Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:25:54.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Sounding Chinese and Listening Chinese: Awareness and Knowledge in the Laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

Anna M. Babel
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, A. (2003). The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication 23(3/4):231–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., and Rijn, H. V. (1993). The CELEX Lexical Data Base on CD-ROM. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Babel, A. M. (2010). Contact and contrast in Valley Spanish. PhD thesis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Balota, D., Yap, M., Hutchison, K., Cortese, M., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J., Nelson, D., Simpson, G., and Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods 39(3):445–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., and Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3):255–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1):148.Google Scholar
Beddor, P., McGowan, K., Boland, J., Coetzee, A., and Brasher, A. (2013). The time course of perception of coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133(4):2350–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beddor, P. S., Harnsberger, J., and Lindemann, S. (2002). Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates. Journal of Phonetics 30(4):591627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model, in Goodman, J. C. and Nusbaum, H. C. (eds.), The Development of Speech Perception: The Transition from Speech Sounds to Spoken Words, pp. 167224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, R. (2002). Accents: A Manual for Actors. New York: Proscenium Publishers Incorporated.Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. and Alexander, J. (2007). Semantic-contextual and acoustic-phonetic enhancements for English sentence-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121(4):2339–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, E. G. (2010). Imitation, awareness; and folk linguistic artifacts. PhD thesis. Houston, TX: Rice University.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2010). Locating identity in language, in Llamas, C. and Watt, D. (eds.), Language and Identities, pp. 1828. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, K. (2009). The nature of sociolinguistic perception. Language Variation and Change 21(1):135–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creel, S. and Bregman, M. (2011). How talker identity relates to language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(5):190204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahan, D., Drucker, S. J., and Scarborough, R. A. (2008). Talker adaptation in speech perception: adjusting the signal or the representations? Cognition 108:710–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Docherty, G. J. and Foulkes, P. (2014). An evaluation of usage-based approaches to the modelling of sociophonetic variability. Lingua 142:4256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drager, K. (2010). Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(7):473–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of sociolinguistics 12(4):453–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espiritu, Y. (1992). Asian American Panethnicity: Bridging Institutions and Identities. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P. and Docherty, G. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34:409–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganong, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6:110–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Gick, B. and Derrick, D. (2009). Aero-tactile integration in speech perception. Nature 462:502–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, J., Warren, P., and Drager, K. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics 34:458–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, J. (1989). When talk isn’t cheap: language and political economy. American Ethnologist 16(2):248–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwamoto, D. K. and Liu, W. M. (2010). The impact of racial identity, ethnic identity, Asian values, and race-related stress on Asian Americans and Asian international college students psychological well-being. Journal of Counseling Psychology 57(1):79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model, in Johnson, K. and Mullennix, J. W. (eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing, pp. 145–65. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (2006). Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34:485–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, B. and Kiesling, S. F. (2008). Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of/aw/-monophthongization in pittsburgh1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1):533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koops, C., Gentry, E., and Pantos, A. (2008). The effect of perceived speaker age on the perception of pin and pen vowels in Houston, Texas. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected papers from NWAV 36, 14(2):91–101.Google Scholar
Kucera, H. and Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P., and Christensen, R. (2013). lmerTest: tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models. R package version 2.0–11.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., and Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology 54:358–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindemann, S. (2003). Koreans, Chinese or Indians? Attitudes and ideologies about non-native English speakers in the United States. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3):348–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, S. (2005). Who speaks “broken English”? US undergraduates’ perceptions of non-native English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15(2):187212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L. (1986). “Voicing” in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech 29:311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mack, S. and Munson, B. (2012). The influence of /s/ quality on ratings of men’s sexual orientation: Explicit and implicit measures of the “gay lisp” stereotype. Journal of Phonetics 40(1):198212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, V. A. and Repp, B. H. (1981). Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69:548–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGowan, K. B. (2015). Social expectation improves speech perception in noise. Language and Speech. 58(4):502–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264:746–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milroy, L. and McClenaghan, P. (1977). Stereotyped reactions to four educated accents in ulster. Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 2:111.Google Scholar
Munson, B. (2010). Levels of phonological abstraction and knowledge of socially motivated speech-sound variation: A review, a proposal, and a commentary on the papers by Clopper, Pierrehumbert, and Tamati; Drager; Foulkes; Mack; and Smith, Hall, and Munson. Journal of Laboratory Phonology 1:157–77.Google Scholar
Neuhauser, S. and Simpson, A. P. (2007). Imitated or authentic? listeners’ judgements of foreign accents, in ICPhS XVI. Saarbrücken: International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, N. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1):6285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2002). Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness, in Bod, R., Hay, J., and Jannedy, S. (eds.), Probability Theory in Linguistics. Cambrigde, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Preston, D. R. (1996). Whaddayaknow?: The modes of folk linguistic awareness. Language Awareness 5(1):4074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiong, H. X. (2004). Why China English should stand alongside British, American, and the other. English Today 20(02):2633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051-07-0.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. L. (1992). Non-language factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of non-native English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 33(4):511–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulman, R. (1983). Vowel categorization by the bilingual listener. PERILUS Working Papers, III:81–99.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3–4):193229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, M. and Kataoka, R. (2013). Effects of phonetically-cued talker variation on semantic encoding. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134(6):EL485–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumner, M., Kim, S. K., King, E., and McGowan, K. B. (2014). The socially-weighted encoding of spoken words: A dual-route approach to speech perception. Frontiers in Psychology 4(1015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumner, M. and Samuel, A. G. (2009). The role of experience in the processing of cross-dialectal variation. Journal of Memory and Language 60:487501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szakay, A., Babel, M., and King, J. (2012). Sociophonetic markers facilitate translation priming: Maori English goat – a different kind of animal. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(2):138–46.Google Scholar
Tang Tang, C. C. and van Heuven, V. J. (2009). Mutual intelligibility of Chinese dialects experimentally tested. Lingua 119(5):709–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., and Bradlow, A. R. (2010). The wildcat corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language and Speech 53(4):510–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, J. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, P., Lai, C. F., Nagasawa, R., and Lin, T. (1998). Asian Americans as a model minority: Self-perceptions and perceptions by other racial groups. Sociological Perspectives 41(1):95118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×