Part I - Hobbesian Variations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2016
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Before AnarchyHobbes and his Critics in Modern International Thought, pp. 1 - 140Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Bibliography
Armitage, David (2004a). “The Fifty Years’ Rift: Intellectual History and International Relations,” Modern Intellectual History 1, pp. 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David (2004b). “Is There a Pre-History of Globalization?,” in Cohen, Deborah and O’Connor, Maura (eds.), Comparison and History: Europe in Cross-National Perspective, New York.Google Scholar
Armitage, David (2006). “Hobbes and the Foundations of Modern International Thought,” in Tully, , Brett, , and Hamilton-Bleakly, (eds.), Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Armitage, David (2014). “Critical Exchange: Foundations of Modern International Theory,” Contemporary Political Theory 13, pp. 387–418.Google Scholar
Armitage, David (2015). “Modern International Thought: Problems and Prospects,” History of European Ideas 41, pp. 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duncan (2001). “International Relations: The Dawn of a Historiographical Turn?,” British Journal of Political and International Relations 3, pp. 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duncan (2007). Victorian Visions of Global Order: Empire and International Relations in Nineteenth-Century Political Thought, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobbitt, Philip (2002). The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace, and the Course of History, New York.Google Scholar
Boucher, David (1998). Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel and Tully, James (eds.) (2006). Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brierly, James Leslie (1928). The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1981). “Hobbes and the International Anarchy,” Social Research 41, pp. 717–738.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.) (1966). Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London.Google Scholar
Cavallar, Georg (2002). The Rights of Strangers: Theories of International Hospitality, the Global Community, and Political Justice since Vitoria, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian (1996). “Traditions of Thought and Classical Theories of International Relations,” in Clark, Ian and Neumann, Iver B. (eds.), Classical Theories of International Relations, London.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian (1998). “Beyond the Great Divide: Globalization and the Theory of International Relations,” Review of International Studies 24, pp. 479–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (2011). The Beast and the Sovereign, vol. II, ed. Lisse, Michel, Mallet, Marie-Louise, and Michaud, Ginette, Chicago.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Edwin DeWitt (1917). “The Analogy between Natural Persons and International Persons in the Law of Nations,” The Yale Law Journal 26, pp. 564–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Edwin DeWitt (1920). The Equality of States in International Law, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael (1997). Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism, London.Google Scholar
Dunn, John (1968). “The Identity of the History of Ideas,” Philosophy 43, pp. 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, Tim (1998) Inventing International Society: A History of the English School, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, David (1951). “The Decline of Modern Political Theory,” The Journal of Politics 13, pp. 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flathman, Richard (1993). Thomas Hobbes: Skepticism, Individuality, and Chastened Politics, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Forrester, Katrina (2014). “Citizenship, War, and the Origins of International Ethics in American Political Philosophy, 1960–1975,” The Historical Journal 57, pp. 773–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel (2003). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collége de France, 1975–1976, New York.Google Scholar
Gallie, W.B. (1978). Philosophers of Peace and War: Clausewitz, Marx, Engels, and Tolstoy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, James W. (1925). “Limitations of National Sovereignty in International Relations,” American Political Science Review 19, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David (1969). The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. (1993). The Descent of Political Theory: A Genealogy of an American Vocation, Chicago.Google Scholar
Haslam, Jonathan (2002). No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations since Machiavelli, Yale.Google Scholar
