Book contents
- Before Anarchy
- Before Anarchy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Part I Hobbesian Variations
- Part II Hobbesian Receptions
- 5 Pufendorf’s Anti-Hobbesian Camouflage
- 6 Pufendorf’s International Thought
- 7 Rousseau and the Quest for Peace
- 8 Vattel the Sorry Comforter
- Epilogue: Globalizing Political Thought
- Index
- References
8 - Vattel the Sorry Comforter
from Part II - Hobbesian Receptions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2016
Book contents
- Before Anarchy
- Before Anarchy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Part I Hobbesian Variations
- Part II Hobbesian Receptions
- 5 Pufendorf’s Anti-Hobbesian Camouflage
- 6 Pufendorf’s International Thought
- 7 Rousseau and the Quest for Peace
- 8 Vattel the Sorry Comforter
- Epilogue: Globalizing Political Thought
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Before AnarchyHobbes and his Critics in Modern International Thought, pp. 234 - 268Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Ackerman, Bruce and Katyal, Neal (1995). “Our Unconventional Founding,” The University of Chicago Law Review 62, pp. 475–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M.S. (1970). “Eighteenth-Century Theories of the Balance of Power,” in Hatton, R. and Anderson, M.S. (eds.), Studies in Diplomatic History: Essays in Memory of D.B. Horn, Hamden, CT.Google Scholar
Armitage, David (2005). “The Contagion of Sovereignty: Declarations of Independence since 1776,” South African Historical Journal 52, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulac, Stephane (2003). “Emer de Vattel and the Externalization of Sovereignty,” Journal of the History of International Law 5, pp. 237–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bricker, John W. (1953) “Making Treaties and Other International Agreements,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 289, pp. 134–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brierly, J.L. (1963) The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, David (1993). “International Obligations: To Whom Are They Owed?,” The Review of Politics 55, pp. 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony and Engel, Kirsten (1988). “State Responsibility for the Exportation of Nuclear Power Technology,” Virginia Law Review 74, pp. 1011–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deudney, Daniel (1995). “The Philadelphian System: Sovereignty, Arms Control, and Balance of Power in the American States-Union, Circa 1787–1861,” International Organization 49, pp. 191–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deudney, Daniel (2007). Bounding Power: Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Engdahl, David E. (1965). “Characterization of Interstate Arrangements: When Is a Compact Not a Compact?,” Michigan Law Review 64, pp. 63–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Richard (1975). “New Paradigm for International Legal Studies: Prospects and Proposals,” The Yale Law Journal 84, pp. 969–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontana, Biancamaria (2002). “The Napoleonic Empire and the Europe of Nations,” in Pagden, Anthony (ed.), The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to the European Union, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ford, Washington C. (1913–17). The Writings of John Quincy Adams, ed. Ford, Washington C., 7 vols., New York.Google Scholar
Fowler, Michael Ross and Bunck, Julie Marie (1995). Law, Power, and the Sovereign State: The Evolution and Application of the Concept of Sovereignty, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Gallie, W.B. (1978). Philosophers of Peace and War: Kant, Clausewitz, Marx, Engels and Tolstoy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Stephen A. (1976). “Nixonian Foreign Policy: A New Balance of Power, or a Revived Concert?,” Polity 8, pp. 389–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gierke, Otto von (1957). Natural Law and the Theory of Society, 1500 to 1800, trans. Barker, Ernest, Boston.Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan (2006). “Humanitarian Intervention and Pretexts for War,” The American Journal of International Law 100, pp. 107–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, Thomas (1978). “Origins of the Unwritten Constitution: Fundamental Law In American Revolutionary Thought,” Stanford Law Review 30, pp. 843–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Leo (1948). “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948,” The American Journal of International Law 42, pp. 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (2005). The Rights of War and Peace, ed. Tuck, Richard, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Hinsley, F.H. (1965). Power and the Pursuit of Peace: Theory and Practice in the History of Relations between States, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1994). David Hume: Political Writings, eds. Warner, Stuart and Livingston, Donald, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (2003). “International Law and the Making and Unmaking of Boundaries,” in Buchanan, Allen and Moore, Margaret (eds.), States, Nations, and Borders: The Ethics of Making Boundaries, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ion, Theodore P. (1911). “Sanctity of Treaties,” The Yale Law Journal 20, pp. 268–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, Mark W. (1999). “Religion and the Literature of International Law: Some Standard Texts,” in Janis, Mark W. and Evans, Carolyn (eds.), Religion and International Law, The Hague.Google Scholar
Jay, Stewart (1989). “The Status of the Law of Nations in Early American Law,” Vanderbilt Law Review 42, pp. 819–849.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. Glen (1980). “Historical Perspectives on Human Rights and U. S. Foreign Policy,” Universal Human Rights 2, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Paul W. (1987). “From Nuremberg to The Hague: The United States Position in Nicaragua v. United States and the Development of International Law,” Yale Journal of International Law 12, pp. 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1970). Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch [1795], in Reiss, H.S. (ed.) Kant: Political Writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward (2002). Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, David (1986). “Primitive Legal Scholarship,” Harvard International Law Journal 27, pp. 1–98.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart (1988). Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (2001). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Daniel G. and Russell, Greg (1990). “The Ethics of Power in American Diplomacy: The Statecraft of John Quincy Adams,” The Review of Politics 52, pp. 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Daniel George (1985). Foreign Policy in the Early Republic: The Law of Nations and the Balance of Power, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew (1982). Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobel, Jules (1985). “The Limits of Constitutional Power: Conflicts between Foreign Policy and International Law,” Virginia Law Review 71, pp. 1071–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauerseth, Per (1964). “Balance-of-Power Thinking from the Renaissance to the French Revolution,” Journal of Peace Research 1, pp. 120–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, Gary L. (2000). “The Politics of Meaning: Law Dictionaries and the Liberal Tradition of Interpretation,” The American Journal of Legal History 44, pp. 257–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans (1948). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York.Google Scholar
Morley, Michael T. (2002). “The Law of Nations and the Offenses Clause of the Constitution: A Defense of Federalism,” The Yale Law Journal 112, pp. 109–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nafziger, James A. R. (1983). “The General Admission of Aliens under International Law,” The American Journal of International Law 77, pp. 804–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nifong, William R. (2000). “Promises Past: Marcus AtiliusRegulus and the Dialogue of Natural Law,” Duke Law Journal 49, pp. 1077–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyes, John E. (1999). “Christianity and Theories of International Law in Nineteenth-Century Britain,” in Janis, Mark W. and Evans, Carolyn (eds.), Religion and International Law, The Hague.Google Scholar
Onuf, Peter, and Onuf, Nicholas (1993). Federal Union, Modern World: The Law of Nations in an Age of Revolutions, 1776–1814, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas (1994). The States System of Europe, 1640–1990: Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palan, Ronen (2002). “Tax Havens and the Commercialization of State Sovereignty,” International Organization 56, pp. 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A. (2002). “Some Europes in Their History,” in Pagden, Anthony (ed.) The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to the European Union, Cambridge, pp. 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, (1688) An Introduction to the History of the Principal Kingdoms and States of Europe [1682] (London, 1719).Google Scholar
Rossi, Christopher (1998). Broken Chain of Being: James Brown Scott and the Origins of Modern International Law, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, J.S. (1937). “The First American Treatise on International Law,” The American Journal of International Law 31, pp. 697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacque (1990). “Summary of Saint-Pierre’s Project for Perpetual Peace,” in Roosevelt, Grace (ed.), Reading Rousseau in the Nuclear Age, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (2003). The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, New York.Google Scholar
Sherry, Suzanna (1987). “The Founders’ Unwritten Constitution,” The University of Chicago Law Review 54, pp. 1127–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striner, Richard (1995). “Political Newtonianism: The Cosmic Model of Politics in Europe and America,” The William and Mary Quarterly 52, pp. 583–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Ann van Wynen and Thomas, A. J. (1951). “Equality of States in International Law. Fact or Fiction?” Virginia Law Review 37, pp. 791–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vagts, Alfred (1948). “The Balance of Power: Growth of an Idea,” World Politics 1, pp. 82–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vattel, Emer de (1741). Défense du système leibnitzien contra les objections et imputations de Mr. de Crousaz, continues dans l’Examen de l’Essai su l’homme de Mr. Pope. Oul’on a joint la Réponse aux objections de Mr.Roques, continues dans le Journal Helvétique, par Mr.Emer de Vattel, Leyden.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de (1746). Pieces diverses, avec quelques lettres de morale et d’amusement, Paris.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de (1747). “Essai sur le fondement du droit naturel,” Le loisir philosophique; ou pièces diverses de philosophie, de morale, et d’amusement, Geneva.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de (1916). The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law, Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, trans. Fenwick, C.G. in Scott, J. Brown, ed., The Classics of International Law, Washington.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de (2008a). The Law of Nations, ed. Kapossy, Béla and Whatmore, Richard, Indiana, IN.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de (2008b). ‘Emer de Vattel’s Mélanges de littérature, de morale et de politique (1760),’ History of European Ideas 34, pp. 77–103.Google Scholar
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, May 23, 1969.Google Scholar
Vollenhoven, Cornelius (1919). The Three Stages in the Evolution of the Law of Nations, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voltaire, , (1901), The Works of Voltaire. A Contemporary Version, in 21 vols., New York.Google Scholar
Wehberg, Hans (1959). “Pacta Sunt Servanda,” The American Journal of International Law 53, pp. 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, Francis (1889). The Revolutionary Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States, vol. II, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin (1966). “Why Is There No International Theory?,” in Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London.Google Scholar
Wilson, George Grafton (1938). “The Influence of Dumas,” The American Journal of International Law 32, pp. 346–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1995). Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Petractatum [1749], Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy (1957). “International Conflict and the United Nations,” World Politics 10, pp. 24–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Quincy (1963). “Toward a Universal Law for Mankind,” Columbia Law Review 63, pp. 435–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar