Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: May 2013

4 - Replicability and reliability of behavioral tests

from Section 1 - General

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

References

Bausell, R.B. and Li, Y.-F. (2002) Power Analysis for Experimental Research: A Practical Guide for the Biological, Medical, and Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Beck, J.A., Lloyd, S., Hafexparast, M., Lennon-Pierce, M., Eppig, J.T., Festing, M.F.W., et al. (2000) Genealogies of mouse inbred strains. Nat Genet 24: 23–25.
Chesler, E.J., Wilson, S.G., Lariviere, W.R., Rodriguez-Zas, S.L., and Mogil, J.S. (2002) Influences of laboratory environment on behavior. Nat Neurosci 5: 1101–1102.
Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA.
Crabbe, J.C., Wahlsten, D., and Dudek, B.C. (1999) Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 284: 1670–1672.
Crabbe, J.C., Metten, P., Yu, C.H., Schlumbohm, J.P., Cameron, A. J., and Wahlsten, D. (2003). Genotypic differences in ethanol sensitivity in two tests of motor incoordination. J Appl Physiol 95: 1338–1351.
Dotson, C.D. and Spector, A.C. (2005) Drinking spout orifice size affects licking behavior in inbred mice. Physiol Behav 85: 655–661.
Grubb, S.C., Churchill, G.A., and Bogue, M.A. (2004) A collaborative database of inbred mouse strain characteristics. Bioinformatics 20: 2857–2859.
Izidio, G.S., Lopes, D.M., Spricigo, L., Jr., and Ramos, A. (2005) Common variations in the pretest environment influence genotypic comparisons in models of anxiety. Genes Brain Behav 4: 412–419.
Kafkafi, N., Benjamini, Y., Sakov, A., Elmer, G.I., and Golani, I. (2005) Genotype–environment interactions in mouse behavior: a way out of the problem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 4619–4624.
Murphy, K.R. and Myors, B. (2004) Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA.
Paigen, K. and Eppig, J.T. (2000) A mouse phenome project. Mamm Genome 11: 715–717.
Petkov, P.M., Ding, Y.M., Cassell, M.A., Zhang, W.D., Wagner, G., Sargent, E.E., et al. (2004) An efficient SNP system for mouse genome scanning and elucidating strain relationships. Genome Res 14: 1806–1811.
Rustay, N.R., Wahlsten, D., and Crabbe, J.C. (2003) Assessment of genetic susceptibility to ethanol intoxication in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 2917–2922.
Shavelson, R.J. and Webb, N.M. (1991) Generalizability Theory. A Primer. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, USA.
Tordoff, M.G., Alarcon, L.K., Byerly, E.A., and Doman, S.A. (2005) Mice acquire flavor preferences during shipping. Physiol Behav 86: 480–486.
Traub, R.E. (1994) Reliability for the Social Sciences. Theory and Applications. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, USA.
Wahlsten, D. (1990) Insensitivity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment interaction. Behav Brain Sci 13: 109–120.
Wahlsten, D. (2006) Sample size requirements for experiments on laboratory animals. In Jones, B.C. and Mormède, P. (eds.), Neurobehavioral Genetics: Methods and Applications, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Wahlsten, D., Cooper, S.F., and Crabbe, J.C. (2005) Different rankings of inbred mouse strains on the Morris maze and a refined four-arm water escape task. Behav Brain Res 165: 36–51.
Wahlsten, D., Metten, P., Phillips, T.J., Boehm, S.L., II, Burkhart-Kasch, S., Dorow, J., et al. (2003) Different data from different labs: lessons from studies of gene–environment interaction. J. Neurobiol 54: 283–311.
Wang, H., Tranguch, S., Xie, H., Hanley, G., Das, S.K., and Dey, S.K. (2005) Variation in commercial rodent diets induces disparate molecular and physiological changes in the mouse uterus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 9960–9965.
Winer, B.J. (1991) Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 10th edn. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.