Hinsley, F.H. (1962). Power and the Pursuit of Peace: Theory and Practice in the History of Relations between States, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobden, Stephen (2002). “Historical Sociology: Back to the Future of International Relations?,” in Hobden, Stephen and Hobson, John (eds.), Historical Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian (2008). After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council, Princeton.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Renee (2005). “Tradition as Invention: The ‘Traditions Tradition’ and the History of Ideas in International Relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34, pp. 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Laurie M. (1993). Thucydides, Hobbes, and the Interpretation of Realism, DeKalb.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward (2002). Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerry, John (2013). Remarks at the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, February 20, 2013.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen (1982). “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables,” International Organization 36, pp. 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. (2001). “Beyond Anarchy: The Importance of Security Institutions,” International Security 26, pp. 129–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Richard (1991). “International Relations and the Methodological Turn,” Political Studies 39, pp. 462–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry and Mapel, David R. (eds.) (1992). Traditions of International Ethics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navari, Cornelia (1996). “Hobbes, the State of Nature and the Laws of Nature,” in Clark, Ian and Neumann, Iver B. (eds.), Classical Theories of International Relations, New York.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas (1989). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A. (1962). “The History of Political Thought: A Methodological Inquiry,” in Laslett, P. and Runciman, W.G. (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rengger, Nicholas (1999). International Relations, Political Theory and the Problem of Order: Beyond International Relations Theory, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rengger, Nicholas (2000). “Political Theory and International Relations: Promised Land or Exit from Eden,” International Affairs 76, pp. 755–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1915). Political Writings, vol. ii, ed. Vaughan, C.E, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C. (1998). The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations, State University of New York, Albany.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C. (2000) “Resurrecting International Political Theory,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29, pp. 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C. (2002) “Together Again: Reuniting Political Theory and International Relations Theory,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4, pp. 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (1976). The Concept of the Political, trans. Schwab, George, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1969). “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas,” History and Theory 8, pp. 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael Joseph (1986). Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
Smith, Steve (1992). “The Forty Years Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21, pp. 489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steve (1995). “The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory,” in Smith, Steve and Booth, Ken (eds.), International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Teschke, Benno (2003). The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations, London.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1978). Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1999). The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vigezzi, Bruno (2005). The British Committee for the Theory of International Politics, 1954–1985: The Rediscovery of History, Milan.Google Scholar
Vincent, John R. (1981). “The Hobbesian Tradition in Twentieth Century International Thought,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10, pp. 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R.B.J. (1987). “Realism Change, and International Political Theory,” International Studies Quarterly 31, pp. 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrender, Howard (1961). The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin (1966). “Why Is There No International Theory?,” in Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London.Google Scholar
Williams, Howard (1996). International Relations and the Limits of Political Theory, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C. (1996). “Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration,” International Organization 50, pp. 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willoughby, Westel Woodbury (1896). An Examination of the Nature of the State, London.Google Scholar
Willoughby, Westel Woodbury (1918). “The Juristic Conception of the State,” American Political Science Review 12, pp. 192–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold (1962). Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics, Baltimore. Originally published as the Introduction to his The Anglo-American Tradition in Foreign Affairs (1956), New Haven, CT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibliography
Abizadeh, Arash (2011). “Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory,” American Political Science Review 105, pp. 298–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aravamudan, Srinivas (2009). “Hobbes and America,” in Carey, Daniel and Festa, Lynn (eds.), Postcolonial Enlightenment: Eighteenth-Century Colonialisms and Postcolonial Theory, Oxford.Google Scholar
Baumgold, Deborah (2013). “‘Trust’ in Hobbes’s Political Thought,” Political Theory 41, pp. 838–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramhall, John (1655). A Defence of True Liberty from Antecedent and Extrinsecall Necessity, London.Google Scholar
