Hague: Nieuwkoop and B. de Graaf, 1966).Google Scholar
Milton, John, Complete Poems and Major Prose, ed. Hughes, Merritt (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar
Michel de, Montaigne, “Apology for Raymond Sebond,” in Essays, II: 12, in The Complete Essays of Montaigne, trans. Frame, Donald M. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
de Mornay, Phillipe, A Work Concerning the Trewnesse of the Christian Religion, Written in French: Against Atheists, Epicures, Paynims, Jewes, Mahumetists, and other Infidels, trans. Sidney, PhilipSir and Golding, Arthur (London, 1587).Google Scholar
Neville, Alexander, The Lamentable Tragedie of Oedipus the Son of Laius King of Thebes out of Seneca (London, 1563).Google Scholar
Parr, Katherine, Complete Works and Correspondence, ed. Mueller, Janel (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Perkins, William, Resolution to the countryman, proving it utterly unlawful to buy or use our yearly Prognostications (London, 1588).Google Scholar
Perkins, William, Foundation of Christian Religion Gathered into Six Principles, in The Work of William Perkins, ed. Breward, Ian (Abingdon: Sutton Courtenay Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Perkins, William, A Grain of Mustard Seed, in The Work of William Perkins, ed. Breward, Ian (Abingdon: Sutton Courtenay Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Perkins, William, A Treatise Tending Unto A Declaration Whether a Man be in the Estate of Damnation, or in the Estate of Grace (London, 1595).Google Scholar
Plato, , The Republic, trans. with an introduction by Lee, Desmon (New York, NY: Penguin Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Rabelais, François, Gargantua and Pantagruel, trans. Urquart, ThomasSir and de Motteux, Peter [1693] (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1934).Google Scholar
Seneca, , Oedipus, Agamemnon, Thyestes, Hercules on Oeta, Octavia, ed. and trans. Fitch, John G., Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Seneca, , Oedipus in The Two Faces of Oedipus: Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus and Seneca’s Oedipus, trans. Aul, Frederick M. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Scott, William, The Model of Poesy, ed. Alexander, Gavin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, The New Cambridge Shakespeare, ed. Braunmuller, A. R. and Gibbons, Brian, 2nd edn, 41 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, All’s Well That Ends Well, ed. Fraser, Russell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William, As You Like It, ed. Hattaway, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, Cymbeline, ed. Butler, Martin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, The First Part of King Henry IV, ed. Weil, Herbert and Weil, Judith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, The First Part of King Henry VI, ed. Hattaway, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, The First Quarto of King Lear, ed. Halio, Jay L. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, ed. Edwards, Philip (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, King Henry V, ed. Gurr, Andrew (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, King John, ed. Beaurline, L. A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William, King Richard II, ed. Gurr, Andrew (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, King Richard III, ed. Lull, Janis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, Love’s Labour’s Lost, ed. Carroll, William C. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, The Merchant of Venice, ed. Mahood, M. M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, ed. Foakes, R. A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, Much Ado About Nothing, ed. Mares, F. H. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, The Second Part of King Henry VI, ed. Hattaway, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William, The Sonnets, ed. Evans, G. Blakemore (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, The Tempest, ed. Lindley, David (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, The Third Part of King Henry VI, ed. Hattaway, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, The Tragedy of King Lear, ed. Halio, Jay L. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, Twelfth Night or What You Will, ed. Donno, Elizabeth Story (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, The Winter’s Tale, ed. Snyder, Susan and Curren-Aquino, Deborah T. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Sidney, Sir Philip, A Defence of Poetry, ed. van Dorsten, J.A. (Oxford University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Sophocles, , Oedipus Tyrannus, in The Two Faces of Oedipus: Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus and Seneca’s Oedipus, trans. Aul, Frederick M. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Sparke, Thomas, A Short Treatise, very comfortable for all those Christians that be troubles and disquieted in their consciences with the sight of their own infirmities (London, 1580).Google Scholar
Spedding, James, Ellis, Robert Leslie, and Heath, Douglas Denon (eds.), The Works of Francis Bacon (Boston, MA: Brown & Taggard, 1860–64).Google Scholar
Spedding, James, Ellis, Robert Leslie, and Heath, Douglas Denon (eds.), The Letters and the Life of Francis Bacon, 15 vols. (London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts, 1861).Google Scholar
Tyndale, William, An Answer unto Sir Thomas More’s Dialogue (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Tyndale, William, The Fyrst Parte of the Bible Called the.v. Bookes of Moses (London, 1551).Google Scholar
Whythorne, Thomas, The Autobiography of Thomas Whythorne, ed. Osborne, James M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Zwingli, Ulrich. A Short Pathway to the Understanding of the Scriptures (Worcester, 1550).Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Adams, Barry B. Coming-to-Know: Recognition and the Complex Plot in Shakespeare (New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2000).Google Scholar
