Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: February 2013

8 - Attention

from Section I - Structural and Functional Neuroanatomy


Neurology and psychiatry are securely established medical specialties with well-demarcated areas of clinical and research expertise. Behavioral neurology (BN) is widely held to have begun with the work of Norman Geschwind in the mid-twentieth century. A neuropsychiatric approach to patient care began to reemerge and steadily gain momentum as physicians increasingly appreciated the neurologic bases of psychiatric disease and the psychiatric aspects of neurologic disease. The prospect of BN and neuropsychiatry (NP) drawing together finds considerable support in academia. Annual scholarly meetings are held conjointly by the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology and the American Neuropsychiatric Association in order to disseminate new research findings and educate practitioners. Traumatic brain injury occupies a major portion of the practice of many subspecialists in BN&NP and additional studies are needed to better define the best methods of neurorehabilitation.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO


1. PosnerMI.Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980;32(1):3–25.
2. TreismanAM, GeladeG.A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol. 1980;12(1):97–136.
3. TreismanA.The binding problem. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996;6(2):171–8.
4. WolfeJM, CaveKR, FranzelSL.Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989;15(3):419–33.
5. WolfeJM.Guided Search 2.0 – a revised model of Visual-Search. Psychon B Rev. 1994;1(2):202–38.
6. DesimoneR, DuncanJ.Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193–222.
7. HillyardSA, VogelEK, LuckSJ.Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998;353(1373):1257–70.
8. CarrascoM, Penpeci-TalgarC, EcksteinM.Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement. Vision Res. 2000;40(10–12):1203–15.
9. VogelEK, WoodmanGF, LuckSJ.Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001;27(1):92–114.
10. BisiachE, VallarG.Hemineglect in humans. In BollerF, GrafmanJ, editors. Handbook of Neuropsychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1988.
11. FriedrichFJ, EglyR, RafalRD, BeckD.Spatial attention deficits in humans: a comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions. Neuropsychology 1998;12(2):193–207.
12. PosnerMI, WalkerJA, FriedrichFJ, RafalRD.Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J Neurosci. 1984;4(7):1863–74.
13. CohenJD, RomeroRD, ServanschreiberD, FarahMJ.Mechanisms of spatial attention – the relation of macrostructure to microstructure in parietal neglect. J Cogn Neurosci. 1994;6(4):377–87.
14. EglinM, RobertsonLC, KnightRT.Visual search performance in the neglect syndrome. J Cogn Neurosci. 1989;1(4):372–85.
15. HeilmanKM, ValensteinE.Frontal lobe neglect in man. Neurology 1972;22(6):660–4.
16. HeilmanKM, ValensteinE, WatsonRT.Localization of neglect. In KerteszA, editor. Localization in Neuropsychology. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1983, pp. 471–92.
17. HusainM, ShapiroK, MartinJ, KennardC.Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients. Nature 1997;385(6612):154–6.
18. ColbyCL, GoldbergME.Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:319–49.
19. HenikA, RafalR, RhodesD.Endogenously generated and visually guided saccades after lesions of the human frontal eye fields. J Cogn Neurosci. 1994;6(4):400–11.
20. VeceraSP, RizzoM.Attention: normal and disordered processes. In RizzoM, EslingerPJ, editors. Principles and Practice of Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2004, pp. 223–45.
21. HopfingerJB, BuonocoreMH, MangunGR.The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3(3):284–91.
22. KincadeJM, AbramsRA, AstafievSV, ShulmanGL, CorbettaM.An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of voluntary and stimulus-driven orienting of attention. J Neurosci. 2005;25(18):4593–604.
23. DuncanJ.Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984;113(4):501–17.
24. EglyR, DriverJ, RafalRD.Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994;123(2):161–77.
25. SerencesJT, SchwarzbachJ, CourtneySM, GolayX, YantisS.Control of object-based attention in human cortex. Cereb Cortex 2004;14(12):1346–57.
26. ShomsteinS, BehrmannM.Cortical systems mediating visual attention to both objects and spatial locations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103(30):11,387–92.
27. RaymondJE, ShapiroKL, ArnellKM.Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992;18(3):849–60.
28. RizzoM, AkutsuH, DawsonJ.Increased attentional blink after focal cerebral lesions. Neurology 2001;57(5):795–800.
29. HommelB, KesslerK, SchmitzFet al. How the brain blinks: towards a neurocognitive model of the attentional blink. Psychol Res. 2006;70(6):425–35.
30. AllportDA, StylesEA, HsiehST.Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In UmiltàC, MoscovitchM, editors. Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1994, pp. 396–419.
31. RogersRD, MonsellS.Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1995;124(2):207–31.
32. VeceraSP, RizzoM.Spatial attention: normal processes and their breakdown. Neurol Clin. 2003;21(3):575–607.
33. CairdJK, EdwardsCJ, CreaserJ.The effect of time constraints on older and younger driver decisions to turn at intersections using a modifed change blindness paradigm. 1st International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design; Aspen, CO: University of Iowa; 2001.
34. BatchelderS, RizzoM, VanderleestR, VeceraSP.Traffic scene related change blindness in older drivers. In RizzoM, LeeJD, McGeheeD, editors. Proceedings of Driving Assessment 2003: 2nd International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, Park City, UT, July 21–24, 2003; Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa; 2003, pp. 177–81.
35. TreatJR.A Study of Pre-crash Factors Involved in Traffic Accidents. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan; 1980.
36. TheeuwesJ.Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: the effect of visual onsets and offsets. Percept Psychophys. 1991;49(1):83–90.
37. O’ReganJK, RensinkRA, ClarkJJ.Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’. Nature 1999;398(6722):34.
38. RizzoM, ReinachS, McGeheeD, DawsonJ.Simulated car crashes and crash predictors in drivers with Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 1997;54(5):545–51.
39. RizzoM, McGeheeDV, DawsonJD, AndersonSN.Simulated car crashes at intersections in drivers with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2001;15(1):10–20.
40. KantowitzBH.Using microworlds to design intelligent interfaces that minimize driver distraction. 1st International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design; Aspen, CO: University of Iowa; 2001, pp. 42–57.
41. RizzoM.Safe and unsafe driving. In RizzoM, EslingerPJ, editors. Principles and Practice of Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2004, pp. 197–222.
42. MesulamMM.A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol. 1981;10(4):309–25.
43. CorbettaM, ShulmanGL.Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3(3):201–15.
44. SchallJD, ThompsonKG.Neural selection and control of visually guided eye movements. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:241–59.
45. MesulamMM.Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;354(1387):1325–46.
46. HeilmanKM, WatsonRT, ValensteinE.Neglect I: Clinical and anatomic issues. In FeinbergTE, FarahMJ, editors. Patient-based Approaches to Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000.
47. LosierBJ, KleinRM.A review of the evidence for a disengage deficit following parietal lobe damage. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001;25(1):1–13.