Bramhall, John (1842–45). The Works of the Most Reverend Father in God, John Bramhall, D.D. Sometime Lord Archbishop of Armagh, Primate and Metropolitan of All Ireland, ed. Parker, J.H., 5 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Bredekamp, Horst (2007). “Thomas Hobbes’s Visual Strategies,” in Springborg, Patricia (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brown, Keith (1978). “The Artist of the Leviathan Title-Page,” British Library Journal 4, pp. 24–36.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1981). “Hobbes and International Anarchy,” Social Research 48, pp. 717–738.Google Scholar
Coke, Roger (1660). Justice Vindicated. From the False Fucus Put Upon It by Thomas White, Gent., Mr. Thomas Hobbs, and Hugo Grotius. As also Elements of Power & Subjection, Wherein Is Demonstrated the Cause of All Humane, Christian, and Legal Society. And as Previous Introduction to These Is Shewed the Method by Which Men Must Necessarily Attain Arts & Sciences, London.Google Scholar
Corbett, Margery and Lightbown, Ronald (1979). The Comely Frontispiece: The Emblematic Title-Page in England, 1550–1660, London.Google Scholar
De Mesquita, Bruce Bueno, et al. (2003). The Logic of Political Survival, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Edwin DeWitt (1917). “The Analogy between Natural Persons and International Persons in the Law of Nations,” The Yale Law Journal 26, pp. 564–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eachard, John (1672). Mr Hobbs’s State of Nature Considered: In a Dialogue between Philautus and Timothy, London.Google Scholar
Filmer, Robert (1652). Observations Concerning the Originall of Government, Upon Mr Hobs “Leviathan,” Mr Milton against Salmasius, H. Grotius ‘De Jure Belli ac Pacis’, London.Google Scholar
Flathman, Richard E. (2002). Thomas Hobbes: Skepticism, Individuality, and Chastened Politics, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David (1990). Moral Dealing: Contract, Ethics, and Reason, Ithaca, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, M.M. (1981). “Picturing Hobbes’s Politics? The Illustrations to Philosophical Rudiments,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 44, pp. 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1651). Leviathan, or the Matter, Form and Power of a Commonwealth, Ecclesiastical and Civil, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1656). The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, and Chance Clearly Stated and Debated between Dr. Bramhall, Bishop of Derry, and Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1668). Leviathan, sive, De Materia, forma, & potestate civitatis ecclesiasticae et civilis, Amsterdam: Joan Blaeu.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1679). Behemoth, or an Epitome of the Civil Wars of England, from 1640 to 1660, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1839–1845). The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, ed. Molesworth, William, in 11 vols, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1969). The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, ed. Tönnies, Ferdinand, 2nd edn, introd., Goldsmith, M.M., London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1971). The Answer of Mr. Hobbes to Sr. William D’Avenant’s Preface, in William D’Avenant, A Discourse upon Gondibert. An Heroick Poem Written by Sr. William D’Avenant with an Answer to It by Mr. Hobbes (Paris, 1650), ed. Gladish, David F., Sir William Davenant’s Gondibert, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1990). Behemoth, or the Long Parliament, ed. Holmes, Stephen, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1995). Three Discourses: A Critical Modern Edition of a Newly Identified Work of the Young Hobbes, ed. Reynolds, Noel B. and Saxonhouse, Arlene W., Chicago.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1998). On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (2005). A Dialogue between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch (2007). ‘Hobbes on the Natural Condition of Mankind,’ in Springborg, Patricia (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Johnston, David (1994). The Idea of a Liberal Theory: A Critique and Reconsideration, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, George (1657). An Examination of the Political Part of Mr. Hobbs His Leviathan, London.Google Scholar
Lucy, William (1663). Observations, Censures and Confutations of Notorious Errours in Mr. Hobbes His Leviathan, London.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C.B. (1962). The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke, Oxford.Google Scholar
Parkin, Jon (2007). Taming the Leviathan: The Reception of the Political and Religious Ideas of Thomas Hobbes in England, 1640–1700, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole (1979). The Problem of Political Obligation: A Critique of Liberal Theory, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1991). On the Duty of Man and Citizen, ed. Tully, James, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2007). Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1990). “The State of War,” in Reading Rousseau in the Nuclear Age, ed. Roosevelt, Grace G., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1997). The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (2003). The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, New York.Google Scholar
Schochet, Gordon (1975). Patriarchalism in Political Thought: The Authoritarian Family and Political Speculation and Attitudes Especially in Seventeenth-Century England, Oxford.Google Scholar