Adleman, Janet, Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to The Tempest (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Aers, David, “A Whisper in the Ear of Early Modernists; or Reflections on Literary Critics’ Writing ‘the History of the Subject,’” in Culture and History 1350–1600: Essays on English Communities, Identities and Writing, ed. Aers, David (New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992), pp. 117–202.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio, Pilate and Jesus, trans. Kotsko, Adam (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B., “Toys, Prologues and the Great Amiss: Shakespeare’s Tragic Openings,” in Shakespearean Tragedy, Stratford-upon-Avon Studies 20, (New York, Edward Arnold, 1984), pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Altman, Joel B., The Improbability of Othello: Rhetorical Anthropology and Shakespearean Selfhood (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Altman, Joel B., The Tudor Play of Mind: Rhetorical Inquiry and the Development of Elizabethan Drama (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Asquith, Claire, Shadowplay: The Hidden Beliefs and Coded Politics of William Shakespeare (New York, NY: Public Affairs Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. W., Shakespeare’s Five-Act Structure: Shakespeare’s Early Plays in the Background of Renaissance Theories of Five-Act Structure from 1570 (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Barber, C. L., Shakespeare’s Festive Comedy: A Study of Dramatic Form and Its Relation to Social Custom (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Barkan, Leonard, “Diana and Actaeon: Myth as Synthesis,” English Literary Renaissance 10(3) (1980): 317–59.Google Scholar
Barker, Francis, The Tremulous Private Body (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Barker, Francis, and Hulme, Peter, “‘Nymphs and Reapers Heavily Vanish’: The Discursive Contexts of The Tempest,” in Alternative Shakespeares, ed. Drakakis, John, 2nd edn (London: Routledge, 2001), pp. 194–208.Google Scholar
Barnaby, Andrew, and Schnell, Lisa J., Literate Experience: The Work of Knowing in Seventeenth-Century Writing (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).Google Scholar
Barton, Anne, “Keys to Shakespeare,” Review of Shakespeare’s Tragic Practice, by Evans, Bertrand, London Review of Books 2(11) (1980): 12–14.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. “Was Shakespeare an Essex Man?” in 2008 Lectures, Proceedings of the British Academy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Beauregard, David N., Catholic Theology in Shakespeare’s Plays (Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Beckwith, Sarah, Shakespeare and the Grammar of Forgiveness (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Belsey, Catherine, The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama (London: Methuen, 1985).Google Scholar
Bender, John, “Enlightenment Fiction and the Scientific Hypothesis,” Representations 61 (1998): 6–28.Google Scholar
Benson, Sean, “The Problem of ‘Calvinism’: English Theologies of Predestination c. 1580–1630,” in Belief and Practice in Reformation England: Essays in Honor of Patrick Collinson, ed. Wabuda, Susan and Litzenberger, Caroline (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998), pp. 229–49.Google Scholar
Berger, Harry Jr., “Textual Dramaturgy: Representing the Limits of Theater in Richard II,” Theater Journal 39 (1987): 135–55.Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren (ed.), Compassion: The Culture and Politics of an Emotion (London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Bevington, David, “The Debate about Shakespeare and Religion,” in Shakespeare and Early Modern Religion, ed. Loewenstein, David and Witmore, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 23–39.Google Scholar
Bevington, David, Mankind to Marlowe: Growth of Structure in the Popular Drama of Tudor England (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Bishop, Tom, Shakespeare and the Theater of Wonder (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Blisset, W. F., “Recognition in King Lear,” in Some Facets of King Lear: Essays in Prismatic Criticism, ed. Colie, Rosalie L. and Flahiff, F. T. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974), pp. 103–16.Google Scholar
Bohannan, Laura, “Shakespeare in the Bush,” reprinted in Critical Essays on Shakespeare’s Hamlet, ed. Kastan, David Scott (New York: G. K. Hall, 1995).Google Scholar
Boitani, Piero, The Tragic and the Sublime in Medieval Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Boose, Lynda, “Othello’s Handkerchief: ‘The Recognizance and Pledge of Love,’” English Literary Renaissance 5 (1975): 360–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, Stephen, King Lear, Macbeth, Indefinition and Tragedy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Braden, Gordon, Renaissance Tragedy and the Senecan Tradition: Anger’s Privilege (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Bradley, A. C., Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth, 2nd edn (London: Macmillan, 1960).Google Scholar
Brand, John, Observations on the Popular Antiquities of Great Britain, 3 vols. (London: H. G. Bohn, 1900).Google Scholar
Brooke, John Hedley, “Religious Belief and the Content of the Sciences,” Osiris 16 (2001): 3–28.Google Scholar
Brower, Reuben A. Hero and Saint: Shakespeare and the Graeco-Roman Heroic Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Brown, Paul, “’This Thing of Darkness I Acknowledge Mine’: The Tempest and the Discourse of Colonialism,” in Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism, ed. Dollimore, Jonathan and Sinfield, Alan, 2nd edn (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994), pp. 48–71.Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas, “The Horn of Plenty: Cuckoldry and Capital in the Drama of the Age of Shakespeare,” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 30(2) (1990): 195–215.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth, “Othello: An Essay to Illustrate a Method,” in Kenneth Burke on Shakespeare, ed. Newstol, Scott L. (West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press, 2007), pp. 65–100.Google Scholar
Calderwood, James, Shakespearean Metadrama (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Cartwright, Kent, Shakespearean Tragedy and Its Double: The Rhythms of Audience Response (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Cartwright, Kent, Theater and Humanism: English Drama in the Sixteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Casey, Edward, The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley, Disowning Knowledge in Six Plays of Shakespeare (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Cefalu, Paul, “Rethinking the discourse of colonialism in its own terms: Shakespeare’s The Tempest, Captain John Smith’s Virginia Narratives and the English Response to Vagrancy,” Shakespeare Studies 28 (2000): 85–199.Google Scholar
Clegg, Cyndia, “Truth, Lies and the Law of Slander in Much Ado About Nothing,” in The Law in Shakespeare, ed. Jordan, Constance and Cunningham, Karen (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), pp. 167–188.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, “Biographia Literaria,” in Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ed. Jackson, H. J., The Oxford Authors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Coleridge’s Shakespearean Criticism, ed. Raynor, Thomas Middleton (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1930).Google Scholar
Collinson, Patrick, “The Life and Letters of Godly Master Dering,” in Godly People, Essays on English Protestantism and Puritanism (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2003).Google Scholar
Collinson, Patrick, “Literature and Religion,” in Cambridge History of Early Modern English Literature, ed. Loewenstein, David and Mueller, Janel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Como, David, Blown by the Spirit: Puritanism and the Emergence of an Antinomian Underground in Pre-Civil-War England (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Comparetti, Domenico, Vergil in the Middle Ages, trans. Benecke, E. F. M. (London: Sonnenschein, 1895).Google Scholar
Cox, John D., Seeming Knowledge: Shakespeare’s Skeptical Faith (Baylor, TX: Baylor University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Cummings, Brian, The Literary Culture of the Reformation: Grammar and Grace (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Cummings, Brian, Mortal Thoughts: Religion, Secularity and Identity in Shakespeare and Early Modern Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Curran, John E. Jr., Hamlet, Protestantism, and the Mourning of Contingency: Not to Be (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2006).Google Scholar
Danson, Lawrence, Shakespeare’s Dramatic Genres (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, “Baconian Facts, Academic Civility, and the Prehistory of Objectivity,” Annals of Scholarship 8 (1991): 337–64.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective,” Social Studies of Science 22 (1992): 597–618.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750 (New York, NY: Zone Books, 1998).Google Scholar
Davidson, Clifford, “The History of King Lear and The Problem of Belief,” Christianity and Literature 45(3–4) (1996): 285–301.Google Scholar
Dawson, Anthony, “The Secular Theater,” in Shakespeare and Religious Change, ed. Graham, Kenneth J. E. and Collington, Philip D. (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), pp. 238–60.Google Scholar
Dawson, Anthony, and Yachnin, Paul, The Culture of Playgoing in Shakespeare’s England: a Collaborative Debate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta, Hamlet without Hamlet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Desmet, Christy, Reading Shakespeare’s Characters: Rhetoric, Ethics, Identity (Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Diehl, Huston, Staging Reform, Reforming the Stage (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Dollimore, Jonathan, “King Lear (c. 1605–6) and Essentialist Humanism,” in Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Duffy, Eamon, The Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England 1400–1580 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
During, Simon, Modern Enchantments: The Cultural Power of Secular Magic (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Dusenbury, D. L., “Pilate Schemes,” review of Pilate and Jesus, by Agamben, Giorgio, Times Literary Supplement 5895 (25 March 2016): 15.Google Scholar
Elton, William, King Lear and the Gods (San Marino, CA: Huntington Library Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Elton, William, “Double Plot in King Lear,” in King Lear: A Casebook, ed. Kermode, Frank (London: Macmillan, 1969), pp. 245–64.Google Scholar
Escolme, Bridget, Talking to the Audience: Shakespeare, Performance, Self (New York, NY: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Evans, Bertrand, Shakespeare’s Tragic Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Feeney, Denis, Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Felperin, Howard, Shakespearean Representation: Mimesis and Modernity in Elizabethan Tragedy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Finglass, O. J., “The Textual Transmission of Sophocles’ Dramas” in A Companion to Sophocles, ed. Ormond, Kirk (Oxford: Blackwell, 2012).Google Scholar
Foakes, R. A., Hamlet vs. Lear: Cultural Politics and Shakespeare’s Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Forker, Charles R. “Unstable Identity in Shakespeare’s Richard II, Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature 54(1) (2000): 3–21.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious, ed. Strachey, James (New York, NY: W. W. Norton, 1971).Google Scholar
