Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T09:18:10.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix C - The post-Honorian additions to the Porta Appia and other fifth- and sixth-century construction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Hendrik W. Dey
Affiliation:
Hunter College, City University of New York
Get access

Summary

While a precise chronology for the post-Honorian additions to the Porta Appia is difficult, a few remarks may be hazarded.

As others have said, the foundations of the Honorian towers subsided rather dramatically at an early date, destabilizing them dangerously and opening large fissures in their exteriors, some of which were extensively repaired in the 1920s. It has thus been suggested that the additions to the towers were meant to buttress them, tempting some to connect their construction with damage sustained in the earthquake of 443. This hypothesis is not without its problems, however. To begin with, its proponents assert that the new top chambers were added after the “buttresses”; yet if the towers were unstable enough already to require buttressing, it is hardly probable that they would subsequently have been singled out, as very few towers anywhere along the Wall were, for further heightening. More importantly, similar square shells were added around Honorian towers at three other gates, the Portae Flaminia, Tiburtina, and Praenestina-Labicana, none of which seems to have been affected by serious problems with subsidence, earthquake-related or otherwise.

The fact remains that both the square casings and the top chambers do appear to have been added after the gate had suffered significant damage, consonant with what an earthquake might be expected to provoke. The year 443 thus remains a possible terminus post quem; but as it seems unlikely that reconstruction on such a grandiose scale was undertaken during the turbulent years between the sack of Rome in 410 and the end of the fifth century, I am inclined to move the terminus post to the period of Theoderic, the first ruler after Honorius to whom significant work on the Wall can be credited, during whose reign another powerful earthquake shook the city, in 502.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×