Silverthorne, Michael (1996). “Political Terms in the Latin of Thomas Hobbes,” International Journal of the Classical Tradition 2, pp. 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch (1909). Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (Amsterdam, 1670), reprinted in RHM Elwes, The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol. I, London.Google Scholar
Tenison, Thomas (1670). The Creed of Mr. Hobbes Examined: In a Feigned Conference Between Him, and a Student of Divinity, London.Google Scholar
Thornton, Helen (2002). “Cain, Abel and Thomas Hobbes,” History of Political Thought 23, pp. 611–633.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael C. (2005). The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, David (1997). “Thomas Hobbes’s Machiavellian Moments,” in Kelley, David R. and Sacks, David Harris (eds.), The Historical Imagination in Early Modern Britain: History, Rhetoric, and Fiction, 1500–1800, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Boucher, David (1990). “Inter-Community and International Relations in the Political Philosophy of Hobbes,” Polity 23, pp. 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramhall, John (1842–45). The Works of the Most Reverend Father in God, John Bramhall, D.D. sometime Lord Archbishop of Armagh, Primate and Metropolitan of All Ireland, ed. Parker, J.H., 5 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel (1997). Liberty, Right and Nature: Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eachard, John (1672). Mr Hobbs’s State of Nature Considered; in a Dialogue Between Philautus and Timothy, London.Google Scholar
Filmer, Robert (1991). Observations Concerning the Originall of Government, Upon Mr Hobs Leviathan [1652], ed. Sommerville, Johann, Sir Robert Filmer: Patriarcha and Other Writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Flathman, Richard E. (2002). Thomas Hobbes: Skepticism, Individuality, and Chastened Politics, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (2003). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College de France, 1975–1976, New York.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1969). The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, ed. Tönnies, Ferdinand, 2nd edn, introd., Goldsmith, M.M., London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1971). The Answer of Mr. Hobbes to Sr. William D’Avenant’s Preface, in D’Avenant, William, A Discourse upon Gondibert. An Heroick Poem Written by Sr. William D’Avenant With an Answer to it by Mr. Hobbes (Paris, 1650), ed. Gladish, David F., Sir William Davenant’s Gondibert, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1998). On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (2005). A Dialogue between a Philosopher and a Student, of the Common Laws of England, eds. Cromartie, Alan and Skinner, Quentin, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (2008). A Dialogue between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England, Oxford.Google Scholar
Maloney, Pat (1997) “Leaving the Garden of Eden: Linguistic and Political Authority in Thomas Hobbes,” History of Political Thought 18, pp. 242–266.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip (2008). Made with Words: Hobbes on Language, Mind, and Politics, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna (1967). The Concept of Representation, Berkeley and Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purchas, Samuel (1625). Hakluytus Posthumus, or Purchas His Pilgrimes, 4 vols., London.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2007). Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenison, Thomas (1670). The Creed of Mr. Hobbes Examined: In a Feigned Conference between Him, and a Student in Divinity, London.Google Scholar
Wallace, John M. (1968) Destiny His Choice: The Loyalism of Andrew Marvell, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Abizadeh, Arash (2011). “Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory,” American Political Science Review 105:2, pp. 298–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahrensdorf, Peter (2000). “The Fear of Death and the Longing for Immortality: Hobbes and Thucydides on Human Nature and the Problem of Anarchy,” American Political Science Review 94:3, pp. 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Airaksinen, Timo and Bertman, Martin (1989). Hobbes: War among Nations, Brookfield, VT.Google Scholar
Armitage, David (2006). “Hobbes and the Foundations of Modern International Thought,” in Tully, James, Brett, Annabel, with Hamilton-Bleakly, Holy (eds.), Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Aubrey, John (2000). Brief Lives: Together with, an Apparatus for the Lives of Our English Mathematical Writers; and, the Life of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, London.Google Scholar
Badie, Bertrand (2001). “Realism under Praise, or a Requiem? The Paradigmatic Debate in International Relations,” International Political Science Review 22:3, pp. 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzoni, Gino and Zanato, Tiziano (eds.) (1982). “Fulgenzio Micanzio,” in Storici e Politici Veneti del Cinquecento e del Seicento, Milano & Napoli.Google Scholar