Frye, Northrup, Anatomy of Criticism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Frye, Northrup, “Fools of Time,” in Northrup Frye’s Writings on Shakespeare and the Renaissance, ed. Grande, Troni Y. and Sherbert, Garry (Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Frye, Roland Mushat, Shakespeare and Christian Doctrine (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Gillies, John, Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Gondreau, Paul, The Passions of Christ’s Soul in the Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas (Münster: Aschendorff, 2002).Google Scholar
Graham, Robert Bates, and Richter, Gregory C., “The Capon Theory of the Cuckold’s Horns: Confirmation or Conjecture,” Journal of American Folklore 110(395) (1987): 58–63.Google Scholar
Grantley, Darryll, London in Early Modern English Drama: Representing the Built Environment (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).Google Scholar
Greaves, R. L., “Puritanism and Science: The Anatomy of a Controversy,” Journal of the History of Ideas 30 (1969): 346–60.Google Scholar
Green, Larry, “Pathos,” in Oxford Encyclopedia of Rhetoric, ed. Sloane, Thomas (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2001), pp. 554–69.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen, Hamlet in Purgatory (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen, “Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic Colonialism in The Tempest” in First Images of America: the Impact of the New World on the Old, ed. Chiapelli, Frederic, Allen, Michael J. B., and Benson, Robert L. (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1996), pp. 561–80.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen, Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen, “Introduction” to Much Ado About Nothing, in The Norton Shakespeare (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997)Google Scholar
Gregory, Brad, The Unintended Reformation: How a Religious Revolution Secularized Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Gross, Daniel, A Secret History of Emotion (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Grossman, Jonathan, Charles Dickens’ Networks: Public Transport and the Novel (Oxford; Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian, The Emergence of Probability: A Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Hadfield, Andrew, Literature, Politics and National Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Haigh, Christopher, The Plain Man’s Pathways to Heaven: Kinds of Christianity in Post-Reformation England, 1570–1640 (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Hamlin, William M., Tragedy and Scepticism in Shakespeare’s England (New York, NY: Palgrave, 2005).Google Scholar
Hammer, Paul. “Shakespeare’s Richard II, the Play of 7 February 1601, and the Essex Rising,” Shakespeare Quarterly 59(1) (2008): 1–35.Google Scholar
Hanson, Elizabeth, Discovering the Subject in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, The Fall of Man and the Foundations of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Harvey, John, “A Note on Shakespeare and Sophocles,” Essays in Criticism 27 (1977): 259–70.Google Scholar
Harvey, Susan Ashbrook, Scenting Salvation: Ancient Christianity and the Olfactory Imagination (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Hassel, R. Chris, Faith and Folly in Shakespeare’s Comedies (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Hawkes, Terence, Shakespeare’s Talking Animals (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1974).Google Scholar
Heinemann, Margot, “Demystifying the Mystery of State: King Lear and the World Upside Down,” Shakespeare Survey 44 (1992).Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard, Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Higman, Francis, “Calvin’s Works in Translation,” in Calvinism in Europe, 1540–1620, ed. Pettegree, Andrew, Duke, Alistair, and Lewis, Gillian (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher, The Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Hirsch, James, Shakespeare and the History of Soliloquies (Madison, WI: Associated University Presses, 2003).Google Scholar
Honigmann, E. A. J., Seven Tragedies Revisited: The Dramatist’s Manipulation of Response, new edn [1976] (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002).Google Scholar
Honigmann, E. A. J., Shakespeare: The Lost Years, 2nd edn (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Houlbrooke, Ralph, Death, Religion, and the Family in England, 1480–1750 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Hungerford, Amy, Postmodern Belief: American Literature and Religion since 1960 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Hunter, Robert G., Shakespeare and the Comedy of Forgiveness (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Hunter, Robert G., Shakespeare and the Mystery of God’s Judgments (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Hutson, Lorna, The Invention of Suspicion: Law and Mimesis in Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Hyde, Isabel. “The Tragic Flaw: Is It a Tragic Error?” Modern Language Review 58(3) (1963): 321–25.Google Scholar
Irish, Bradley J. “Writing Woodstock: The Prehistory of Richard II and Shakespeare’s Dramatic Method,” Renaissance Drama 41(1–2) (2013): 131–49.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I., Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650–1750 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Jackson, Ken, and Marotti, Arthur F., “The Turn to Religion in Early Modern English Studies,” Criticism 46 (2004): 167–90.Google Scholar
Jackson, Ken, and Marotti, Arthur F. (eds.), Shakespeare and Early Modern Religion: Early Modern and Postmodern Perspectives (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Jaffa, Harry V., “The Limits of Politics: King Lear, Act I, Scene i,” in Shakespeare’s Politics, ed. Bloom, Allan with Jaffa, Harry V. (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1964), pp. 113–45.Google Scholar
James, Mervyn, Society, Politics and Culture: Studies in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
James, Susan, Passion and Action: the Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa, and Stewart, Alan, Hostage to Fortune: The Troubled Life of Francis Bacon (New York, NY: Hill & Wang, 1999).Google Scholar
Jenkins, Harold, Structural Problems in Shakespeare: lectures and essays, ed. Honigmann, Ernst (London: Arden, 2000).Google Scholar
Jochum, Klaus Peter, Discrepant Awareness: Studies in English Renaissance Drama (Frankfurt: Lang, 1979).Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel, “Preface to Shakespeare.” in Selections from Johnson on Shakespeare, ed. Bronson, Bertrand H. with O’Meara, Jean M. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel, Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare, ed. Woudhuysen, Henry, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Paul A. Lear’s Self-Discovery (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Joseph, Sister Mariam, Shakespeare’s Use of the Arts of Language (Eastford, CT: Martino Fine Books, 2013).Google Scholar
Kahn, Coppélia, “The Absent Mother in King Lear,” in Rewriting the Renaissance, The Discovery of Sexual Difference in Early Modern England, ed. Ferguson, Margaret, Quilligan, Maureen, and Vickers, Nancy. J. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1986), pp. 33–49Google Scholar
Kahn, Coppélia, Man’s Estate: Masculine Identity in Shakespeare (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria, The Future of Illusion: Political Theology and Early Modern Texts (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Kaiser, Scott, “Rebusing the Fartuous Word: Malaforms and Malaprops in Shakespeare,” Voice and Speech Review 5(1) (2007): 276–80.Google Scholar
Kanoo, James, Image Ethics in Shakespeare and Spenser (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).Google Scholar
Karant-Nunn, Susan C., The Reformation of Feeling: Shaping the Religious Emotions in Early Modern Germany (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Kareem, Sarah, Eighteenth-Century Fiction and the Reinvention of Wonder (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott, Shakespeare and the Shapes of Time (Hanover, NH: University of New England Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott, A Will to Believe: Shakespeare and Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Kaufman, Peter Iver, “Much in Prayer: The Inward Researches of Elizabethan Protestants,” Journal of Religion 73(2) (1993): 163–82.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Peter Iver, Prayer, Despair and Drama (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Kendall, R. T., Calvin and English Calvinism to 1649 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Kiefer, Frederick, Fortune and Elizabethan Tragedy (San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1981).Google Scholar
Kisery, Andras, Hamlet’s Moment: Drama and Political Knowledge in Renaissance England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Knapp, Jeffrey, Shakespeare’s Tribe: Church, Nation and Theater in Renaissance England (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Knights, L. C., “King Lear,” in King Lear, Critical Essays, ed. Muir, Kenneth (London: Routledge, 1982).Google Scholar
Kott, Jan, “King Lear or Endgame,” in Shakespeare our Contemporary, trans. Taborksi, Boleslaw (Garden City, NJ: Doubleday, 1964).Google Scholar
Lake, Peter, Anglicans and Puritans? Presbyterianism and English Conformist Thought, Whitgift to Hooker (New York: HarperCollins, 1988).Google Scholar
Lake, Peter, “The Laudian Style: Order, Uniformity and the Pursuit of the Beauty of Holiness in the 1630s,” in The Early Stuart Church, 1603–42, ed. Fincham, Kenneth (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Lake, Peter, and Questier, Michael, The Antichrist’s Lewd Hat: Protestants, Papists and Players in Post-Reformation England (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Lander, Jesse M. “Thinking with Fairies: A Midsummer Night’s Dream and the Problem of Belief,” in Shakespeare Survey 65 (2013), 42–57.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard, A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline, The Serious Pleasures of Suspense: Victorian Realism and Narrative Doubt (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Levy, Fritz, Tudor Historical Thought (San Marino, CA: Huntington Library Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara, Protestant Poetics and the Seventeenth-century Religious Lyric (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Lewis, Jayne, Air’s Appearance: Literary Atmosphere in British Fiction, 1660–1794 (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Loewenstein, David, and Witmore, Michael C. (eds.), Shakespeare and Early Modern Religion (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Love, Genevieve. “Going Back to That Well: Richard II’s Deposition Scene,” in Richard II: New Critical Essays, ed. Lopez, Jeremy (London: Routledge, 2012), pp. 265–76.Google Scholar
Lupton, Julia Reinhard, Citizen-Saints: Shakespeare and Political Theology (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Lupton, Julia Reinhard, and Hammill, Graham (eds.), Political Theology and Early Modernity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Lupton, Julia Reinhard, and Reinhard, Kenneth, After Oedipus: Shakespeare in Psychoanalysis (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Lyons, Bridget Gellert, “The Subplot as Simplification in King Lear,” in Some Facets of King Lear: Essays in Prismatic Criticism, ed. Colie, Rosalie L. and Flahiff, F. T. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974), pp. 23–38.Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre Shauna, The Economy of Character: Novels, Market Culture, and the Business of Inner Meaning (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Mack, Maynard, King Lear in Our Time (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Mack, Maynard, “Engagement and Detachment in Shakespeare’s Plays,” in Essays on Shakespeare and Elizabethan Drama in Honor of Hardin Craig, ed. Hosely, Richard (Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, 1962), pp. 275–96.Google Scholar
Mack, Peter, Elizabethan Rhetoric, Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Marshall, Peter, “The Company of Heaven: Identity and Sociability in the English Protestant Afterlife c. 1560–1630,” Historical Reflections 26(2) (2000): 311–33.Google Scholar
Mascuch, Michael, Origins of the Individualist Self: Autobiography and Self-Identity in England, 1591–1771 (New York, NY: Polity Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Matheson, Lister M. “English Chronicle Contexts for Shakespeare’s Death of Richard II,” in From Page to Performance: Essays in Early English Drama, ed. Alford, John A. (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press, 1995), pp. 195–219.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen, Theology and Science in the Thought of Francis Bacon (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
Maus, Katherine Eisaman, Inwardness and Theater in the English Renaissance (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Maus, Katherine Eisaman, “Horns of Dilemma: Jealousy, Gender and Spectatorship in English Renaissance Drama,” English Literary History 54 (1987): 561–83.Google Scholar
Mayer, Jean-Christophe, Shakespeare’s Hybrid Faith: History, Religion and the Stage (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar
McCoy, Richard C., “Awakening Faith in The Winter’s Tale,” in Shakespeare and Early Modern Religion, ed. Loewenstein, David and Witmore, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 214–30.Google Scholar
McEachern, Claire, The Poetics of English Nationhood, 1590–1612 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
McEachern, Claire, “Fathering Herself: A Source Study of Shakespeare’s Feminism,” Shakespeare Quarterly 39(3) (1988): 269–90.Google Scholar
McEachern, Claire, and Shuger, Debora (eds.), Religion and Culture in Reformation England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
McKluskie, Kathleen, “The Patriarchal Bard: Feminist Criticism and Shakespeare’s King Lear and Measure for Measure,” in Political Shakespeare, ed. Dollimore, Jonathan and Sinfield, Alan (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1985).Google Scholar
McMullan, Gordon, Shakespeare and the Idea of Late Writing: Authorship in the Proximity of Death (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
McNamer, Sarah, Affective Meditation and the Invention of Medieval Compassion (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Mellinkoff, Ruth, The Horned Moses in Medieval Thought and Art (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Merton, Robert, Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century England (New York, NY: Howard Fertig, 1970).Google Scholar
Miller, Perry, The New England Mind: the Seventeenth Century (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Milward, Robert, Shakespeare’s Religious Background (London: Sidgewick & Jackson, 1973).Google Scholar
Miola, Robert, Shakespeare and Classical Tragedy: The Influence of Seneca (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Monta, Susannah Brietz, Martyrdom and Literature in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Monta, Susannah Brietz, “‘It Is Requir’d You Do Awake Your Faith’: Belief in Shakespeare’s Theater,” in Religion and Drama in Early Modern England: the Performance of Religion on the Renaissance Stage, ed. Degenhardt, Jane Hwang and Williamson, Elizabeth (London: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 115–138.Google Scholar
Montrose, Louis, The Purpose of Playing: Shakespeare and the Cultural Politics of the Elizabethan Theatre (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Montrose, Louis, “The Purpose of Playing: Reflections on Shakespearean Anthropology,” Helios 7 (1979–80): 51–74.Google Scholar
Morrison, Karl. F., “I Am You”: The Hermeneutics of Empathy in Western Literature, Theology and Art (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Mullaney, Stephen, The Place of the Stage: License, Play and Power on the Renaissance Stage (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Mullaney, Stephen, The Reformation of Emotions (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Muller, Richard A., Christ and the Decree (Durham, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Murray, Molly, The Poetics of Conversion in Early Modern England: Verse and Change from Donne to Dryden (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Orlin, Lena Cowen, Locating Privacy in Tudor London (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Palfrey, Simon, and Stern, Tiffany, Shakespeare in Parts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Palmer, D. J., “The Self-Awareness of the Tragic Hero,” in Shakespearean Tragedy, Stratford-upon-Avon Studies 20 (New York: Edward Arnold, 1984), pp. 129–58.Google Scholar
Partee, Charles, Calvin and Classical Philosophy (Leiden, Netherlands: E. J. Brill, 1977).Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee, “On the Margin: Postmodernism, Ironic History and Medieval Studies,” Speculum 65 (1990): 87–108.Google Scholar
