Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:52:54.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The relationship between riverbank habitat and prey availability and the distribution of otter (Lutra lutra) signs: an analysis using a geographical information system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Nigel Dunstone
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Martyn L. Gorman
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter presents preliminary findings of a research programme to determine the factors that influenced the distribution of otter signs in the upper Tyne catchment, Northumberland, England, between 1993 and 1995. The work presented here considers two aspects of the research programme. Firstly, the effect of changing the sampling scale on the pattern of distribution of otter signs in the catchment is assessed. In this context, sampling scale is defined as the size of the sampling unit. Secondly, the relationships between the distribution of otter signs and the availability of different types of riverbank vegetation and the influence of prey availability are investigated.

In the majority of studies of habitat utilization by otters, the distribution of otter spraints has been used as an indicator of the presence or absence of otters (Jenkins & Burrows, 1980; Macdonald & Mason, 1983; Bas et al., 1984). A relationship between the distribution of otter signs and riverbank vegetation, in particular the availability of woodland and scrub habitats, was found in all of these studies. A similar relationship has been demonstrated using radiotelemetry techniques. Jefferies et al. (1986) showed that radio–tracked otters spent over 50% of their time in wooded areas, although only a few individuals were tracked. Green et al. (1984) showed that one of their radio–tracked otters sprainted more at centres of activity than elsewhere, although analysis of the movements of another individual showed no such relationship.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×