Boucher, David (1990). “Inter-community and International Relations in the Political Philosophy of Hobbes,” Polity 23:2, pp. 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, Annabel (1997). Liberty, Right and Nature: Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brown, Chris (1998). “Contractarian Thought and the Constitution of International Society,” in Mapel, David, and Nardin, Terry (eds.), International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives, Princeton, NJ, pp. 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1981). “Hobbes and the International Anarchy,” Social Research 41, pp. 717–738.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.) (1966). Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry (1993). “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School,” International Organization 47, pp. 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Jones, Charles, and Little, Richard (1993). The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, E.H. (1939). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, New York.Google Scholar
Cromartie, Alan (2000). “Unwritten Law in Hobbesian Political Thought,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2:2, pp. 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Mas, Enrico (1986). “Paolo Sarpi nelle lettere di Fulgenzio Micanzio al Cavendish,” in Fra Paolo Sarpi dei Servi di Maria. Atti del convegno di studio, Venezia 28–29–30 ottobre 1983, Venice.Google Scholar
Dessler, David (1989). “What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?,” International Organization 43, pp. 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deudney, Daniel (2009). “Left Behind: Neorealism’s Truncated Contextual Materialism and Republicanism,” International Relations 23:3, pp. 341–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Jack (2015). “The Discourse of Anarchy in IR,” International Theory 7, pp. 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, Tim (1998). Inventing International Society: A History of the English School, Basingstoke, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Richard (1978). “The World Order Models Project and Its Critics: A Reply,” International Organization 32:2, pp. 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew (1999). “The Civic Solution to the Crisis of English Colonization, 1609–1625,” Historical Journal 42, pp. 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forde, Steven (1992). “Classical Realism,” in Nardin, Terry and Mapel, David (eds.), Traditions of International Ethics, New York.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Murray (1979). “Thomas Hobbes and the External Relations of States,” British Journal of International Studies 5:3, pp. 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel (2003). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976, New York.Google Scholar
Gabrieli, Vittorio (1957). “Bacone, la Riforma e Roma Nella Versione Hobbesiana d’un Carteggio di Fulgenzio Micanzio,” English Miscellany 8, pp. 195–250.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David (1969). The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor (2001). “The Hobbesian Problem and the Microfoundations of International Relations Theory,” Security Studies 11:2, pp. 164–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Ian (2011). “The Triumph of Anti-liberalism? Reconciling Radicalism to Realism in International Relations Theory,” Political Studies Review 9:1, pp. 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Donald (1984). “Thomas Hobbes’s Highway to Peace,” International Organization 38:2, pp. 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, James (1771). Oceana, ed. Toland, , The Oceana and Other Works of James Harrington, London.Google Scholar
Haslam, Jonathan (2002). No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations since Machiavelli, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1679). Behemoth, or An Epitome of the Civil Wars of England, from 1640 to 1660, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1969). The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, ed. Tönnies, Ferdinand, 2nd edn, introd., Goldsmith, M.M., London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1971). A Dialogue between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1971). The Answer of Mr. Hobbes to Sr. William D’Avenant’s Preface, in D’Avenant, William, A Discourse upon Gondibert. An Heroick Poem Written by Sr. William D’Avenant with an Answer to It by Mr. Hobbes (Paris, 1650), ed. Gladish, David F., Sir William Davenant’s Gondibert, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1990). Behemoth, or the Long Parliament, ed. Holmes, Stephen, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1991). Man and Citizen: De Homine and De Cive, ed. Gert, Bernard, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1995). Three Discourses: A Critical Modern Edition of a Newly Identified Work of the Young Hobbes, ed. Reynolds, Noel B. and Saxonhouse, Arlene W., Chicago.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1998). On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan (1986). “The Language of Sociability and Commerce: Samuel Pufendorf and the Theoretical Foundations of the ‘Four-Stages’ Theory,” in Pagden, Anthony (ed.), Languages of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge, pp. 253–276.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan (2005). Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Johnson, Laurie (1996). “Thucydidean Realism: Between Athens and Melos,” in Frankel, Benjamin (ed.), Roots of Realism, London, pp. 169–193.Google Scholar
Johnson, Laurie (2007). “Mathematici versus Dogmatici: Understanding the Realist Project through Hobbes,” in Clinton, David (ed.), The Realist Tradition and Contemporary International Relations, Baton Rouge, LA, pp. 96–116.Google Scholar
Johnson, Thomas (1996). “The Idea of Power Politics: The Sophistic Foundations of Realism,” in Frankel, Benjamin (ed.), Roots of Realism, London, pp. 194–247.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward (2002). Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1986). “Realism, Neorealism and the Study of World Politics,” in Keohane, Robert O. (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics, New York.Google Scholar
