Book contents
2 - Hobbes Before Anarchy
from Part I - Hobbesian Variations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2016
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Before AnarchyHobbes and his Critics in Modern International Thought, pp. 33 - 66Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Abizadeh, Arash (2011). “Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory,” American Political Science Review 105, pp. 298–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aravamudan, Srinivas (2009). “Hobbes and America,” in Carey, Daniel and Festa, Lynn (eds.), Postcolonial Enlightenment: Eighteenth-Century Colonialisms and Postcolonial Theory, Oxford.Google Scholar
Baumgold, Deborah (2013). “‘Trust’ in Hobbes’s Political Thought,” Political Theory 41, pp. 838–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramhall, John (1655). A Defence of True Liberty from Antecedent and Extrinsecall Necessity, London.Google Scholar
Bramhall, John (1842–45). The Works of the Most Reverend Father in God, John Bramhall, D.D. Sometime Lord Archbishop of Armagh, Primate and Metropolitan of All Ireland, ed. Parker, J.H., 5 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Bredekamp, Horst (2007). “Thomas Hobbes’s Visual Strategies,” in Springborg, Patricia (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brown, Keith (1978). “The Artist of the Leviathan Title-Page,” British Library Journal 4, pp. 24–36.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1981). “Hobbes and International Anarchy,” Social Research 48, pp. 717–738.Google Scholar
Coke, Roger (1660). Justice Vindicated. From the False Fucus Put Upon It by Thomas White, Gent., Mr. Thomas Hobbs, and Hugo Grotius. As also Elements of Power & Subjection, Wherein Is Demonstrated the Cause of All Humane, Christian, and Legal Society. And as Previous Introduction to These Is Shewed the Method by Which Men Must Necessarily Attain Arts & Sciences, London.Google Scholar
Corbett, Margery and Lightbown, Ronald (1979). The Comely Frontispiece: The Emblematic Title-Page in England, 1550–1660, London.Google Scholar
De Mesquita, Bruce Bueno, et al. (2003). The Logic of Political Survival, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Edwin DeWitt (1917). “The Analogy between Natural Persons and International Persons in the Law of Nations,” The Yale Law Journal 26, pp. 564–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eachard, John (1672). Mr Hobbs’s State of Nature Considered: In a Dialogue between Philautus and Timothy, London.Google Scholar
Filmer, Robert (1652). Observations Concerning the Originall of Government, Upon Mr Hobs “Leviathan,” Mr Milton against Salmasius, H. Grotius ‘De Jure Belli ac Pacis’, London.Google Scholar
Flathman, Richard E. (2002). Thomas Hobbes: Skepticism, Individuality, and Chastened Politics, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David (1990). Moral Dealing: Contract, Ethics, and Reason, Ithaca, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, M.M. (1981). “Picturing Hobbes’s Politics? The Illustrations to Philosophical Rudiments,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 44, pp. 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1651). Leviathan, or the Matter, Form and Power of a Commonwealth, Ecclesiastical and Civil, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1656). The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, and Chance Clearly Stated and Debated between Dr. Bramhall, Bishop of Derry, and Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1668). Leviathan, sive, De Materia, forma, & potestate civitatis ecclesiasticae et civilis, Amsterdam: Joan Blaeu.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1679). Behemoth, or an Epitome of the Civil Wars of England, from 1640 to 1660, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1839–1845). The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, ed. Molesworth, William, in 11 vols, London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1969). The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, ed. Tönnies, Ferdinand, 2nd edn, introd., Goldsmith, M.M., London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1971). The Answer of Mr. Hobbes to Sr. William D’Avenant’s Preface, in William D’Avenant, A Discourse upon Gondibert. An Heroick Poem Written by Sr. William D’Avenant with an Answer to It by Mr. Hobbes (Paris, 1650), ed. Gladish, David F., Sir William Davenant’s Gondibert, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1990). Behemoth, or the Long Parliament, ed. Holmes, Stephen, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1995). Three Discourses: A Critical Modern Edition of a Newly Identified Work of the Young Hobbes, ed. Reynolds, Noel B. and Saxonhouse, Arlene W., Chicago.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1998). On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (2005). A Dialogue between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch (2007). ‘Hobbes on the Natural Condition of Mankind,’ in Springborg, Patricia (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Johnston, David (1994). The Idea of a Liberal Theory: A Critique and Reconsideration, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, George (1657). An Examination of the Political Part of Mr. Hobbs His Leviathan, London.Google Scholar
Lucy, William (1663). Observations, Censures and Confutations of Notorious Errours in Mr. Hobbes His Leviathan, London.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C.B. (1962). The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke, Oxford.Google Scholar
Parkin, Jon (2007). Taming the Leviathan: The Reception of the Political and Religious Ideas of Thomas Hobbes in England, 1640–1700, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole (1979). The Problem of Political Obligation: A Critique of Liberal Theory, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1991). On the Duty of Man and Citizen, ed. Tully, James, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2007). Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1990). “The State of War,” in Reading Rousseau in the Nuclear Age, ed. Roosevelt, Grace G., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1997). The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (2003). The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, New York.Google Scholar
Schochet, Gordon (1975). Patriarchalism in Political Thought: The Authoritarian Family and Political Speculation and Attitudes Especially in Seventeenth-Century England, Oxford.Google Scholar
Silverthorne, Michael (1996). “Political Terms in the Latin of Thomas Hobbes,” International Journal of the Classical Tradition 2, pp. 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch (1909). Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (Amsterdam, 1670), reprinted in RHM Elwes, The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol. I, London.Google Scholar
Tenison, Thomas (1670). The Creed of Mr. Hobbes Examined: In a Feigned Conference Between Him, and a Student of Divinity, London.Google Scholar
Thornton, Helen (2002). “Cain, Abel and Thomas Hobbes,” History of Political Thought 23, pp. 611–633.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael C. (2005). The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, David (1997). “Thomas Hobbes’s Machiavellian Moments,” in Kelley, David R. and Sacks, David Harris (eds.), The Historical Imagination in Early Modern Britain: History, Rhetoric, and Fiction, 1500–1800, Cambridge.Google Scholar