Pavel, Thomas G., The Poetics of Plot: The Case of English Renaissance Drama, Theory and History of Literature volume 18 (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Peat, Derek, “‘And That’s True Too’: King Lear and the Tension of Uncertainty,” in Aspects of King Lear: Articles Reprinted from Shakespeare Survey, ed. Muir, Kenneth and Wells, Stanley (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Perry, Nandra, Imitatio Christi: The Poetics of Piety in Early Modern England (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Pinciss, Gerald M., Forbidden Matter: Religion in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries (Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Poole, Kristen, Supernatural Environments in Shakespeare’s England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary, A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society (Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Pye, Christopher, The Vanishing: Shakespeare, the Subject and Early Modern Culture (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Quiring, Björn (ed.), “If Then the World a Theatre Present …”: Revisions of the Theatrum Mundi Metaphor in Early Modern England (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014).Google Scholar
Rabkin, Norman, Shakespeare and the Common Understanding (New York, NY: Macmillan, 1967).Google Scholar
Read, Sophie, Eucharist and the Poetic Imagination in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Rees, Joan, Shakespeare and the Story: Aspects of Creation (London: Athlone Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Reiss, Timothy J., Mirages of the Self: Patterns of Personhood in Ancient and Early Modern Europe (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Reiss, Timothy J., Tragedy and Truth: Studies in the Development of a Renaissance and Neoclassical Discourse (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Ribner, Irving, The English History Play in the Age of Shakespeare (New York, NY: Barnes & Noble, 1957).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, The Course of Recognition, trans. Pellauer, David (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, Time and Narrative, 3 vols., trans. McLaughlin, Kathleen and Pellauer, David (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Risden, E. L., Shakespeare and the Problem Play: Complex Forms, Crossed Genres and Moral Quandaries (Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2012).Google Scholar
Rivett, Sarah, The Science of the Soul in Colonial New England (Durham, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Roche, Thomas P. Jr., “‘Nothing Almost Sees Miracles: Tragic Knowledge in King Lear,” in On King Lear, ed. Danson, Lawrence (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981), pp. 136–62.Google Scholar
Rosen, Alan, Dislocating the End: Climax, Closure and the Invention of Genre (New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2001).Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, Thomas G., Senecan Drama and Stoic Cosmology (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Rozett, Martha Tucker, The Doctrine of Election and the Emergence of Elizabethan Tragedy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Legacy Library, 2014).Google Scholar
Ruge, Enno, “Having a Good Time at the Theater of the World: Amusement, Anti-theatricality and the Calvinist Use of the Theatrum Mundi Metaphor in Early Modern England,” in “If Then the World a Theatre Present …”: Revisions of the Theatrum Mundi Metaphor in Early Modern England, ed. Quiring, Bjorn (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014).Google Scholar
Rummel, Erika, The Humanist-Scholastic Debate in the Renaissance and Reformation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Russo, Teresa G., Recognition and Modes of Knowledge: Anagnorisis from Antiquity to Contemporary Theory (Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Rymer, Thomas, “Othello: A Bloody Farce”, in A Short View of Tragedy, in The Critical Works of Thomas Rymer, ed. Zimansky, Curt (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1956), pp. 132–64.Google Scholar
Ryrie, Alex, Being Protestant in Reformation Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Salingar, Leo, Dramatic Form in Shakespeare and the Jacobeans (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Sanchez, Melissa E., “Seduction and Service in The Tempest,” Studies in Philology 105 (2008): 50–82.Google Scholar
Sanders, Julie, The Cultural Geography of Early Modern Drama, 1620–1650 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Sanders, Wilbur, The Dramatist and the Received Idea: Studies in the Plays of Marlowe and Shakespeare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Schleiner, Louise, Tudor and Stuart Women Writers (Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Scragg, Leah, Shakespeare’s Mouldy Tales: Recurrent Plot Motifs in Shakespearean Drama (New York, NY: Longmans, 1992).Google Scholar
Shagan, Ethan H. The Rule of Moderation: Violence, Religion and the Politics of Restraint in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Shagan, Ethan H. The Birth of Modern Belief: the Creedal Revolution in Early Modern Europe, 1500–1700 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Shagan, Ethan H., and Shuger, Debora (eds.), Religion in Tudor England: An Anthology of Primary Sources (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara, A Culture of Fact: England 1550–1720 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Shell, Alison, Oral Culture and Catholicism in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Shell, Alison, Shakespeare and Religion, Arden Critical Companions (London: Bloomsbury, 2010).Google Scholar
Shoulson, Jeffrey S. Fictions of Conversion: Jews, Christians, and Cultures of Change in Early Modern England (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Shuger, Debora, The Renaissance Bible: Scholarship, Sacrifice, Subjectivity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Shuger, Debora, “A Protesting Catholic Puritan in Elizabethan England,” Journal of British Studies 48(3) (2009): 587–630.Google Scholar
Skiffington, Lloyd A., The History of English Soliloquy, Aeschylus to Shakespeare (Totowa, NJ: Rowan & Littlefield, 1985).Google Scholar