Kratochwill, Friedrich (1984). “The Force of Prescriptions,” International Organization 38:4, pp. 685–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. (1988). Leibniz: Political Writings, ed. Riley, Patrick, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven (2003). “The Question of Power: Europe versus America,” Constellations 10:3, pp. 352–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Joseph (1974). “War and Ideology,” in Held, Virginia, Moregenbesser, Sidney, and Nagel, Thomas (eds.), Philosophy, Morality, and International Affairs, New York.Google Scholar
McLean, Iain (1981). “The Social Contract in Leviathan and the Prisoner’s Dilemma Super Game,” Political Studies 29:3, pp. 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molesworth, William (1839–45). The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, London.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans (1948). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York.Google Scholar
Navari, Cornelia (1982). “Hobbes and the Hobbesian Tradition in International Relations,” Millennium: The Journal of International Affairs 11, pp. 202–222.Google Scholar
Navari, Cornelia (1996). “Hobbes, the State of Nature and the Laws of Nature,” in Clark, Ian and Neumann, Iver B. (eds.), Classical Theories of International Relations, New York, pp. 20–41.Google Scholar
Newman, Saul (2012). “Crowned Anarchy: Postanarchism and International Relations Theory,” Millennium 40:2, pp. 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paganini, Gianni (ed.) (2000). The Return of Scepticism: From Hobbes and Descartes to Bayle, Vercelli, Italy.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1934). De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo [1672], trans. Oldfather, C.H., Oxford.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Noel and Hilton, John (1993). “Thomas Hobbes and Authorship of Horae Subsecivae,” History of Political Thought 14, pp. 361–380.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Noel and Saxonhouse, Arlene (1995). Three Discourses: A Critical Modern Edition of Newly Identified Work of the Young Hobbes, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Robertson, John (1995). “Empire and Union: Two Concepts of the Early Modern Political Order,” in Robertson, John (ed.), A Union for Empire: Political Thought and the British Union of 1707, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Rosow, Stephen (2009). “Paradigm, Tradition, and the Politics of Realism,” in Freyberg-Inan, Annette, Harrison, Ewan, and James, Patrick (eds.), Rethinking Realism in International Relations: Between Tradition and Innovation, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Sorell, Tom (2006). “Hobbes on Trade, Consumption and International Order,” Monist: An International Quarterly Journal of General Philosophical Inquiry 89:2, pp. 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1999). “Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 7:1, pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael Joseph (1986). Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch (1909). Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (Amsterdam, 1670), reprinted in RHM Elwes, The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol. I, London.Google Scholar
Springborg, Patricia (2015). “Hobbes, Donne and the Virginia Company: Terra Nullius and ‘The Bulimia of Dominion’,” History of Political Thought 36, pp. 113–164.Google Scholar
Stein, Peter (2004). “The ‘Ius Commune’ and Its Demise,” The Journal of Legal History 25, pp. 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1952). The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1996). “Hobbes’s Moral Philosophy,” in Sorell, Tom (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1999). The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (2004). “The Utopianism of Leviathan,” in Sorell, Tom and Fisneau, Luc (eds.), Leviathan after 350 Years, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer (2008). The Laws of Nature and Nations, Kapossy, Béla and Whatmore, Richard (eds.), Indiana, IN.Google Scholar
Vigezzi, Bruno (2005). The British Committee for the Theory of International Politics, 1954–1985: The Rediscovery of History, Milan Italy.Google Scholar
Vitoria, Francisco (1991). Relectiones de Indis, in Pagden, Anthony and Lawrence, Jeremy (eds.), Vitoria: Political Writings, Cambridge UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth (1991). “Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory,” in Rothstein, Robert (ed.), The Evolution of Theory in International Relations, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael (1980). Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Implications, London.Google Scholar
Welch, David A. (2003). “Why International Relations Theorists Should Stop Reading Thucydides,” Review of International Studies 29, pp. 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1987). “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,” International Organization 41, pp. 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Howard (1996). International Relations and the Limits of Political Theory, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C. (2005). The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zouche, Richard (1650). Iuris et Iudicii Faecialis, sive, Iuris inter Gentes, et Quaestionum de Eodem Explicatio, Oxford.Google Scholar