Slights, Jessica, “Rape and the Romanticizing of Shakespeare’s Miranda,” Studies in English Literature 1500–1599 41 (2001): 257–79.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce R., The Acoustic World of Early Modern England: Attending to the O-Factor (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce R., “Toward the Rediscovery of Tragedy: Productions of Seneca’s Plays on the English Renaissance Stage,” Renaissance Drama 9 (1978): 3–37.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce R., Ancient Scripts and Modern Experience on the English Stage, 1500–1700 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Snyder, Susan, The Comic Matrix of Shakespeare’s Tragedies: Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, Othello and King Lear (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Sokol, B. J., A Brave New World of Knowledge: Shakespeare, The Tempest and Early Modern Epistemology (Madison, WI: Associated University Presses, 2003).Google Scholar
Solomon, Julie, Objectivity in the Making: Francis Bacon and the Politics of Inquiry (Baltimore, MD: University of Maryland Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Somerville, John C. The Secularization of Early Modern England: from Religious Culture to Religious Faith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Stachniewski, John, The Persecutory Imagination: English Puritanism and the Literature of Religious Despair (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Stannard, David. E., Puritan Way of Death: a Study in Religion, Culture and Social Change (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Stapleton, M. L., Fated Sky: The Femina Furens in Shakespeare (Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Stoll, Abraham, “Thus Conscience: Synderesis and the Destructuring of Conscience in Reformation England,” Exemplaria 24(1–2) (2012): 62–77.Google Scholar
Streete, Adrian, Protestantism and Drama in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Strier, Richard, Resistant Structures (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Sullivan, Garrett, The Drama of Landscape: Land, Property and Social Relations on the Early Modern Stage (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Thatcher, David, Begging to Differ: Modes of Discrepancy in Shakespeare (New York: Peter Lang, 1999).Google Scholar
Thirlwall, Connop, “On the Irony of Sophocles,” in The Philological Museum, vol. II (Cambridge: Deightons, 1833), pp. 483–537.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith, Religion and the Decline of Magic: Studies in Popular Beliefs in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Turner, Henry S., The English Renaissance Stage: Geometry, Poetry and the Practical Spatial Arts, 1580–1630 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Tyack, Nicholas, Anticalvinists: The Rise of English Arminianism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Henry G. The Problem of Certainty in English Thought, 1630–1690 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1963).Google Scholar
Vaughn, Alden T. “Trinculo’s Indian: American Natives in Shakespeare’s England,” in The Tempest and Its Travels, ed. Hulme, Peter and Sherman, William H. (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000), pp. 49–59.Google Scholar
Vermeule, Blakey, Why Do We Care about Literary Characters? (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Veyne, Paul, Did the Greeks Believe in Their Myths? An Essay on the Constitutive Imagination (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian (ed.), William Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage, 1623–1692, vol. I (London: Routledge, 1974).Google Scholar
Walsham, Alexandra, Providence in Early Modern England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Walsham, Alexandra, The Reformation of the Landscape: Religion, Identity and Memory in Early Modern Britain and Ireland (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Walsham, Alexandra, “‘A Glose of Godlines’: Philip Stubbes, Elizabethan Grub Street and the Invention of Puritanism,” in Belief and Practice in Reformation England: Essays in Honor of Patrick Collinson, ed. Wabuda, Susan and Litzenberger, Caroline (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998).Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall L., Marvelous Images: On Values and the Arts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Waterfield, John, The Heart of His Mystery: Shakespeare and the Catholic Faith in England Under Elizabeth and James (Bloomington, IN: iUniverse, 2009).Google Scholar
Watson, Robert N., Back to Nature: The Green and the Real in Renaissance Literature (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Watson, Robert N., “Othello as Protestant Propaganda,” in Religion and Culture in Reformation England, ed. McEachern, Claire and Shuger, Debora (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 234–57.Google Scholar
Watt, Ian, The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding, 2nd edn (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Wilson, Luke, “Drama and Marine Insurance in Shakespeare’s London,” in The Law in Shakespeare, ed. Jordan, Constance and Cunningham, Karen (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), pp. 127–42.Google Scholar
Winston, Jessica, “Seneca in Early Elizabethan England,” Renaissance Quarterly 59 (2006): 29–58.Google Scholar
Wood, James, The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief (New York, NY: Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
Woods, Gillian, Shakespeare’s Unreformed Fictions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Wright, Louis B., “William Perkins: Elizabethan Apostle of ‘Practical Divinity,’” Huntington Library Quarterly 3(2) (1940): 171–96.Google Scholar
Wright, Nancy E., “The Legal Interpretation of Defamation in Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing,” Ben Jonson Journal 13 (2006): 281–312.Google Scholar
Zucker, Adam, The Places of Wit in Early Modern Comedy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar